It's always called "Gun Violence".......sorry "Guns" don't commit crimes

BasicHumanUnit

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2013
22,220
16,500
2,405
Everywhere needed
The Left is ALWAYS sneaking in subconscious implications that serve to make the weak minded public outraged over the wrong things while oblivious to the REAL underlying problems. Snowflakes are perfect targets for this propaganda as they have no mental defenses to help them see beyond the BS.

Here's an article on Fox News (and just stop saying it's right wing ok?...it isn't anymore...and if you can't say why, you're out of touch)
Baltimore's 'nobody kill anybody' weekend leaves at least 2 people dead

Now here's the part that sharp people pick up on......

Baltimore has been marred by gun violence for years. The city has seen 204 murders by the end of July, a record number in the city's history, the Baltimore Sun reported.

Why not call it "THUG VIOLENCE"? It's as if there would be no violence but for those evil Guns. How many times have we read now when attackers use vehicles to kill people....did the article say "Vehicle Violence"? No. When people are attacked with knives, do they say "Knife Violence"? No. What about when thugs beat someone...is it called "Fist Violence"? No.

I get sick of it. The brazen avoidance of placing responsibility where it belongs in order to push a Progressive agenda! The blame belongs on the thugs and the "Regressive" policies that encourage Thug Life!!

Don't let them continue to do this...call them out every chance you get.
 
Last edited:
Do you have some other term you would rather people use to denote violent acts committed with a firearm?
 
Gun violence is such a poor term indeed. Precisely crafted to take all the fault away from the criminals and transferring it into the guns instead.

Armed murders/robberies is what we are talking about here... and of course, gang violence.
 
Last edited:
Interesting that the MSM has all but forgotten the most incredible example of gun violence against congress people in modern history and it only happened barely six weeks ago. Maybe it's part of the crazy hate filled left wing concept of payback for the election? Remember the name even if the left wing media chooses to bury it. James T. Hodgkinson shot the republican whip in congress and he had a list of republicans in his pocket. The crazy thing is that even after the most sensational shooting in modern political history if you google Hodgkinson you get some Brit newsman or the disease and James T. is far down the list.
 
Last edited:
More frivolous gun control laws = more violent crime... fact
 
If y'all insist on blaming guns; you have no cause to get buthurt when people blame blacks. Still interested in control measures?
 
The Left is ALWAYS sneaking in subconscious implications that serve to make the weak minded public outraged over the wrong things while oblivious to the REAL underlying problems. Snowflakes are perfect targets for this propaganda as they have no mental defenses to help them see beyond the BS.

Here's an article on Fox News (and just stop saying it's right wing ok?...it isn't anymore...and if you can't say why, you're out of touch)
Baltimore's 'nobody kill anybody' weekend leaves at least 2 people dead

Now here's the part that sharp people pick up on......

Baltimore has been marred by gun violence for years. The city has seen 204 murders by the end of July, a record number in the city's history, the Baltimore Sun reported.

Why not call it "THUG VIOLENCE"? It's as if there would be no violence but for those evil Guns.

I get sick of it. The brazen avoidance of placing responsibility where it belongs in order to push a Progressive agenda! The blame belongs on the thugs and the "Regressive" policies that encourage Thug Life!!

Don't let them continue to do this...call them out every chance you get.
It's called gun violence because they use guns. If they were abusing their right to bear sticks, rocks or forks, we might focus on that. I am told knives do more harm than guns, but then again, the second amendment isn't defending the right to bear butter knives. And you can actually run away or stand a better chance of defending yourself against knives, forks, spoons, axes, or big rocks someone just picked up. Guns Now aren't what our founding fathers had in mind, they were all about muzzle loading flintlock rifles, as apposed to the modern high powered rifles with a high round capacity that mows down defenseless children in a pre-school. Our forefathers never envisioned THAT, They would stand against such abuses of our Constitution that would lead to that. Self defense would come last if it meant enabling mass murder.
 
Last edited:
If y'all insist on blaming guns; you have no cause to get buthurt when people blame blacks. Still interested in control measures?
Not me but I always love to witness the gun nuts coming out to tell liberals how liberals feel about guns.
 
The Left is ALWAYS sneaking in subconscious implications that serve to make the weak minded public outraged over the wrong things while oblivious to the REAL underlying problems. Snowflakes are perfect targets for this propaganda as they have no mental defenses to help them see beyond the BS.

Here's an article on Fox News (and just stop saying it's right wing ok?...it isn't anymore...and if you can't say why, you're out of touch)
Baltimore's 'nobody kill anybody' weekend leaves at least 2 people dead

Now here's the part that sharp people pick up on......

Baltimore has been marred by gun violence for years. The city has seen 204 murders by the end of July, a record number in the city's history, the Baltimore Sun reported.

Why not call it "THUG VIOLENCE"? It's as if there would be no violence but for those evil Guns.

I get sick of it. The brazen avoidance of placing responsibility where it belongs in order to push a Progressive agenda! The blame belongs on the thugs and the "Regressive" policies that encourage Thug Life!!

Don't let them continue to do this...call them out every chance you get.
It's called gun violence because they use guns. If they were abusing their right to bear sticks, rocks or forks, we might focus on that. I am told knives do more harm than guns, but then again, the second amendment isn't defending the right to bear butter knives. And you can actually run away or stand a better chance of defending yourself against knives, forks, spoons, axes, or big rocks someone just picked up. Guns Now aren't what our founding fathers had in mind, they we all about muzzle loading flintlock rifles, as apposed to the high powered rifles with a high round capacity that mows down defenseless children in a pre -school. our fore fathers never envisioned THAT, They would stand against such abuses of our Constitution that would lead to that.

stand a better chance of defending yourself against knives, forks, spoons, axes, or big rocks someone just picked up

yeah more so if you have a gun to protect yourself with

Now aren't what our founding fathers had in mind,

that is such a lame and stale argument

when the 2nd was written for the time they had several rifles that would be advanced for the day

like the Girardoni which could fire twenty 46 caliber balls in a minute
 
It's called gun violence because they use guns. If they were abusing their right to bear sticks, rocks or forks, we might focus on that. I am told knives do more harm than guns, but then again, the second amendment isn't defending the right to bear butter knives. And you can actually run away or stand a better chance of defending yourself against knives, forks, spoons, axes, or big rocks someone just picked up. Guns Now aren't what our founding fathers had in mind, they were all about muzzle loading flintlock rifles, as apposed to the modern high powered rifles with a high round capacity that mows down defenseless children in a pre-school. Our forefathers never envisioned THAT, They would stand against such abuses of our Constitution that would lead to that. Self defense would come last if it meant enabling mass murder.

Nice try but.......

How many times have we read now when attackers use vehicles to kill people....did the article say "Vehicle Violence"? No. When people are attacked with knives, do they say "Knife Violence"? No. What about when thugs beat someone...is it called "Fist Violence"? No.

And notice again...you said.....

as apposed to the modern high powered rifles with a high round capacity that mows down defenseless children in a pre-school.

Neither Ancient nor Modern Rifles EVER "Mow" ANYONE down. It's the PERSON doing it with the tool. For God's sake! Grow some neurons!
 
Last edited:
The Left is ALWAYS sneaking in subconscious implications that serve to make the weak minded public outraged over the wrong things while oblivious to the REAL underlying problems. Snowflakes are perfect targets for this propaganda as they have no mental defenses to help them see beyond the BS.

Here's an article on Fox News (and just stop saying it's right wing ok?...it isn't anymore...and if you can't say why, you're out of touch)
Baltimore's 'nobody kill anybody' weekend leaves at least 2 people dead

Now here's the part that sharp people pick up on......

Baltimore has been marred by gun violence for years. The city has seen 204 murders by the end of July, a record number in the city's history, the Baltimore Sun reported.

Why not call it "THUG VIOLENCE"? It's as if there would be no violence but for those evil Guns.

I get sick of it. The brazen avoidance of placing responsibility where it belongs in order to push a Progressive agenda! The blame belongs on the thugs and the "Regressive" policies that encourage Thug Life!!

Don't let them continue to do this...call them out every chance you get.
It's called gun violence because they use guns. If they were abusing their right to bear sticks, rocks or forks, we might focus on that. I am told knives do more harm than guns, but then again, the second amendment isn't defending the right to bear butter knives. And you can actually run away or stand a better chance of defending yourself against knives, forks, spoons, axes, or big rocks someone just picked up. Guns Now aren't what our founding fathers had in mind, they we all about muzzle loading flintlock rifles, as apposed to the high powered rifles with a high round capacity that mows down defenseless children in a pre-school. Our forefathers never envisioned THAT, They would stand against such abuses of our Constitution that would lead to that. Self defense would come last if it meant enabling mass murder.
No. They wouldn't. They would see to it that the average citizen was as equitably armed as their government enforcers. Just as they in fact did; and for the very same reasons. The founding fathers also interestingly enough opposed the idea of maintaining a standing army... But now that we have just that; the 2nd amendment is indespensible for us to remain free.
 
The Left is ALWAYS sneaking in subconscious implications that serve to make the weak minded public outraged over the wrong things while oblivious to the REAL underlying problems. Snowflakes are perfect targets for this propaganda as they have no mental defenses to help them see beyond the BS.

Here's an article on Fox News (and just stop saying it's right wing ok?...it isn't anymore...and if you can't say why, you're out of touch)
Baltimore's 'nobody kill anybody' weekend leaves at least 2 people dead

Now here's the part that sharp people pick up on......

Baltimore has been marred by gun violence for years. The city has seen 204 murders by the end of July, a record number in the city's history, the Baltimore Sun reported.

Why not call it "THUG VIOLENCE"? It's as if there would be no violence but for those evil Guns.

I get sick of it. The brazen avoidance of placing responsibility where it belongs in order to push a Progressive agenda! The blame belongs on the thugs and the "Regressive" policies that encourage Thug Life!!

Don't let them continue to do this...call them out every chance you get.
It's called gun violence because they use guns. If they were abusing their right to bear sticks, rocks or forks, we might focus on that. I am told knives do more harm than guns, but then again, the second amendment isn't defending the right to bear butter knives. And you can actually run away or stand a better chance of defending yourself against knives, forks, spoons, axes, or big rocks someone just picked up. Guns Now aren't what our founding fathers had in mind, they we all about muzzle loading flintlock rifles, as apposed to the high powered rifles with a high round capacity that mows down defenseless children in a pre -school. our fore fathers never envisioned THAT, They would stand against such abuses of our Constitution that would lead to that.

stand a better chance of defending yourself against knives, forks, spoons, axes, or big rocks someone just picked up

yeah more so if you have a gun to protect yourself with

Now aren't what our founding fathers had in mind,

that is such a lame and stale argument

when the 2nd was written for the time they had several rifles that would be advanced for the day

like the Girardoni which could fire twenty 46 caliber balls in a minute
Which was an air rifle by the way...
 
The Left is ALWAYS sneaking in subconscious implications that serve to make the weak minded public outraged over the wrong things while oblivious to the REAL underlying problems. Snowflakes are perfect targets for this propaganda as they have no mental defenses to help them see beyond the BS.

Here's an article on Fox News (and just stop saying it's right wing ok?...it isn't anymore...and if you can't say why, you're out of touch)
Baltimore's 'nobody kill anybody' weekend leaves at least 2 people dead

Now here's the part that sharp people pick up on......

Baltimore has been marred by gun violence for years. The city has seen 204 murders by the end of July, a record number in the city's history, the Baltimore Sun reported.

Why not call it "THUG VIOLENCE"? It's as if there would be no violence but for those evil Guns.

I get sick of it. The brazen avoidance of placing responsibility where it belongs in order to push a Progressive agenda! The blame belongs on the thugs and the "Regressive" policies that encourage Thug Life!!

Don't let them continue to do this...call them out every chance you get.
It's called gun violence because they use guns. If they were abusing their right to bear sticks, rocks or forks, we might focus on that. I am told knives do more harm than guns, but then again, the second amendment isn't defending the right to bear butter knives. And you can actually run away or stand a better chance of defending yourself against knives, forks, spoons, axes, or big rocks someone just picked up. Guns Now aren't what our founding fathers had in mind, they we all about muzzle loading flintlock rifles, as apposed to the high powered rifles with a high round capacity that mows down defenseless children in a pre -school. our fore fathers never envisioned THAT, They would stand against such abuses of our Constitution that would lead to that.

stand a better chance of defending yourself against knives, forks, spoons, axes, or big rocks someone just picked up

yeah more so if you have a gun to protect yourself with

Now aren't what our founding fathers had in mind,

that is such a lame and stale argument

when the 2nd was written for the time they had several rifles that would be advanced for the day

like the Girardoni which could fire twenty 46 caliber balls in a minute
Which was an air rifle by the way...

indeed it was

however it was a weapon useful to the military

lewis and clark had one

it really freaked the natives out

--LOL
 

Forum List

Back
Top