Kari Lake loses last court case to overturn Arizona Governor's vote

You cannot see the ballot unless you are Superman. Get fucking real.

Observers aren't there to "see the ballot". They are there to observe the process.

Just like video cameras in the counting area. The cameras aren't there to show the ballots, they are there to show the process.

WW
 
Observers aren't there to "see the ballot". They are there to observe the process.

Just like video cameras in the counting area. The cameras aren't there to show the ballots, they are there to show the process.

WW
And that process cannot be questioned? That is what happened when observers testified. They were not believed. Why?
 
And that process cannot be questioned?

Sure they can question the process. If they have question they address them with the Election Supervisor. Which is what I said before.

They cannot question the actual workers and disrupt their work.

And that process cannot be questioned? That is what happened when observers testified. They were not believed. Why?
Jacqueline Onigkeit and Andrew Myers were believed. The Judge believed them when they went into detail about how Maricopa Country actually DID perform signature verification.

Lakes own first two witness basically ruined her case before she was out of the gate.

WW
 
Sure they can question the process. If they have question they address them with the Election Supervisor. Which is what I said before.

They cannot question the actual workers and disrupt their work.


Jacqueline Onigkeit and Andrew Myers were believed. The Judge believed them when they went into detail about how Maricopa Country actually DID perform signature verification.

Lakes own first two witness basically ruined her case before she was out of the gate.

WW
That is your opinion and the opinion of a biased judge who probably does not want his dog killed.
 
Observers sitting six feet away. That is not observation that is just a show.

Says you, inventing yet another conspiracy to explain Melissa Calrone's absolute lack of credibility.

Again, running the same ballots over and over would be completely obvious and result in many times the more votes counted than were on the voter rolls. That didn't happen either.

This is why judges assess credibility. As they should, as they're supposed to.
 
Says you, inventing yet another conspiracy to explain Melissa Calrone's absolute lack of credibility.

Again, running the same ballots over and over would be completely obvious and result in many times the more votes counted than were on the voter rolls. That didn't happen either.

This is why judges assess credibility. As they should, as they're supposed to.
You people discredited her with continuous attacks. Tell the truth you bag of shit.
 
You people discredited her with continuous attacks. Tell the truth you bag of shit.
She discredits herself with a fantastically implausible story contradicted by overwhelming evidence. A story she didn't report on the day the votes were counted. A story she's changed several times. With NO version reported by any other poll worker, any vote counter, or any observer. Republican or Democrat.

Your assertion that no observer could see if the same votes were counted over and over from 6' away is laughably inaccurate. They absolutely could.

Worse, her claims are contradicted by the vote counts. If the votes had been run several times through the machine, there would be several times more votes counted than there were voters on the roll.

Worse still, she continued to elaborate making up fantastical new details. Making up the claim that there were ZERO registered voters in the voting book. Despite her having no access to the voting book. And her claims being provably false.

Its not 'attacks' that undermined the credibility of Melissa Calrone. Its the absurdity of her claims.

And yours.
 
She discredits herself with a fantastically implausible story contradicted by overwhelming evidence. A story she didn't report on the day the votes were counted. A story she's changed several times. With NO version reported by any poll worker, any vote counter, or any observer.

Worse, her claims are contradicted by the vote counts. If the votes had been run several times through the machine, there would be several times more votes counted than there were voters on the roll.

Worse still, she (as you do) continued to elaborate. Making up the claim that there were ZERO registered voters in the voting book. Despite her having no access to the voting book. And her claims being probably false.

Its not 'attacks' that undermined the credibility of Melissa Calrone. Its the absurdity of her claims.

And yours.
More propaganda. I did not believe it then and I am not going to believe it now.
 
More propaganda. I did not believe it then and I am not going to believe it now.

Laughing.....of course you don't believe it. As you'll ignore ANYTHING that doesn't ape what you want to believe. Any person, any judge, any ruling, any investigation, any count, any recount, any hand count, any audit, any official, any voting board, any secretary of state, any Attorney General.......

......if they don't ape your conspiracy.

Your willful ignorance isn't a legal standard. Which is why your ilk have such a perfect of failure in court. And why Loser Lake lost again.
 
Laughing.....of course you don't believe it. As you'll ignore ANYTHING that doesn't ape what you want to believe. Any person, any judge, any ruling, any investigation, any count, any recount, any hand count, any audit, any official, any voting board, any secretary of state, any Attorney General.......

......if they don't ape your conspiracy.

Your willful ignorance isn't a legal standard. Which is why your ilk have such a perfect of failure in court. And why Loser Lake lost again.

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top