Kennedy said:

[LeftofLeft]

Yep. He also said a rising tide raises all ships. Liberals ignore this because it is the basis for supply side, or, what the modern day liberal refers to as "trickle down". Back to Kennedy, Liberals would refer to the "riding tide raising all ships" economic policy as a failure because there would be a delta in the size of the ships.....essentially, "the income gap". When the economy is booming and everyone's income is going up as well as their take home pay, Liberals double down on "income inequality" as a problem.

When has an economic policy rooted in class envy ( income redistribution) ever led to economic prosperity?

JFK said "A rising tide lifts all boats"

He didn't realize Republicans would figure out a way so that the rising tide only lifts the yachts

What you are describing is a socialist economy with a true 1 percent locked in. Reagan and Bush II rose the economic tide with their policies. Universal Home ownership was a worthwhile cause but the Democrats felt that financial controls and rules on loan limits was either "not fair" or "racist" that while many buyers could qualify for a $250,000 house, not all of those buyers could qualify for a $500,000 house.

Reagan and Bush sold us on the idea that if we took care of the yachts, all the other boats would naturally just do better

So, all the money went to the yachts and they got bigger and fancier

Meanwhile, the other boats struggled to stay afloat

Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats would let the non-yachts keep the level of fuel (i.e. take home pay) that Reagan and Bush did other boats would do more than just float.

The problem for working Americans is that their take home pay has not increased in spite of the economy adding $50 trillion in wealth in the last eight years

That is the largest rise in the tide in history and none of the smaller boats benefitted from it

Define wealth.

 

[LeftofLeft]

What JFK said in the same inauguration speech where he said "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country

Show US where and how a free society helping the poor equates to income equality???

 

[rightwinger]

JFK said "A rising tide lifts all boats"

He didn't realize Republicans would figure out a way so that the rising tide only lifts the yachts

What you are describing is a socialist economy with a true 1 percent locked in. Reagan and Bush II rose the economic tide with their policies. Universal Home ownership was a worthwhile cause but the Democrats felt that financial controls and rules on loan limits was either "not fair" or "racist" that while many buyers could qualify for a $250,000 house, not all of those buyers could qualify for a $500,000 house.

Reagan and Bush sold us on the idea that if we took care of the yachts, all the other boats would naturally just do better

So, all the money went to the yachts and they got bigger and fancier

Meanwhile, the other boats struggled to stay afloat

Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats would let the non-yachts keep the level of fuel (i.e. take home pay) that Reagan and Bush did other boats would do more than just float.

The problem for working Americans is that their take home pay has not increased in spite of the economy adding $50 trillion in wealth in the last eight years

That is the largest rise in the tide in history and none of the smaller boats benefitted from it

Define wealth.

National assets

Personal assets, small business, corporate and non profit

 

[rightwinger]

What JFK said in the same inauguration speech where he said "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country

Show US where and how a free society helping the poor equates to income equality???

It doesn't

You help the poor because they need helping. That is what great societies do

 

[LeftofLeft]

What you are describing is a socialist economy with a true 1 percent locked in. Reagan and Bush II rose the economic tide with their policies. Universal Home ownership was a worthwhile cause but the Democrats felt that financial controls and rules on loan limits was either "not fair" or "racist" that while many buyers could qualify for a $250,000 house, not all of those buyers could qualify for a $500,000 house.

Reagan and Bush sold us on the idea that if we took care of the yachts, all the other boats would naturally just do better

So, all the money went to the yachts and they got bigger and fancier

Meanwhile, the other boats struggled to stay afloat

Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats would let the non-yachts keep the level of fuel (i.e. take home pay) that Reagan and Bush did other boats would do more than just float.

The problem for working Americans is that their take home pay has not increased in spite of the economy adding $50 trillion in wealth in the last eight years

That is the largest rise in the tide in history and none of the smaller boats benefitted from it

Define wealth.

National assets

Personal assets, small business, corporate and non profit

This is not an insult but an analysis: You believe in redistribution of wealth.

 

[LeftofLeft]

What JFK said in the same inauguration speech where he said "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country

Show US where and how a free society helping the poor equates to income equality???

It doesn't

You help the poor because they need helping. That is what great societies do

So, you are saying we/US don't help the poor? Compared to what other great societies?

 

[rightwinger]

Reagan and Bush sold us on the idea that if we took care of the yachts, all the other boats would naturally just do better

So, all the money went to the yachts and they got bigger and fancier

Meanwhile, the other boats struggled to stay afloat

Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats would let the non-yachts keep the level of fuel (i.e. take home pay) that Reagan and Bush did other boats would do more than just float.

The problem for working Americans is that their take home pay has not increased in spite of the economy adding $50 trillion in wealth in the last eight years

That is the largest rise in the tide in history and none of the smaller boats benefitted from it

Define wealth.

National assets

Personal assets, small business, corporate and non profit

This is not an insult but an analysis: You believe in redistribution of wealth.

No
I believe in stopping programs and policies that help those who obviously don't need it

 

[rightwinger]

What JFK said in the same inauguration speech where he said "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country

Show US where and how a free society helping the poor equates to income equality???

It doesn't

You help the poor because they need helping. That is what great societies do

So, you are saying we/US don't help the poor? Compared to what other great societies?

Compared to EU, Japan, S Korea, Canada...we do much less

 

[LeftofLeft]

Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats would let the non-yachts keep the level of fuel (i.e. take home pay) that Reagan and Bush did other boats would do more than just float.

The problem for working Americans is that their take home pay has not increased in spite of the economy adding $50 trillion in wealth in the last eight years

That is the largest rise in the tide in history and none of the smaller boats benefitted from it

Define wealth.

National assets

Personal assets, small business, corporate and non profit

This is not an insult but an analysis: You believe in redistribution of wealth.

No
I believe in stopping programs and policies that help those who obviously don't need it

So do I.

 

[LeftofLeft]

What JFK said in the same inauguration speech where he said "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country

Show US where and how a free society helping the poor equates to income equality???

It doesn't

You help the poor because they need helping. That is what great societies do

So, you are saying we/US don't help the poor? Compared to what other great societies?

Compared to EU, Japan, S Korea, Canada...we do much less

Show US how we are more dependent on the EU, Japan, S Korea, and Canada? I will give you a HINT: When you have US Troops defending you, it is easier to redistribute wealth. Rightwinger, do you realize which Country each of those regions depend for security? Are you saying we should depend on another Country four Our security or should we pull out of those Countries to fund the wealth transfer you admire? Do tell.

 

[rightwinger]

What JFK said in the same inauguration speech where he said "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country

Show US where and how a free society helping the poor equates to income equality???

It doesn't

You help the poor because they need helping. That is what great societies do

So, you are saying we/US don't help the poor? Compared to what other great societies?

Compared to EU, Japan, S Korea, Canada...we do much less

Show US how we are more dependent on the EU, Japan, S Korea, and Canada? I will give you a HINT: When you have US Troops defending you, it is easier to redistribute wealth. Rightwinger, do you realize which Country each of those regions depend for security? Are you saying we should depend on another Country four Our security or should we pull out of those Countries to fund the wealth transfer you admire? Do tell.

I said we do less to help the poor and working class

Maybe if we did not spend so much being the worlds policeman we could do more to help our own people

 

[Syriusly]

"ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country"

Is there any democrat or liberal in the USA today that would say those words? Or is there any democrat or liberal in the USA today that believes those words?.

Tell us how you have answered that Redfish?

Or Donald Trump?

 

[Skull Pilot]

What you are describing is a socialist economy with a true 1 percent locked in. Reagan and Bush II rose the economic tide with their policies. Universal Home ownership was a worthwhile cause but the Democrats felt that financial controls and rules on loan limits was either "not fair" or "racist" that while many buyers could qualify for a $250,000 house, not all of those buyers could qualify for a $500,000 house.

Reagan and Bush sold us on the idea that if we took care of the yachts, all the other boats would naturally just do better

So, all the money went to the yachts and they got bigger and fancier

Meanwhile, the other boats struggled to stay afloat

Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats would let the non-yachts keep the level of fuel (i.e. take home pay) that Reagan and Bush did other boats would do more than just float.

The problem for working Americans is that their take home pay has not increased in spite of the economy adding $50 trillion in wealth in the last eight years

That is the largest rise in the tide in history and none of the smaller boats benefitted from it

Define wealth.

National assets

Personal assets, small business, corporate and non profit

and assets have nothing to do with income

 

[rightwinger]

Reagan and Bush sold us on the idea that if we took care of the yachts, all the other boats would naturally just do better

So, all the money went to the yachts and they got bigger and fancier

Meanwhile, the other boats struggled to stay afloat

Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats would let the non-yachts keep the level of fuel (i.e. take home pay) that Reagan and Bush did other boats would do more than just float.

The problem for working Americans is that their take home pay has not increased in spite of the economy adding $50 trillion in wealth in the last eight years

That is the largest rise in the tide in history and none of the smaller boats benefitted from it

Define wealth.

National assets

Personal assets, small business, corporate and non profit

and assets have nothing to do with income

Of course not

That is why they funnel money into assets and not income

Income is for suckers

 

[LeftofLeft]

Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats would let the non-yachts keep the level of fuel (i.e. take home pay) that Reagan and Bush did other boats would do more than just float.

The problem for working Americans is that their take home pay has not increased in spite of the economy adding $50 trillion in wealth in the last eight years

That is the largest rise in the tide in history and none of the smaller boats benefitted from it

Define wealth.

National assets

Personal assets, small business, corporate and non profit

and assets have nothing to do with income

Of course not

That is why they funnel money into assets and not income

Income is for suckers

Pelosi, Reid, Kerry are masters of that art. True elite 1 percenters that have also mastered you. I'm not buying what they're peddling which is laughable to watch you people eat it up.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats would let the non-yachts keep the level of fuel (i.e. take home pay) that Reagan and Bush did other boats would do more than just float.

The problem for working Americans is that their take home pay has not increased in spite of the economy adding $50 trillion in wealth in the last eight years

That is the largest rise in the tide in history and none of the smaller boats benefitted from it

Define wealth.

National assets

Personal assets, small business, corporate and non profit

and assets have nothing to do with income

Of course not

That is why they funnel money into assets and not income

Income is for suckers

money is an asset too.

Income is what you earn and you actually control that

 

[Redfish]

The only thing these greedy filthy ass Democrats care about is how big their welfare check will be and what upgrade they will get on their Obamaphone.

They are only concerned about getting somebody else to pay their bills not what they can contribute to their country.

Democrats are the scum of America.

sadly the party of Kennedy and Truman has become the party of socialist dictatorship.

 

[Redfish]

Show US where and how a free society helping the poor equates to income equality???

It doesn't

You help the poor because they need helping. That is what great societies do

So, you are saying we/US don't help the poor? Compared to what other great societies?

Compared to EU, Japan, S Korea, Canada...we do much less

Show US how we are more dependent on the EU, Japan, S Korea, and Canada? I will give you a HINT: When you have US Troops defending you, it is easier to redistribute wealth. Rightwinger, do you realize which Country each of those regions depend for security? Are you saying we should depend on another Country four Our security or should we pull out of those Countries to fund the wealth transfer you admire? Do tell.

I said we do less to help the poor and working class

Maybe if we did not spend so much being the worlds policeman we could do more to help our own people

'
more leftist bullshit. The poor in the USA are better off than the middle classes in most of the rest of the world.

But, since you brought it up, how much should the government provide to people who are too lazy to work? Should there be any limits on how much govt cheese you get?

 

[rightwinger]

It doesn't

You help the poor because they need helping. That is what great societies do

So, you are saying we/US don't help the poor? Compared to what other great societies?

Compared to EU, Japan, S Korea, Canada...we do much less

Show US how we are more dependent on the EU, Japan, S Korea, and Canada? I will give you a HINT: When you have US Troops defending you, it is easier to redistribute wealth. Rightwinger, do you realize which Country each of those regions depend for security? Are you saying we should depend on another Country four Our security or should we pull out of those Countries to fund the wealth transfer you admire? Do tell.

I said we do less to help the poor and working class

Maybe if we did not spend so much being the worlds policeman we could do more to help our own people

'
more leftist bullshit. The poor in the USA are better off than the middle classes in most of the rest of the world.

But, since you brought it up, how much should the government provide to people who are too lazy to work? Should there be any limits on how much govt cheese you get?

I love it when Conservatives compare us to third world shitholes

 

[Redfish]

"ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country"

Is there any democrat or liberal in the USA today that would say those words? Or is there any democrat or liberal in the USA today that believes those words?.

Tell us how you have answered that Redfish?

Or Donald Trump?

I supported Kennedy when he said that, it was the right thing to promote, and still is the right thing today.

But, as usual, you dodged the question. Which democrats of today would say what Kennedy said? What democrats of today would have the balls to end WW2 like Truman did?

Try to actually address the question.