flacaltenn
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #81
And what does the "party" think comrade??
The usual leftist explanation is that they do not stand a significant chance of dying as a result of terrorism, so the negligible chance that it will happen to them, personally, means it is an unimportant issue.
In most cases, a person is considered a sociopath when they display a consistent pattern of thinking only of themself with absolutely no concern for others.
These illiberal leftists have managed to turn sociopathy into a shared experience.
Might actually be a math deficit then huh? I mean acts of violence tend to be random and unpredicted. While THESE particular acts are anything but random and unpredicted. So it's not the absolute number that matters, but the frequency and the repeated ORIGIN of the violence.
It's like disease prevention. If you understand the vectors and causes of a disease, there's less of an excuse for the consequences. Doesn't have to be the largest killer..
In terms of numbers -- there are about 40 LITIGATED terror cases that were "stopped". Some were clear entrapment, but the majority are acts that COULD HAVE increased the numbers big time. Maybe double? Triple?
And then -- leftists love to quote probabilities of injury and harm for terrorism -- but always exclude the losses of Americans abroad. Which easily DOUBLES that number.