TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
- Thread starter
- #81
A. (from your own link, btw): The treaty would require countries that ratify it to establish national regulations to control the transfer of conventional arms and components and to regulate arms brokers, but it will not explicitly control the domestic use of weapons in any country.
B. Treaties with foreign nations cannot override the constitution. It's in the constitution.
Exactly - the opposition stems from the NRA hierarchy who make millions out of arming child soldiers around the world.
Heaven forbid that people would not be able to make money by arming terrorists!
Do you honestly think that it will do what it says it will? Or will liberals use this as a platform for more gun regulations here in the United States? Sigh.