Against, why don't you read the report for yourself. Thats not what it says.Because it's the truth, and what you are spouting is fake news. The report did not say they found no criminality.Nope. In today's correction he said his team did not form a determination about criminality while in his report he stated that they found no criminality.Well....When correcting his earlier testimony Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
But his findings state "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
That certainly sounds like a determination.
We did not reach a determination...
We did not reach a conclusion...
We did not conclude...
That kind of sounds like a distinction without difference, no?
And in light of my response to Bootney above how is your whining relevant?You gotta post the whole quote kid:When correcting his earlier testimony Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
But his findings state "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
That certainly sounds like a determination.
“while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Mueller didn't lie to congress, but you sure as hell just tried to lie to us.
They said there was not enough to prosecute. No conspiracy and no obstruction.
Mueller is a prosecutor he cannot exonerate