Kentucky Clerk Jailed for Contempt of Court

[Kondor3]

Break the law, suffer the consequences. That's tyranny?

tyranny that she has to respect the rights of others.

Tyranny that forces her to deal with sexual deviants and perverts (homosexuals).

lol. keep up the crazy. it suits you.

It is not 'crazy' to label homosexuality as sexual deviancy and perversion.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

There is no reason to call her a hog. Is that why she should be jailed in your opinion? Stay on topic. Christians singled out for political prisioners.

You have been spoon fed the facts of the case and yet you continue to lie about it.

Or are you just plain stupid?

Either way, quit being such a silly drama queen. She's not a martyr or a political prisoner.

She defied the decision of the Supreme Court of The United States. She is in contempt of court.

And no - Obama had nothing to do with it so don't even go there.

Don't call me stupid fuckwad. How do you like this getting personal? My opinion is just as valid if not more so. Half the country was against this court decision. That doesn't settle anything when God is concerned. Makes no difference is you believe in God or not.

Wrong.

You saying that she is a martyr or political prisoner is indeed the words of an ignorant drama queen.

If you don't like the law, work to change it. Until then, neither you nor she are above the laws of the land.

If you want to live by the laws of some "god", Iraq has a spot for you.

Your response is proof this is all about religious persecution and creation of a new class of political prisoners in this country. Next yoo people will line up the boxcars to haul us off to prisoner camps for extermination. You did it once before. You are capable of it again.

Comparing the Supreme Court of the United States to nazis?

That's downright stupid.

Bullshit. Your side are the Nazis.

 

[ogibillm]

what happens on jan 20, 2017 that would cause the supreme court to go back on their decision?

Conservatives regain control of the Executive, as well as the Legislative, and begin to strong-arm the Judicial.

All it takes is one Justice, to change his-or-her mind, or to retire, or to expire - in order to stand the whole thing back on its ear again.

The present state of affairs is far more fragile than you are allowing yourself to believe.

good to know that you don't believe in an independent judicial branch like our founders did.

 

[Kondor3]

...4. Believing in a god does not make you immune from the law.

When the Law forces you to engage in Wickedness, then the Law must be changed.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

Then change the law.

And if you don't like the Constitution of the US, leave or join the other anti-America RWs and work to overthrow it.

Meanwhile, you DO have to abide by the law or suffer the consequences.

All it will take is a revised SCOTUS ruling.

Which should be easy enough to arrange, over the long haul.

 

[Seawytch]

Break the law, suffer the consequences. That's tyranny?

Get lost dyke bitch.

Ooh, cogent argument. I'm slain.

 

[ogibillm]

Break the law, suffer the consequences. That's tyranny?

tyranny that she has to respect the rights of others.

Tyranny that forces her to deal with sexual deviants and perverts (homosexuals).

lol. keep up the crazy. it suits you.

It is not 'crazy' to label homosexuality as sexual deviancy and perversion.

no, it's crazy to think that requiring a government official to follow the law and treat all citizens equally is tantamount to tyranny.
thinking that it matters that you believe homosexuality to be perversion or deviant is just laughable.

 

[Kondor3]

what happens on jan 20, 2017 that would cause the supreme court to go back on their decision?

Conservatives regain control of the Executive, as well as the Legislative, and begin to strong-arm the Judicial.

All it takes is one Justice, to change his-or-her mind, or to retire, or to expire - in order to stand the whole thing back on its ear again.

The present state of affairs is far more fragile than you are allowing yourself to believe.

good to know that you don't believe in an independent judicial branch like our founders did.

Presidents have been stacking and strong-arming the Supreme Court for centuries... snap out of it, farm boy.

 

[Rotagilla]

what happens on jan 20, 2017 that would cause the supreme court to go back on their decision?

Conservatives regain control of the Executive, as well as the Legislative, and begin to strong-arm the Judicial.

All it takes is one Justice, to change his-or-her mind, or to retire, or to expire - in order to stand the whole thing back on its ear again.

The present state of affairs is far more fragile than you are allowing yourself to believe.

good to know that you don't believe in an independent judicial branch like our founders did.

all three branches are irredeemably corrupt and only work for minorities and special interests...

 

[Kondor3]

Break the law, suffer the consequences. That's tyranny?

tyranny that she has to respect the rights of others.

Tyranny that forces her to deal with sexual deviants and perverts (homosexuals).

lol. keep up the crazy. it suits you.

It is not 'crazy' to label homosexuality as sexual deviancy and perversion.

no, it's crazy to think that requiring a government official to follow the law and treat all citizens equally is tantamount to tyranny.
thinking that it matters that you believe homosexuality to be perversion or deviant is just laughable.

Sexual deviancy and perversion should revert to outlaw status.

 

[Seawytch]

what happens on jan 20, 2017 that would cause the supreme court to go back on their decision?

Conservatives regain control of the Executive, as well as the Legislative, and begin to strong-arm the Judicial.

All it takes is one Justice, to change his-or-her mind, or to retire, or to expire - in order to stand the whole thing back on its ear again.

The present state of affairs is far more fragile than you are allowing yourself to believe.

The war isn't over.

It's only just begun.

You won the last round.

The American People are likely to win the next.

Except Roberts wouldn't reverse the decision. You'd have to get at least two liberals off the bench and replace them with someone insane. Good luck.

 

[BULLDOG]

...4. Believing in a god does not make you immune from the law.

When the Law forces you to engage in Wickedness, then the Law must be changed.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

Then change the law.

And if you don't like the Constitution of the US, leave or join the other anti-America RWs and work to overthrow it.

Meanwhile, you DO have to abide by the law or suffer the consequences.

All it will take is a revised SCOTUS ruling.

Which should be easy enough to arrange, over the long haul.

You be sure to hold your breath until that happens. You lost. Accept it and move on.

 

[ogibillm]

what happens on jan 20, 2017 that would cause the supreme court to go back on their decision?

Conservatives regain control of the Executive, as well as the Legislative, and begin to strong-arm the Judicial.

All it takes is one Justice, to change his-or-her mind, or to retire, or to expire - in order to stand the whole thing back on its ear again.

The present state of affairs is far more fragile than you are allowing yourself to believe.

good to know that you don't believe in an independent judicial branch like our founders did.

all three branches are irredeemably corrupt and only work for minorities and special interests...

lol. you keep fighting the civil war. those traitors believed as you do

 

[Vigilante]

...4. Believing in a god does not make you immune from the law.

When the Law forces you to engage in Wickedness, then the Law must be changed.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

How many LAWS has the obomanation REFUSED to prosecute?

none.

You are either a liar, or stupid...I vote for both!

• U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Refuses to Prosecute ...
  www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2307562/posts
  Aug 03, 2009 · U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Refuses to Prosecute President Obama ... Violated the Code of Federal Regulations as well as Federal Criminal Laws ...

• Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws - Steve Friess ...
  www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77486.html
  Jun 16, 2012 · ... the Department of Justice announced it would not prosecute medical ... has told him many times as well. Obama is a ... to ignore voting laws?

• Americorps Inspector General has found many cases of fraud ...
  Americorps Inspector General has found many cases of fraud but Obama administration refuses to prosecute...
  Feb 08, 2011 · Americorps Inspector General has found many cases of fraud but Obama administration refuses to prosecute. ... to prosecute those who break the laws?

• DOJ Refuses to Prosecute Case of 'Willful' Tax Records Access
  www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Holder-tax-prosecute-refuse/2013/07/16/...
  DOJ Refuses to Prosecute Case of 'Willful ... Grassley has asked Attorney General Eric Holder to explain before ... How can Obama be a failure. He has initiated ...

DOJ Refuses to Prosecute IRS Cases | Politics
beforeitsnews.com › Politics
Jul 19, 2013 · DOJ Refuses to Prosecute IRS Cases. Friday, July 19, 2013 3:46 % of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents. ... (an Obama appointee).

• Obama Pushes for Gun Control, Refuses to Prosecute Gang ...
  www.frontpagemag.com/.../obama-pushes-gun-control-refuses-prosecute...
  Obama Pushes for Gun Control, ... but Obama has chosen to neglect ... one would think that the documented lack of enforcement of existing gun laws by a president ...

• Need more, I have them!

 

[ogibillm]

tyranny that she has to respect the rights of others.

Tyranny that forces her to deal with sexual deviants and perverts (homosexuals).

lol. keep up the crazy. it suits you.

It is not 'crazy' to label homosexuality as sexual deviancy and perversion.

no, it's crazy to think that requiring a government official to follow the law and treat all citizens equally is tantamount to tyranny.
thinking that it matters that you believe homosexuality to be perversion or deviant is just laughable.

Sexual deviancy and perversion should revert to outlaw status.

like i said, keep up the crazy.

 

[Rotagilla]

Break the law, suffer the consequences. That's tyranny?

tyranny that she has to respect the rights of others.

Tyranny that forces her to deal with sexual deviants and perverts (homosexuals).

lol. keep up the crazy. it suits you.

It is not 'crazy' to label homosexuality as sexual deviancy and perversion.

no, it's crazy to think that requiring a government official to follow the law and treat all citizens equally is tantamount to tyranny.
thinking that it matters if you believe homosexuality to be perversion or deviant is just laughable.

Does affirmative action "treat all citizens equally"?
Do race based set asides and preferential treatment as a "protected class" "treat all citizens equally"?

 

[Vigilante]

Really, she was the wrong woman to do this, as her history brought out by the FAGERAL media shows her to be a hypocrite...BUT, if all the other clerks around the country refused to do it, were arrested, and held onto their religious convictions, what would THOUSANDS of these people be sending a message to the majority of Americans....that our culture has been usurped by a bunch of perverted scumbags that, at most are 2% of the population, and have lesbians in the SCOTUS that made another horrible decision!

She wasn't a Christian while committing those indiscretions. If she was, Christians would abandon her. We aren't.

I know, but still the VISUAL doesn't look good, and you know the FAGERALS in the press and in here will discount that!

 

[ogibillm]

...4. Believing in a god does not make you immune from the law.

When the Law forces you to engage in Wickedness, then the Law must be changed.

The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

How many LAWS has the obomanation REFUSED to prosecute?

none.

You are either a liar, or stupid...I vote for both!

• U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Refuses to Prosecute ...
  www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2307562/posts
  Aug 03, 2009 · U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Refuses to Prosecute President Obama ... Violated the Code of Federal Regulations as well as Federal Criminal Laws ...

• Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws - Steve Friess ...
  www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77486.html
  Jun 16, 2012 · ... the Department of Justice announced it would not prosecute medical ... has told him many times as well. Obama is a ... to ignore voting laws?

• Americorps Inspector General has found many cases of fraud ...
  Americorps Inspector General has found many cases of fraud but Obama administration refuses to prosecute...
  Feb 08, 2011 · Americorps Inspector General has found many cases of fraud but Obama administration refuses to prosecute. ... to prosecute those who break the laws?

• DOJ Refuses to Prosecute Case of 'Willful' Tax Records Access
  www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Holder-tax-prosecute-refuse/2013/07/16/...
  DOJ Refuses to Prosecute Case of 'Willful ... Grassley has asked Attorney General Eric Holder to explain before ... How can Obama be a failure. He has initiated ...

DOJ Refuses to Prosecute IRS Cases | Politics
beforeitsnews.com › Politics
Jul 19, 2013 · DOJ Refuses to Prosecute IRS Cases. Friday, July 19, 2013 3:46 % of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents. ... (an Obama appointee).

• Obama Pushes for Gun Control, Refuses to Prosecute Gang ...
  www.frontpagemag.com/.../obama-pushes-gun-control-refuses-prosecute...
  Obama Pushes for Gun Control, ... but Obama has chosen to neglect ... one would think that the documented lack of enforcement of existing gun laws by a president ...

• Need more, I have them!

nice sources. now do you have something legitimate?
enforcing the law in a manner different from what you would like is not the same as not enforcing or prosecuting the law

 

[AvgGuyIA]

MLK wasn't getting paid by government for what he did, and was working to stop segregation, not enforce it like she is.

Its a comparison of methods, not of reasons or circumstances.

when mlk was arrested it was showing the injustice in the system. she's getting arrested because she's denying people their rights - she is the injustice

If marriage is a right, then anyone can marry.

No??????

WTF!!!!

same sex couples have the right to get married. she's denying them that right.
what you said, as incoherent as it was, does not change that.

She isn't denying them anything other than a license from her. They can always get one.....They just have to get into their cars and drive to another county.

That doesn't force gay marriage acceptance on the rest us us.

 

[Rotagilla]

what happens on jan 20, 2017 that would cause the supreme court to go back on their decision?

Conservatives regain control of the Executive, as well as the Legislative, and begin to strong-arm the Judicial.

All it takes is one Justice, to change his-or-her mind, or to retire, or to expire - in order to stand the whole thing back on its ear again.

The present state of affairs is far more fragile than you are allowing yourself to believe.

good to know that you don't believe in an independent judicial branch like our founders did.

all three branches are irredeemably corrupt and only work for minorities and special interests...

lol. you keep fighting the civil war. those traitors believed as you do

they were patriots fighting an invasion...like the patriots in 1776

...like I said, though...all three branches are irredeemably corrupt and only work for minorities and special interests...

 

[BlindBoo]

Religious tyranny is coming to an end. This is just one grumpy dinosaur pitching a fit. I don't agree with jail, but if she refuses to do her job she should be fired.