It Was Done on Tobacco. It Can Be Done on Guns.

[MAGAman]

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

My Constitutional rights don't give a damn what a Fascist thinks I need.

 

[harmonica]

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

My Constitutional rights don't give a damn what a Fascist thinks I need.

rights are not unlimited --that's ridiculous

 

[MAGAman]

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

My Constitutional rights don't give a damn what a Fascist thinks I need.

rights are not unlimited --that's ridiculous

I've never said my rights are unlimited.

I did say my rights are not limited by what you, the Democrat Party, or any other group of Fascists say I need.

 

[harmonica]

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

My Constitutional rights don't give a damn what a Fascist thinks I need.

rights are not unlimited --that's ridiculous

I've never said my rights are unlimited.

I did say my rights are not limited by what you, the Democrat Party, or any other group of Fascists say I need.

...your reply is full of facts and sense

 

[Wyatt earp]

it's in the 2nd Amendment?
I didn't realize milk was considered an arm.
hmmm, the right to keep and bear milk...
Nope, never seen it.

Which one is it you "never seen" in the Constitution ... "milk" or "assault weapons"? I have read the Constitution and I can tell you 100% that you will find milk mentioned right near the mention of assault weapons. Look again and I am sure you will agree.

'assault weapons' are arms.
Mentioned in the 2nd Amendment
Milk is not.

You are not looking carefully enough. Have you found "assault weapons" mentioned? Good! Now read a little further and you will find "milk" mentioned. Have another look .... I'll wait.

Huh?


Have you found:

T.V.

Radio

Film

Internet

Mentioned in the 1st amendment?


.

I am very sorry if that went over your head but you can't blame me for that. View attachment 279192

Over my head?

Think potsie think.

.

 

[rightwinger]

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

My Constitutional rights don't give a damn what a Fascist thinks I need.

You have no Constitutional right to shoot up a school
We the People have no obligation to help you

 

[MAGAman]

You have no Constitutional right to shoot up a school
We the People have no obligation to help you

We the People have a Bill of Rights.

You the Fascists have the right to dream about eliminating it.

 

[Blues Man]

"Assault weapons" are in common use for traditionally lawful purposes, making them "bearable arms" as the term is use din 2A jurisprudence.
Thus, your statement there is no right to own and use 'assault weapons' - like just about everything else you post - is unsupportable nonsense.

free speech is limited--so is the 2A

A red herring?
That's the -best- you can do?

I accept your concession of the point - that, by virtue of the fact 'assault weapons' are in common use for traditionally lawful purposes, we do in fact have a right to own and use them.

Now, to address your red herring:
The basic exercise of the right to free speech is only limited when it harms others and/or places them in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger -- when does the basic exercise of the right to keep and bear arms harm others, or place them in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger?

I know this question is above your pay grade, but please do try to not embarrass yourself with your response.

hahahahhahahahaaha
o---geeee--let me think--this is tough one.....???
how about when they MURDER someone---that's harming, isn't it?!!!!

What about the people who don't commit murder?

Which by the way is the vast majority of gun owners.

Why is it you people can't seem to understand that no one is responsible for the crimes committed by another?

All people are not the same person

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they need?

An AR 15 is no different than any other semiautomatic rifle.

 

[Blues Man]

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

My Constitutional rights don't give a damn what a Fascist thinks I need.

You have no Constitutional right to shoot up a school
We the People have no obligation to help you

No shit Sherlock and 99.999% of gun owners will never shoot up a school

 

[harmonica]

free speech is limited--so is the 2A

A red herring?
That's the -best- you can do?

I accept your concession of the point - that, by virtue of the fact 'assault weapons' are in common use for traditionally lawful purposes, we do in fact have a right to own and use them.

Now, to address your red herring:
The basic exercise of the right to free speech is only limited when it harms others and/or places them in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger -- when does the basic exercise of the right to keep and bear arms harm others, or place them in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger?

I know this question is above your pay grade, but please do try to not embarrass yourself with your response.

hahahahhahahahaaha
o---geeee--let me think--this is tough one.....???
how about when they MURDER someone---that's harming, isn't it?!!!!

What about the people who don't commit murder?

Which by the way is the vast majority of gun owners.

Why is it you people can't seem to understand that no one is responsible for the crimes committed by another?

All people are not the same person

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they need?

An AR 15 is no different than any other semiautomatic rifle.

no one needs a semi with a 50/20/etc mag

 

[Blues Man]

A red herring?
That's the -best- you can do?

I accept your concession of the point - that, by virtue of the fact 'assault weapons' are in common use for traditionally lawful purposes, we do in fact have a right to own and use them.

Now, to address your red herring:
The basic exercise of the right to free speech is only limited when it harms others and/or places them in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger -- when does the basic exercise of the right to keep and bear arms harm others, or place them in a condition of clear, present and immediate danger?

I know this question is above your pay grade, but please do try to not embarrass yourself with your response.

hahahahhahahahaaha
o---geeee--let me think--this is tough one.....???
how about when they MURDER someone---that's harming, isn't it?!!!!

What about the people who don't commit murder?

Which by the way is the vast majority of gun owners.

Why is it you people can't seem to understand that no one is responsible for the crimes committed by another?

All people are not the same person

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they need?

An AR 15 is no different than any other semiautomatic rifle.

no one needs a semi with a 50/20/etc mag

No one needs you to tell them what they need

 

[harmonica]

hahahahhahahahaaha
o---geeee--let me think--this is tough one.....???
how about when they MURDER someone---that's harming, isn't it?!!!!

What about the people who don't commit murder?

Which by the way is the vast majority of gun owners.

Why is it you people can't seem to understand that no one is responsible for the crimes committed by another?

All people are not the same person

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they need?

An AR 15 is no different than any other semiautomatic rifle.

no one needs a semi with a 50/20/etc mag

No one needs you to tell them what they need

let's keep it real

 

[Blues Man]

What about the people who don't commit murder?

Which by the way is the vast majority of gun owners.

Why is it you people can't seem to understand that no one is responsible for the crimes committed by another?

All people are not the same person

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they need?

An AR 15 is no different than any other semiautomatic rifle.

no one needs a semi with a 50/20/etc mag

No one needs you to tell them what they need

let's keep it real

Good advice . Why don't you take it?

 

[harmonica]

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they need?

An AR 15 is no different than any other semiautomatic rifle.

no one needs a semi with a 50/20/etc mag

No one needs you to tell them what they need

let's keep it real

Good advice . Why don't you take it?

.......it was stated no one needs a ---etc--you know--a high capacity weapon--and this is very hard to argue
...why don't you state why you need it?

 

[Blues Man]

Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they need?

An AR 15 is no different than any other semiautomatic rifle.

no one needs a semi with a 50/20/etc mag

No one needs you to tell them what they need

let's keep it real

Good advice . Why don't you take it?

.......it was stated no one needs a ---etc--you know--a high capacity weapon--and this is very hard to argue
...why don't you state why you need it?

I don't have an Ar 15 because I have no use for a small caliber rodent gun.

That said I don't have to justify anything I do to you or anyone else as long as I am not breaking any laws or harming anyone in the process.

 

[rightwinger]

You have no Constitutional right to shoot up a school
We the People have no obligation to help you

We the People have a Bill of Rights.

You the Fascists have the right to dream about eliminating it.

Yes we do
You have no right to help those who want to shoot up a school

 

[rightwinger]

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

My Constitutional rights don't give a damn what a Fascist thinks I need.

You have no Constitutional right to shoot up a school
We the People have no obligation to help you

No shit Sherlock and 99.999% of gun owners will never shoot up a school

But we know the favored weapon of those who want to slaughter children

Why do we help them get it?

 

[Blues Man]

You have no Constitutional right to shoot up a school
We the People have no obligation to help you

We the People have a Bill of Rights.

You the Fascists have the right to dream about eliminating it.

Yes we do
You have no right to help those who want to shoot up a school

Here we go again

Not all people are the same person.

No law abiding gun owner has ever helped anyone shoot up a school

 

[harmonica]

no one needs a semi with a 50/20/etc mag

No one needs you to tell them what they need

let's keep it real

Good advice . Why don't you take it?

.......it was stated no one needs a ---etc--you know--a high capacity weapon--and this is very hard to argue
...why don't you state why you need it?

I don't have an Ar 15 because I have no use for a small caliber rodent gun.

That said I don't have to justify anything I do to you or anyone else as long as I am not breaking any laws or harming anyone in the process.

as stated, no need for it
I had some idiot that said we don't need cars--hahahaha
comparing cars/POOLS/knives/etc to firearms = hahahahhahhaaha

 

[Blues Man]

If you don’t plan on shooting up a school, responsible gun owners don’t need an AR-15 with a 50 round magazine

My Constitutional rights don't give a damn what a Fascist thinks I need.

You have no Constitutional right to shoot up a school
We the People have no obligation to help you

No shit Sherlock and 99.999% of gun owners will never shoot up a school

But we know the favored weapon of those who want to slaughter children

Why do we help them get it?

I don't help anyone get any weapons.

But let's say you got an AR 15 banned what's to stop anyone hell bent on mass murder from using another rifle, shotgun or handgun?