Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps you will be good enough to explain using Islamic scripture how it would be best if sharia law were not the law all around the world.
How it is best is man judge by man made laws and not "allahs "law.
Why would I want to do that? Islam is the ideal system for all people. True belief does not result from compulsion -- forced "conversions" will not produce an ideal Islamic society, they'll produce a society of munafiquun. People must choose to embrace Islam.
And obey Allah and obey the Messenger and be cautious. But if you turn back then know that the duty of Our Messenger is only a clear deliverance of the message. - 5:92
Please prove that the argument is illogical.Your "arguments" are illogical from the beginning period.
Please prove that the argument is unfounded and irrational.The are unfounded and irrational
We will no get involveled in disproving the illogic of lies or how they are irrational .
WHAT IS THE MESSAGE?
8:39
You just crazy as hell jack.Please prove that the argument is illogical.
Please prove that the argument is unfounded and irrational.
We will no get involveled in disproving the illogic of lies or how they are irrational .
Your argument is contingent on the legitimacy of internal abrogation, and you refuse to disprove an argument that refutes abrogation. Your concession has been accepted; thank you.
WHAT IS THE MESSAGE?
8:39
Bid'ah-free:
And fight with them until there is no more persecution, and the religion is for Allah. But if they desist, then surely Allah is Seer of what they do. (39-40)
...
And if they incline to peace, include thou also to it, and trust in Allah. Surely he is the Hearer, the Knower. (61)
Al-SuyutiIt has less intellectual weight than even my posts.
I can at least link to traditional recognized scholars to back up my opinion , you have to lean on untrusted sources.
"Untrusted sources."
Al-Suyuti
Shah Wali Ullah [1703-1762]
Abul Ala Maududi
Please, continue to spout ignorance. Continue to avoid addressing my argument. It only benefits me.
Actually, Islam is quite different in the aspect of giving.Islam forbids not giving your percentage of what you earn to them like every other brainwashing scam created by mankind.
Al-SuyutiIt has less intellectual weight than even my posts.
I can at least link to traditional recognized scholars to back up my opinion , you have to lean on untrusted sources.
"Untrusted sources."
Al-Suyuti
Shah Wali Ullah [1703-1762]
Abul Ala Maududi
Please, continue to spout ignorance. Continue to avoid addressing my argument. It only benefits me.
Fight those who don't believe in God nor in the Last Day [Unless they believe in the Prophet God bless him and grant him peace] nor hold what is forbidden that which God and His emissary have forbidden [e.g. Wine] nor embrace the true faith [which is firm and abrogates other faiths, i.e., the Islamic religion] from among [for distinguishing] those who were given the Book [i.e., the Jews and Christians] until they give the head-tax [i.e., the annual taxes imposed on them] (l'an yadinl) humbly submissive, and obedient to Islam's rule.
Shah Wali Ullah
Shah Waliullah (1703-1762) was a great Muslim thinker of his time. Claiming his lineage from Quraysh tribe of Prophet Mohammad and the second Caliph Umar, he stressed upon the need of unity in Muslim community against the political rise of Marathas, Jats and Sikhs. Upset with the political disorder and fading glory of Muslim power he reminded the contemporary Muslim rulers of their holy duty of Jihad and raised the slogan that Islam is in danger. Although he was in agreement with his contemporary Mohammad Wahhab, his ideology was more a political strategy against the rising power of Hindus led by Marathas, Jats and Sikhs than against the Sufi-tomb worship and Shias. He supported the uncompromising Islamic thought of Wahhab for strict compliance of the custom and practices of the Prophet but he floated a theory of rational evaluation of Islam which was nothing but a sugar-coated version of Islamic fundamentalism. He is therefore known as a great Islamic strategist for the political power of Islam. At his invitation Ahmad Shah Durrani a ruling warlord of Afghanistan launched Jihad in Delhi in 1760 and defeated the Marathas in the third battle of Panipat. Highly regarded as a vibrant political Islamist among the Muslim community of South Asia, Shah Wali Ullah is also known as one of the ideological co-fathers of all the Islamist movements including Deoband, Aligarh, Muslim League, Jammaat-e-Ulema-e-Hind, Tabligh Jamaat, Jamaat-e-Islami and Taliban. Like Shah Wali Ullah who regarded the rise of the political power of Hindus a danger to Islam, Taliban is not only against the rise of Crusaders, Jews and the Hindus but also against the Muslim powers not following the custom and practices of the Prophet Era.
Abul Ala Maududi
Jamaat-e-Islami [1] (Urdu: جماعتِ اسلامی, Jamaat-i-Islami, "Islamic Block" Jamaat, JI) is an Islamist political party that was founded by Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi on 26 August 1941, in Lahore, in what is today Pakistan.[2] and is the oldest religious party in Pakistan.[2]
JI was a member of the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA, United Council of Action, United Front), a coalition between religious-political parties in Pakistan. The MMA has denounced President Musharraf for "betraying" the Taliban and siding with the U.S. against them. They reject any attempts to settle the Kashmir dispute with India peacefully and support the Kashmir "Jihad". The MMA also denounces the presence of American troops and agencies in Pakistan. One of the allegation is that they support militant groups banned by the government.[8]
Maududi was arrested again in 1953 for his alleged role in the violent agitation against the Ahmadiyah sect. He was sentenced to death by a military court, but the sentence was commuted. In 1958 Pakistan came under military rule, and political parties, including the Jama'at-i Islami, were banned.
You have not refuted my argument concerning abrogation. I will assume this is because you cannot. If my assumption is incorrect, there's only one way to prove me wrong. Until you actually address the argument, I'll let you talk to yourself.You just crazy as hell jack.We will no get involveled in disproving the illogic of lies or how they are irrational .
Your argument is contingent on the legitimacy of internal abrogation, and you refuse to disprove an argument that refutes abrogation. Your concession has been accepted; thank you.
You have not refuted my argument concerning abrogation. I will assume this is because you cannot. If my assumption is incorrect, there's only one way to prove me wrong. Until you actually address the argument, I'll let you talk to yourself.You just crazy as hell jack.Your argument is contingent on the legitimacy of internal abrogation, and you refuse to disprove an argument that refutes abrogation. Your concession has been accepted; thank you.![]()
Let us watch as the writings of these enormously influential Islamic scholars are dismissed with a string of pitiful one-liners or a lame cutn'paste.![]()