Just To Confirm....

[JoeB131]

There was no ability to inspect, so no one, at any time, knew if they were abiding.....

Except even Trump had to admit that they were abiding by the agreement in 2017.

AP Report: Trump administration to confirm Iran is complying with nuclear deal

The IAEA admitted Iran was in compliance.

Iran is complying with nuclear deal restrictions: IAEA report

"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”

YOu really think that you can hide a massive nuclear program in 24 hours? Without anyone noticing you are moving tons of equipment?

This wasn’t the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "

The Zionists have been claiming Iran is about to get a Nuke since 1992.... I think we can stop taking them seriously.

When are we going to inspect Israel's nuclear facilities?

 

[PoliticalChic]

There was no ability to inspect, so no one, at any time, knew if they were abiding.....

Except even Trump had to admit that they were abiding by the agreement in 2017.

AP Report: Trump administration to confirm Iran is complying with nuclear deal

The IAEA admitted Iran was in compliance.

Iran is complying with nuclear deal restrictions: IAEA report

"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”

YOu really think that you can hide a massive nuclear program in 24 hours? Without anyone noticing you are moving tons of equipment?

This wasn’t the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "

The Zionists have been claiming Iran is about to get a Nuke since 1992.... I think we can stop taking them seriously.

When are we going to inspect Israel's nuclear facilities?

I am the only one you should ever listen to because.....

....I AM NEVER WRONG.

 

[JoeB131]

I am the only one you should ever listen to because.....

....I AM NEVER WRONG.

Um, yeah, some Mail Order Bride who cut and pastes what she reads on right wing websites like she had an original idea doesn't comprise being "right".

The Iran deal was working. All the other signatories were just fine with it. At some point, they are just going to ignore Trump and resume trade with Iran, and now Iran doesn't have to comply with any agreement.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I am the only one you should ever listen to because.....

....I AM NEVER WRONG.

Um, yeah, some Mail Order Bride who cut and pastes what she reads on right wing websites like she had an original idea doesn't comprise being "right".

The Iran deal was working. All the other signatories were just fine with it. At some point, they are just going to ignore Trump and resume trade with Iran, and now Iran doesn't have to comply with any agreement.

“Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.”
Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close




There never was ANY intention by the Muslim former President to put any bars in place of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
I'm never wrong.

 

[j-mac]

When is Trump going to get that better Iran nuclear deal he promised ?

When are you going to post honestly?

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

 

[JoeB131]

Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.”
Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

There never was ANY intention by the Muslim former President to put any bars in place of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
I'm never wrong.

Again, except the IAEA and even the State Department had to admit the Iranians were complying.

Even Trump couldn't cite a single violation of the accord.

 

[Mindful]

There was no ability to inspect, so no one, at any time, knew if they were abiding.....

Except even Trump had to admit that they were abiding by the agreement in 2017.

AP Report: Trump administration to confirm Iran is complying with nuclear deal

The IAEA admitted Iran was in compliance.

Iran is complying with nuclear deal restrictions: IAEA report

"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”

YOu really think that you can hide a massive nuclear program in 24 hours? Without anyone noticing you are moving tons of equipment?

This wasn’t the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "

The Zionists have been claiming Iran is about to get a Nuke since 1992.... I think we can stop taking them seriously.

When are we going to inspect Israel's nuclear facilities?

Your moral equivalence is stunning.

No nuclear weapons, no Israel.

But you'd like that, wouldn't you?

 

[easyt65]

....that everything we on the Right have said about Obama, Iran, nuclear weapons.....is true and correct....


1. "Report On 1,500 Protesters Killed And Khamenei's Role Reverberates Among Iranians"
https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-denies-report-on-khamenei-s-responsibility-for-killing-1500-protesters/30341052.html




2. "Special Report: Iran’s leader ordered crackdown on unrest - 'Do whatever it takes to end it'"
Special Report: Iran’s leader ordered crackdown on unrest - 'Do whatever it takes to end it'




3. Do you require more confirmation of Hussein Obama's religious affiliation....the only possible explanation for his guarantee of nuclear weapons to these 7th century savages?



Ready to admit it, Democrats????

President Trump should be held accountable for Iran murdering so many of its oppressed citizens...



.

 

[JoeB131]

Your moral equivalence is stunning.

No nuclear weapons, no Israel.

But you'd like that, wouldn't you?

Wouldn't bother me a bit... The Zionist Entity is an apartheid abomination.... the world will be so much better off when it ends.

So why does the Zionist Entity get to have Nukes but Iran can't?

 

[Mindful]

Your moral equivalence is stunning.

No nuclear weapons, no Israel.

But you'd like that, wouldn't you?

Wouldn't bother me a bit... The Zionist Entity is an apartheid abomination.... the world will be so much better off when it ends.

So why does the Zionist Entity get to have Nukes but Iran can't?

Are you serious?

 

[JoeB131]

Are you serious?

I'm totally serious. Why do the Zionists get to have Nukes but Iran can't? Not because they are a democracy... you can't call yourself that when you don't let half your people vote because they'd vote to disband the country.

(Iran also has elections, but never mind.)

It would be nice if no one has nukes... This country we give them to Actors and Peanut Farmers and Game Show Hosts.

 

[Mindful]

Are you serious?

I'm totally serious. Why do the Zionists get to have Nukes but Iran can't? Not because they are a democracy... you can't call yourself that when you don't let half your people vote because they'd vote to disband the country.

(Iran also has elections, but never mind.)

It would be nice if no one has nukes... This country we give them to Actors and Peanut Farmers and Game Show Hosts.

I'm not taking you seriously.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.”
Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

There never was ANY intention by the Muslim former President to put any bars in place of Iran getting nuclear weapons.
I'm never wrong.

Again, except the IAEA and even the State Department had to admit the Iranians were complying.

Even Trump couldn't cite a single violation of the accord.

I just proved that there was never any way to tell if they were complying.

I'd demand you stop lying.....but then, you'd be mute.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....that everything we on the Right have said about Obama, Iran, nuclear weapons.....is true and correct....


1. "Report On 1,500 Protesters Killed And Khamenei's Role Reverberates Among Iranians"
https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-denies-report-on-khamenei-s-responsibility-for-killing-1500-protesters/30341052.html




2. "Special Report: Iran’s leader ordered crackdown on unrest - 'Do whatever it takes to end it'"
Special Report: Iran’s leader ordered crackdown on unrest - 'Do whatever it takes to end it'




3. Do you require more confirmation of Hussein Obama's religious affiliation....the only possible explanation for his guarantee of nuclear weapons to these 7th century savages?



Ready to admit it, Democrats????

President Trump should be held accountable for Iran murdering so many of its oppressed citizens...



.

Democrats/Liberals are the most unself-aware of people.....they'll never get the sarcasm.

 

[JoeB131]

I just proved that there was never any way to tell if they were complying.

I'd demand you stop lying.....but then, you'd be mute.

You didn't prove anything of the sort. Even the Trump Administration had to admit they were in compliance.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I just proved that there was never any way to tell if they were complying.

I'd demand you stop lying.....but then, you'd be mute.

You didn't prove anything of the sort. Even the Trump Administration had to admit they were in compliance.

Moron.
There were no inspections.

The Obamunists count on morons like you to parrot the party line...'were too!!!!!"



Let's check:


"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”


This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iran’s declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA it’s doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it can’t, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the agreement text.)"

Why Is Iran’s Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq



==============================================



“Particularly troublesome, you have to wait 24 days before you can inspect.”

–Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), speaking to reporters about the international nuclear agreement with Iran, Aug. 10, 2015

“At non-designated sites it will take 24 days to get an inspection.”

–Schumer, speaking to reporters, Aug. 11

=======================================================



" The prime minister exhorted International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano to “go and inspect this atomic warehouse immediately,” before Iran hides its contents.

A week later, however, the IAEA rejected his suggestion. In a statement, the agency said, “All information obtained, including from third parties, is subject to rigorous review and assessed together with other available information to arrive at an independent assessment based on the agency’s own expertise.”

This wasn’t the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "

... at least twice the IAEA has acknowledged it was not verifying compliance."
What the IAEA doesn't know — or want to know — about Iran’s nuclear program

==============================================================


Proof of the lack of inspections is right here:

“Netanyahu Exposes Iran’s Nuclear Facade

Another secret nuclear facility is revealed as Iran continues to push its nuclear program forward.

… Netanyahu’s press conference came hours after the International Atomic Energy Agency revealed that it found traces of uranium from Iran’s secret atomic warehouse.

This latest information comes a year and a half after Netanyahu first revealed Iran’s secret nuclear archive, which exposed Iran’s plan to develop five nuclear warheads as early as 2003. It also comes a year after he exposed an Iranian secret nuclear warehouse in Tehran and asked the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect the site, where he claimed Iran had once stored 33 pounds of radioactive material, which it disguised as rug cleaner. In April, Reuters reported that the agency had inspected the site and took samples for analysis.

A few hours before Netanyahu’s speech, the International Atomic Energy Agency announced the discovery of traces of uranium from the sample taken at the Tehran warehouse, the same element Iran is enriching and one of the only two fissile elements with which it is possible to develop a nuclear bomb.

Netanyahu responded to the discovery by calling it a direct violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. He also showed satellite images of the warehouse, which illustrate that Iran literally covered it up with gravel.” Netanyahu Exposes Iran’s Nuclear Facade

It was a bad agreement for the beginning. We said it years ago. And let me tell you a few examples about why it is a bad agreement. You cannot inspect the facilities. You have to let them know in advance if you want to come to inspect the military facilities. It's a joke. They continue with a ballistic missile program. Prime Minister Netanyahu exposed documents that we found in Tehran and we showed it to the world that they're continuing with their ballistic missile program. Third, is the issue of the expiration date. What will happen in five, six, seven years and the most important the President has talk about it is the funding. Today they have a lot of funding and they put into their military and sponsoring their proxies in Syria, in Lebanon, in Yemen. They're using that money that they're getting from the Europeans to sponsor terrorism all over the world. Rep. Michael McCaul on Iran deal flaws, immigration policy

==============================================================================





Pompeo slams Iran’s ‘intimidation’ of IAEA inspector as ‘outrageous’

US secretary of state calls blocking of UN official from nuclear site an ‘unwarranted act of intimidation,’ says alarmed by Tehran’s ‘lack of adequate cooperation’

Pompeo slams Iran’s ‘intimidation’ of IAEA inspector as ‘outrageous’

================================================================

“Israel's Iran documents show nuclear deal 'was built on lies'

The new secretary of state said the documents were proof "beyond any doubt" that "the Iranian regime was not telling the truth".

"Iran hid a vast atomic archive from the world and from the IAEA - until today," Mr Pompeo added.” Iran nuclear deal built on lies, says US

======================================================

“After Israel’s Netanyahu unveiled 100,000 files proving the existence of Iran’s secret nuclear weapons program, the Iran Deal’s defenders insisted that they had always known that Iran was lying.

Transparency and serious inspections of Iran’s nuclear sites: two things that the Iran Deal doesn’t have.

The first thing the Iran Deal did was lock away gobs of information, including about its own side deals. The IAEA’s inspections and Joint Commission’s proceedings are secret. The IAEA puts out information, like the number of inspections, but without specific locations, they have no context or meaning.

“The most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime ever,” Obama called it, “The most robust inspections and verification regime that we’ve ever had,” Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Iran echo chamber coordinator, claimed. And now it’s even more robust. “FACT: the #IranDeal mandates the most robust nuclear inspections ever peacefully negotiated,” Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz tweeted.

FACT: Obama, Rhodes and Moniz had already been caught lying about the Iran Deal. All you had to do was listen to the words coming out of their mouths at various times and compare them to each other.

“It cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb,” Obama claimed of the deal. But he had also admitted that it would give Iran a zero breakout time to a bomb. Both statements can’t be true.

“Under this deal you will have anywhere, anytime 24⁄7 access,” Ben Rhodes told CNN. A few months later, he also told CNN, “We never sought in this negotiation the capacity for so-called anytime, anywhere where you could basically go anywhere in the country.”

Moniz, whom the Iran Deal echo chamber trotted out as their expert, didn’t just lie to the media. He had already been caught lying to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee when he claimed that Iran would only be allowed to keep “only 300 kilograms of low (3.67 percent) enriched uranium hexafluoride, and will not exceed this level for fifteen years.”

The truth was that a secret exemption allowed Iran to stockpile “unknown quantities” of LEU.

In 2015, IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano announced that the IAEA had inspected the Parchin site, a likely home of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Here’s how the incredibly robust inspection process went, according to Amano. “The Agency has, in certain circumstances, permitted States’ representatives to carry out activities in support of the Agency’s verification work… In the case of Parchin, the Iranian side played a part in the sample-taking process by swiping samples.”

What that actually meant was that the Iranians took the samples and gave them to the IAEA.

According to Iran’s atomic spokesman, the samples were collected “in the absence of the inspectors affiliated to the International Atomic Energy Agency.”

Frontpagemag





There were no inspections.....and that's just the way Hussein Obama and the mullahs wanted it.

 

[JoeB131]

Moron.
There were no inspections.

The Obamunists count on morons like you to parrot the party line...'were too!!!!!"

Let's check:

"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations

Why should they?

One more time, you aren't going to dismantle a huge nuclear infrastructure like a vendor table on Times Square...

Even Trump admitted that the Iranians were in compliance.

AP Report: Trump administration to confirm Iran is complying with nuclear deal

The Trump administration is expected to tell Congress early next week that Iran is still complying with the 2015 nuclear deal, three U.S. officials said Thursday, even as a broader review of Iran policy ordered by President Donald Trump drags on.

Under the deal negotiated by President Barack Obama and world powers, the administration must certify to Congress every three months whether Iran is complying with an elaborate set of terms designed to limit its nuclear program. The Trump administration issued its first certification in April and faces a Monday deadline to certify that Iran is still complying.

Though officials cautioned that Trump could still change his mind, they said the administration was preparing to say Iran is indeed complying but that the certification does not prejudge the outcome of Trump’s Iran policy review. The officials weren’t authorized to discuss the decision publicly and requested anonymity.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Moron.
There were no inspections.

The Obamunists count on morons like you to parrot the party line...'were too!!!!!"

Let's check:

"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations

Why should they?

One more time, you aren't going to dismantle a huge nuclear infrastructure like a vendor table on Times Square...

Even Trump admitted that the Iranians were in compliance.

AP Report: Trump administration to confirm Iran is complying with nuclear deal

The Trump administration is expected to tell Congress early next week that Iran is still complying with the 2015 nuclear deal, three U.S. officials said Thursday, even as a broader review of Iran policy ordered by President Donald Trump drags on.

Under the deal negotiated by President Barack Obama and world powers, the administration must certify to Congress every three months whether Iran is complying with an elaborate set of terms designed to limit its nuclear program. The Trump administration issued its first certification in April and faces a Monday deadline to certify that Iran is still complying.

Though officials cautioned that Trump could still change his mind, they said the administration was preparing to say Iran is indeed complying but that the certification does not prejudge the outcome of Trump’s Iran policy review. The officials weren’t authorized to discuss the decision publicly and requested anonymity.

There was never any way to tell if they were 'in compliance,' dunce.

I just proved it.


I have your new avi here:

 

[JoeB131]

There was never any way to tell if they were 'in compliance,' dunce.

I just proved it.

Uh, you didn't prove anything. You just said, "There's some way they MIGHT be cheating, even though I've offered no proof that they did, and everyone admitted they were complying, even Trump."

Point was, we had an agreement. They were in compliance. We can't afford another war.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There was never any way to tell if they were 'in compliance,' dunce.

I just proved it.

Uh, you didn't prove anything. You just said, "There's some way they MIGHT be cheating, even though I've offered no proof that they did, and everyone admitted they were complying, even Trump."

Point was, we had an agreement. They were in compliance. We can't afford another war.

Take your time, Ol' Timer,...clean off those specs.....look up the words you don't know.....mull over the fact that there never were, nor were intended to be, any inspections.



Moron.
There were no inspections.

The Obamunists count on morons like you to parrot the party line...'were too!!!!!"



Let's check:


"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”


This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iran’s declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA it’s doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it can’t, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the agreement text.)"

Why Is Iran’s Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq



==============================================



“Particularly troublesome, you have to wait 24 days before you can inspect.”

–Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), speaking to reporters about the international nuclear agreement with Iran, Aug. 10, 2015

“At non-designated sites it will take 24 days to get an inspection.”

–Schumer, speaking to reporters, Aug. 11

=======================================================



" The prime minister exhorted International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano to “go and inspect this atomic warehouse immediately,” before Iran hides its contents.

A week later, however, the IAEA rejected his suggestion. In a statement, the agency said, “All information obtained, including from third parties, is subject to rigorous review and assessed together with other available information to arrive at an independent assessment based on the agency’s own expertise.”

This wasn’t the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "

... at least twice the IAEA has acknowledged it was not verifying compliance."
What the IAEA doesn't know — or want to know — about Iran’s nuclear program

==============================================================


Proof of the lack of inspections is right here:

“Netanyahu Exposes Iran’s Nuclear Facade

Another secret nuclear facility is revealed as Iran continues to push its nuclear program forward.

… Netanyahu’s press conference came hours after the International Atomic Energy Agency revealed that it found traces of uranium from Iran’s secret atomic warehouse.

This latest information comes a year and a half after Netanyahu first revealed Iran’s secret nuclear archive, which exposed Iran’s plan to develop five nuclear warheads as early as 2003. It also comes a year after he exposed an Iranian secret nuclear warehouse in Tehran and asked the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect the site, where he claimed Iran had once stored 33 pounds of radioactive material, which it disguised as rug cleaner. In April, Reuters reported that the agency had inspected the site and took samples for analysis.

A few hours before Netanyahu’s speech, the International Atomic Energy Agency announced the discovery of traces of uranium from the sample taken at the Tehran warehouse, the same element Iran is enriching and one of the only two fissile elements with which it is possible to develop a nuclear bomb.

Netanyahu responded to the discovery by calling it a direct violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. He also showed satellite images of the warehouse, which illustrate that Iran literally covered it up with gravel.” Netanyahu Exposes Iran’s Nuclear Facade

It was a bad agreement for the beginning. We said it years ago. And let me tell you a few examples about why it is a bad agreement. You cannot inspect the facilities. You have to let them know in advance if you want to come to inspect the military facilities. It's a joke. They continue with a ballistic missile program. Prime Minister Netanyahu exposed documents that we found in Tehran and we showed it to the world that they're continuing with their ballistic missile program. Third, is the issue of the expiration date. What will happen in five, six, seven years and the most important the President has talk about it is the funding. Today they have a lot of funding and they put into their military and sponsoring their proxies in Syria, in Lebanon, in Yemen. They're using that money that they're getting from the Europeans to sponsor terrorism all over the world. Rep. Michael McCaul on Iran deal flaws, immigration policy

==============================================================================





Pompeo slams Iran’s ‘intimidation’ of IAEA inspector as ‘outrageous’

US secretary of state calls blocking of UN official from nuclear site an ‘unwarranted act of intimidation,’ says alarmed by Tehran’s ‘lack of adequate cooperation’

Pompeo slams Iran’s ‘intimidation’ of IAEA inspector as ‘outrageous’

================================================================

“Israel's Iran documents show nuclear deal 'was built on lies'

The new secretary of state said the documents were proof "beyond any doubt" that "the Iranian regime was not telling the truth".

"Iran hid a vast atomic archive from the world and from the IAEA - until today," Mr Pompeo added.” Iran nuclear deal built on lies, says US

======================================================

“After Israel’s Netanyahu unveiled 100,000 files proving the existence of Iran’s secret nuclear weapons program, the Iran Deal’s defenders insisted that they had always known that Iran was lying.

Transparency and serious inspections of Iran’s nuclear sites: two things that the Iran Deal doesn’t have.

The first thing the Iran Deal did was lock away gobs of information, including about its own side deals. The IAEA’s inspections and Joint Commission’s proceedings are secret. The IAEA puts out information, like the number of inspections, but without specific locations, they have no context or meaning.

“The most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime ever,” Obama called it, “The most robust inspections and verification regime that we’ve ever had,” Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Iran echo chamber coordinator, claimed. And now it’s even more robust. “FACT: the #IranDeal mandates the most robust nuclear inspections ever peacefully negotiated,” Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz tweeted.

FACT: Obama, Rhodes and Moniz had already been caught lying about the Iran Deal. All you had to do was listen to the words coming out of their mouths at various times and compare them to each other.

“It cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb,” Obama claimed of the deal. But he had also admitted that it would give Iran a zero breakout time to a bomb. Both statements can’t be true.

“Under this deal you will have anywhere, anytime 24⁄7 access,” Ben Rhodes told CNN. A few months later, he also told CNN, “We never sought in this negotiation the capacity for so-called anytime, anywhere where you could basically go anywhere in the country.”

Moniz, whom the Iran Deal echo chamber trotted out as their expert, didn’t just lie to the media. He had already been caught lying to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee when he claimed that Iran would only be allowed to keep “only 300 kilograms of low (3.67 percent) enriched uranium hexafluoride, and will not exceed this level for fifteen years.”

The truth was that a secret exemption allowed Iran to stockpile “unknown quantities” of LEU.

In 2015, IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano announced that the IAEA had inspected the Parchin site, a likely home of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Here’s how the incredibly robust inspection process went, according to Amano. “The Agency has, in certain circumstances, permitted States’ representatives to carry out activities in support of the Agency’s verification work… In the case of Parchin, the Iranian side played a part in the sample-taking process by swiping samples.”

What that actually meant was that the Iranians took the samples and gave them to the IAEA.

According to Iran’s atomic spokesman, the samples were collected “in the absence of the inspectors affiliated to the International Atomic Energy Agency.”

Frontpagemag





There were no inspections.....and that's just the way Hussein Obama and the mullahs wanted it.