It's begun! Bud Light Banned in Bars

[HereWeGoAgain]

I didn't move the goalpost. Apparently you don't understand.

I'm calling you a hypocrite for your inconsistent stance on cancel culture and I'm wondering if you're just as inconsistent on abortion. You're not. You're consistent on abortion but inconsistent on cancel culture. Apparently you're not bright enough to realize the difference between having actual convictions on some topics (like you do with abortion) and being a hypocrite about others (like you with cancel culture).

Take your time with that one. It's obviously way over your head. And don't forget to drop me another funny rating.

Just stop.
You're a fucken liar and you refuse to admite it.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Just stop.
You're a fucken liar and you refuse to admite it.

What did I lie about?

I just showed that your stance on abortion is consistent while your stance on cancel culture isn't. That is, you have actual convictions about abortion but you're a complete fucking hypocrite about cancel culture.

Suppose I asked someone if they have a problem with abortion and they said "I'm against abortion because it's murdering a baby, which is not ok, but I'm fine with it if my friends do it", even you would be able to see the hypocrisy in that stance. That's inconsistent, it's hypocritical. That's exactly you when it comes to cancel culture.

Maybe you should just stick to dropping funny ratings if you're not smart enough to follow along.

 

[Curried Goats]

I have no idea if I could or not but I do know I don’t do research for free.

I would be careful to use the Catholic Church as an example for why liberals gays do not groom. The Catholic Church is full to overflowing with liberal gays. And they groom.

The Roman Catholic Church was having a hard time recruiting Priests because of their rules on marriage. However, gays viewed the marriage rules differently — as an opportunity rather than a hinderance.

Therefore since the Catholic Church is overflowing with gay Priests it is not surprising that some are busy glooming young men.

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/07/29/catholic-priests-its-empirical-fact-that-many-clergy-are-gay

Why Did So Many Gay Men Enter the Priesthood in the 20th Century?

No-order liturgy and no-order doctrine attract gay priests

www.churchmilitant.com

The Persistence of Grooming in the Catholic Church | Joseph Sciambra

“It is better to be unhappy and know the worst, than to be happy in a fool's paradise.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky In the year 2000, I went on a pilgrimage to France. One of my first stops was the former 12th century Benedictine Abbey of Sainte Marie Madeleine in the Burgundian village of Vézelay. Since

josephsciambra.com

***snip***


The apparatus for abuse remains fully intact in the Church; and it is protected by the influential and the powerful. Not on account of any courage or foresight by the bishops, but solely due to the bravery of survivors who came forward and took legal action, child molestation is arguably more difficult to accomplish in the Catholic Church; the pedophiles were expelled and laicized; but other predators remained. Over the years, they have only slightly modified their tactics and marginally refined who are their prospective targets. Whereas the early gay-rights priest activists of the 1970s were primarily focused on gaining acceptance for the LGBT community within the Church and in society, nowadays the next generation are fixated on confirming children and young people into a sexual or gender identity. And this subtle form of grooming is performed before large audiences at various Catholic religious education conferences, at parishes, in ministries, at Catholic universities, and on social media. Nothing is in the shadows anymore.

Oftentimes the laity seem oddly complicit; even those who have good intentions; who truly want to reach out to the marginalized; but, in the end, their efforts can make it possible for those they are trying to help to eventually suffer victimization at the hands of others.

The reality of continued institutionalized grooming in the Catholic Church was difficult for even me to comprehend. I couldn’t talk about what happened to me; I couldn’t even discuss the grooming I experienced as an adult in a Catholic apostolate that I respected; I covered up my own abuse. I thought, by keeping silent, many others would benefit from the good that an imperfect ministry could provide. After all, the Church offered no alternatives – except returning to the unimaginable.

Then, everything changed. I inadvertently bumped into someone, I had spoken with for the last couple of years at the gay street fests in San Francisco where I outreached to the LGBT community; my annual visits were occasionally extraordinary – for some reason, every year, I would repeatedly encounter the same individuals; a favorite story: a very tall drag queen, who I gave a Rosary to, hugged me the following year when we met again; evidently, the Rosary had become a cherished object. But other reunions were not so happy. A particularly naive young man, since we last met, had been encouraged by those he met at an affirmative parish to undergo sex reassignment surgery. Such a gentle soul had been so cruelly deceived. The following year, when I saw him again – I turned away and cried.

The image of Ganymede from Vézelay is still in my head; I can’t get it out. Like the edifice of the Abbey of Sainte Marie Madeleine, where the macabre sculpture is housed, the Catholic Church is still standing, but its former glory had been reduced to an historical artifact. The sounds of that frozen scream are still reverberating. No one hears – and no cares. There is no new St. Peter Damian in the Church. I can kneel down and pray and pretend that I do not hear. I cannot any longer. Because it is driving me mad. The best I can do is walk outside and tell those who are hurting and scared – do not go inside that place – for only deception and death awaits you.

Your Bingo links aren't going to hide the fact that institutions that counsel repression and shame are the ones rife with pedophiles.

 

[HeyNorm]

It appears that you're describing your problem, not mine.

As has been explained before. If you create a game, and make the rules, it is not hypocrisy for your opponents to play by the rules you created.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

 

[XponentialChaos]

As has been explained before. If you create a game, and make the rules, it is not hypocrisy for your opponents to play by the rules you created.

It is when you claim you were against something and then do the exact same thing.

“Hypocrite: a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that they do not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.”

It’s right there, by definition. You’re just desperately trying to justify it.

 

[Rogue AI]

Cancel culture at its finest.

Maybe you liberals can introduce a gay tax, forcing innocent Americans to guy fag positive products. Since clearly people spending their own money as they see fit is no longer acceptable in liberal circles.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Maybe you liberals can introduce a gay tax, forcing innocent Americans to guy fag positive products. Since clearly people spending their own money as they see fit is no longer acceptable in liberal circles.

 

[Rogue AI]

This is simply another example of how liberals attempt to usurp semantics to make illegitimate points. Cancel culture is not a monetary issue, it is and always has been the issue of liberal trash explicitly shutting down conservative speakers, opinions, and whatever else they disagree with through bullying, violence, threats, and excessive whining. Boycotting an item through financial means is simply individuals making a choice, they are in no way interfering with the rights of others as the 'cancel culture' folks do.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

This is simply another example of how liberals attempt to usurp semantics to make illegitimate points. Cancel culture is not a monetary issue, it is and always has been the issue of liberal trash explicitly shutting down conservative speakers, opinions, and whatever else they disagree with through bullying, violence, threats, and excessive whining. Boycotting an item through financial means is simply individuals making a choice, they are in no way interfering with the rights of others as the 'cancel culture' folks do.

It is always different when your side does it!

 

[Rogue AI]

It is always different when your side does it!

It's different because nobody is threatening to storm the Bud Light factory to stop production, you know, like how your lot interfere with conservative speakers in universities, restaurants, and elsewhere to stifle notions like free assembly and speech. Nobody is threatening to dox assembly workers for making Bud Light, in fact the only thing people are doing, is not buy a product. I guess now making simple financial decisions needs to be controlled by folks like you. Sad.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It's different because nobody is threatening to storm the Bud Light factory to stop production, you know, like how your lot interfere with conservative speakers in universities, restaurants, and elsewhere to stifle notions like free assembly and speech. Nobody is threatening to dox assembly workers for making Bud Light, in fact the only thing people are doing, is not buy a product. I guess now making simple financial decisions needs to be controlled by folks like you. Sad.

Have I ever said you all are not allowed to do this?

I just enjoy laughing at how alike you are to those you seem to hate so very much.

 

[HeyNorm]

It is when you claim you were against something and then do the exact same thing.

“Hypocrite: a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that they do not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.”

It’s right there, by definition. You’re just desperately trying to justify it.

You created the game. You wusses just want us to sit back and take it. I get that.

When you throw the first punch, expect to be hit back. Even if I oppose violence, I will fight back. That is not hypocrisy. It’s common sense.

 

[Curried Goats]

You created the game. You wusses just want us to sit back and take it. I get that.

When you throw the first punch, expect to be hit back. Even if I oppose violence, I will fight back. That is not hypocrisy. It’s common sense.

Do you have any choice but to sit down and take it?

 

[Rogue AI]

Have I ever said you all are not allowed to do this?

I just enjoy laughing at how alike you are to those you seem to hate so very much.

Hardly, this is just one more example of liberals attempting to redefine something into something it is not. Not purchasing a product is nothing at all like blocking the entrance to a speaker, or shouting down speakers. The difference is that liberal cancel culture is a pro-active thing, boycotting products is accomplished through no activity. Completely opposite ideas, then again, you folks don't know the difference between a man and woman, complex ideas like active and inactive are way over your heads.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Hardly, this is just one more example of liberals attempting to redefine something into something it is not. Not purchasing a product is nothing at all like blocking the entrance to a speaker, or shouting down speakers. The difference is that liberal cancel culture is a pro-active thing, boycotting products is accomplished through no activity. Completely opposite ideas, then again, you folks don't know the difference between a man and woman, complex ideas like active and inactive are way over your heads.

whatever helps you sleep at night little buddy is good with me!

but, I am still going to laugh at you all.

hope that is ok

 

[XponentialChaos]

You created the game. You wusses just want us to sit back and take it. I get that.

When you throw the first punch, expect to be hit back. Even if I oppose violence, I will fight back. That is not hypocrisy. It’s common sense.

So you’re doing the same thing that you criticized the left of doing. You’re a hypocrite.

None of you ever claimed to be against fighting under specific situations. But you guys did claim to be against cancel culture, and you were completely full of shit.

“Hypocrite: a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that they do not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.”

 

[HeyNorm]

So you’re doing the same thing that you criticized the left of doing. You’re a hypocrite.

None of you ever claimed to be against fighting under specific situations. But you guys did claim to be against cancel culture, and you were completely full of shit.

“Hypocrite: a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that they do not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.”

Quit crying when the person you pulled a gun on shoots back.

What are you? 12?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Quit crying when the person you pulled a gun on shoots back.

What are you? 12?

Nobody said that they were morally opposed to defending themselves in a life-threatening situation.

You guys said that you were against cancel culture and you’ve proven that you guys were completely full of shit.

Go ahead and throw your crybaby hypocrite temper tantrum, it doesn’t change anything.

 

[HeyNorm]

Nobody said that they were morally opposed to defending themselves in a life-threatening situation.

You guys said that you were against cancel culture and you’ve proven that you guys were completely full of shit.

Go ahead and throw your crybaby hypocrite temper tantrum, it doesn’t change anything.

Adulting is hard on you mommas boys.

Time to grow up lil guy.