Joe The World's Dumbest Politician Biden Says He’d Defy Subpoena to Testify in Trump’s Senate Trial

[Ray From Cleveland]

What part of the video confuses you?

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Do you realize how stupid that remark is? What you're saying is that Joe had the prosecutor fired because he was not doing enough to investigate a corrupt business his son worked for, and you expect anything but a dumb Democrat to believe that?

It doesn't even make any sense. Especially when Shokin did an interview explaining that he was indeed investigating Burisma, and in particular, Hunter and a money laundering scheme. That's when Joe flew down there and had him fired.

Shokin's claim is certainly more believable than the tales from the Democrat party and MSM.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

So Hunter working at a job he had zero experience in for 50k a month was on the up and up?
I got a bridge to sell ya.....

That has nothing to do with the video.
It was shady....as in nepotism shady and looks bad shady. He shouldn't have taken the gig. Joe
should have told him to refuse. But he didn't. Looks bad.

But there is no evidence of ant corruption between Joe Biden and Burisma. None. They were
investigated. Nothing. Stop lying.

Yet you've done nothing but offer your weak ass opinion on the matter.

 

[LoneLaugher]

None of it. Why are you unable to grasp the concept and characterize it accurately? Are you a moron?

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Do you realize how stupid that remark is? What you're saying is that Joe had the prosecutor fired because he was not doing enough to investigate a corrupt business his son worked for, and you expect anything but a dumb Democrat to believe that?

It doesn't even make any sense. Especially when Shokin did an interview explaining that he was indeed investigating Burisma, and in particular, Hunter and a money laundering scheme. That's when Joe flew down there and had him fired.

Shokin's claim is certainly more believable than the tales from the Democrat party and MSM.

Your timing is fucked. And you are too dishonest to admit it.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Do you realize how stupid that remark is? What you're saying is that Joe had the prosecutor fired because he was not doing enough to investigate a corrupt business his son worked for, and you expect anything but a dumb Democrat to believe that?

It doesn't even make any sense. Especially when Shokin did an interview explaining that he was indeed investigating Burisma, and in particular, Hunter and a money laundering scheme. That's when Joe flew down there and had him fired.

Shokin's claim is certainly more believable than the tales from the Democrat party and MSM.

Your timing is fucked. And you are too dishonest to admit it.

Again with your opinions.

 

[LoneLaugher]

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

So Hunter working at a job he had zero experience in for 50k a month was on the up and up?
I got a bridge to sell ya.....

That has nothing to do with the video.
It was shady....as in nepotism shady and looks bad shady. He shouldn't have taken the gig. Joe
should have told him to refuse. But he didn't. Looks bad.

But there is no evidence of ant corruption between Joe Biden and Burisma. None. They were
investigated. Nothing. Stop lying.

Yet you've done nothing but offer your weak ass opinion on the matter.

I've provided facts.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Do you realize how stupid that remark is? What you're saying is that Joe had the prosecutor fired because he was not doing enough to investigate a corrupt business his son worked for, and you expect anything but a dumb Democrat to believe that?

It doesn't even make any sense. Especially when Shokin did an interview explaining that he was indeed investigating Burisma, and in particular, Hunter and a money laundering scheme. That's when Joe flew down there and had him fired.

Shokin's claim is certainly more believable than the tales from the Democrat party and MSM.

Your timing is fucked. And you are too dishonest to admit it.

Timing of what? It has nothing to do with timing. It has to do with the likely possibility that Joe had Shokin fired to help protect his son. If that can be proven, it makes what Trump did a nothing burger. That's the reason for the knee-jerk reaction by the commies when they learned that Trump was curious about Joe and Hunter.

 

[edward37]

Military drill between China Russia and Iran and some one called Joe dumb ?? Trump is a major AH for letting this happen

 

[jknowgood]

You keep flapping your lips but nothing is coming out as far as clarifying your position.

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Lol, Biden was a part of the corruption. That's what the prosecuter was investigating. When Biden forced them to fire him.

That is a false statement. You are now done. Liars suck.

No lie in that statement. You're a fool.

 

[LoneLaugher]

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Do you realize how stupid that remark is? What you're saying is that Joe had the prosecutor fired because he was not doing enough to investigate a corrupt business his son worked for, and you expect anything but a dumb Democrat to believe that?

It doesn't even make any sense. Especially when Shokin did an interview explaining that he was indeed investigating Burisma, and in particular, Hunter and a money laundering scheme. That's when Joe flew down there and had him fired.

Shokin's claim is certainly more believable than the tales from the Democrat party and MSM.

Your timing is fucked. And you are too dishonest to admit it.

Timing of what? It has nothing to do with timing. It has to do with the likely possibility that Joe had Shokin fired to help protect his son. If that can be proven, it makes what Trump did a nothing burger. That's the reason for the knee-jerk reaction by the commies when they learned that Trump was curious about Joe and Hunter.

Likely possibility? No. Impossibility. That did not happen. You need to check the timeline of events. Biden firing Sholkin was unrelated to any Burisma
investigation. No Burisma investigation was paused, stopped or interfered with by the firing of Sholkin. This is already a known fact.

You are lying. Over and over again.

 

[LoneLaugher]

My position is that, given the facts, Joe Biden asked for a proper quid pro quo in that video. His ask was for something...specifically a more
capable prosecutor to rid Ukraine of corruption, that benefited the US and the US's foreign policy goals. So...it was, in every way, A PERFECT VIDEO.

Asshole.

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Lol, Biden was a part of the corruption. That's what the prosecuter was investigating. When Biden forced them to fire him.

That is a false statement. You are now done. Liars suck.

No lie in that statement. You're a fool.

You are lying. The facts are known.

 

[Likkmee]

Leeeeeave Joe alone !

 

[jknowgood]

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Lol, Biden was a part of the corruption. That's what the prosecuter was investigating. When Biden forced them to fire him.

That is a false statement. You are now done. Liars suck.

No lie in that statement. You're a fool.

You are lying. The facts are known.

Like Biden said we believe In truth, not facts. He does represent your party well.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

So Hunter working at a job he had zero experience in for 50k a month was on the up and up?
I got a bridge to sell ya.....

That has nothing to do with the video.
It was shady....as in nepotism shady and looks bad shady. He shouldn't have taken the gig. Joe
should have told him to refuse. But he didn't. Looks bad.

But there is no evidence of ant corruption between Joe Biden and Burisma. None. They were
investigated. Nothing. Stop lying.

Yet you've done nothing but offer your weak ass opinion on the matter.

I've provided facts.

Well then back em up.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You stupid Fuck!!!
Barisma is corrupt as hell!!!

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

Do you realize how stupid that remark is? What you're saying is that Joe had the prosecutor fired because he was not doing enough to investigate a corrupt business his son worked for, and you expect anything but a dumb Democrat to believe that?

It doesn't even make any sense. Especially when Shokin did an interview explaining that he was indeed investigating Burisma, and in particular, Hunter and a money laundering scheme. That's when Joe flew down there and had him fired.

Shokin's claim is certainly more believable than the tales from the Democrat party and MSM.

Your timing is fucked. And you are too dishonest to admit it.

Timing of what? It has nothing to do with timing. It has to do with the likely possibility that Joe had Shokin fired to help protect his son. If that can be proven, it makes what Trump did a nothing burger. That's the reason for the knee-jerk reaction by the commies when they learned that Trump was curious about Joe and Hunter.

Likely possibility? No. Impossibility. That did not happen. You need to check the timeline of events. Biden firing Sholkin was unrelated to any Burisma
investigation. No Burisma investigation was paused, stopped or interfered with by the firing of Sholkin. This is already a known fact.

You are lying. Over and over again.

You should be able to prove that then.
If you're so sure tell us where you got your info.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Yep. And Biden was seeking a tougher prosecutor to investigate said corruption.

If you guy would stop lying, you'd have nothing to say. It is really odd.

So Hunter working at a job he had zero experience in for 50k a month was on the up and up?
I got a bridge to sell ya.....

That has nothing to do with the video.
It was shady....as in nepotism shady and looks bad shady. He shouldn't have taken the gig. Joe
should have told him to refuse. But he didn't. Looks bad.

But there is no evidence of ant corruption between Joe Biden and Burisma. None. They were
investigated. Nothing. Stop lying.

Yet you've done nothing but offer your weak ass opinion on the matter.

I've provided facts.

Well then back em up.

Timeline: Key dates in the U.S. political controversy over Ukraine

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

So Hunter working at a job he had zero experience in for 50k a month was on the up and up?
I got a bridge to sell ya.....

That has nothing to do with the video.
It was shady....as in nepotism shady and looks bad shady. He shouldn't have taken the gig. Joe
should have told him to refuse. But he didn't. Looks bad.

But there is no evidence of ant corruption between Joe Biden and Burisma. None. They were
investigated. Nothing. Stop lying.

Yet you've done nothing but offer your weak ass opinion on the matter.

I've provided facts.

Well then back em up.

Timeline: Key dates in the U.S. political controversy over Ukraine

What the hell does that prove....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

So Hunter working at a job he had zero experience in for 50k a month was on the up and up?
I got a bridge to sell ya.....

That has nothing to do with the video.
It was shady....as in nepotism shady and looks bad shady. He shouldn't have taken the gig. Joe
should have told him to refuse. But he didn't. Looks bad.

But there is no evidence of ant corruption between Joe Biden and Burisma. None. They were
investigated. Nothing. Stop lying.

Yet you've done nothing but offer your weak ass opinion on the matter.

I've provided facts.

Well then back em up.

Timeline: Key dates in the U.S. political controversy over Ukraine

So I guess Biden should have no problem with the subpoena right?

 

[LoneLaugher]

That has nothing to do with the video.
It was shady....as in nepotism shady and looks bad shady. He shouldn't have taken the gig. Joe
should have told him to refuse. But he didn't. Looks bad.

But there is no evidence of ant corruption between Joe Biden and Burisma. None. They were
investigated. Nothing. Stop lying.

Yet you've done nothing but offer your weak ass opinion on the matter.

I've provided facts.

Well then back em up.

Timeline: Key dates in the U.S. political controversy over Ukraine

What the hell does that prove....

Timeline. It is known fact. Now fuck off. I'm bored with the fucking dishonesty.

 

[LoneLaugher]

That has nothing to do with the video.
It was shady....as in nepotism shady and looks bad shady. He shouldn't have taken the gig. Joe
should have told him to refuse. But he didn't. Looks bad.

But there is no evidence of ant corruption between Joe Biden and Burisma. None. They were
investigated. Nothing. Stop lying.

Yet you've done nothing but offer your weak ass opinion on the matter.

I've provided facts.

Well then back em up.

Timeline: Key dates in the U.S. political controversy over Ukraine

So I guess Biden should have no problem with the subpoena right?

You'll have to ask him. Do all innocent people obey subpoenas or do some go to court to have them enforced?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yet you've done nothing but offer your weak ass opinion on the matter.

I've provided facts.

Well then back em up.

Timeline: Key dates in the U.S. political controversy over Ukraine

So I guess Biden should have no problem with the subpoena right?

You'll have to ask him. Do all innocent people obey subpoenas or do some go to court to have them enforced?

You go to court. That's what the Republicans did when Obama obstructed Congress that he didn't get impeached for.