Joe Biden gets into testy exchange with man over gun rights

[JustAGuy1]

The voter in Detroit accuses biden of planning to take guns and Sleepy Joe loses it

Joe Biden gets into testy exchange with man over gun rights - CNNPolitics

Washington (CNN)Joe Biden got into a testy exchange Tuesday with a worker in Detroit who falsely accused the former vice president of wanting to confiscate guns from Americans, a remark that caused the Democratic presidential hopeful to say the man was "full of s***."

Yeah, Trump certainly doesn't have that kind of potty mouth.

Oh, wait...


Joe Biden is not afraid to speak the truth to a Trumptard.

"You're full of shit."

Trump uses cuss words in his speech

but he does not curse at others because he is under control

The Pussy Grabber is under control! BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

A guy whose tweets are a neverending stream of insults.

Oh, man. That's rich.

At least Biden has the balls to call out someone to their face.

From a guy whose posts are a never ending string of insults...

Ironical ain't it?

 

[protectionist]

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, it is 100% bullshit to propose that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest.

You're the one completely ignoring the facts, while you go around calling names.

If you actually listened to her speech (which you DID NOT) Pam Blondie conviniently forgets to talk about what Shokin has been doing with his time in office - which is a crucial component of this matter.

Even Juliani did not try to claim that Shokin was clean, but tried to equate it out by saying that all officials are corrupt in Ukraine.

How clean or unclean Shokin was, is a DODGE. What matters is Shokin was an opponent of Burisma, which became airhead Hunter Biden's money tree.

Joe just didn't want Shokin around where he could interfere with Burisma. Pure personal interest. Biden didn't give a rat's ass about Shokin's record, other than Burisma.

Trouble with Democrats is, they think the American people are stupid. We're not.

 

[the other mike]

John McCain passes dossier alleging secret Trump-Russia contacts to FBI

 

[Faun]

...getting a corrupt prosecutor fired who was lining his pockets by squashing corruption cases against the rich in Ukraine IS NOT job well done? Since when??

IMF, DoS, EU and Ukrainian corruption watch groups and even prosecutor's own deputy all thought it was job well done...but hey, what the hell do they know.

Prosecutors don't squash corruption cases. Defense attorneys do that.

Prosecutor PROSECUTES the case. If prosecutor does not prosecute there is no PROSECUTION....mmk dumbass?

Shokin idled Burisma case for two years before Joe exerted pressure on Ukrainian parlament to get his do-nothing ass out.

Doesn't really matter what Shokin was doing. Important thing is Biden threatened to withhold a Billion $ in aid to Ukraine for something he wanted, not what the US wanted.

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy goals.

It is in our interest to have a strong, well governed Democracies on Russian border, Shokin's corrupt conduct of his office was undermining these goals.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, so to say that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest is pure bs.

Not bs at all. Shokin had been a thorn in the side of Burisma. That made him an enemy of Biden, when Biden's son came along and occupied a high position in the company, purely for corrupt leverage, hooked to Joe Biden's positions as US VP and involved with Ukraine.

Biden wanted Shokin out because he was on the opposite side of Burisma and Hunter Biden. Very obvious.

YOU are the dumbass.

Oh? How was Shokin a thorn in the size of Burisma? He was actively protecting Zlochevsky, Burisma's owner, from a British investigation by refusing to cooperate with a British court which had frozen some $23 million of Zlochevsky's assets.

 

[AntonToo]

Prosecutors don't squash corruption cases. Defense attorneys do that.

Prosecutor PROSECUTES the case. If prosecutor does not prosecute there is no PROSECUTION....mmk dumbass?

Shokin idled Burisma case for two years before Joe exerted pressure on Ukrainian parlament to get his do-nothing ass out.

Doesn't really matter what Shokin was doing. Important thing is Biden threatened to withhold a Billion $ in aid to Ukraine for something he wanted, not what the US wanted.

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy goals.

It is in our interest to have a strong, well governed Democracies on Russian border, Shokin's corrupt conduct of his office was undermining these goals.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, so to say that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest is pure bs.

Not bs at all. Shokin had been a thorn in the side of Burisma. That made him an enemy of Biden, when Biden's son came along and occupied a high position in the company, purely for corrupt leverage, hooked to Joe Biden's positions as US VP and involved with Ukraine.

Biden wanted Shokin out because he was on the opposite side of Burisma and Hunter Biden. Very obvious.

YOU are the dumbass.

Oh? How was Shokin a thorn in the size of Burisma? He was actively protecting Zlochevsky, Burisma's owner, from a British investigation by refusing to cooperate with a British court which had frozen some $23 million of Zlochevsky's assets.

Poor dumbass protectionist, nothing ever seems to add up in his little house of cards world.

 

[the other mike]

Trouble with Democrats is, they think the American people are stupid. We're not.

No worries. Thanks to Obama signing off on the Patriot Act and NDAA, Trump can just throw all the (D)issidents into coronavirus FEMA camps .

Wear your MAGA hats at the check points.

 

[AntonToo]

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, it is 100% bullshit to propose that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest.

You're the one completely ignoring the facts, while you go around calling names.

If you actually listened to her speech (which you DID NOT) Pam Blondie conviniently forgets to talk about what Shokin has been doing with his time in office - which is a crucial component of this matter.

Even Juliani did not try to claim that Shokin was clean, but tried to equate it out by saying that all officials are corrupt in Ukraine.

How clean or unclean Shokin was, is a DODGE. What matters is Shokin was an opponent of Burisma

Opponents of Burisma do not bury cases against it's wealthy owner.

 

[M14 Shooter]

John McCain passes dossier alleging secret Trump-Russia contacts to FBI

OMFG - Marcie Kaptur, D-OH
Never was there a bigger yes-man to the union and party bosses.
Why does she have a job? Mel Pelfrey, District 2 MEBA-AMO.

One of the greatest days in OH history was when the Ohio GOP forced Kaptur and Kucinich to face off in a primary election.

 

[protectionist]

Prosecutors don't squash corruption cases. Defense attorneys do that.

Prosecutor PROSECUTES the case. If prosecutor does not prosecute there is no PROSECUTION....mmk dumbass?

Shokin idled Burisma case for two years before Joe exerted pressure on Ukrainian parlament to get his do-nothing ass out.

Doesn't really matter what Shokin was doing. Important thing is Biden threatened to withhold a Billion $ in aid to Ukraine for something he wanted, not what the US wanted.

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy goals.

It is in our interest to have a strong, well governed Democracies on Russian border, Shokin's corrupt conduct of his office was undermining these goals.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, so to say that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest is pure bs.

Not bs at all. Shokin had been a thorn in the side of Burisma.

Bullshit, he did nothing on this case for two years before getting removed.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

Ukraine Ex-Official Casts Doubt on Biden Conflict Claim

Doesn't matter if it was 2 years, or 3, or 4. Point is, Shokin had been a Burisma opponent, and could resume at any time. That was good enough for the corrupt Biden boys.

 

[the other mike]

John McCain passes dossier alleging secret Trump-Russia contacts to FBI

OMFG - Marcie Kaptur, D-OH
Never was there a bigger yes-man to the union and party bosses.
Why does she have a job? Mel Pelfrey, District 2 MEBA-AMO.

Ambassador Yovanovich.

 

[Faun]

Trouble with Democrats is, they think the American people are stupid. We're not.

No worries. Thanks to Obama signing off on the Patriot Act and NDAA, Trump can just throw all the (D)issidents into coronavirus FEMA camps .

Wear your MAGA hats at the check points.

Wut?? The Patriot Act was signed into law in October, 2001.... who was president?

 

[AntonToo]

Prosecutor PROSECUTES the case. If prosecutor does not prosecute there is no PROSECUTION....mmk dumbass?

Shokin idled Burisma case for two years before Joe exerted pressure on Ukrainian parlament to get his do-nothing ass out.

Doesn't really matter what Shokin was doing. Important thing is Biden threatened to withhold a Billion $ in aid to Ukraine for something he wanted, not what the US wanted.

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy goals.

It is in our interest to have a strong, well governed Democracies on Russian border, Shokin's corrupt conduct of his office was undermining these goals.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, so to say that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest is pure bs.

Not bs at all. Shokin had been a thorn in the side of Burisma.

Bullshit, he did nothing on this case for two years before getting removed.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

Ukraine Ex-Official Casts Doubt on Biden Conflict Claim

Doesn't matter if it was 2 years, or 3, or 4. Point is, Shokin had been a Burisma opponent

WTF makes you think that that Shokin, who was refusing to co-operate with UK authorities on Burisma case was Burisma opponent?

Can you rationally explain or is it one of those dumbass things you make yourself belive because otherwise your house of cards falls apart?

 

[protectionist]

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, it is 100% bullshit to propose that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest.

You're the one completely ignoring the facts, while you go around calling names.

If you actually listened to her speech (which you DID NOT) Pam Blondie conviniently forgets to talk about what Shokin has been doing with his time in office - which is a crucial component of this matter.

Even Juliani did not try to claim that Shokin was clean, but tried to equate it out by saying that all officials are corrupt in Ukraine.

How clean or unclean Shokin was, is a DODGE. What matters is Shokin was an opponent of Burisma

Opponents of Burisma do not bury cases against it's wealthy owner.

. All that matters is Joe saw Shokin as an opponent of Burisma. Simple as that.

 

[Faun]

Prosecutor PROSECUTES the case. If prosecutor does not prosecute there is no PROSECUTION....mmk dumbass?

Shokin idled Burisma case for two years before Joe exerted pressure on Ukrainian parlament to get his do-nothing ass out.

Doesn't really matter what Shokin was doing. Important thing is Biden threatened to withhold a Billion $ in aid to Ukraine for something he wanted, not what the US wanted.

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy goals.

It is in our interest to have a strong, well governed Democracies on Russian border, Shokin's corrupt conduct of his office was undermining these goals.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, so to say that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest is pure bs.

Not bs at all. Shokin had been a thorn in the side of Burisma.

Bullshit, he did nothing on this case for two years before getting removed.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

Ukraine Ex-Official Casts Doubt on Biden Conflict Claim

Doesn't matter if it was 2 years, or 3, or 4. Point is, Shokin had been a Burisma opponent, and could resume at any time. That was good enough for the corrupt Biden boys.

I notice you keep repeating how Shokin was a thorn in Burisma's side but you're not giving any examples of how they were a thorn...

 

[Faun]

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, it is 100% bullshit to propose that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest.

You're the one completely ignoring the facts, while you go around calling names.

If you actually listened to her speech (which you DID NOT) Pam Blondie conviniently forgets to talk about what Shokin has been doing with his time in office - which is a crucial component of this matter.

Even Juliani did not try to claim that Shokin was clean, but tried to equate it out by saying that all officials are corrupt in Ukraine.

How clean or unclean Shokin was, is a DODGE. What matters is Shokin was an opponent of Burisma

Opponents of Burisma do not bury cases against it's wealthy owner.

. All that matters is Joe saw Shokin as an opponent of Burisma. Simple as that.

Why would Biden view Shokin as an opponent to Burisma when Shokin was protecting Zlochevsky?

As always, you make no sense.

 

[AntonToo]

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, it is 100% bullshit to propose that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest.

You're the one completely ignoring the facts, while you go around calling names.

If you actually listened to her speech (which you DID NOT) Pam Blondie conviniently forgets to talk about what Shokin has been doing with his time in office - which is a crucial component of this matter.

Even Juliani did not try to claim that Shokin was clean, but tried to equate it out by saying that all officials are corrupt in Ukraine.

How clean or unclean Shokin was, is a DODGE. What matters is Shokin was an opponent of Burisma

Opponents of Burisma do not bury cases against it's wealthy owner.

. All that matters is Joe saw Shokin as an opponent of Burisma. Simple as that.

 

[protectionist]

Doesn't really matter what Shokin was doing. Important thing is Biden threatened to withhold a Billion $ in aid to Ukraine for something he wanted, not what the US wanted.

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy goals.

It is in our interest to have a strong, well governed Democracies on Russian border, Shokin's corrupt conduct of his office was undermining these goals.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, so to say that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest is pure bs.

Not bs at all. Shokin had been a thorn in the side of Burisma.

Bullshit, he did nothing on this case for two years before getting removed.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

Ukraine Ex-Official Casts Doubt on Biden Conflict Claim

Doesn't matter if it was 2 years, or 3, or 4. Point is, Shokin had been a Burisma opponent

WTF makes you think that that Shokin, who was refusing to co-operate with UK authorities on Burisma case was Burisma opponent?

Can you rationally explain or is it one of those dumbass things you make yourself belive because otherwise your house of cards falls apart?

I could but I'd be typing more than I care to on a cell phone. So I'll do what you do. Drop a link.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

 

[protectionist]

You're the one completely ignoring the facts, while you go around calling names.

If you actually listened to her speech (which you DID NOT) Pam Blondie conviniently forgets to talk about what Shokin has been doing with his time in office - which is a crucial component of this matter.

Even Juliani did not try to claim that Shokin was clean, but tried to equate it out by saying that all officials are corrupt in Ukraine.

How clean or unclean Shokin was, is a DODGE. What matters is Shokin was an opponent of Burisma

Opponents of Burisma do not bury cases against it's wealthy owner.

. All that matters is Joe saw Shokin as an opponent of Burisma. Simple as that.

Why would Biden view Shokin as an opponent to Burisma when Shokin was protecting Zlochevsky?

As always, you make no sense.

Read the link. Get informed.

 

[AntonToo]

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy goals.

It is in our interest to have a strong, well governed Democracies on Russian border, Shokin's corrupt conduct of his office was undermining these goals.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, so to say that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest is pure bs.

Not bs at all. Shokin had been a thorn in the side of Burisma.

Bullshit, he did nothing on this case for two years before getting removed.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

Ukraine Ex-Official Casts Doubt on Biden Conflict Claim

Doesn't matter if it was 2 years, or 3, or 4. Point is, Shokin had been a Burisma opponent

WTF makes you think that that Shokin, who was refusing to co-operate with UK authorities on Burisma case was Burisma opponent?

Can you rationally explain or is it one of those dumbass things you make yourself belive because otherwise your house of cards falls apart?

I could but I'd be typing more than I care to on a cell phone. So I'll do what you do. Drop a link.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

1.) If the Ukraine prosecutor’s firing involved only his alleged corruption and ineptitude, why did Burisma's American legal team refer to those allegations as “false information?"

BECAUSE SHOKIN WAS SHIELDING THEM - DUH.


2.) If the firing had nothing to do with the Burisma case, as Biden has adamantly claimed, why would Burisma’s American lawyers contact the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case?

BECAUSE SHOKIN WAS SHIELDING THEM - DUH.

 

[Faun]

No dumbass, it 100% matters - if Shokin was an empediment to Ukraine dealing with it's vast corruption problems then Joe Biden forcing his removal was perfectly consistent with faithful conduct of American foreign policy goals.

It is in our interest to have a strong, well governed Democracies on Russian border, Shokin's corrupt conduct of his office was undermining these goals.

Removal of Shokin was pushed by the DoS, EU, IMF and Ukrainian corruption watch groups, so to say that this was somehow Biden's unique personal interest is pure bs.

Not bs at all. Shokin had been a thorn in the side of Burisma.

Bullshit, he did nothing on this case for two years before getting removed.

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

Ukraine Ex-Official Casts Doubt on Biden Conflict Claim

Doesn't matter if it was 2 years, or 3, or 4. Point is, Shokin had been a Burisma opponent

WTF makes you think that that Shokin, who was refusing to co-operate with UK authorities on Burisma case was Burisma opponent?

Can you rationally explain or is it one of those dumbass things you make yourself belive because otherwise your house of cards falls apart?

I could but I'd be typing more than I care to on a cell phone. So I'll do what you do. Drop a link.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

What you posted was an opinion piece.

Even worse, an opinion piece with discredited lies, such as Solomon's claim that Shokin was actively investigating Burisma.

Even worse still, it's an opinion piece containing lies by an opinion writer whose credibility was disemboweled by his former employer, The Hill...

The Hill's review of John Solomon's columns on Ukraine