January 6, 2015: peaceful transition of power

Statistikhengst

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2013
45,564
11,757
2,070
deep within the statistical brain!!
114th United States Congress - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

114th congress.png


Officially, the 114th Congress of our United States meets from January 3, 2015 to January 3, 2015, but the first work day for our new Congress is on Tuesday, January 6th. On that day, member of Congress will take the oath of office and the work should begin.

We know that the House of Representatives remains unchanged, with a Republican majority, and presumably, John Boehner (R-OH) as Speaker of the House of Representatives and therefore 3rd in line of succession to the Presidency. In the 112th congress (2011-2013), it was R 242 / D 193. In the 113th Congress (2013-2015), it was R 234 / D 201. And now, in the 114th congress, at current, it is R 246 / D 188 / V 1 (V = vacancy).

We know that control of the US Senate will change hands, from the Democrats to the Republicans.

The Republicans now have 54 seats, the Democrats have 44 seats, and two very different kinds of Independents (Bernie Sanders and Angus King - both from New England), who have caucused with the Democrats and will presumably continue to do so, have 2 seats. Wait and see. At least for now, in terms of caucus power, that means R 54 / "D" 46. The presumption is that Mitch McConnell (R-KY) will become the Majority Leader of the US Senate. He was majority Whip from 2001-2003.

This in turn means that we go from a D+9 margin in the 113th congress (Senate) to an R+9 margin in the 114th Congress (Senate), an +18% shift toward the GOP in the Senate. This is the same 18% shift that the GOP enjoyed after the 1994 mid-term elections. The GOP majority of 54 Senators is it's second highest percentage of the Senate since 1997 (the GOP actually GAINED seats in the Senate in the same year that Bill Clinton was re-elected. Does that ring a bell?), where the GOP had 55 seats in 1997-2001, again from 2005-2007. 54 is the same number of Senators as in the 98th Congress, under Reagan, from 1983-1985. 18% is the largest shift for the GOP since 1929. But all of these statistics pale in comparison to 1958, where the DEMS shifted 29 seats in the US Senate, a 29.6% shift.

What I find impressive every two years, and twice in presidential cycles, is the peaceful transition of power. This is what sets civilized nations like our Union apart from other political systems.

Whether or not you like the results of the 2014 mid-terms, the electorate that went out to vote has spoken and now it is time for our Congress to get down to work. This is what they are paid for. And elections indeed do have consequences. So, let's look at the consequences:

1.) assuming that the Filibuster (Cloture) rule stays as is, then the Republicans will not have a filibuster-proof Senate, just as the Democrats did not have a filibuster-proof senate. What that means in terms of how the Republican Senate Majority leader breaks down legislation or tries to pass with a simple majority vote under reconciliation, remains to be seen.

2.) The Senate is likely to pass a certain amount of legislation that our President could very well veto.

To get some perspective on how these data points fit into our history, I recommend this link from January 14th, 2014, almost one year ago:

Congressional Elections compared to Presidential Terms 1855-present US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

And here a direct link to the raw data itself:

us congresses since 1855
(as html)

My congratulations to all members of the 114th Congress.

I suspect that the next two years are going to be very interesting.

PS: I put this in "politics" because the new congress will play a great role in politics overall in the next two years, including the 2016 campaign, which for all intents and purposes will also start in 2015... :D
 
Last edited:
Not much of a surprise. Only the VERY far right partisan hacks actually think there is going to be violence as the government transitions over. It will be very interesting to see how the republicans play this majority though. It WILL decide the 2016 elections (or at least decide if they have a snowballs chance in hell). the republicans are going to have to show that they can legislate like adults. A series of no will not cut it when you have the legislative branch completely under your control.

I predict they are going to screw the pooch with more social issues the cash strapped Americans could give two hoots about but I have been wrong before. They did really well avoiding that trap over the last election cycle.
 
I hope that the senate will do the correct thing and restore the filibuster but I HIGHLY doubt they are going to. once power has been grabbed - it will be kept. They have little motivation to do so other than it is what is correct.
 
Not much of a surprise. Only the VERY far right partisan hacks actually think there is going to be violence as the government transitions over. It will be very interesting to see how the republicans play this majority though. It WILL decide the 2016 elections (or at least decide if they have a snowballs chance in hell). the republicans are going to have to show that they can legislate like adults. A series of no will not cut it when you have the legislative branch completely under your control.

I predict they are going to screw the pooch with more social issues the cash strapped Americans could give two hoots about but I have been wrong before. They did really well avoiding that trap over the last election cycle.
Because Harry Reid legislated like an adult by refusing to allow House bills to be voted on.
 
“The Senate is likely to pass a certain amount of legislation that our President could very well veto.”

Which can be easily avoided by Congress pursuing sound, responsible governance.
Translation: If they do everything Obama tells them to do, everything will be fine.
 
Not much of a surprise. Only the VERY far right partisan hacks actually think there is going to be violence as the government transitions over. It will be very interesting to see how the republicans play this majority though. It WILL decide the 2016 elections (or at least decide if they have a snowballs chance in hell). the republicans are going to have to show that they can legislate like adults. A series of no will not cut it when you have the legislative branch completely under your control.

I predict they are going to screw the pooch with more social issues the cash strapped Americans could give two hoots about but I have been wrong before. They did really well avoiding that trap over the last election cycle.
Because Harry Reid legislated like an adult by refusing to allow House bills to be voted on.
What does Harry Reid acting like an idiot have to do with the republicans?


You do understand that acting like a democrat only ensures that democrats are in power, right?
 
“The Senate is likely to pass a certain amount of legislation that our President could very well veto.”

Which can be easily avoided by Congress pursuing sound, responsible governance.
the republicans are going to WANT to pass things he votes - bills that the public likes and the president cant effectively spin to his advantage. He then has to capitulate or face the political backlash. It is a fine line for the republicans to walk. They need some compromised bills and some bills that are too distasteful for the president that the people are behind.
 
It will be assumed Congress will act in good faith, and pass legislation beneficial to the Nation as a whole.

And should Congress fail to do that, and seek to pass measures not beneficial to all Americans, where an objective, factual, and non-partisan analysis determines a given proposed measure is not beneficial to the Nation as a whole, then such legislation will be subject to warranted and appropriate denunciation, and if passed, vetoed by the president.
 
It will be assumed Congress will act in good faith, and pass legislation beneficial to the Nation as a whole.

And should Congress fail to do that, and seek to pass measures not beneficial to all Americans, where an objective, factual, and non-partisan analysis determines a given proposed measure is not beneficial to the Nation as a whole, then such legislation will be subject to warranted and appropriate denunciation, and if passed, vetoed by the president.
Agree. They should do the opposite of what the Democrats have been doing.
 
Yes...I suppose this is a transition, but unfortunately nothing will change. The Rs and Ds are merely two wings of the same criminal gang.

Hell the Rs already proved they are no different, when they passed that stupid funding bill....thus thumbing their noses at their base, right after winning huge in the midterms.
 
It will be assumed Congress will act in good faith, and pass legislation beneficial to the Nation as a whole.

And should Congress fail to do that, and seek to pass measures not beneficial to all Americans, where an objective, factual, and non-partisan analysis determines a given proposed measure is not beneficial to the Nation as a whole, then such legislation will be subject to warranted and appropriate denunciation, and if passed, vetoed by the president.
Ya, because Obama wouldn't veto legislation that was beneficial to the entire nation.

Bah, don't be such a partisan.
 
It will be assumed Congress will act in good faith, and pass legislation beneficial to the Nation as a whole.

And should Congress fail to do that, and seek to pass measures not beneficial to all Americans, where an objective, factual, and non-partisan analysis determines a given proposed measure is not beneficial to the Nation as a whole, then such legislation will be subject to warranted and appropriate denunciation, and if passed, vetoed by the president.
Bullshit
Every piece of legislation produces winners and losers.
Was ACA beneficial to the nation as a whole? No. Lots of people got their polciies cancelled.
Was Dodd Frank? No. Lots of consumers were locked out of some programs and saw bank fees increased.
Is there any piece of legislation ever passed that is beneficial to the nation as a whole? No.
Your post is nonsense.

Republicans need to do what they were elected to: effectively end ACA, rein in the bureaucracy, clean up the Obama scandals like IRS and hold people accountable.
Fortunately with Dems running scared from Obama and ACA this will be a lot easier. They will pass an ACA fix that will be veto proof.
 
.

We have a national political system that is almost completely controlled by money.

Unless & until that changes, our "leaders" will continue to disappoint.

(That won't stop their flocks from spinning for them, however)

.
What would you like it to be controlled by, military force?
 
.

We have a national political system that is almost completely controlled by money.

Unless & until that changes, our "leaders" will continue to disappoint.

(That won't stop their flocks from spinning for them, however)

.
What would you like it to be controlled by, military force?

Nope, just a better system:

1. Balanced Budget Amendment
2. Short, strict term limits
3. Publicly-funded elections

We would see the behavior of these thugs & liars change overnight, and we would see a better class of "leader".

.
 
.

We have a national political system that is almost completely controlled by money.

Unless & until that changes, our "leaders" will continue to disappoint.

(That won't stop their flocks from spinning for them, however)

.
What would you like it to be controlled by, military force?
How about the Constitution?

Ever read it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top