Jonathan Turley on the Unsigned 4-3 Colorado Decison Regarding President Trump.

Turley is a complete republican shill. He would eat tRump's feces if they told him to.
Turley is a true constitutional expert. He’s not a Trump supporter. He’s a supporter of the constitutional restraints placed upon the three branches of the federal government. That infludes the judicial branch.
 
Why would you have been shocked when Bush attacked Iraq? Were you not paying attention?

The problem here is that under the strict letter of the law, Trump did forment an insurrection, and under the 14th Amendment, is banned from holding office.
he hasnt been charged or found guilty of insurrection .. should Texas and Arizona kick Briben off the ballot for for not fulfilling his duties and protecting our borders ?
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but the US Constitution declares the eligibility requirements for the presidency and Trump meets all of them. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment does not apply because Trump has not been found guilty of insurrection, and in this country we do not assume guilt. We are innocent until proven guilty, and this decision by the Colorado SC is despicable, blatant politics that in fact undermines democracy rather than bolsters it. Let the people choose, THAT is democracy.
 
Of course, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment does not apply here, for several reasons, in fact.

Maybe that's why the decision is unsigned? None of the 4 of the 4-3 majority wants to own it.



You would be better off listening to Oswald Bates.

 
Turley is a true constitutional expert. He’s not a Trump supporter. He’s a supporter of the constitutional restraints placed upon the three branches of the federal government. That infludes the judicial branch.
sure2.gif
 
Please show us the language in the 14th that requires a conviction to be removed for insurgency.
Please show us the language in the 14th that requires a red conviction to be removed for insurgency.
There first needs to be this insurrection, rebellion or insurgence. Seeing that the investigations couldn’t find one, this ruling will be struck down as a partisan motivated stunt.
 
Wouldn't legislation that required all absentee or mail in ballots be sent and received by certified or registered mail solve this? The added cost would encourage in person voting.
 
Please show us the language in the 14th that requires a conviction to be removed for insurgency.

Seriously? All you gotta do is charge somebody? Jesus Christ dude, it was almost 3 effing years ago and NOBODY has been convicted on insurgency. NOBODY. There was no insurgency until somebody gets convicted of it, you don't get to declare it to be so cuz you want it to be so. So the democrats accuse Trump and bring the charge against him and that's it, he can't run for the presidency? After 3 effing years? And you don't think this action positively reels of partisan politics rather than actual justice?

I thought the Left was so concerned about democracy, what happened to let the people decide who they want for their next president. This sounds like a threat to democracy where somebody wants to deny the voters the opportunity to vote for their candidate of their choice.
 
There first needs to be this insurrection, rebellion or insurgence. Seeing that the investigations couldn’t find one, this ruling will be struck down as a partisan motivated stunt.
They found one and said so repeatedly. The proof does not require a legal conviction is what has hamstrung you
 
Seriously? All you gotta do is charge somebody? Jesus Christ dude, it was almost 3 effing years ago and NOBODY has been convicted on insurgency. NOBODY. There was no insurgency until somebody gets convicted of it, you don't get to declare it to be so cuz you want it to be so. So the democrats accuse Trump and bring the charge against him and that's it, he can't run for the presidency? After 3 effing years? And you don't think this action positively reels of partisan politics rather than actual justice?

I thought the Left was so concerned about democracy, what happened to let the people decide who they want for their next president. This sounds like a threat to democracy where somebody wants to deny the voters the opportunity to vote for their candidate of their choice.
task078 shows why he is MAGA: he can't reason logically,

Show us in the 14th the language that requires a charge and conviction
 
Turley is a true constitutional expert. He’s not a Trump supporter. He’s a supporter of the constitutional restraints placed upon the three branches of the federal government. That infludes the judicial branch.

Turley is a $10.00 whore.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the US Constitution declares the eligibility requirements for the presidency and Trump meets all of them. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment does not apply because Trump has not been found guilty of insurrection, and in this country we do not assume guilt. We are innocent until proven guilty, and this decision by the Colorado SC is despicable, blatant politics that in fact undermines democracy rather than bolsters it. Let the people choose, THAT is democracy.

Well, you'd be wrong. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment doesn't require a conviction, mere participation in an insurrection is adequate. Trump was impeached and indicted for his participation in January 6th.
 
Of course, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment does not apply here, for several reasons, in fact.

Maybe that's why the decision is unsigned? None of the 4 of the 4-3 majority wants to own it.



Memes Are for Mice

If there really had been an insurrection, Trump would have absolute power now. Instead, January 6 was no different from the Boston Tea Party, that is, a non-lethal show of sentiment. GOPers are being annoying and slavish by listening to Influencer jackasses who tell them to claim it was an FBI plot. That's as silly as if the original patriots claimed that British agents dumped the tea.
 
with Trump blowing Xiden out of the water in the latest polls nationally...it is no surprise to see the Demafascist make this move.
 
That's fake news.
nah, the polls are real.

Trump Takes 2024 Lead as Biden Approval Hits New Low ...


It appear though the more facist the demafacsit get, attacking democracy, the more the people react...


Trump is now 'MORE likely to beat Biden' after Colorado ruling: Top pollster says controversial state Supreme Court decision will lead to a huge surge​

 
nah, the polls are real.

Trump Takes 2024 Lead as Biden Approval Hits New Low ...


It appear though the more facist the demafacsit get, attacking democracy, the more the people react...


Trump is now 'MORE likely to beat Biden' after Colorado ruling: Top pollster says controversial state Supreme Court decision will lead to a huge surge​

No, they aren't. Media needs a close race to sell ads. They are weighting the polls to get that race. tRump, in reality, hadn't got a prayer.
 

Forum List

Back
Top