Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
When you look at nonsense such as that you must ask yourself....if the Sun suddenly went out...what would happen? Would that magical CO2 molecule keep us warm?
This is quite possibly the dumbest defense of the theory the sun is causing global warming I have ever heard.
I am a skeptic of liberal solutions to just about every problem under the sun, pun intended.It is coming, whether most people know it or not.
The only way to avert the coming disaster is to keep the carbon in the ground. Now, if the energy industry or the government were to fund and come up with a device that removed the carbon and CO2 from burning coal, oil, and natural gas before it entered the atmosphere, GREAT. Problem also solved. The only thing that will work is keeping the carbon, in the form of CO2, from entering the atmosphere. It doesn't matter how that is done. If we can figure out how to do that then problem solved and we can burn away.
If anyone can post up a link where the energy industry is working towards such goals and devices please do.
Otherwise the point is mute. And it doesn't matter if most people don't understand this is the reality. It is the reality.
Let us know when you are moving to a cave. We'll miss you.
Are you a climate change denier? I didn't anticipate that.
Hmmmm. I think you are struggling with this one. My advice.......go with the scientists. They know stuff.
Liberal solutions are not based on science. Or logic. They are nothing but old school anti-capitalist class warfare with a new party dress on.I am a skeptic of liberal solutions to just about every problem under the sun, pun intended.It is coming, whether most people know it or not.
The only way to avert the coming disaster is to keep the carbon in the ground. Now, if the energy industry or the government were to fund and come up with a device that removed the carbon and CO2 from burning coal, oil, and natural gas before it entered the atmosphere, GREAT. Problem also solved. The only thing that will work is keeping the carbon, in the form of CO2, from entering the atmosphere. It doesn't matter how that is done. If we can figure out how to do that then problem solved and we can burn away.
If anyone can post up a link where the energy industry is working towards such goals and devices please do.
Otherwise the point is mute. And it doesn't matter if most people don't understand this is the reality. It is the reality.
Let us know when you are moving to a cave. We'll miss you.
Are you a climate change denier? I didn't anticipate that.
Hmmmm. I think you are struggling with this one. My advice.......go with the scientists. They know stuff.
Just because I believe a firefighter who says a fire was started by a kid playing with matches doesn't mean I subscribe to the liberal who says we need to ban all matches. You follow?
That much is obvious. A poster rogered up on the liberal solution to stop taking any more resources out of the ground on federal land, and I ridiculed him.Liberal solutions are not based on science. Or logic. They are nothing but old school anti-capitalist class warfare with a new party dress on.I am a skeptic of liberal solutions to just about every problem under the sun, pun intended.Let us know when you are moving to a cave. We'll miss you.
Are you a climate change denier? I didn't anticipate that.
Hmmmm. I think you are struggling with this one. My advice.......go with the scientists. They know stuff.
Just because I believe a firefighter who says a fire was started by a kid playing with matches doesn't mean I subscribe to the liberal who says we need to ban all matches. You follow?
No. I don't follow. It seems that we are not communicating well here.
I am a skeptic of liberal solutions to just about every problem under the sun, pun intended.It is coming, whether most people know it or not.
The only way to avert the coming disaster is to keep the carbon in the ground. Now, if the energy industry or the government were to fund and come up with a device that removed the carbon and CO2 from burning coal, oil, and natural gas before it entered the atmosphere, GREAT. Problem also solved. The only thing that will work is keeping the carbon, in the form of CO2, from entering the atmosphere. It doesn't matter how that is done. If we can figure out how to do that then problem solved and we can burn away.
If anyone can post up a link where the energy industry is working towards such goals and devices please do.
Otherwise the point is mute. And it doesn't matter if most people don't understand this is the reality. It is the reality.
Let us know when you are moving to a cave. We'll miss you.
Are you a climate change denier? I didn't anticipate that.
Hmmmm. I think you are struggling with this one. My advice.......go with the scientists. They know stuff.
Yes, they know a good scam when they see one and they have been scamming the people of Earth for decades.
ThatLiberal solutions are not based on science. Or logic. They are nothing but old school anti-capitalist class warfare with a new party dress on.I am a skeptic of liberal solutions to just about every problem under the sun, pun intended.Are you a climate change denier? I didn't anticipate that.
Hmmmm. I think you are struggling with this one. My advice.......go with the scientists. They know stuff.
Just because I believe a firefighter who says a fire was started by a kid playing with matches doesn't mean I subscribe to the liberal who says we need to ban all matches. You follow?
No. I don't follow. It seems that we are not communicating well here.
I'd like to triple nuclear to 300gw and invest 50 billion into fusion research.
Sounds like a good idea?
I am a skeptic of liberal solutions to just about every problem under the sun, pun intended.Let us know when you are moving to a cave. We'll miss you.
Are you a climate change denier? I didn't anticipate that.
Hmmmm. I think you are struggling with this one. My advice.......go with the scientists. They know stuff.
Yes, they know a good scam when they see one and they have been scamming the people of Earth for decades.
No mountain of evidence will impact your opinion. That's got to be a very weird feeling.
I am a skeptic of liberal solutions to just about every problem under the sun, pun intended.Are you a climate change denier? I didn't anticipate that.
Hmmmm. I think you are struggling with this one. My advice.......go with the scientists. They know stuff.
Yes, they know a good scam when they see one and they have been scamming the people of Earth for decades.
No mountain of evidence will impact your opinion. That's got to be a very weird feeling.
Untrue. Some evidence PERIOD would be acceptable. Computer derived fiction though doesn't count as evidence now does it?
I am a skeptic of liberal solutions to just about every problem under the sun, pun intended.
Hmmmm. I think you are struggling with this one. My advice.......go with the scientists. They know stuff.
Yes, they know a good scam when they see one and they have been scamming the people of Earth for decades.
No mountain of evidence will impact your opinion. That's got to be a very weird feeling.
Untrue. Some evidence PERIOD would be acceptable. Computer derived fiction though doesn't count as evidence now does it?
Are you of the opinion that all of the evidence supporting the theory regarding climate change is based on computer models?
Would you like me to provide you with a link to a website where you can examine all sorts of evidence? I'll be glad to do so.
Hmmmm. I think you are struggling with this one. My advice.......go with the scientists. They know stuff.
Yes, they know a good scam when they see one and they have been scamming the people of Earth for decades.
No mountain of evidence will impact your opinion. That's got to be a very weird feeling.
Untrue. Some evidence PERIOD would be acceptable. Computer derived fiction though doesn't count as evidence now does it?
Are you of the opinion that all of the evidence supporting the theory regarding climate change is based on computer models?
Would you like me to provide you with a link to a website where you can examine all sorts of evidence? I'll be glad to do so.
How about you present a link to a piece of evidence that isn't. That will be easier.
Yes, they know a good scam when they see one and they have been scamming the people of Earth for decades.
No mountain of evidence will impact your opinion. That's got to be a very weird feeling.
Untrue. Some evidence PERIOD would be acceptable. Computer derived fiction though doesn't count as evidence now does it?
Are you of the opinion that all of the evidence supporting the theory regarding climate change is based on computer models?
Would you like me to provide you with a link to a website where you can examine all sorts of evidence? I'll be glad to do so.
How about you present a link to a piece of evidence that isn't. That will be easier.
I'm sorry......does that mean you do not wish to take a look at the website that I am suggesting? I can find it for you. Back when I wasn't sure about all this....this particular website presented the info in an easily digestible and verifiable manner.
Would you like the link or not?
No mountain of evidence will impact your opinion. That's got to be a very weird feeling.
Untrue. Some evidence PERIOD would be acceptable. Computer derived fiction though doesn't count as evidence now does it?
Are you of the opinion that all of the evidence supporting the theory regarding climate change is based on computer models?
Would you like me to provide you with a link to a website where you can examine all sorts of evidence? I'll be glad to do so.
How about you present a link to a piece of evidence that isn't. That will be easier.
I'm sorry......does that mean you do not wish to take a look at the website that I am suggesting? I can find it for you. Back when I wasn't sure about all this....this particular website presented the info in an easily digestible and verifiable manner.
Would you like the link or not?
Please provide the link
the denier hive mind are going to have a spazz attack over this
Wow Isaac you just ruined my day. I had given you high marks for your great postings about attack back at Islam. Now you go and sidle up with GW wackos? I am going to have to hunt the board and remove all the WINNER tags I put on you. I thought you were one of the smart ones?
I'm always glad to disappoint people.
I don't live in a box dobey, though you have a great need to put people in boxes and close the lid tight.
Real life isn't black and white it is in color.
If there is even a slight man-made cause to GW what you think"they" will do about it? Take more money from us? hand it out to "them and themselves"? USA is clean compared to China India Africa etc. What you want to do? Shut down the country? Solar Cars? Horses? How do you heat cool your home? Natural Gas, Coal, oil? you want to freeze? It is always nice to cut down on pollution and we already do that.
Last one for this thread.
The isotope of CO2 from burning fossil fuels is different than the isotope of naturally occurring CO2.
The carbon cycle, like all natural cycles, was in equilibrium until 1750. Then the CO2 started rising in the atmosphere because of the burning of trees, which are made of carbon, in large number by human. This has continued to increase the last 250 years adding in coal, oil, and natural gas. Additional CO2 that is emitted into the atmosphere every year is 35 billion tons.
The debate on this ended 15 years ago among scientists. We know Global Warming is real and accelerating. The denial industry spends billions trying to confuse people and they have had success because people naturally don't want to believe such a large and scary thing is happening. Cognitive dissonance has been harnessed by the denial industry.
It is all mute.
Soon enough the whole human race is going to be faced with something it has never seen. And it won't be pleasant by any stretch of the imagination. A new mass extinction has already started.
Here ya go.
Global Warming and Climate Change skepticism examined
It's fairly comprehensive.....and fluid.
Enjoy.
Wow Isaac you just ruined my day. I had given you high marks for your great postings about attack back at Islam. Now you go and sidle up with GW wackos? I am going to have to hunt the board and remove all the WINNER tags I put on you. I thought you were one of the smart ones?
I'm always glad to disappoint people.
I don't live in a box dobey, though you have a great need to put people in boxes and close the lid tight.
Real life isn't black and white it is in color.
If there is even a slight man-made cause to GW what you think"they" will do about it? Take more money from us? hand it out to "them and themselves"? USA is clean compared to China India Africa etc. What you want to do? Shut down the country? Solar Cars? Horses? How do you heat cool your home? Natural Gas, Coal, oil? you want to freeze? It is always nice to cut down on pollution and we already do that.
Last one for this thread.
The isotope of CO2 from burning fossil fuels is different than the isotope of naturally occurring CO2.
The carbon cycle, like all natural cycles, was in equilibrium until 1750. Then the CO2 started rising in the atmosphere because of the burning of trees, which are made of carbon, in large number by human. This has continued to increase the last 250 years adding in coal, oil, and natural gas. Additional CO2 that is emitted into the atmosphere every year is 35 billion tons.
The debate on this ended 15 years ago among scientists. We know Global Warming is real and accelerating. The denial industry spends billions trying to confuse people and they have had success because people naturally don't want to believe such a large and scary thing is happening. Cognitive dissonance has been harnessed by the denial industry.
It is all mute.
Soon enough the whole human race is going to be faced with something it has never seen. And it won't be pleasant by any stretch of the imagination. A new mass extinction has already started.
Here ya go.
Global Warming and Climate Change skepticism examined
It's fairly comprehensive.....and fluid.
Enjoy.
You do realize that that is nothing but opinion.....right? There is no factual evidence in the entire post. You really need to do better than that.
Holy shit!
Mr. Merkley (for himself, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Sanders, Mrs. Boxer, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Leahy, and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
A Bill To prohibit drilling in the outer Continental Shelf, to prohibit coal leases on Federal land, and for other purposes.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds that—
(1) from 1880 through 2014, global temperatures have increased by about 0.9 degrees Celsius;
(2) the vast majority of global warming that has occurred over the past 50 years was due to human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels;
And so forth and so on.
So Merkley, et al. propose this:
(2) the Federal Government should pursue management of Federal land and waters for the benefit of the people of the United States by not issuing any new lease or renewing any nonproducing lease for coal, oil, or natural gas in any Federal land or waters.
Buncha morons!
How many nuke plants do these fuckin' cretins want us to build instead? LOL!
I'd like to triple nuclear to 300gw and invest 50 billion into fusion research.
Sounds like a good idea?
