meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,909
- 18,114
- 2,290
I used to have respect for Deshowitz, but I think he doing this from a belief that MAGA's aren't very smart, and will believe anything. Trumps argument that Jack Smith is violating Trumps 6th amendment right to counsel, by going after Trumps lawyers. They may not remember Trumps legal history, from Roy Cohen to Michael Cohn, Trump uses his lawyers to do his dirty work.Those of us who paid attention in Physics (and many of us who didn't), are well aware that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
The Democrats, in their desperate fury to throw the kitchen sink at Trump, are not only putting him in the driver's seat for 2024; they are putting themselves in serious legal jeopardy.
Alan Dershowitz: Jack Smith could face indictment if Trump wins case * WorldNetDaily * by Around the Web
Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said that Special Counsel Jack Smith could himself be indicted if the indictment of former President Donald Trump is thrown out.www.wnd.com
The possibility of this is very real.
Trump will never win his trial in DC.
But he will definitely appeal it - and the case is almost just as flimsy as the rest. He will win on appeal.
Potentially right around the time he moves back into the White House.
What a confluence of striking events that is.
How sweet it's going to be next year, when the idiot Leftists crowing on this board about what seems to be an imminent victory - self-immolate into the perpetual abyss of total loss.
Dershowitz's 1st amendment argument is equally flawed, because he didn't go after Trump for what he said, but what he did. Like create slates of fake electors so that Mike Pence could count the fake electors instead of the real electors.
BTW: Giuliani isn't Trumps lawyer, he isn't anybodies lawyer. Lin Wood, can no longer practice law. And that list is growing.