Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 37,153
- 21,963
- 2,945
Certainly another brick in the wall“This time we’ve got him.”
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Certainly another brick in the wall“This time we’ve got him.”
![]()
I don't think anything Comer says at this point can be taken seriously now that his chief witness turned out to be a Russian agent.First off, it doesnt need to be proven in order to hurt your election chances. It has already been proven in the court of public opinion.
Secondly, it may not be proven until Joe loses the election and pardons himself, at which point it will be 100% proven. Then again, Comer may have a fun October surprise in store for us. Who knows?
money laundering and depending on where the money came from it could get a lot worse,,
at this point we dont know where the lawyer got the money,,
thats the whole problem,,
The lawyer for James Biden. You asked why they haven’t denied it. They have.Who said it was a loan? An article? And their proof is?
You have to report the total amount of uncharged interest on your taxes and it will count against your annual and/or lifetime gift exclusions as appropriate.
If there is no record of this, the Bidens broke the law.
Did they break the law?Lock him up
Did they break the law?
You keep telling yourself that guy, but if your whole case is built on the word of a guy who just got busted for being a Russian Agent, you have a credibility problem.Most of the nation disagrees with you and we have an election soon.
The whole case hinged on THIS guy? No one even knew his name until last week.You keep telling yourself that guy, but if your whole case is built on the word of a guy who just got busted for being a Russian Agent, you have a credibility problem.
Translation: you have nothing.Certainly another brick in the wall
The whole case hinged on THIS guy? No one even knew his name until last week.![]()
Me? No. House committees - mountains of evidence.Translation: you have nothing.
Right. And the House committees know they have nothing substantive, hence why they're not doing anything with these "mountains of evidence".Me? No. House committees - mountains of evidence.
Unlike the DEm impeachments, they are actually doing investigations and gathering evidence. Hearings this summer are going to be fun fun funRight. And the House committees know they have nothing substantive, hence why they're not doing anything with these "mountains of evidence".
Hence what I said the first time - you have nothing.