Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I suppose the way you combat alcoholism is to make sure everyone drinks? It's basically the remedy to gun violence; make sure everyone is armed to the teeth.
why not simply muster the militia and perform a visual check of their equipment? gun lovers who refuse to register for posse duty can always be mustered for inspection.
You know, speaking of mustard, before I was vegetarian I liked hot dogs with just mustard. Now I love veggie dogs, but I like ketchup better on those. Though ketchup and mustard is good. I prefer not only mustard though on veggie dogs
why not simply muster the militia and perform a visual check of their equipment? gun lovers who refuse to register for posse duty can always be mustered for inspection.
You know, speaking of mustard, before I was vegetarian I liked hot dogs with just mustard. Now I love veggie dogs, but I like ketchup better on those. Though ketchup and mustard is good. I prefer not only mustard though on veggie dogs
A "Veggie" dog is not a hot dog…what it is is not something you can actually quantify…but it is not a hot dog….God be with you…….and your…..tubular vegetable product
I suppose the way you combat alcoholism is to make sure everyone drinks? It's basically the remedy to gun violence; make sure everyone is armed to the teeth.
No…but you would think so since as a lefty you don't engage your brain. You treat guns the same as you treat every other problem….if someone misuses alcohol, you arrest them….if someone misuses a gun you arrest them.
Why is that dynamic so hard for you lefty, anti gun extremists to get….considering more people die because of alcohol than they do because of guns.
I suppose the way you combat alcoholism is to make sure everyone drinks? It's basically the remedy to gun violence; make sure everyone is armed to the teeth.
No…but you would think so since as a lefty you don't engage your brain. You treat guns the same as you treat every other problem….if someone misuses alcohol, you arrest them….if someone misuses a gun you arrest them.
Why is that dynamic so hard for you lefty, anti gun extremists to get….considering more people die because of alcohol than they do because of guns.
They are authoritarian leftists, they don't know what the word liberal actually means. I'm a liberal, a classic liberal
Make all gun manufacturers responsible for any misdeeds in which a gun is involved. Insurance companies will back this law as will many users of guns.
How American of you. You want to hold a company liable for something they didn't do.
Exactly, what they didn't do is come up with some ideas to make their products safer.Make all gun manufacturers responsible for any misdeeds in which a gun is involved. Insurance companies will back this law as will many users of guns.
How American of you. You want to hold a company liable for something they didn't do.
The
Exactly, what they didn't do is come up with some ideas to make their products safer.Make all gun manufacturers responsible for any misdeeds in which a gun is involved. Insurance companies will back this law as will many users of guns.
How American of you. You want to hold a company liable for something they didn't do.
The auto industry, for example, because of public pressure have created safer cars, who ever heard of some of the auto safety features fifty years ago? Gun manufacturers seem to have no responsibility as they continue pumping out weapons for profit, and the public pays with dead children and adults. They use the NRA as their lobby, the Second Amendment as their legal guardian. and some Americans love for guns as their base to avoid any meaningful legislation. Put some of the burden on the gun makers and they might suddenly find some methods to make guns safer?
Gun makers make weapons capable of killing, not Nerf guns. They are not toys, they are tools.The
Exactly, what they didn't do is come up with some ideas to make their products safer.Make all gun manufacturers responsible for any misdeeds in which a gun is involved. Insurance companies will back this law as will many users of guns.
How American of you. You want to hold a company liable for something they didn't do.
The auto industry, for example, because of public pressure have created safer cars, who ever heard of some of the auto safety features fifty years ago? Gun manufacturers seem to have no responsibility as they continue pumping out weapons for profit, and the public pays with dead children and adults. They use the NRA as their lobby, the Second Amendment as their legal guardian. and some Americans love for guns as their base to avoid any meaningful legislation. Put some of the burden on the gun makers and they might suddenly find some methods to make guns safer?
So why did gun makers put safety switches on guns if not as a safety feature?Gun makers make weapons capable of killing, not Nerf guns. They are not toys, they are tools.The
Exactly, what they didn't do is come up with some ideas to make their products safer.Make all gun manufacturers responsible for any misdeeds in which a gun is involved. Insurance companies will back this law as will many users of guns.
How American of you. You want to hold a company liable for something they didn't do.
The auto industry, for example, because of public pressure have created safer cars, who ever heard of some of the auto safety features fifty years ago? Gun manufacturers seem to have no responsibility as they continue pumping out weapons for profit, and the public pays with dead children and adults. They use the NRA as their lobby, the Second Amendment as their legal guardian. and some Americans love for guns as their base to avoid any meaningful legislation. Put some of the burden on the gun makers and they might suddenly find some methods to make guns safer?
Cars can be made safer because their purpose is to move people.
Guns cannot be made "safe" because that defeats the purpose.
The Car analogy is bullshit. What you want to do is more akin to making a lawn mower with no blade so it can't harm grass.
Thanks again, loser. You've proposed licensing and registration a couple dozen times but never once proven that this would be effective. When challenged, you resort to ad hom attacks. You've got NOTHING.Stating a fact [You're either stupid, or a damn liar. I suspect both.] isn't a personal attack, it's an observation based on your mendacity and lack our comprehension.
Stop lying, and - if you can - think about my posts. Misrepresentation is dishonest and is used by those incapable of writing a substantive rebuttal.
Please post the post wherein I proposed registration. On another thread I posited guns needed to be insured in case of theft and registered with an insurance company, not a government agency, so that if stolen, they could be traced back to the source. Laws can prevent the governemnt from accessing such a registration shielding the number and type of firearms from the government.
In fact I have no problem with registering my gun, why do you? Paranoid?
Who do you know that doesn't have their guns insured? That's automatic with home or rental insurance.
What type of insurance are you asking about? Theft of personal property for sure and it is good practice to keep a copy of the bill of sale and a photograph of the gun if stolen or damaged in a fire.
Liability insurance is different, some companies may find the risk to great and cancel the policy, others may raise the premium and deductible, based on the number and type of weapons as well as other factors.
If I had to guess, those with weapons considered to be "assault", and those with a large cache, are probably self insured.
All content is protected under your insurance policy unless you bought the policy from your barber somewhere. It doesn't matter if a thief steals your jewelry or your guns. You report it to the police and the insurance company for compensation.
It won't raise your premiums either because most insurance companies put you in an over generous plan. My plan for content is over $100,000. Why? I don't know, that's just how they make these plans. And I have thousands of dollars in music equipment in my home, and it's all covered under one plan.
"maybe" is the word I used. I do believe some gun owners (Zimmerman is a good example) seek out situations in their mind wherein they stop a bad guy with their gun. I also believe possessing a gun is much like having a couple of drinks, it can cloud one's judgment.
Yes, guns emanate evil, they could turn Mother Teresa into Charles Bronson, I feel you
Mr. Bronson wasn't evil, his character in all those movies made him a hero, likely movies watched over and over by Zimmerman and others like him.
Zimmerman was "evil?" Tell me how you're smarter than conservatives because you aren't all black and white like they are.
Trayvon and Georgie deserved each other, neither was a good guy. But I wouldn't call either of them "evil"
Trayvon was a minor, Zimmerman had a gun and believed that made him a man. IT didn't! He got his ass kicked by a kid, in a fight he started which happens to most bullie; rather than take his lumps like a man, he took a child's life.
He was a hero to most racists and members of the crazy right wing,
So where is this evidence that Zimmerman started the fight? The Martin autopsy revealed that Martin only had two injuries: a scrape on his knuckle consistent with hitting somebody or something, and a bullet hole that took his life. No evidence whatsoever that he was assaulted or attacked.
Zimmerman had two black eyes, lacerations to the back of his neck, a broken nose, and some minor back injuries.
So with that evidence, you would conclude that Zimmerman attacked Martin?
You should restrain your comments to things you know something about.
Zimmerman is a gd idiot.
But an alive GD idiot. Without his legal firearm, that little hoodlum might have killed him.
Gun makers make weapons capable of killing, not Nerf guns. They are not toys, they are tools.The
Exactly, what they didn't do is come up with some ideas to make their products safer.Make all gun manufacturers responsible for any misdeeds in which a gun is involved. Insurance companies will back this law as will many users of guns.
How American of you. You want to hold a company liable for something they didn't do.
The auto industry, for example, because of public pressure have created safer cars, who ever heard of some of the auto safety features fifty years ago? Gun manufacturers seem to have no responsibility as they continue pumping out weapons for profit, and the public pays with dead children and adults. They use the NRA as their lobby, the Second Amendment as their legal guardian. and some Americans love for guns as their base to avoid any meaningful legislation. Put some of the burden on the gun makers and they might suddenly find some methods to make guns safer?
Cars can be made safer because their purpose is to move people.
Guns cannot be made "safe" because that defeats the purpose.
The Car analogy is bullshit. What you want to do is more akin to making a lawn mower with no blade so it can't harm grass.
To keep people from shooting themselves, not others.[
So why did gun makers put safety switches on guns if not as a safety feature?Gun makers make weapons capable of killing, not Nerf guns. They are not toys, they are tools.The
Exactly, what they didn't do is come up with some ideas to make their products safer.Make all gun manufacturers responsible for any misdeeds in which a gun is involved. Insurance companies will back this law as will many users of guns.
How American of you. You want to hold a company liable for something they didn't do.
The auto industry, for example, because of public pressure have created safer cars, who ever heard of some of the auto safety features fifty years ago? Gun manufacturers seem to have no responsibility as they continue pumping out weapons for profit, and the public pays with dead children and adults. They use the NRA as their lobby, the Second Amendment as their legal guardian. and some Americans love for guns as their base to avoid any meaningful legislation. Put some of the burden on the gun makers and they might suddenly find some methods to make guns safer?
Cars can be made safer because their purpose is to move people.
Guns cannot be made "safe" because that defeats the purpose.
The Car analogy is bullshit. What you want to do is more akin to making a lawn mower with no blade so it can't harm grass.
To keep people from shooting themselves, not others.[
So why did gun makers put safety switches on guns if not as a safety feature?Gun makers make weapons capable of killing, not Nerf guns. They are not toys, they are tools.The
Exactly, what they didn't do is come up with some ideas to make their products safer.How American of you. You want to hold a company liable for something they didn't do.
The auto industry, for example, because of public pressure have created safer cars, who ever heard of some of the auto safety features fifty years ago? Gun manufacturers seem to have no responsibility as they continue pumping out weapons for profit, and the public pays with dead children and adults. They use the NRA as their lobby, the Second Amendment as their legal guardian. and some Americans love for guns as their base to avoid any meaningful legislation. Put some of the burden on the gun makers and they might suddenly find some methods to make guns safer?
Cars can be made safer because their purpose is to move people.
Guns cannot be made "safe" because that defeats the purpose.
The Car analogy is bullshit. What you want to do is more akin to making a lawn mower with no blade so it can't harm grass.
The whole purpose for carrying a firearm is for protection. If I have to diddle with a trigger lock, retrieve it from a box or rely on some electronic sensor that recognizes my grip, I may die. Defeats the whole purpose.
He got his ass kicked by a kid, in a fight he started
Yes, guns emanate evil, they could turn Mother Teresa into Charles Bronson, I feel you
Mr. Bronson wasn't evil, his character in all those movies made him a hero, likely movies watched over and over by Zimmerman and others like him.
Zimmerman was "evil?" Tell me how you're smarter than conservatives because you aren't all black and white like they are.
Trayvon and Georgie deserved each other, neither was a good guy. But I wouldn't call either of them "evil"
Trayvon was a minor, Zimmerman had a gun and believed that made him a man. IT didn't! He got his ass kicked by a kid, in a fight he started which happens to most bullie; rather than take his lumps like a man, he took a child's life.
He was a hero to most racists and members of the crazy right wing,
So where is this evidence that Zimmerman started the fight? The Martin autopsy revealed that Martin only had two injuries: a scrape on his knuckle consistent with hitting somebody or something, and a bullet hole that took his life. No evidence whatsoever that he was assaulted or attacked.
Zimmerman had two black eyes, lacerations to the back of his neck, a broken nose, and some minor back injuries.
So with that evidence, you would conclude that Zimmerman attacked Martin?
You should restrain your comments to things you know something about.
You need to read without bias and with comprehension. I stated above that no one but the two of them knew who started the fight, and one of them is dead. We have some evidence why the deceased was in the complex; Zimmerman had no apparent business being there. What can you infer from that evidence [both facts were common knowledge to those who followed the matter)?
You didn't answer my question.Why are you so stupid; or maybe English isn't your native language. Hmm, do you and Sarah Palin both speak American? Syntax isn't your forte.Why do you hate the fact that Zimmerman did not murder a black guy?Yes, guns emanate evil, they could turn Mother Teresa into Charles Bronson, I feel you
Mr. Bronson wasn't evil, his character in all those movies made him a hero, likely movies watched over and over by Zimmerman and others like him.
Zimmerman was "evil?" Tell me how you're smarter than conservatives because you aren't all black and white like they are.
Trayvon and Georgie deserved each other, neither was a good guy. But I wouldn't call either of them "evil"
Trayvon was a minor, Zimmerman had a gun and believed that made him a man. IT didn't! He got his ass kicked by a kid, in a fight he started which happens to most bullie; rather than take his lumps like a man, he took a child's life.
He was a hero to most racists and members of the crazy right wing,
