Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's see....
murder has a victim
pedo has a victim
homo has a ...oh wait. No victim.
Fail.
It doesn't take away the fact you cherry picked. Fail on your part and lousy attempt at deflection
Sorry to disappoint you but the cherry-picking of abomonations and sins seems to be coming from your side![]()
Sin is sin ,homosexuality being one of them
Well you conservatives sure have a funny way of prioritizing your sins and abominations now don't you?
Somehow, with Christ's embracing of the poor and disenfranchised - I can't see him as a conservative who's primary goal seems to be criminalizing poverty![]()
Christ did not criminalize poverty.....He criminalized Corruption. Think about that the next time a crony (D) skims off the top in the name of "the children."
Or does Left-think teach them that their existence entitles them to the property of others and that they bear no responsibility for their actions,
that sexual intercourse outside of marriage brings no risk,
because they're rightfully entitled to murder the life they conceive or if they choose not to murder their pre-born child that they're entitled to demand the property of others, through state and federal subsidies.
And that if they do not work, that their entitled to the property of others through similar state and federal subsidies, robbing them of their inherent ambition.... stealing any hope of their being anything but poor and disenfranchised.
Now, what do you suppose Christ's position is on the deceitful who foment such fraudulences upon the hapless innocent whose trust is wasted upon such evil?
My guess is that you're not going to truly appreciate the unenviable position that you're in, until the appreciation has passed from blessing, to curse.
The people who think they know if Jesus is a Republican or Democrat are modern day Pharisees.
No, really.
Or does Left-think teach them that their existence entitles them to the property of others and that they bear no responsibility for their actions,
Nope. Everyone is responsible for their actions but they aren't responsible for the actions of others. However, their existence entitles them to the same respect and dignity as a human being that is accorded the rich.
that sexual intercourse outside of marriage brings no risk,
Where did you come up with that buffoonery? We believe in sex education and that includes both the risks and pitfalls of pregnancy, proper use of and availability of contraception. Sex education means you might choose to abstain or you might choose to have sex responsibly - but you should not be ignorant. Of course that's part of the difference between Right-think and Left-think: you believe ignorance is better than education and that women should "just hold an asprin between your knees honey".
because they're rightfully entitled to murder the life they conceive or if they choose not to murder their pre-born child that they're entitled to demand the property of others, through state and federal subsidies.
Wow. Do you really hate women that much?
We're entitled to the same right you are - the right to control our own bodies and make our own reproductive decisions. If it is such an issue to you, I would be happy to find someone willing to donate her embryo to you for implantation. Otherwise, you and I are part of the safety net that ensures our nations most vulnerable are protected. Who knows - someday that might even include you in their numbers
And that if they do not work, that their entitled to the property of others through similar state and federal subsidies, robbing them of their inherent ambition.... stealing any hope of their being anything but poor and disenfranchised.
Oh? Many get out of poverty with a little help - something you would deny them.
Now, what do you suppose Christ's position is on the deceitful who foment such fraudulences upon the hapless innocent whose trust is wasted upon such evil?
My guess is that you're not going to truly appreciate the unenviable position that you're in, until the appreciation has passed from blessing, to curse.
My guess is, Christ's response to your distortions would be a face palmHe was not crazy about the rich and the inequalities of his time.
Or does Left-think teach them that their existence entitles them to the property of others and that they bear no responsibility for their actions,
Nope. Everyone is responsible for their actions but they aren't responsible for the actions of others. However, their existence entitles them to the same respect and dignity as a human being that is accorded the rich.
that sexual intercourse outside of marriage brings no risk,
Where did you come up with that buffoonery? We believe in sex education and that includes both the risks and pitfalls of pregnancy, proper use of and availability of contraception. Sex education means you might choose to abstain or you might choose to have sex responsibly - but you should not be ignorant. Of course that's part of the difference between Right-think and Left-think: you believe ignorance is better than education and that women should "just hold an asprin between your knees honey".
because they're rightfully entitled to murder the life they conceive or if they choose not to murder their pre-born child that they're entitled to demand the property of others, through state and federal subsidies.
Wow. Do you really hate women that much?
We're entitled to the same right you are - the right to control our own bodies and make our own reproductive decisions. If it is such an issue to you, I would be happy to find someone willing to donate her embryo to you for implantation. Otherwise, you and I are part of the safety net that ensures our nations most vulnerable are protected. Who knows - someday that might even include you in their numbers
And that if they do not work, that their entitled to the property of others through similar state and federal subsidies, robbing them of their inherent ambition.... stealing any hope of their being anything but poor and disenfranchised.
Oh? Many get out of poverty with a little help - something you would deny them.
Now, what do you suppose Christ's position is on the deceitful who foment such fraudulences upon the hapless innocent whose trust is wasted upon such evil?
My guess is that you're not going to truly appreciate the unenviable position that you're in, until the appreciation has passed from blessing, to curse.
My guess is, Christ's response to your distortions would be a face palmHe was not crazy about the rich and the inequalities of his time.
Or does Left-think teach them that their existence entitles them to the property of others and that they bear no responsibility for their actions,
Nope. Everyone is responsible for their actions but they aren't responsible for the actions of others. However, their existence entitles them to the same respect and dignity as a human being that is accorded the rich.
that sexual intercourse outside of marriage brings no risk,
Where did you come up with that buffoonery? We believe in sex education and that includes both the risks and pitfalls of pregnancy, proper use of and availability of contraception. Sex education means you might choose to abstain or you might choose to have sex responsibly - but you should not be ignorant. Of course that's part of the difference between Right-think and Left-think: you believe ignorance is better than education and that women should "just hold an asprin between your knees honey".
because they're rightfully entitled to murder the life they conceive or if they choose not to murder their pre-born child that they're entitled to demand the property of others, through state and federal subsidies.
Wow. Do you really hate women that much?
We're entitled to the same right you are - the right to control our own bodies and make our own reproductive decisions. If it is such an issue to you, I would be happy to find someone willing to donate her embryo to you for implantation. Otherwise, you and I are part of the safety net that ensures our nations most vulnerable are protected. Who knows - someday that might even include you in their numbers
And that if they do not work, that their entitled to the property of others through similar state and federal subsidies, robbing them of their inherent ambition.... stealing any hope of their being anything but poor and disenfranchised.
Oh? Many get out of poverty with a little help - something you would deny them.
Now, what do you suppose Christ's position is on the deceitful who foment such fraudulences upon the hapless innocent whose trust is wasted upon such evil?
My guess is that you're not going to truly appreciate the unenviable position that you're in, until the appreciation has passed from blessing, to curse.
My guess is, Christ's response to your distortions would be a face palmHe was not crazy about the rich and the inequalities of his time.
It's no longer your body when it has its own separate and recognizable DNA
Not too many years ago, a Man could beat his wife.
Not too many years before then, he could kill her if he was in a bad mood.
The Wife was considered Chattel.
Today, we don't consider Wives to be the property of husbands and we shouldn't consider other sentient beings as chattel either
Too bad your morality is stuck in the 12th Century.
But that's about as far along as I expect dimocraps to get. Better than most
It's no longer your body when it has its own separate and recognizable DNA
Or does Left-think teach them that their existence entitles them to the property of others and that they bear no responsibility for their actions,
Nope. Everyone is responsible for their actions but they aren't responsible for the actions of others. However, their existence entitles them to the same respect and dignity as a human being that is accorded the rich.
that sexual intercourse outside of marriage brings no risk,
Where did you come up with that buffoonery? We believe in sex education and that includes both the risks and pitfalls of pregnancy, proper use of and availability of contraception. Sex education means you might choose to abstain or you might choose to have sex responsibly - but you should not be ignorant. Of course that's part of the difference between Right-think and Left-think: you believe ignorance is better than education and that women should "just hold an asprin between your knees honey".
because they're rightfully entitled to murder the life they conceive or if they choose not to murder their pre-born child that they're entitled to demand the property of others, through state and federal subsidies.
Wow. Do you really hate women that much?
We're entitled to the same right you are - the right to control our own bodies and make our own reproductive decisions. If it is such an issue to you, I would be happy to find someone willing to donate her embryo to you for implantation. Otherwise, you and I are part of the safety net that ensures our nations most vulnerable are protected. Who knows - someday that might even include you in their numbers
And that if they do not work, that their entitled to the property of others through similar state and federal subsidies, robbing them of their inherent ambition.... stealing any hope of their being anything but poor and disenfranchised.
Oh? Many get out of poverty with a little help - something you would deny them.
Now, what do you suppose Christ's position is on the deceitful who foment such fraudulences upon the hapless innocent whose trust is wasted upon such evil?
My guess is that you're not going to truly appreciate the unenviable position that you're in, until the appreciation has passed from blessing, to curse.
My guess is, Christ's response to your distortions would be a face palmHe was not crazy about the rich and the inequalities of his time.
ROFLMNAO!
Now that is just pitiful.
Your concessions are all duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Reader, understand that these are the would-be 'people', who are now advising you that white women can 'identify' as black... and because of that the white woman IS BLACK.
They're advising you and Men can 'identify' as woman... and because they identify as women, such a man is A WOMAN.
And they're coming to advise you that otherwise physically healthy people can 'identify' as quadriplegics and because they believe that their perfectly healthy limbs are preventing them from being complete', they want YOU to pay to have those healthy bodies butchered.
And they're coming to tell you that you need to accept these DELUSIONS as REALITY, because if you do not you're a hater and HATE iS WRONG.
For now well over 20 years, I've been warning everyone who would listen in message boards and debate forums all over the interwebz... that the Ideological Left was the manifestation of what has otherwise always been known as Evil.
Scan the drivel to which I am responding and see if you can find so much as a scintilla of lucidity... let alone something good, wholesome or even remotely sustainable.
If you find something that you feel represents what you would call 'good'.... post it up for discussion. Tell me what it is and why you think it reflects something virtuous.
It's no longer your body when it has its own separate and recognizable DNA
SO his body contains DNA separate and distinct from his DNA?
Oh now that IS Fascinatin'... .
(Again Reader, this is part and parcel of the delusion, wherein one 'identifies' themselves as having DNA distinct from their DNA, thus one's DNA is whatever their subjective needs DEMAND their DNA IS... .
They're quite mad you know ... and sadly, it seems to be spreading.)
(Reader ... They're quite mad you know ... and sadly, it seems to be spreading.)
Indeed.
Or does Left-think teach them that their existence entitles them to the property of others and that they bear no responsibility for their actions,
Nope. Everyone is responsible for their actions but they aren't responsible for the actions of others. However, their existence entitles them to the same respect and dignity as a human being that is accorded the rich.
that sexual intercourse outside of marriage brings no risk,
Where did you come up with that buffoonery? We believe in sex education and that includes both the risks and pitfalls of pregnancy, proper use of and availability of contraception. Sex education means you might choose to abstain or you might choose to have sex responsibly - but you should not be ignorant. Of course that's part of the difference between Right-think and Left-think: you believe ignorance is better than education and that women should "just hold an asprin between your knees honey".
because they're rightfully entitled to murder the life they conceive or if they choose not to murder their pre-born child that they're entitled to demand the property of others, through state and federal subsidies.
Wow. Do you really hate women that much?
We're entitled to the same right you are - the right to control our own bodies and make our own reproductive decisions. If it is such an issue to you, I would be happy to find someone willing to donate her embryo to you for implantation. Otherwise, you and I are part of the safety net that ensures our nations most vulnerable are protected. Who knows - someday that might even include you in their numbers
And that if they do not work, that their entitled to the property of others through similar state and federal subsidies, robbing them of their inherent ambition.... stealing any hope of their being anything but poor and disenfranchised.
Oh? Many get out of poverty with a little help - something you would deny them.
Now, what do you suppose Christ's position is on the deceitful who foment such fraudulences upon the hapless innocent whose trust is wasted upon such evil?
My guess is that you're not going to truly appreciate the unenviable position that you're in, until the appreciation has passed from blessing, to curse.
My guess is, Christ's response to your distortions would be a face palmHe was not crazy about the rich and the inequalities of his time.
It's no longer your body when it has its own separate and recognizable DNA
Oh? Do you realize your own body is teeming with seperate and recognizable DNA?
Not too many years ago, a Man could beat his wife.
Not too many years before then, he could kill her if he was in a bad mood.
The Wife was considered Chattel.
Today, we don't consider Wives to be the property of husbands and we shouldn't consider other sentient beings as chattel either
What do you define as "sentient beings"?
Too bad your morality is stuck in the 12th Century.
Not at all.
But that's about as far along as I expect dimocraps to get. Better than most
We're each entitled to our own expectations...but not to each other's bodies.
(Reader ... They're quite mad you know ... and sadly, it seems to be spreading.)
Indeed.
Good for you. Recognizing the problem is the essential first step to solving it.
Now, what are your intentions for step two of finding your way out of that madness and to reverse the spreading of your delusion?
I'd suggest you stop fomenting Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance through posting such on internet message boards.
It would at least be a good first step.
Or does Left-think teach them that their existence entitles them to the property of others and that they bear no responsibility for their actions,
Nope. Everyone is responsible for their actions but they aren't responsible for the actions of others. However, their existence entitles them to the same respect and dignity as a human being that is accorded the rich.
that sexual intercourse outside of marriage brings no risk,
Where did you come up with that buffoonery? We believe in sex education and that includes both the risks and pitfalls of pregnancy, proper use of and availability of contraception. Sex education means you might choose to abstain or you might choose to have sex responsibly - but you should not be ignorant. Of course that's part of the difference between Right-think and Left-think: you believe ignorance is better than education and that women should "just hold an asprin between your knees honey".
because they're rightfully entitled to murder the life they conceive or if they choose not to murder their pre-born child that they're entitled to demand the property of others, through state and federal subsidies.
Wow. Do you really hate women that much?
We're entitled to the same right you are - the right to control our own bodies and make our own reproductive decisions. If it is such an issue to you, I would be happy to find someone willing to donate her embryo to you for implantation. Otherwise, you and I are part of the safety net that ensures our nations most vulnerable are protected. Who knows - someday that might even include you in their numbers
And that if they do not work, that their entitled to the property of others through similar state and federal subsidies, robbing them of their inherent ambition.... stealing any hope of their being anything but poor and disenfranchised.
Oh? Many get out of poverty with a little help - something you would deny them.
Now, what do you suppose Christ's position is on the deceitful who foment such fraudulences upon the hapless innocent whose trust is wasted upon such evil?
My guess is that you're not going to truly appreciate the unenviable position that you're in, until the appreciation has passed from blessing, to curse.
My guess is, Christ's response to your distortions would be a face palmHe was not crazy about the rich and the inequalities of his time.
It's no longer your body when it has its own separate and recognizable DNA
Oh? Do you realize your own body is teeming with seperate and recognizable DNA?
Not too many years ago, a Man could beat his wife.
Not too many years before then, he could kill her if he was in a bad mood.
The Wife was considered Chattel.
Today, we don't consider Wives to be the property of husbands and we shouldn't consider other sentient beings as chattel either
What do you define as "sentient beings"?
Too bad your morality is stuck in the 12th Century.
Not at all.
But that's about as far along as I expect dimocraps to get. Better than most
We're each entitled to our own expectations...but not to each other's bodies.
I bet you'll get an A+ for that in your women's studies group.
But you're just simply dead wrong. All you're doing is quibbling.
If you want the right to terminate a pregnancy, just say so. But for you to mentally masturbate all over your computer screen is a bit much.
A fetus has distinct DNA, separate and recognizable from the Mother's and the Father's.
It is my opinion that once you accept the responsibility of carrying that separate DNA in your body, that the person inside of you has certain rights.
If that fetus was put there against your will, that's another matter entirely and you should be able to dispose of an unwanted fetus at will.
But once you accept that responsibility, either by incompetence, laziness and idiocy (ie, too lazy to go to the Drug Store) or with affirmative forethought, then it should be seen through.
Unless you're a dimocrap. In which case, you should be given an abortion on demand, at any time up to and including birth plus $5 from Crime Stop and an additional $20 from Mensa.
In some cases, you can be awarded up to $100 from the "Keep the Human Gene Pool Viable" fund.
So, in essence, we're on he same page.
Have you any idea how many organisms with seperate and independent DNA infest your body?
Have you any idea how many organisms with seperate and independent DNA infest your body?
With human DNA?
Yes I do happen to know he precise number of organisms in my body have himan DNA distinct from my own... And that precise number is: (you ready) ...
.
.
.
0
Have you any idea how many organisms with seperate and independent DNA infest your body?
With human DNA?
Yes I do happen to know he precise number of organisms in my body have himan DNA distinct from my own... And that precise number is: (you ready) ...
.
.
.
0
Ah...now you're moving the goal posts
You never specified human DNA.
Have you any idea how many organisms with seperate and independent DNA infest your body?
With human DNA?
Yes I do happen to know he precise number of organisms in my body have himan DNA distinct from my own... And that precise number is: (you ready) ...
.
.
.
0
Ah...now you're moving the goal posts
You never specified human DNA.
ROFL! Adorable...
The discussion is centered upon human beings and the human life conceived through the human physiological behavior central to marriage, which gestated in the womb of the female... And those who claim a right to murder that human life in order to escape the responsibilities inherent in the behavior they willfully engaged in.
Front that subject... You ran to equate that human life and the distinct DNA Intrinsic to it, with that of bacteria...
Which if you're keeping score, would be you moving the goal post.