Keith Scott - Charlotte shooting victim exposed as career criminal and ex-con

What any person's past is, unless they just committed some heinous crime, is irrelevant.

The police have no prosecutorial authority. To try to bring up someone's distant past as a reason to murder them in the present is a huge Red Herring. It is the argument of the weak.
It is relevant when the media makes these people out to be saints right off the bat. Criminals act a certain way compared to normal, law abiding citizens. So yes, it is relevant.
Not relevant in the court of law, or is it?
How they act is. If you stand there and rationally talk to the officer, the gun doesn't even come out. You act like an idiot, refuse to listen, walk away from, put your hands up when you weren't even asked to, etc, what would you think if you were the officer?
What LAW did Scott break?
Perhaps it's the cops who were acting like idiots, or cowards.

Easily said from behind your computer screen.
 
BTW, it's not always illegal for a felon to have a gun.

What do you mean by that.? That they are allowed to have blackpowder guns.? Unless they have a pardon, federal law says they can't have modern smokeless powder guns.
 

Forum List

Back
Top