Kerry Claims 'Great Respect' for 'Religious Importance' of Khamenei's Fatwa

[Neotrotsky]

Get a load of this....

Look up “gullible” in the dictionary and one will find Kerry and Papa Obama's pictures next to it.

"Now I want to be very clear. Nothing in our deliberations is decided until everything is decided. And the purpose of these negotiations is not just to get any deal; it is to get the right deal. President Obama means it when he says, again and again, that Iran will not be permitted to get a nuclear weapon. As you all know, Iran says it doesn’t want a nuclear weapon, and that is a very welcome statement that the Supreme Leader has, in fact, incorporated into a fatwa. And we have great respect – great respect – for the religious importance of a fatwa. And what we are effectively trying to do is translate that into legal language, into everyday language within the framework of a negotiated agreement that everybody can understand, which requires everybody to have certain obligations and ultimately be able to guarantee that Iran’s program, its nuclear program, will be peaceful now and peaceful forever."

 

[Jackson]

I don't think they are gullible, I think they are working for the terrorists! I haven't seen much from Obama to determine he's working for Americans....have you?

 

[Neotrotsky]

And we have great respect – great respect – for the religious importance of a fatwa.

ones does have to admit
this is really sucking up

Really, does this include the fatwas to kill people?

Sad to think these amateurs are in charge

 

[Jackson]

And we have great respect – great respect – for the religious importance of a fatwa.

ones does have to admit
this is really sucking up

Really, does this include the fatwas to kill people?

Sad to think these amateurs are in charge

Really.

 

[Neotrotsky]

They stone women to death in Iran
and Papa Obama wants to give them an easy path to uranium

Democrats claims.....
nothing to see here-
this deal is good for the US, otherwise you are racist

 

[Jackson]

I don't think they are gullible, I think they are working for the terrorists! I haven't seen much from Obama to determine he's working for Americans....have you?

They worked to get Obamacare where millions have lost their doctors and their health plans,,,was that for the common good? Nope!

They are letting illegals come into the US via Obama's EO, and allowing them to get thousands in tax refunds when they haven't paid a dime, not to mention taking jobs away from citizens. Was that good for the country? Nada!

Now Obama and Kerry are doing their best to see that there is nothing standing in the way of Iran getting the bomb and most likely starting WWIII....is that what Americans want? Good Lord, NO!

 

[Neotrotsky]

I know

why do the Democrats hate the US ?

 

[Jackson]

I know

why do the Democrats hate the US ?

All Socialists do.

 

[Neotrotsky]

But pretend they don't

 

[Neotrotsky]

Good thing with the Israel election
Netanyahu’s comments made the left's collective head spin:

“Anyone who is going to establish a Palestinian state, anyone who is going to evacuate territories today, is simply giving a base for attacks to the radical Islam against Israel,” he said. “This is the true reality that was created here in the last few years.”

Netanyahu went on to say that any opponents on the left who might argue otherwise are “sticking their head in the sand, time and time again.”


No doubt the dangerous position of Papa Obama and Iran
helped to push the election into Netanyahu’s arms

He should really thank him

 

[waltky]

Yea, whatever happened with dat nuclear fatwa??...

Fatwa? Iran’s Nuclear Activity Continued for Years After Ayatollah Supposedly Banned It
December 3, 2015 – Iran conducted a coordinated program aimed at developing a nuclear bomb until 2003, and carried out further weapons-related activity until at least 2009, the U.N. nuclear watchdog said in a key report to its governing board on Wednesday.

That assessment by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicates that Iran continued to carry out some weapons development activities even after supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s purported fatwa banning such activity – and, in the words of House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Rep. Ed Royce, Iran “lied” about it. The exact date of the fatwa is in dispute – some critics dispute its very existence or whether it holds much religious weight – but Iranian President Hasan Rouhani has dated it to early November 2004; Iran’s state-funded Press TV has said it was issued in August 2005; and the Iranian government referred to the existence of the fatwa in a September 2005 letter to the IAEA.

Yet according to the IAEA, some weapons-related activity continued for years after a coordinated program was stopped in 2003 – and therefore for years after Khamenei supposedly issued a religious decree declaring that the production, stockpiling, or use of nuclear weapons was forbidden under Islam, and that Iran would never acquire or use them. President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have cited the fatwa favorably on several occasions in the context of negotiations that delivered the controversial nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) last summer. “The Agency’s overall assessment is that a range of activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device were conducted in Iran prior to the end of 2003 as a coordinated effort, and some activities took place after 2003,” the IAEA report stated.

Specifically, it said activities that took place after 2003 included “computer modelling of a nuclear explosive device” – work which the IAEA assessed Iran continued to carry out between 2005 and 2009. In the period since 2009, the IAEA said, it found “no credible indications of activities in Iran relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device.” Overall, the IAEA said the Iranian activities “did not advance beyond feasibility and scientific studies, and the acquisition of certain relevant technical competences and capabilities.”

They did, however, include work in 2002-2003 looking into ways to ensure that a spherical payload in a Shahab-3 missile “would remain safe until the re-entry vehicle reached its designated target, and that the payload would then function correctly.” (The Shahab-3, first test-fired in 1998, has a range of around 800 miles, potentially threatening Israel as well as U.S. allies and forces in the Gulf. The fusion device in a nuclear warhead is typically spherical in shape.)

Iran ‘shall cooperate fully’

 

[LeftofLeft]

Get a load of this....

Look up “gullible” in the dictionary and one will find Kerry and Papa Obama's pictures next to it.

"Now I want to be very clear. Nothing in our deliberations is decided until everything is decided. And the purpose of these negotiations is not just to get any deal; it is to get the right deal. President Obama means it when he says, again and again, that Iran will not be permitted to get a nuclear weapon. As you all know, Iran says it doesn’t want a nuclear weapon, and that is a very welcome statement that the Supreme Leader has, in fact, incorporated into a fatwa. And we have great respect – great respect – for the religious importance of a fatwa. And what we are effectively trying to do is translate that into legal language, into everyday language within the framework of a negotiated agreement that everybody can understand, which requires everybody to have certain obligations and ultimately be able to guarantee that Iran’s program, its nuclear program, will be peaceful now and peaceful forever."

From the man with 4 Purple Hearts in 6 months service in Vietnam who stood outside the White House and threw someone else's medals onto the lawn in protest while pretending the medals were his......kind of like Dan Rather pretending that MS Word generated documents were authentic documents that GW Bush was AWOL even though MS Word was at least ten years away from hitting the market.