Political Junky
Gold Member
- May 27, 2009
- 25,793
- 3,990
They do frown on it, unless they don't.I thought going outside of American law was frowned on by you freaks to the far right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
They do frown on it, unless they don't.I thought going outside of American law was frowned on by you freaks to the far right.
The demise was due to no objections to homo sex. Homo marriage would have sped it up.I thought that homo-sexual marriage was going to destroy the US?
But...now you're saying that neither Greece nor Rome allowed homo-sexual marriage...and I note that both empires have disappeared.
Why would you want to repeat their mistake?
It's called history. You should consider consulting it sometime.I thought going outside of American law was frowned on by you freaks to the far right.
so...it's now time to admire Greek and Roman marriage.It's called history. You should consider consulting it sometime.I thought going outside of American law was frowned on by you freaks to the far right.
I thought that homo-sexual marriage was going to destroy the US?
But...now you're saying that neither Greece nor Rome allowed homo-sexual marriage...and I note that both empires have disappeared.
Why would you want to repeat their mistake?
Aah, I see.The demise was due to no objections to homo sex. Homo marriage would have sped it up.I thought that homo-sexual marriage was going to destroy the US?
But...now you're saying that neither Greece nor Rome allowed homo-sexual marriage...and I note that both empires have disappeared.
Why would you want to repeat their mistake?
Neither does the fag militia. It doesn't address lifestyle choice.Spartans and other Greeks didn't have recourse to Article 4, Section 2 of our federal Constitution.
Yet it's outside American jurisprudence, and you believe nothing should be considered out of it.It's called history. You should consider consulting it sometime.I thought going outside of American law was frowned on by you freaks to the far right.
Someone should told the Founders.I've never understood the insistence on calling it by the name 'marriage' for homosexuals, but of course any two adults have as much right as any other two to form a union.
Has anyone pointed out that Greece and Rome also had total acceptance of slavery? That wars of conquest were normal? That racism was absolute? Those civilizations were just part of the evolution of human experience and thought. They are to be studied for their successes and their failures; to be learned from, not copied.
Article 4, section 2 specifically covers the several citizens in the several States.Neither does the fag militia. It doesn't address lifestyle choice.Spartans and other Greeks didn't have recourse to Article 4, Section 2 of our federal Constitution.
The justice [Scalia] noted the Greeks and Romans had no moral disapproval of homosexual relations, yet neither culture ever considered approving same-sex marriage. The implication was that those cultures must have found it would cause some sort of harm to society.
GO SCALIA!
Scalia Why no ancient Greek gay marriages
Article 4, section 2 specifically covers the several citizens in the several States.Neither does the fag militia. It doesn't address lifestyle choice.Spartans and other Greeks didn't have recourse to Article 4, Section 2 of our federal Constitution.
Only infidels, protestants, and renegades are that hypocritical to a god through rendering unto Caesar.
And, it shows when they try to muster honest Indjeun contingents.
Privileges and immunities are included as lifestyle choices, Person on the Right.Article 4, section 2 specifically covers the several citizens in the several States.Neither does the fag militia. It doesn't address lifestyle choice.Spartans and other Greeks didn't have recourse to Article 4, Section 2 of our federal Constitution.
Only infidels, protestants, and renegades are that hypocritical to a god through rendering unto Caesar.
And, it shows when they try to muster honest Indjeun contingents.
It doesn't address lifestyle choice, skid mark.
No it doesn't, skid mark.Privileges and immunities are included as lifestyle choices, Person on the Right.Article 4, section 2 specifically covers the several citizens in the several States.Neither does the fag militia. It doesn't address lifestyle choice.Spartans and other Greeks didn't have recourse to Article 4, Section 2 of our federal Constitution.
Only infidels, protestants, and renegades are that hypocritical to a god through rendering unto Caesar.
And, it shows when they try to muster honest Indjeun contingents.
It doesn't address lifestyle choice, skid mark.
Yes, it does, punkin.No it doesn't, skid mark.Privileges and immunities are included as lifestyle choices, Person on the Right.Article 4, section 2 specifically covers the several citizens in the several States.Neither does the fag militia. It doesn't address lifestyle choice.Spartans and other Greeks didn't have recourse to Article 4, Section 2 of our federal Constitution.
Only infidels, protestants, and renegades are that hypocritical to a god through rendering unto Caesar.
And, it shows when they try to muster honest Indjeun contingents.
It doesn't address lifestyle choice, skid mark.