Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TRUMPS REFUSAL TO PLEAD GUILTY IS PROOF HES GUILTY HA HA CHECKMAET TRUMPERS HILLARY 2016Yes, a fact finder could infer that a defendant taking steps to obstruct an investigation did so because the defendant was guilt -- OF THE UNDERLYING CRIME.Justice. The investigation.Actually that's incorrect.Cannot obstruct if there is not a crime.
What are you obstructing if you’re not guilty?
BTW, obstructing an investigation can be considered a tacit admission of guilt.
If, however, there is no underlying crime, that is also probative as to whether the defendant, acting to end the investigation, had corrupt intent. It really make the case for LACK of corrupt intent when ending a wasteful investigation into NON-crimes is your job---like the President.
.
Nope. In today's correction he said his team did not form a determination about criminality while in his report he stated that they found no criminality.Well....When correcting his earlier testimony Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
But his findings state "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
That certainly sounds like a determination.
We did not reach a determination...
We did not reach a conclusion...
We did not conclude...
That kind of sounds like a distinction without difference, no?
And in light of my response to Bootney above how is your whining relevant?You gotta post the whole quote kid:When correcting his earlier testimony Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
But his findings state "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
That certainly sounds like a determination.
“while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Mueller didn't lie to congress, but you sure as hell just tried to lie to us.
When correcting his earlier testimony Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
But his findings state "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
That certainly sounds like a determination.
THAT MOTHERFUCKER!!!Nope. In today's correction he said his team did not form a determination about criminality while in his report he stated that they found no criminality.
1) Trump commuted an obstructive act when he ordered Don McGahn to fire the special counsel.
2) The obstruction act was connected to an official proceeding.
3) The act was carried out with corrupt intent.
With precision, Rep. Jeffries ticks through the three elements proving obstruction of justice
Seems clear to me
Yet it was never followed through, and Mueller never posted a Prosecution charge about it over 2 years later.
Don't continue to be dumb on this dead end.
What did Mueller say that discredited anyone?You're an absolute idiot for trying to keep this train wreck going. Nothing came from this today that was good for you. All it did was enforce how fucking stupid you unhinged idiots really are.Only in your underwear is the Obstruction DUPE.
Now go lick your wounds and come back in 2024 and try again.
Trump's obstruction didn't have the desired effect but was obstruction nonetheless.
Seriously?
You're the one on the defensive, dope. Mueller just publicly validated everything I've said from the beginnning.
TAKE THE LOSS.
Mueller discredited your entire narrative established by Barr. You are reduced to attacking his appearance and demeanor rather than the substance of the report. The truth is now out there straight from Mueller.
You took a hit whether you recognize it yet or not.
I’ll wait for the quotes.
Derp...What did Mueller say that discredited anyone?
I’ll wait for the quotes.
You gotta post the whole quote kid:When correcting his earlier testimony Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
But his findings state "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
That certainly sounds like a determination.
“while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Mueller didn't lie to congress, but you sure as hell just tried to lie to us.
Mueller: "I don't agree with your characterizations."
Jordan: "I'm reading from your report."
View attachment 270878
Hi mikey tikey! How the fuck are you? No cockroaches in my back yard. Did you at least read the Barr summary...Still waiting for one of you cockroaches to provide some proof other than what some media asshat claims.Wrong.There was no obstruction.
There was no collusion.
There was no Russian interference in the election.
