"Judge" Napolitano is inept as a legal expert!

[busybee01]

Nappy has been upset ever since he pitched Trump appointing him to the Supreme Court and got turned down.

I care very little about Trump. He's just another New York Democrat.

With regard to the topic itself, we have a very good guide. It's called the constitution.

Federalist papers, conveniently, are a blueprint for a better understanding of it.

The constitution supports constitutional statutes, one of which permits the federal government to protect federal properties...such as federal buildings. That is the sole reason for the presence of federal officers in Portland at this time. They were protecting the federal courthouse. They were not sent there to assist the local LEO in dealing with protestors unrelated to the federal courthouse. Despite what the asshole liberal leaders in Oregon stated, they did identify themselves to the persons they were arresting.

Watch the news. You might learn something now and then.

No they were not. They were dragging people off of the streets well beyond the boundaries of the federal building. They have no authority to drag anyone away beyond the boundaries of the federal building.

Yes they do. There is no such thing as throwing fireworks then running down the street laughing that you got away. Federal authorities can pursue felons that have vandalized federal property.

They do not have the right to enforce local laws. They clearly were not dragging people away because they committed a federal crime. Some of these were clearly illegal.

 

[busybee01]

Read the law:

Nappy has been upset ever since he pitched Trump appointing him to the Supreme Court and got turned down.

I care very little about Trump. He's just another New York Democrat.

With regard to the topic itself, we have a very good guide. It's called the constitution.

Federalist papers, conveniently, are a blueprint for a better understanding of it.

The constitution supports constitutional statutes, one of which permits the federal government to protect federal properties...such as federal buildings. That is the sole reason for the presence of federal officers in Portland at this time. They were protecting the federal courthouse. They were not sent there to assist the local LEO in dealing with protestors unrelated to the federal courthouse. Despite what the asshole liberal leaders in Oregon stated, they did identify themselves to the persons they were arresting.

Watch the news. You might learn something now and then.

No they were not. They were dragging people off of the streets well beyond the boundaries of the federal building. They have no authority to drag anyone away beyond the boundaries of the federal building.

Read the law:

Pay attention where it says "on and off the property"

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:40%20section:1315%20edition:prelim)

E) conduct investigations, on and off the property in question, of offenses that may have been committed against property owned or occupied by the Federal Government or persons on the property;

They still have to have probable cause. They cannot drag someone off the street just for the hell of it.

 

[busybee01]

Not being sure how much Napolitano is paid by Fox News to be their resident legal "expert", I can still say without any doubt that he's being overpaid.

I've seen this goofball several times come on as a guest and make stupid mistakes regarding interpretation of US law and the constitution.

Just today, he claimed that federal LEO cannot operate within a state without an invitation from the governor of that state or a mayor within that state. He says that President Trump's sending federal officers into Portland was wrong and unconstitutional.

Napolitano is FULL OF SHIT! Federal LEO can go to wherever federal laws are broken. They can investigate, pursue, arrest and prosecute persons suspected of committing federal crimes. They can protect federal properties from vandalism and deliberate damage by persons participating in protests and riots WHETHER THEY ARE INVITED INTO THE STATE OR NOT.

https://www.independent.co.uk/ /wor...l-troops-trump-unconstitutional-a9629631.html

Makes me want to send a big to the arrogant little Napoleon!

He must have criticized Trump and triggered the White House which automatically triggers his echo chamber of lemmings, the Whaaaa weeping patrol snowflake crybabies.

You wanna here an echo chamber? Just listen to the fake news media parroting the liberal talking points. This is but one example:

Tucker Carlson is a Trump propaganda outlet. Fake news is what Carlson does.

 

[asaratis]

Read the law:

Nappy has been upset ever since he pitched Trump appointing him to the Supreme Court and got turned down.

I care very little about Trump. He's just another New York Democrat.

With regard to the topic itself, we have a very good guide. It's called the constitution.

Federalist papers, conveniently, are a blueprint for a better understanding of it.

The constitution supports constitutional statutes, one of which permits the federal government to protect federal properties...such as federal buildings. That is the sole reason for the presence of federal officers in Portland at this time. They were protecting the federal courthouse. They were not sent there to assist the local LEO in dealing with protestors unrelated to the federal courthouse. Despite what the asshole liberal leaders in Oregon stated, they did identify themselves to the persons they were arresting.

Watch the news. You might learn something now and then.

No they were not. They were dragging people off of the streets well beyond the boundaries of the federal building. They have no authority to drag anyone away beyond the boundaries of the federal building.

Read the law:

Pay attention where it says "on and off the property"

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:40%20section:1315%20edition:prelim)

E) conduct investigations, on and off the property in question, of offenses that may have been committed against property owned or occupied by the Federal Government or persons on the property;

They still have to have probable cause. They cannot drag someone off the street just for the hell of it.

Is it not possible that the federal officers had video evidence of the perpetrator violating federal laws? Do you actually think they have no access to cameras and videos? Does your mommy know you're on the internet?