TRFjr
VIP Member
- Oct 24, 2013
- 896
- 203
yes colorado didn't have these problems... the reason some states did better then others state is because of that reason... where a state was offered to do so ... they have done fine... where they are having problems is where republican governors decided they wouldn't work with the feds .. by not doing this it went into a federal registry ... that's where the problems started I never got a you have to wait screen .. it just went right through now because of they problems the national registry has had we too have to wait until Nov. 15
P.S.
My dad he was a wise man in my opinion ... he said to me once son 90% of the problems you have in life will be created by you... the other 10% you have no control over ... here's a situation where Texans could have some sort of control over these problems by voting out those problems theychose not to vote them out ... the only way you can get your problems solved is get rid of the Ted cruz want a be's
and those states the didn't have the same problem with their exchanges like the feds are those figures they have shown are up to 80% enrolling into Medicaid no Obama care which will cause Obama care to collapse
its apparent you haven't any Idea what you're talking about .. its apparent you haven't gone to the web site to apply for health care ... even people who are on social security before they are 65 get more money then they qualify for medicaid ... the 80% figure you got here is what they have now when you apply they have a 80% finishing rate ... which in my opinion isn't all that bad...
when you apply you have to give them your gross income for the year ... from that figure they put it into their computer to generate a rejection letter from medicaid ... when you get that number then you set up a plan that you will use and if you get any Eligibility money ... as for the plan collapsing that won't happen ...
you see part of the plan for people who are on medicaid they get their money from corporate taxes, not taxes from individuals ... one of the taxes that they have is a tax on medical equipment ... a 2.2% tax on their gross income ... just that tax alone it will pay 30 billion dollars ... that's why the republicans were trying to get it removed ... they knew if it was there then the health care plan will work... it their ... nice try but no soup for you
Medicaid enrollment spike a threat to Obamacare structure? - CBS NewsCBS News) The disastrous rollout of HealthCare.gov may have another serious problem: A CBS News analysis shows that in many of the 15 state-based health insurance exchanges more people are enrolling in Medicaid rather than buying private health insurance. And if that trend continues, there's concern there won't be enough healthy people buying health insurance for the system to work.
As the Obamacare website struggles, the administration is emphasizing state-level success. President Obama said Monday, "There's great demand at the state level as well. Because there are a bunch of states running their own marketplaces."
But left unsaid in the president's remarks: the newly insured in some of those states are overwhelmingly low-income people signing up for Medicaid at no cost to them.
Matt Salo, executive director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors, said, "We're seeing a huge spike in terms of Medicaid enrollments."
He says the numbers have surprised him and state officials.
CBS News has confirmed that in Washington, of the more than 35,000 people newly enrolled, 87 percent signed up for Medicaid. In Kentucky, out of 26,000 new enrollments, 82 percent are in Medicaid. And in New York, of 37,000 enrollments, Medicaid accounts for 64 percent. And there are similar stories across the country in nearly half of the states that run their own exchanges
its all about the enrollment people who enroll in Medicaid are not entering the Obama care health pools there for not increasing the pools numbers to keep rates down
its you who doesn't understand insurance the more you have sign up the bigger the pool there for the cost can be spread around if the pool is not large enough the cost cant be spread around sufficiently enough and rates are increased
my argument wasn't about who is going to pay all those new Medicaid enrollees but was to show those states with the larger figures of enrollment are not actually entering the exchange pools but up to 80% will be on Medicaid that doesn't help to increase the pool size so to keep rates low
Last edited: