It's easier to condemn homosexuality

[Skylar]

No dummy, you represented it as the law. It is obviously not. If so, step parents would be able to Marry stepchildren as they are NOT BLOOD RELATED.

Further, as pointed out before the law reads.

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

It is indeed finite.

You have yet to come up with a single piece of supportive evidence that shows that same sex family members are not eligible to hold a VALID marriage license.

But you do exhibit quite a nasty butthurt from the beating youre taking.

It is based on their laws. Never said otherwise. The instructions even state as much. Nowhere does it state the list of restrictions is exhaustive. But keep trying, it's quite entertaining watching you flop around like a dead fish on the deck of a boat, gasping for life.

And not a single shred of supportive evidence.

Fish, you got hooked

As usual, you prove yourself to be too brain-dead to think for yourself, so you idiotically project your shortcomings upon others.

And still no supportive evidence.

Just a bunch of butthurt

The evidence was given... no such couples could be found.

Is Pop still babbling about his fantasy incest couple that he has no evidence even exists?

Yeah, there's a reason why every one of Pop's pseudo-legal predictions has never happened. And this thread demonstrates it.

 

[Pop23]

Problem is, you're dishonest, you highlights the non salient portion.

The salient portion is:

Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:

Same sex immediate family members are not included in the list of invalid marriages.

Again, you're citing laws as they were written prior to changes affecting gender and marriage due to a Supreme Court ruling
.

And knowing this, why did the Supreme Court address it in their ruling which only made same sex marriage legal, and did nothing to make same sex immediate family marriage illegal?

Because it was already illegal. The SC ruling did not create a loophole in the law. The spirit of the law remains; close-family marriages are still not permitted in iowa. You really are too slow to keep up. I don't know why you even try?

Nope, the SC only changed 595.20 and was silent on 595.19.

So you're wrong again

Iowa claims otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Not at all, they agree with me:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

 

[Faun]

And that is where you argument falls to pieces. I highlighted the salient portion for you to understand that what appears to retards like you is not reality.

Reality is Iowa doesn't allow any close-family members to marry each other regardless of gender.

Problem is, you're dishonest, you highlights the non salient portion.

The salient portion is:

Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:

Same sex immediate family members are not included in the list of invalid marriages.

Again, you're citing laws as they were written prior to changes affecting gender and marriage due to a Supreme Court ruling.

Iowa instructs people interested in filling out a marriage application that regardless of gender, a marriage license will not be issued to any consanguineous couples.

Wrong, quit representing this in clearly a misleading way. There is not absolute ban on same sex, blood related same sex immediate family marriage.

See


Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:

None on the list found in Iowa code 595.19 are same sex immediate family. There claim to a marriage license is then valid.

Iowa says there is. I choose to believe them over a forum pervert like you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

So, if this is definitive, then you beleive a stepdaughter can Marry a Step father.

PervFaun never fails to amaze me.

Now you're making yourself dizzy ruining around in circles again, perv23. You know I don't believe that as we've already covered that.

If facts and truth were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like that.

 

[Pop23]

It is based on their laws. Never said otherwise. The instructions even state as much. Nowhere does it state the list of restrictions is exhaustive. But keep trying, it's quite entertaining watching you flop around like a dead fish on the deck of a boat, gasping for life.

And not a single shred of supportive evidence.

Fish, you got hooked

As usual, you prove yourself to be too brain-dead to think for yourself, so you idiotically project your shortcomings upon others.

And still no supportive evidence.

Just a bunch of butthurt

The evidence was given... no such couples could be found.

Is Pop still babbling about his fantasy incest couple that he has no evidence even exists?

Incest is an act, it's illegal. Marriage does not require sex to be valid.

Since you obviously think this discussion is about a need for sex as a requirement for a valid marriage, you support marital rape.

You are a pervert.

 

[Faun]

Again, you're citing laws as they were written prior to changes affecting gender and marriage due to a Supreme Court ruling
.

And knowing this, why did the Supreme Court address it in their ruling which only made same sex marriage legal, and did nothing to make same sex immediate family marriage illegal?

Because it was already illegal. The SC ruling did not create a loophole in the law. The spirit of the law remains; close-family marriages are still not permitted in iowa. You really are too slow to keep up. I don't know why you even try?

Nope, the SC only changed 595.20 and was silent on 595.19.

So you're wrong again

Iowa claims otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Not at all, they agree with me:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

Iowa says you're an imbecile. Who am I to disagree?

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

 

[Pop23]

Problem is, you're dishonest, you highlights the non salient portion.

The salient portion is:

Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:

Same sex immediate family members are not included in the list of invalid marriages.

Again, you're citing laws as they were written prior to changes affecting gender and marriage due to a Supreme Court ruling.

Iowa instructs people interested in filling out a marriage application that regardless of gender, a marriage license will not be issued to any consanguineous couples.

Wrong, quit representing this in clearly a misleading way. There is not absolute ban on same sex, blood related same sex immediate family marriage.

See


Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:

None on the list found in Iowa code 595.19 are same sex immediate family. There claim to a marriage license is then valid.

Iowa says there is. I choose to believe them over a forum pervert like you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

So, if this is definitive, then you beleive a stepdaughter can Marry a Step father.

PervFaun never fails to amaze me.

Now you're making yourself dizzy ruining around in circles again, perv23. You know I don't believe that as we've already covered that.

If facts and truth were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like that.

No lie, you are the one that maintains your pamphlet accurately reflects the law, which I will point out again is far from true as the law actually states affinity marriage is prohibited but only blood related opposite sex family marriage is.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

See PervFaun?

 

[Pop23]

And knowing this, why did the Supreme Court address it in their ruling which only made same sex marriage legal, and did nothing to make same sex immediate family marriage illegal?

Because it was already illegal. The SC ruling did not create a loophole in the law. The spirit of the law remains; close-family marriages are still not permitted in iowa. You really are too slow to keep up. I don't know why you even try?

Nope, the SC only changed 595.20 and was silent on 595.19.

So you're wrong again

Iowa claims otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Not at all, they agree with me:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

Iowa says you're an imbecile. Who am I to disagree?

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

No, it says you're a butthurt imbecile.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

Why deny this. You're side fought for it.

 

[Faun]

Again, you're citing laws as they were written prior to changes affecting gender and marriage due to a Supreme Court ruling.

Iowa instructs people interested in filling out a marriage application that regardless of gender, a marriage license will not be issued to any consanguineous couples.

Wrong, quit representing this in clearly a misleading way. There is not absolute ban on same sex, blood related same sex immediate family marriage.

See


Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:

None on the list found in Iowa code 595.19 are same sex immediate family. There claim to a marriage license is then valid.

Iowa says there is. I choose to believe them over a forum pervert like you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

So, if this is definitive, then you beleive a stepdaughter can Marry a Step father.

PervFaun never fails to amaze me.

Now you're making yourself dizzy ruining around in circles again, perv23. You know I don't believe that as we've already covered that.

If facts and truth were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like that.

No lie, you are the one that maintains your pamphlet accurately reflects the law, which I will point out again is far from true as the law actually states affinity marriage is prohibited but only blood related opposite sex family marriage is.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

See PervFaun?

You can point to a law affected by SC rulings all you want, Iowa still says close-family members can not marry each other regardless of gender...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

 

[Faun]

Because it was already illegal. The SC ruling did not create a loophole in the law. The spirit of the law remains; close-family marriages are still not permitted in iowa. You really are too slow to keep up. I don't know why you even try?

Nope, the SC only changed 595.20 and was silent on 595.19.

So you're wrong again

Iowa claims otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Not at all, they agree with me:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

Iowa says you're an imbecile. Who am I to disagree?

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

No, it says you're a butthurt imbecile.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

Why deny this. You're side fought for it.

Iowa says you're a pervert and an idiot.

I agree with them on that too.

 

[Faun]

It is based on their laws. Never said otherwise. The instructions even state as much. Nowhere does it state the list of restrictions is exhaustive. But keep trying, it's quite entertaining watching you flop around like a dead fish on the deck of a boat, gasping for life.

And not a single shred of supportive evidence.

Fish, you got hooked

As usual, you prove yourself to be too brain-dead to think for yourself, so you idiotically project your shortcomings upon others.

And still no supportive evidence.

Just a bunch of butthurt

The evidence was given... no such couples could be found.

Is Pop still babbling about his fantasy incest couple that he has no evidence even exists?

Yeah, there's a reason why every one of Pop's pseudo-legal predictions has never happened. And this thread demonstrates it.

Perv23 says a loophole was created which would attract many inter-family members to marry each other for financial benefits ... but then none showed up.

He's as dumb as Stephanie who started the Operation American Spring thread. Same level of idiocy. She claimed tens of millions of people would show up for that moronic event -- then about 50 complete idiots did ... perv23 claims those among the "hundred of millions" of Americans would show up in Iowa to take advantage of a tax loophole -- then can't find any who did.

 

[Pop23]

Wrong, quit representing this in clearly a misleading way. There is not absolute ban on same sex, blood related same sex immediate family marriage.

See


Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:

None on the list found in Iowa code 595.19 are same sex immediate family. There claim to a marriage license is then valid.

Iowa says there is. I choose to believe them over a forum pervert like you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

So, if this is definitive, then you beleive a stepdaughter can Marry a Step father.

PervFaun never fails to amaze me.

Now you're making yourself dizzy ruining around in circles again, perv23. You know I don't believe that as we've already covered that.

If facts and truth were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like that.

No lie, you are the one that maintains your pamphlet accurately reflects the law, which I will point out again is far from true as the law actually states affinity marriage is prohibited but only blood related opposite sex family marriage is.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

See PervFaun?

You can point to a law affected by SC rulings all you want, Iowa still says close-family members can not marry each other regardless of gender...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Nope, only opposite sex couples appear on the list.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.


See, no same sex.

And why do you keep pushing youre discredited opinion that a stepfather cans marry a stepdaughter? And an adopted son can Marry the adoptive Mother?

You are a weirdo.

 

[Pop23]

And not a single shred of supportive evidence.

Fish, you got hooked

As usual, you prove yourself to be too brain-dead to think for yourself, so you idiotically project your shortcomings upon others.

And still no supportive evidence.

Just a bunch of butthurt

The evidence was given... no such couples could be found.

Is Pop still babbling about his fantasy incest couple that he has no evidence even exists?

Yeah, there's a reason why every one of Pop's pseudo-legal predictions has never happened. And this thread demonstrates it.

Perv23 says a loophole was created which would attract many inter-family members to marry each other for financial benefits ... but then none showed up.

He's as dumb as Stephanie who started the Operation American Spring thread. Same level of idiocy. She claimed tens of millions of people would show up for that moronic event -- then about 50 complete idiots did ... perv23 claims those among the "hundred of millions" of Americans would show up in Iowa to take advantage of a tax loophole -- then can't find any who did.

Please link to the Iowa law that makes DNA testing a requirement to Marry?

Without those test it would be impossible to establish a blood relationship.

Please also link to the part of the law that states sex is a requirement of marriage.

Do you know that Iowa 595 actually just call marriage a contract? And that contract does not include sex as a requirement.

Do you also realize that Iowa classifies sex with a blood relative as a crime, but that crime can't be uncorroberated?

So you still have a big hill to climb, no doubt you're spindly legs aren't up to it though.

If you want to fund the massive testing that would be required to DNA test everyone married in Iowa since 2009 I'm sure we can arrange them.

Here's a fun little bit of trivia.

If we found couples that were blood related:

The opposite sex couples would have their licences void.

Same sex family marriages would not.

 

[Faun]

Iowa says there is. I choose to believe them over a forum pervert like you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

So, if this is definitive, then you beleive a stepdaughter can Marry a Step father.

PervFaun never fails to amaze me.

Now you're making yourself dizzy ruining around in circles again, perv23. You know I don't believe that as we've already covered that.

If facts and truth were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like that.

No lie, you are the one that maintains your pamphlet accurately reflects the law, which I will point out again is far from true as the law actually states affinity marriage is prohibited but only blood related opposite sex family marriage is.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

See PervFaun?

You can point to a law affected by SC rulings all you want, Iowa still says close-family members can not marry each other regardless of gender...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Nope, only opposite sex couples appear on the list.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.


See, no same sex.

And why do you keep pushing youre discredited opinion that a stepfather cans marry a stepdaughter? And an adopted son can Marry the adoptive Mother?

You are a weirdo.

I pushed no such thing. When do you stop lying, perv?

 

[Faun]

As usual, you prove yourself to be too brain-dead to think for yourself, so you idiotically project your shortcomings upon others.

And still no supportive evidence.

Just a bunch of butthurt

The evidence was given... no such couples could be found.

Is Pop still babbling about his fantasy incest couple that he has no evidence even exists?

Yeah, there's a reason why every one of Pop's pseudo-legal predictions has never happened. And this thread demonstrates it.

Perv23 says a loophole was created which would attract many inter-family members to marry each other for financial benefits ... but then none showed up.

He's as dumb as Stephanie who started the Operation American Spring thread. Same level of idiocy. She claimed tens of millions of people would show up for that moronic event -- then about 50 complete idiots did ... perv23 claims those among the "hundred of millions" of Americans would show up in Iowa to take advantage of a tax loophole -- then can't find any who did.

Please link to the Iowa law that makes DNA testing a requirement to Marry?

Without those test it would be impossible to establish a blood relationship.

Please also link to the part of the law that states sex is a requirement of marriage.

Do you know that Iowa 595 actually just call marriage a contract? And that contract does not include sex as a requirement.

Do you also realize that Iowa classifies sex with a blood relative as a crime, but that crime can't be uncorroberated?

So you still have a big hill to climb, no doubt you're spindly legs aren't up to it though.

If you want to fund the massive testing that would be required to DNA test everyone married in Iowa since 2009 I'm sure we can arrange them.

Here's a fun little bit of trivia.

If we found couples that were blood related:

The opposite sex couples would have their licences void.

Same sex family marriages would not.

Iowa still thinks you're an idiot.

http://www.co.carroll.ia.us/Recorder/Applicant Instructions.pdf

Oh well, C'est la vie.

 

[Pop23]

So, if this is definitive, then you beleive a stepdaughter can Marry a Step father.

PervFaun never fails to amaze me.

Now you're making yourself dizzy ruining around in circles again, perv23. You know I don't believe that as we've already covered that.

If facts and truth were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like that.

No lie, you are the one that maintains your pamphlet accurately reflects the law, which I will point out again is far from true as the law actually states affinity marriage is prohibited but only blood related opposite sex family marriage is.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

See PervFaun?

You can point to a law affected by SC rulings all you want, Iowa still says close-family members can not marry each other regardless of gender...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Nope, only opposite sex couples appear on the list.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.


See, no same sex.

And why do you keep pushing youre discredited opinion that a stepfather cans marry a stepdaughter? And an adopted son can Marry the adoptive Mother?

You are a weirdo.

I pushed no such thing. When do you stop lying, perv?

Your link, you're proof, says they can.

They are not blood related, and you keep highlighting blood related as those who can't...........

Pretty weak supportive evidence if say.

 

[Pop23]

And still no supportive evidence.

Just a bunch of butthurt

The evidence was given... no such couples could be found.

Is Pop still babbling about his fantasy incest couple that he has no evidence even exists?

Yeah, there's a reason why every one of Pop's pseudo-legal predictions has never happened. And this thread demonstrates it.

Perv23 says a loophole was created which would attract many inter-family members to marry each other for financial benefits ... but then none showed up.

He's as dumb as Stephanie who started the Operation American Spring thread. Same level of idiocy. She claimed tens of millions of people would show up for that moronic event -- then about 50 complete idiots did ... perv23 claims those among the "hundred of millions" of Americans would show up in Iowa to take advantage of a tax loophole -- then can't find any who did.

Please link to the Iowa law that makes DNA testing a requirement to Marry?

Without those test it would be impossible to establish a blood relationship.

Please also link to the part of the law that states sex is a requirement of marriage.

Do you know that Iowa 595 actually just call marriage a contract? And that contract does not include sex as a requirement.

Do you also realize that Iowa classifies sex with a blood relative as a crime, but that crime can't be uncorroberated?

So you still have a big hill to climb, no doubt you're spindly legs aren't up to it though.

If you want to fund the massive testing that would be required to DNA test everyone married in Iowa since 2009 I'm sure we can arrange them.

Here's a fun little bit of trivia.

If we found couples that were blood related:

The opposite sex couples would have their licences void.

Same sex family marriages would not.

Iowa still thinks you're an idiot.

http://www.co.carroll.ia.us/Recorder/Applicant Instructions.pdf

Oh well, C'est la vie.

Gee, that doesn't prohibit step parents from marrying stepchildren either.

Nor adopted parent and child.

And this is your evidence?

You really want people to believe you're a pervert?

Iowa prohibits all affinity marriage. Only a pervert would present this as law showing who iowa prohibits from marraige when the groups mentioned above aren't included.

 

[Faun]

Now you're making yourself dizzy ruining around in circles again, perv23. You know I don't believe that as we've already covered that.

If facts and truth were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like that.

No lie, you are the one that maintains your pamphlet accurately reflects the law, which I will point out again is far from true as the law actually states affinity marriage is prohibited but only blood related opposite sex family marriage is.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

See PervFaun?

You can point to a law affected by SC rulings all you want, Iowa still says close-family members can not marry each other regardless of gender...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Nope, only opposite sex couples appear on the list.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.


See, no same sex.

And why do you keep pushing youre discredited opinion that a stepfather cans marry a stepdaughter? And an adopted son can Marry the adoptive Mother?

You are a weirdo.

I pushed no such thing. When do you stop lying, perv?

Your link, you're proof, says they can.

They are not blood related, and you keep highlighting blood related as those who can't...........

Pretty weak supportive evidence if say.

As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, that list is not exhaustive. That you can't argue without lying about my position reveals even you know you lost this debate.

 

[Pop23]

No lie, you are the one that maintains your pamphlet accurately reflects the law, which I will point out again is far from true as the law actually states affinity marriage is prohibited but only blood related opposite sex family marriage is.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

See PervFaun?

You can point to a law affected by SC rulings all you want, Iowa still says close-family members can not marry each other regardless of gender...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Nope, only opposite sex couples appear on the list.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.


See, no same sex.

And why do you keep pushing youre discredited opinion that a stepfather cans marry a stepdaughter? And an adopted son can Marry the adoptive Mother?

You are a weirdo.

I pushed no such thing. When do you stop lying, perv?

Your link, you're proof, says they can.

They are not blood related, and you keep highlighting blood related as those who can't...........

Pretty weak supportive evidence if say.

As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, that list is not exhaustive. That you can't argue without lying about my position reveals even you know you lost this debate.

Then you really need to support you're own arguments, which you obviously haven't.

I can't always do you're work for you.

Time to grow up little one

 

[Faun]

You can point to a law affected by SC rulings all you want, Iowa still says close-family members can not marry each other regardless of gender...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Nope, only opposite sex couples appear on the list.
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.


See, no same sex.

And why do you keep pushing youre discredited opinion that a stepfather cans marry a stepdaughter? And an adopted son can Marry the adoptive Mother?

You are a weirdo.

I pushed no such thing. When do you stop lying, perv?

Your link, you're proof, says they can.

They are not blood related, and you keep highlighting blood related as those who can't...........

Pretty weak supportive evidence if say.

As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, that list is not exhaustive. That you can't argue without lying about my position reveals even you know you lost this debate.

Then you really need to support you're own arguments, which you obviously haven't.

I can't always do you're work for you.

Time to grow up little one

When do you stop lying?

 

[Skylar]

And still no supportive evidence.

Just a bunch of butthurt

The evidence was given... no such couples could be found.

Is Pop still babbling about his fantasy incest couple that he has no evidence even exists?

Yeah, there's a reason why every one of Pop's pseudo-legal predictions has never happened. And this thread demonstrates it.

Perv23 says a loophole was created which would attract many inter-family members to marry each other for financial benefits ... but then none showed up.

He's as dumb as Stephanie who started the Operation American Spring thread. Same level of idiocy. She claimed tens of millions of people would show up for that moronic event -- then about 50 complete idiots did ... perv23 claims those among the "hundred of millions" of Americans would show up in Iowa to take advantage of a tax loophole -- then can't find any who did.

Please link to the Iowa law that makes DNA testing a requirement to Marry?

Without those test it would be impossible to establish a blood relationship.

Please also link to the part of the law that states sex is a requirement of marriage.

Do you know that Iowa 595 actually just call marriage a contract? And that contract does not include sex as a requirement.

Do you also realize that Iowa classifies sex with a blood relative as a crime, but that crime can't be uncorroberated?

So you still have a big hill to climb, no doubt you're spindly legs aren't up to it though.

If you want to fund the massive testing that would be required to DNA test everyone married in Iowa since 2009 I'm sure we can arrange them.

Here's a fun little bit of trivia.

If we found couples that were blood related:

The opposite sex couples would have their licences void.

Same sex family marriages would not.

Iowa still thinks you're an idiot.

http://www.co.carroll.ia.us/Recorder/Applicant Instructions.pdf

Oh well, C'est la vie.

Wow.....it says right there in the Applicant Instructions:

3) not closely related by blood or first cousins;

And Pop just pretends it doesn't exist. I'm guessing its this kind of pretending and willful ignorance that has led to his record of perfect failure. With exactly none of his pseudo-legal predictions ever coming true.