Just to educate the idiot population about the Conferate Flag and Confederacy.

Columns The Confederate Flag Needs To Be Raised Not Lowered

The Confederate Flag Needs To Be Raised, Not Lowered


History revisionists flooded America’s public schools with Northern propaganda about the people who attempted to secede from the United States, characterizing them as racists, extremists, radicals, hatemongers, traitors, etc. You know, the same way that people in our federal government and news media attempt to characterize Christians, patriots, war veterans, constitutionalists, et al. today.

Folks, please understand that the only people in 1861 who believed that states did NOT have the right to secede were Abraham Lincoln and his radical Republicans. To say that southern states did not have the right to secede from the United States is to say that the thirteen colonies did not have the right to secede from Great Britain. One cannot be right and the other wrong. If one is right, both are right. How can we celebrate our Declaration of Independence in 1776 and then turn around and condemn the Declaration of Independence of the Confederacy in 1861? Talk about hypocrisy!
 
Get yourselves an education if you're even capable of reading:

"Black Confederates" by Charles Kelly Barrow

"Black Sourherners in Confederate Armies" by J.H. Segars

"Slavery was it the cause of the war between the states" by Gene Kizer Jr.

"Everything you were taught about the Civil War is Wrong" by Lochlainn Seabrook

"Why I wave the Confederate Flag, written by a black man" by Anthony Hervey

"Black Southerners in Gray" by Arthur W. Bergeron & Thomas Y. Cartwright



Don't believe the radical communists desecration of the Confederacy or comply with their indoctrination in their efforts to turn America into the former Soviet Union.


Reading books with incorrect information, or ridiculous conclusions is not "learning"....

These Southern REWRITES of Civil War history are pathetic.

Get real.

Yup!

Too bad none of them are honest enough to write a book titled;

"How We White Southerners Lost the War to be Racist Slave Owners"

Dude, we didn't lose anything.. how old do you think we are? And you realize hopefully that many of use either:

a. Are not even from the south
b. Families didn't come here until the 20th century.

Right?

And it is you Johnny-come-lately's that are writing all of these racist books?

Or is are you just the chumps who are buying them?

Now you can try denying that the South lost the war to keep black Americans as their slaves in perpetuity.

But the rest of the civilized non-racist world is better educated than you and knows better.

What on Earth are you babbling about? Or is are you? So much for better educated.

:lol::lol::lol:

Mea culpa!

Had to take a call and didn't do my usual proof reading.

Fixed it now so you can try again.
 
Columns The Confederate Flag Needs To Be Raised Not Lowered

The Confederate Flag Needs To Be Raised, Not Lowered


History revisionists flooded America’s public schools with Northern propaganda about the people who attempted to secede from the United States, characterizing them as racists, extremists, radicals, hatemongers, traitors, etc. You know, the same way that people in our federal government and news media attempt to characterize Christians, patriots, war veterans, constitutionalists, et al. today.

Folks, please understand that the only people in 1861 who believed that states did NOT have the right to secede were Abraham Lincoln and his radical Republicans. To say that southern states did not have the right to secede from the United States is to say that the thirteen colonies did not have the right to secede from Great Britain. One cannot be right and the other wrong. If one is right, both are right. How can we celebrate our Declaration of Independence in 1776 and then turn around and condemn the Declaration of Independence of the Confederacy in 1861? Talk about hypocrisy!

What difference does if make if that point is conceded?

It doesn't detract from the fact that your side went to war against the north and by doing so you assured your own destruction.
 

lwnjock-png.44293
 

Attachments

  • Lwnjock.png
    Lwnjock.png
    33.5 KB · Views: 148
Yup, and the Nazi Flag isn't 'all bad' either. Seriously, ya dumb Camo & Ammo white Redneck dimwits really do need to get it together. That flag represents nothing but bloody horror to African Americans. It represents rape, torture, and murder. Shouldn't have been allowed to fly on Government grounds. Period, end of story.

Are you serious with this post? Or have you completely fucking lost it?

Because I can tell you there are more than one persons out there who take umbridge with Old Glory.

Do you fucking ban her too?

I don't give a good god dam what blacks a couple of hundred years later think. Its as stupid as me leading a rebellion for enslaving the Irish in the new land.

What the fuck?
 
I really love that in their defense of the racist flag...their final failed argument is "it was the Democrats that put it up"...
What they called themselves is irrelevant. Were they conservatives or Liberals? Those are the two labels that never change in definition.
 
Yup, and the Nazi Flag isn't 'all bad' either. Seriously, ya dumb Camo & Ammo white Redneck dimwits really do need to get it together. That flag represents nothing but bloody horror to African Americans. It represents rape, torture, and murder. Shouldn't have been allowed to fly on Government grounds. Period, end of story.

Are you serious with this post? Or have you completely fucking lost it?

Because I can tell you there are more than one persons out there who take umbridge with Old Glory.

Do you fucking ban her too?

I don't give a good god dam what blacks a couple of hundred years later think. Its as stupid as me leading a rebellion for enslaving the Irish in the new land.

What the fuck?

I'm having a hard time believing it caused so much grief to people....seeing nobody gave a shit until some mental midget shot up a church. Left loons are so transparent
 
Good thing the camo & ammo sister-fucker racist white Rednecks are going extinct. They're an embarrassment to our Nation. But their numbers are dwindling. They'll go the way of the Neanderthals in time.

Since when did you become a left wing mother fucker?

What's up with you? You aren't paulitician. You aren't. What the fuck is going on?
 
Senators
§ (D)VA Harry F. Byrd, 1933-1965
§ (D)VA A. Willis Robertson, 1946-1966
§ (D)MS John C. Stennis, 1947-1989
§ (D)MS James O. Eastland, 1941-1941, 1943-1978
§ (D)LA Allen J. Ellender, 1937-1972
§ (D)LA Russell B. Long, 1948-1987
§ (D)OK Thomas Pryor Gore, 1906-1921, 1931-1937
§ (D)AL J. Lister Hill, 1938-1969
§ (D)AL John J. Sparkman, 1946-1979
§ (D)FL Spessard Holland, 1946-1971
§ (D)FL George Smathers, 1951-1969
§ (D)SC Olin D. Johnston, 1945-1965
§ (D,R)SC Strom Thurmond, 1954-1956, 1956-2003
§ (D)AR John McClellan, 1943-1977
§ (D)GA Richard B. Russell, Jr., 1933-1971
§ (D)GA Herman E. Talmadge, 1957-1981
§ (D)TN Herbert S. Walters, 1963-1964


Were these Senators considered Liberals or Conservatives?
 
Absolutely not. It's not the same Democrat party of old and thank heavens its not.

What I don't understand is why Democrats can't just admit a history that was not so pretty and pat themselves on the back for leaving those days behind.

Why do modern day Democrats so hell bent for leather that they have the need to demonize Republicans and attempt to flip both parties histories? Pixie dust falling and making all Democrats Republicans and all Republicans magically turning into Democrats. Overnight.

It's pretty sick.
Who's denying our poor history in the Democrat Party, Tiny? Name names.

DNC website. No guff. I have many friends that are Dems and my father in law and brother in law are devout but true D's that I love and and admire. For the most part we all have remained classical liberal so our ideologies can be discussed and debated without feeling the need to slap each other around. :lol: I don't appreciate the progressives that have hijacked the Dems.

Here's a list from my stack of stuff that WSJ came up with that was missing from D history at the website. Lots more at the link. I want to stay within the copyright rules of the board.

So what's missing?

  • There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were six from 1840 through 1860.

  • There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves. There were seven from 1800 through 1861

  • There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent on the subject. There were 20, from 1868 through 1948.

  • There is no reference to "Jim Crow" as in "Jim Crow laws," nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them. These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC's missing years.
  • These laws segregated public schools, public transportation, restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything from water coolers to beaches). The reason Rosa Parks became famous is that she sat in the "whites only" front section of a bus, the "whites only" designation the direct result of Democrats.

  • There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner, became "a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party."

  • Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease's description of the Klan as the "terrorist arm of the Democratic Party."

  • There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution. The 13th banned slavery.

  • The 14th effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision (made by Democratic pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves.

  • The 15th gave black Americans the right to vote.

  • There is no reference to the fact that Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of President Andrew Johnson, who had been a Democrat before joining Lincoln's ticket in 1864.

  • The law was designed to provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding.There is no reference to the Democrats' opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1875.

  • It was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses Grant. The law prohibited racial discrimination in public places and public accommodations.
  • There is no reference to the Democrats' 1904 platform, which devotes a section to "Sectional and Racial Agitation," claiming the GOP's protests against segregation and the denial of voting rights to blacks sought to "revive the dead and hateful race and sectional animosities in any part of our common country," which in turn "means confusion, distraction of business, and the reopening of wounds now happily healed."

  • There is no reference to four Democratic platforms, 1908-20, that are silent on blacks, segregation, lynching and voting rights as racial problems in the country mount.

  • By contrast the GOP platforms of those years specifically address "Rights of the Negro" (1908), oppose lynching (in 1912, 1920, 1924, 1928) and, as the New Deal kicks in, speak out about the dangers of making blacks "wards of the state."
  • There is no reference to the Democratic Convention of 1924, known to history as the "Klanbake." The 103-ballot convention was held in Madison Square Garden. Hundreds of delegates were members of the Ku Klux Klan, the Klan so powerful that a plank condemning Klan violence was defeated outright.

  • To celebrate, the Klan staged a rally with 10,000 hooded Klansmen in a field in New Jersey directly across the Hudson from the site of the convention.

  • Attended by hundreds of cheering convention delegates, the rally featured burning crosses and calls for violence against African-Americans and Catholics.
  • There is no reference to the fact that it was Democrats who segregated the federal government, at the direction of President Woodrow Wilson upon taking office in 1913. There \is a reference to the fact that President Harry Truman integrated the military after World War II.

  • There is reference to the fact that Democrats created the Federal Reserve Board, passed labor and child welfare laws, and created Social Security with Wilson's New Freedom and FDR's New Deal.

  • There is no mention that these programs were created as the result of an agreement to ignore segregation and the lynching of blacks. Neither is there a reference to the thousands of local officials, state legislators, state governors, U.S. congressmen and U.S. senators who were elected as supporters of slavery and then segregation between 1800 and 1965.

  • Nor is there reference to the deal with the devil that left segregation and lynching as a way of life in return for election support for three post-Civil War Democratic presidents, Grover Cleveland, Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt.
  • There is no reference that three-fourths of the opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Bill in the U.S. House came from Democrats, or that 80% of the "nay" vote in the Senate came from Democrats.

  • Certainly there is no reference to the fact that the opposition included future Democratic Senate leader Robert Byrd of West Virginia (a former Klan member) and Tennessee Senator Albert Gore Sr., father of Vice President Al Gore.

  • Last but certainly not least, there is no reference to the fact that Birmingham, Ala., Public Safety Commissioner Bull Connor, who infamously unleashed dogs and fire hoses on civil rights protestors, was in fact--yes indeed--a member of both the Democratic National Committee and the Ku Klux Klan.
More at link:

The Democrats Missing History - WSJ
Interesting that you claim it is "missing" when it is very easy to access all that stuff at any time.

And there's nothing at the "link" anyway except a notice you have to be a member to read it.

Fuck that.

If I got in there you can.
WSJ has a paywall. If you aren't a subscriber, you cannot access content.

So your comment is disingenuous.
 
Yup, and the Nazi Flag isn't 'all bad' either. Seriously, ya dumb Camo & Ammo white Redneck dimwits really do need to get it together. That flag represents nothing but bloody horror to African Americans. It represents rape, torture, and murder. Shouldn't have been allowed to fly on Government grounds. Period, end of story.

Are you serious with this post? Or have you completely fucking lost it?

Because I can tell you there are more than one persons out there who take umbridge with Old Glory.

Do you fucking ban her too?

I don't give a good god dam what blacks a couple of hundred years later think. Its as stupid as me leading a rebellion for enslaving the Irish in the new land.

What the fuck?
We should probably ban the use of, "Democratic Party" also since they were formed around slavery and black oppression. Their history is a true embarrassment to all Americans.
 
Yup, and the Nazi Flag isn't 'all bad' either. Seriously, ya dumb Camo & Ammo white Redneck dimwits really do need to get it together. That flag represents nothing but bloody horror to African Americans. It represents rape, torture, and murder. Shouldn't have been allowed to fly on Government grounds. Period, end of story.

Are you serious with this post? Or have you completely fucking lost it?

Because I can tell you there are more than one persons out there who take umbridge with Old Glory.

Do you fucking ban her too?

I don't give a good god dam what blacks a couple of hundred years later think. Its as stupid as me leading a rebellion for enslaving the Irish in the new land.

What the fuck?

I'm having a hard time believing it caused so much grief to people....seeing nobody gave a shit until some mental midget shot up a church. Left loons are so transparent


"I'm having a hard time believing"

Because you are an ignorant fuk


People have been calling for that rag to be removed for years and it didn't happen until a pos white southern christer murdered nine African Americans
 
Get yourselves an education if you're even capable of reading:

"Black Confederates" by Charles Kelly Barrow

"Black Sourherners in Confederate Armies" by J.H. Segars

"Slavery was it the cause of the war between the states" by Gene Kizer Jr.

"Everything you were taught about the Civil War is Wrong" by Lochlainn Seabrook

"Why I wave the Confederate Flag, written by a black man" by Anthony Hervey

"Black Southerners in Gray" by Arthur W. Bergeron & Thomas Y. Cartwright



Don't believe the radical communists desecration of the Confederacy or comply with their indoctrination in their efforts to turn America into the former Soviet Union.


Well gosh, I guess that makes it okay then...
 
Get yourselves an education if you're even capable of reading:

"Black Confederates" by Charles Kelly Barrow

"Black Sourherners in Confederate Armies" by J.H. Segars

"Slavery was it the cause of the war between the states" by Gene Kizer Jr.

"Everything you were taught about the Civil War is Wrong" by Lochlainn Seabrook

"Why I wave the Confederate Flag, written by a black man" by Anthony Hervey

"Black Southerners in Gray" by Arthur W. Bergeron & Thomas Y. Cartwright



Don't believe the radical communists desecration of the Confederacy or comply with their indoctrination in their efforts to turn America into the former Soviet Union.
Anyone can write a book or blog but that does not make it factual history. It is a person's opinion--like yours. Give me history facts. If you want to teach people something, like you misleadingly claim, then offer something besides book titles. Feed me facts--true facts not ones from pro-confederate sites, or anti-confederate sites. History!
 

Forum List

Back
Top