Arianrhod
Gold Member
- Jul 24, 2015
- 11,060
- 1,076
- 255
Illegal aliens should be sent at their government's expense, back to where they belong.
How would you force their governments to pay?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Illegal aliens should be sent at their government's expense, back to where they belong.
Damn! I want to go full blown Kinison on these liberal idiots who have to invent shit like undocumented workers because some douche bag who doesn't belong here might be offended if you called him an illegal fucking immigrant.
OFFEND HIM for Christ sake! Maybe he'll get pissed off and LEAVE.
Simply seize Mexican assets in the US. No problem what so ever.Illegal aliens should be sent at their government's expense, back to where they belong.
How would you force their governments to pay?
That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...
The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... A record 47 million Americans receive food stamps, about 13 million more than when he took office. ... History in the making: Watch an F-35C make its first aircraft carrier landing ... Boyer can be reached at [email protected]
Washington Times, no bias there!
Anyway, it's a cold hard fact that wages for the working class have been flat for four decades. Then there's the obscene amount of money flowing upwards due fantastic corporate profits, record productivity and the continuation of flat wage growth. Somebody is getting rich off the flat wages during a time of very good economic growth and counting on the government to makeup the difference for their workers with food stamps.
The GOP could have something about this issue, but even with 76% of the public being for raising the minimum wage, the GOP refused.
The very conservative Cato Institute recently stated that roughly 70% of the middleclassbenefits from minimum wage increases.
good one idiot. that doesnt explain why the richest got richer and the poorest got poorer FASTER UNDER DEMOCRATS than under the Party you accuse of being in the pocket of those rich corporate types
try again.........................
You mean the Libs haven't turned them into victims yet?Damn! I want to go full blown Kinison on these liberal idiots who have to invent shit like undocumented workers because some douche bag who doesn't belong here might be offended if you called him an illegal fucking immigrant.
OFFEND HIM for Christ sake! Maybe he'll get pissed off and LEAVE.
Nah most of the one I've known didn't give a shit what you called them as long as they got paid in cash.
That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...
The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... A record 47 million Americans receive food stamps, about 13 million more than when he took office. ... History in the making: Watch an F-35C make its first aircraft carrier landing ... Boyer can be reached at [email protected]
Washington Times, no bias there!
Anyway, it's a cold hard fact that wages for the working class have been flat for four decades. Then there's the obscene amount of money flowing upwards due fantastic corporate profits, record productivity and the continuation of flat wage growth. Somebody is getting rich off the flat wages during a time of very good economic growth and counting on the government to makeup the difference for their workers with food stamps.
The GOP could have something about this issue, but even with 76% of the public being for raising the minimum wage, the GOP refused.
The very conservative Cato Institute recently stated that roughly 70% of the middleclassbenefits from minimum wage increases.
good one idiot. that doesnt explain why the richest got richer and the poorest got poorer FASTER UNDER DEMOCRATS than under the Party you accuse of being in the pocket of those rich corporate types
try again.........................
Well genius, most people who are paying attention know that the very wealthy, like everyone else too a big financial hit from the Great Recession. Unlike 95% percent, they have the tools that enable them to make up for their loses by paying super low wages and off-shoring jobs which enhanced their operating costs and bottom line. Translation: More money to line their pockets driving working Americans to food stamps.
It's not that hard to figure out Gomer.
And then Mexico seizes U.S. investments in Mexico. Sounds like a plan.Simply seize Mexican assets in the US. No problem what so ever.Illegal aliens should be sent at their government's expense, back to where they belong.
How would you force their governments to pay?
Mexico has about 120 billion in foreign accounts.
That should cover it nicely.
And then Mexico seizes U.S. investments in Mexico. Sounds like a plan.Simply seize Mexican assets in the US. No problem what so ever.Illegal aliens should be sent at their government's expense, back to where they belong.
How would you force their governments to pay?
Mexico has about 120 billion in foreign accounts.
That should cover it nicely.
LOLAnd then Mexico seizes U.S. investments in Mexico. Sounds like a plan.Simply seize Mexican assets in the US. No problem what so ever.Illegal aliens should be sent at their government's expense, back to where they belong.
How would you force their governments to pay?
Mexico has about 120 billion in foreign accounts.
That should cover it nicely.
but congrats for admitting obama made income inequality worse leftard!!!![]()
Well, is a family of 4 making $24,250 in 2015 in better or worse shape than they were in 2001 at $17,050?but congrats for admitting obama made income inequality worse leftard!!!![]()
Poverty levels keep rising but incomes remained stagnant. What do you think would happen?
For example when President Bush was elected the poverty level for a family of 4 was $17,050.00. In 2015 the poverty level is $24,250.00 for a family of 4
How would you prevent Mexico from seizing U.S. assets in Mexico?LOLAnd then Mexico seizes U.S. investments in Mexico. Sounds like a plan.Simply seize Mexican assets in the US. No problem what so ever.Illegal aliens should be sent at their government's expense, back to where they belong.
How would you force their governments to pay?
Mexico has about 120 billion in foreign accounts.
That should cover it nicely.
It's fucking MEXICO. We make the rules.
How would you prevent a 5 year old, 30 pound rug rat from taking your bicycle?How would you prevent Mexico from seizing U.S. assets in Mexico?LOLAnd then Mexico seizes U.S. investments in Mexico. Sounds like a plan.Simply seize Mexican assets in the US. No problem what so ever.Illegal aliens should be sent at their government's expense, back to where they belong.
How would you force their governments to pay?
Mexico has about 120 billion in foreign accounts.
That should cover it nicely.
It's fucking MEXICO. We make the rules.
That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...
The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... A record 47 million Americans receive food stamps, about 13 million more than when he took office. ... History in the making: Watch an F-35C make its first aircraft carrier landing ... Boyer can be reached at [email protected]
Washington Times, no bias there!
Anyway, it's a cold hard fact that wages for the working class have been flat for four decades. Then there's the obscene amount of money flowing upwards due fantastic corporate profits, record productivity and the continuation of flat wage growth. Somebody is getting rich off the flat wages during a time of very good economic growth and counting on the government to makeup the difference for their workers with food stamps.
The GOP could have something about this issue, but even with 76% of the public being for raising the minimum wage, the GOP refused.
The very conservative Cato Institute recently stated that roughly 70% of the middleclassbenefits from minimum wage increases.
good one idiot. that doesnt explain why the richest got richer and the poorest got poorer FASTER UNDER DEMOCRATS than under the Party you accuse of being in the pocket of those rich corporate types
try again.........................
Well genius, most people who are paying attention know that the very wealthy, like everyone else too a big financial hit from the Great Recession. Unlike 95% percent, they have the tools that enable them to make up for their loses by paying super low wages and off-shoring jobs which enhanced their operating costs and bottom line. Translation: More money to line their pockets driving working Americans to food stamps.
It's not that hard to figure out Gomer.
you should avoid posting moron; you just tried to show causation for the poor being poor by essentially sayin they are poor BECAUSE the rich are rich. you're simply an idiot. AGAIN, REGARDLESS of how easy it is for the wealthy to rebound how did that make the poor poorer???
Well, the logical person does not attempt to debate facts.for starters; just off the top of my head:
1. Democrats "immigration reform" has nothing to do with immigration reform, and everything to do with pandering to millions of mostly Hispanic minorities who already SNUCK IN. obama's proposal doesnt address the actual immigration system. There is nothing fair or equitable about putting millions who snuck in ahead of virtually millions from ALL RACES AND ETHNICITIES waiting patiently IN LINE IN THEIR COUNTRIES to come here LEGALLY
2. Black lives are worthless to Democrats. if they actually mattered the Left would be more concerned with teh SIX THOUSAND BLACK PEOPLE MURDERED EVERY YEAR by other Black people.
Oh and if Black lives really mattered, THE ABOVE PROPOSAL FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS would be abandoned by Democrats SINCE IT WILL DEVASTATE THE BLACK COMMUNITY
3. the economy: record welfare and food stamps isnt "forward progress". if things were really so great there wouldnt be 13 MILLION MORE on food stamps heading into obama's EIGHTH AND FINAL YEAR then there were when Bush left office
libs lie to themselves
Maybe if your side offered something other than "This is my opinion and it is TRUTH and STFU!" it might be possible to discuss issues.
But the SHOUTING from your side suggests you're not interested in discussion, just SHOUTING.
for starters; just off the top of my head:
1. Democrats "immigration reform" has nothing to do with immigration reform, and everything to do with pandering to millions of mostly Hispanic minorities who already SNUCK IN. obama's proposal doesnt address the actual immigration system. There is nothing fair or equitable about putting millions who snuck in ahead of virtually millions from ALL RACES AND ETHNICITIES waiting patiently IN LINE IN THEIR COUNTRIES to come here LEGALLY
The immigration reform bill passed the Senate with bi-partisan support and would pass the House with bi-partisan support if Boehner had not blocked it from a vote.
The only people who were opposed to it were the vast majority of voters.
How would you prevent a 5 year old, 30 pound rug rat from taking your bicycle?How would you prevent Mexico from seizing U.S. assets in Mexico?LOLAnd then Mexico seizes U.S. investments in Mexico. Sounds like a plan.Simply seize Mexican assets in the US. No problem what so ever.How would you force their governments to pay?
Mexico has about 120 billion in foreign accounts.
That should cover it nicely.
It's fucking MEXICO. We make the rules.
for starters; just off the top of my head:
1. Democrats "immigration reform" has nothing to do with immigration reform, and everything to do with pandering to millions of mostly Hispanic minorities who already SNUCK IN. obama's proposal doesnt address the actual immigration system. There is nothing fair or equitable about putting millions who snuck in ahead of virtually millions from ALL RACES AND ETHNICITIES waiting patiently IN LINE IN THEIR COUNTRIES to come here LEGALLY
The immigration reform bill passed the Senate with bi-partisan support and would pass the House with bi-partisan support if Boehner had not blocked it from a vote.
The only people who were opposed to it were the vast majority of voters.