Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look at all those qualifiers, many unprovable and incorrect I might add…I would never support a Democrat who was claiming for over two years the election was stolen with no proof who ultimately rallied a crowd of morons, knowing some were armed, to fight or the country will be lost and sent them to the capital while also calling out his vice president as weak because he didn't violate the constitution and stop a fair democratic election.
Especially if during this time they tried to call other states and find just enough votes or tell his AG to just say the election was stolen and let his allies in Congress take care of the rest.
Obviously you would though.
Obama says police racist, BLM acts out and murders. Look at you, no accountability for inflammatory rhetoric that resulted in murder.
He called all GOP murderers, his followers tried to obey him and murder the horrible murderers, right? Look at you, no accountability for inflammatory rhetoric.
So wait, now a call for protesting is attempting to overthrow? then were the Row v Wade overturn protesters trying to overthrow the SCOTUS?
Meanwhile, the J6 committee holds no credibility outside of the leftist bubble, so you might as well be telling me to respect the Quran.
Yes. Why wouldn't I?Did you object strongly to the George Floyd riots?
Proof that Trump organized the people who rioted and ordered them or you’re just lying.
3… 2… 1… Go!
Facts remain: trump called for peaceful protest, called for peace once riot started (unlike Biden/Harris during BLM riots).
www.reuters.com
Many Liberals here felt it was righteous.Yes. Why wouldn't I?
Many Liberals here felt it was righteous.
Yeah, and their is usual a double standard when it comes to the havoc wreaked by red states but let's stay on topic please.There's usually a double standard when it comes to violence wreaked by people in Blue cities.
I didn't say they were conducting a criminal investigation.
Thank goodness for the Jan 6 committee. Now perhaps we can enact legislation that stymies and prepares for future insurrection attempts.
So what? Nothing illegal here. The DoJ likely had most of the info already. Again, if Congress conducts an investigation for legislation purposes and comes across criminal activity, certainly that info can be handed to the DoJ right?
You, probably based on a narrative provided you by the right wing media, are trying to make something normal seem nefarious.
Show me where it is illegal for Congress to pass info to the DoJ.
I am sure they have.
Yes, I would be fine with it.
Why would I want a congressional committee investigation that turned up a crime Biden committed to not be given to the justice department?
It's like you are saying that if Congress found I had committed a crime, that I would subsequently be immune to punishment because that would hurt feelings or be unfair or whatever your reasoning is.
What if a congressional investigation found a murder during an investigation? Is the murderer immune from prosecution?
I didn't say they were conducting a criminal investigation.
Would that not mean that the act of Congress investigating potential crimes
certainly that info can be handed to the DoJ right?
You, probably based on a narrative provided you by the right wing media, are trying to make something normal seem nefarious.
It's like you are saying that if Congress found I had committed a crime, that I would subsequently be immune to punishment because that would hurt feelings or be unfair or whatever your reasoning is.
Show me where it is illegal for Congress to pass info to the DoJ.
What if a congressional investigation found a murder during an investigation? Is the murderer immune from prosecution?
Why would I want a congressional committee investigation that turned up a crime Biden committed to not be given to the justice department?
[/QUOTE]Outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., thanked the members of the Jan. 6 committee for being “relentless” in “their pursuit of truth” and demanded that “justice must be done” following the panel’s last public meeting.
Jan. 6 committee highlights: Panel votes on criminal referrals for Trump and others
The Jan. 6 committee meets Monday to vote on criminal referrals, expected to include former President Donald Trump, and adopt its final report.www.nbcnews.com
see, pelosi knows..this whole thing was an investigation to find out what happened that day, for "justice". Sounds like they knew it was always a criminal investigation...conducted by Congress.
In 2 years of the J6 committee, what laws were created as a result of it?. I think someone said they passed like...2 laws? If that's it..seems kind of a weak cover.
When the Democrat authorities do nothing, that's enough evidence for me to they're pure evil.Different people have different experiences but I think many people on the left thought the 'cause' was self righteous but I don't remember seeing to many examples of the the left supporting known violent offenders directly.
Yeah, and their is usual a double standard when it comes to the havoc wreaked by red states but let's stay on topic please.
What the hell is this a triple jump? Hop, Skip and Jump? A niced pole vault from Hillary to candidate Biden who didn't incite any MOB and send them off to Minneapolis but who did condemn the rioters after Floyds murder.Facts remain: trump called for peaceful protest, called for peace once riot started (unlike Biden/Harris during BLM riots).
The DOJ never investigates Democrats...never!I've been following politics somewhat since Richard Nixon...my first election. The criminals are most always republicans going way back. I copied and pasted some republican criminals off of quora. Guess that's ok. I voted for trump since I disliked Clinton so much. I started seeing from almost the beginning what a piece of shit trump was almost as soon as he got into office.
My copy and paste below. .
"In the last 50 years we have had Democrat presidents for 24 years and republican about the same The total for Democrats is 3 indictments, 1 conviction and 1 prison sentence. For republicans it’s 147 indictments, 94 convictions and 34 prison sentences". These figures don’t count for Trump, but he will probably double those for the Law and Order party.
No, it's the republicans, guys. They've got larceny in the blood it looks like.
Upvote
18
5
2
Dave King
My
You guys were apparently drowning in Russian evidence too. Pray tell how that panned out?Just the documents facts that you run from will do nicely.
Don't think your impotence is not obvious.
Unfortunately in politics, there are criminals on both sides of the aisle. Those that get caught weren't as smart at hiding their tracks.I've been following politics somewhat since Richard Nixon...my first election. The criminals are most always republicans going way back. I copied and pasted some republican criminals off of quora. Guess that's ok. I voted for trump since I disliked Clinton so much. I started seeing from almost the beginning what a piece of shit trump was almost as soon as he got into office.
My copy and paste below. .
"In the last 50 years we have had Democrat presidents for 24 years and republican about the same The total for Democrats is 3 indictments, 1 conviction and 1 prison sentence. For republicans it’s 147 indictments, 94 convictions and 34 prison sentences". These figures don’t count for Trump, but he will probably double those for the Law and Order party.
No, it's the republicans, guys. They've got larceny in the blood it looks like.
Upvote
18
5
2
Dave King
My
You apparently refer to allegations of the disgraced Trump collaborating in the 2016 election with his "savvy" "genius" Putin that the Trump administration's Republican Acting Attorney General appointed a Republican Special Counsel to investigate.You guys were apparently drowning in Russian evidence too.
Thanks for correcting Catsnmeters so completely.. they clearly don’t know anything about govt processes, responsibilities, or how government works.Actually you did:
They are not supposed to investigate crimes.
No, again, how is the committee handing over its investigation to the doj for a criminal investigation, any different than the committee doing the criminal investigation themselves?
No, this isn't coming from any right wing news source, and it is nefarious. The committee is going to hand over its own investigation to the doj, to help them in their criminal investigation. How people cannot see this?
Has nothing to do with feelings. If Congress found you had committed a crime, then they make a referral to the doj to conduct an investigation based on the allegations. They don't conduct a 2 year investigation and then just hand it over to the doj and say "here ya go, we've ready done all the work..here's your investigation on a silver platter". That would be the same as the J6 committee doing the criminal investigation themselves.....
congress has the power to investigate for legislative purposes only.
Actually, the cotus doesn't specifically even give Congress the power to conduct investigations at all, but scotus decided that the power to legislate included to power to investigate for the purpose of creating legislation.
Now, if Congress conducts an investigation on its own for the purposes of creating legislation, then that's fine, thats their scotus interpreted right, however, if during the course of that investigation, they detect a crime, they can tell the doj that a crime may have been committed, and then the doj can conduct a criminal investigation. If the Congress takes their entire investigation and hands it to the doj, it's the same thing as the Congress doing the work of a criminal investigation.....it's the same thing.
If in the course of their investigation, they discover a murder had taken place, then they make a referral to the doj to conduct an investigation for murder, but the Congress doesn't investigate the murder themselves, and then turn over their investigation to the doj to help them. The Congress has no role in conducting criminal investigations.
If the committee, during the course if their investigation, comes across a crime Trump had committed, then they can refer that to the doj, but the committee doesn't actually get to investigate the crime themselves. The problem we have here is that the Committee investigation was so broad, that it was actually a criminal investigation from the start. They started that committee with doj referrals in mind, that was ways their goal. "Legislation" was always just a cover for what they were really doing.
No they don't... They have referred them to the DOJ..Then they have to show ALL THE EVIDENCE!
Videos inside and outside the Capitol building. Documents regarding Epps and any other FBI stooges.
Everything! I watched the hearings and the things they were saying trump was responsible for were totally ludicrous.
Jan. 6 panel to vote on urging DOJ to prosecute Trump on at least 3 criminal charges
The report that the select panel is expected to consider Monday afternoon reflects some recommendations from a subcommittee that evaluated potential referrals.www.politico.com
Exposed what???The J6 panel cannot "urge" anything. Prosecutors at DoJ must decide.
Besides, none of it will make a damn bit of difference, Trump is the irresistible force, especially now that Musk has exposed the Deep State.
Thanks for your personal definition of a coup...
