Ketanji Brown Jackson's Shocking, Sickening Record in Child Porn Cases

[Leo123]

Because I was bringing up the point that you will, undoubtedly, be upset about the make up the SCOTUS bench. You are quoting MLK, but you have (if I recall) gotten involved in some of those threads proclaiming that whites will no longer be the majority in 2040 or 2050. I am not afraid of republicans being elected this Nov.

I am not upset about the skin colors of the justices. YOU are the one bringing up skin color here, not me. As far as the make up of SCOTUS, I would prefer non-progressive justices that go by the Constitution instead of trying to over interpret meanings and make law. I got news for you, 'whites' never existed. No one is white and no one is black. Those are terms and labels applied to people in order to separate them into 'tribes.' Democrats historically have done this.

 

[WinterBorn]

I am not upset about the skin colors of the justices. YOU are the one bringing up skin color here, not me. As far as the make up of SCOTUS, I would prefer non-progressive justices that go by the Constitution instead of trying to over interpret meanings and make law. I got news for you, 'whites' never existed. No one is white and no one is black. Those are terms and labels applied to people in order to separate them into 'tribes.' Democrats historically have done this.

People have historically done that.

Ok, so you don't care about color of justices, and I don't care about whether republicans are elected in November.

As for the make up of SCOTUS, how about all the justices go by the US Constitution and not try to over-interpret meanings to make new law. Because the republicans have been crowing that the new justices Trump put in will strike down Roe v. Wade. Isn't that interpreting and making new law?

 

[bodecea]

Fuck off troll. Assholes like you who support light sentences for pedos need not be allowed in normal society. Protecting our kid from people like you is a big thing for parents. That's why your side is crying because you don't get to indoctrinate children.

Prove where that poster supports lighter sentences for pedos...link where he said that.

 

[bodecea]

Lol, OK shortbus. Be a scared little batch because DeSantis tells you to. Hilarious

What is DeSantis hiding?

 

[WinterBorn]

Prove where that poster supports lighter sentences for pedos...link where he said that.

I am surprised that the mods have not gotten involved in this part of the discussion. Accusations of supporting pedos is pretty close to calling someone a pedo.

 

[Leo123]

People have historically done that.

Ok, so you don't care about color of justices, and I don't care about whether republicans are elected in November.

As for the make up of SCOTUS, how about all the justices go by the US Constitution and not try to over-interpret meanings to make new law. Because the republicans have been crowing that the new justices Trump put in will strike down Roe v. Wade. Isn't that interpreting and making new law?

Yes, that's why the Founders wanted everyone to have equal rights no matter what color. That was a clear challenge to what was going on at the time. Even some of the Founders had slaves but, slavery was and still is a world problem and, it has taken all this time, a Civil War, MLK and others to try to lead US toward the goal of the Founders and the Constitution they wrote.

Roe Wade was not a law passed by Congress. It was a SCOTUS decision to strike down State abortion laws.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, that's why the Founders wanted everyone to have equal rights no matter what color. That was a clear challenge to what was going on at the time. Even some of the Founders had slaves but, slavery was and still is a world problem and, it has taken all this time, a Civil War, MLK and others to try to lead US toward the goal of the Founders and the Constitution they wrote.

Roe Wade was not a law passed by Congress. It was a SCOTUS decision. Decisions can be reversed.

Roe v. Wade was decided based on the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. SCOTUS cannot just decide to reverse the decision without some basis in the US Constitution.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

She might have a reason for being lenient toward child abusers. The abused children might have been white and therefore deserved abuse

 

[Colin norris]

Today Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court nomination was confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Last week investigators got the transcripts of Jackson's sentencing hearings in child porn cases. They show a pattern of shockingly light sentences and a sickening hostility toward anti-child porn laws. I'm not exaggerating one bit. The transcripts destroy the dishonest liberal "fact-checks" that white-washed her record as "pretty mainstream."

This lady has no business sitting on a traffic court, much less the U.S. Supreme Court. But, thanks to the Democrats, she's now a Supreme Court justice.

Exclusive | Ketanji Brown Jackson chose leniency even in baby sex torture cases

Over and over, the records reveal, Judge Jackson made excuses for sex fiends’ criminal behavior and cut them slack in defiance of investigators and prosecutors.

nypost.com

Shocking and sickening? Oh my God. The whole fabric of society has broken down. I was under the impression she had followed the law as per the script and precedents.

It must hurt you godbothering turds when members of your own party can see through your hate and lies and vote for her.
Will you ostracise them now as you did with Cheney? Call them traitors like before?

 

[Leo123]

Roe v. Wade was decided based on the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. SCOTUS cannot just decide to reverse the decision without some basis in the US Constitution.

Yes, and the basis could be defined differently by a different court. Since the 14th amendment (basically created for former slaves) has a Due Process Clause that prohibits States from depriving life, liberty or property without fair procedure, that clause could also be re-interpreted to protect the rights of the unborn.

 

[The Original Tree]

Shocking and sickening? Oh my God. The whole fabric of society has broken down. I was under the impression she had followed the law as per the script and precedents.

It must hurt you godbothering turds when members of your own party can see through your hate and lies and vote for her.
Will you ostracise them now as you did with Cheney? Call them traitors like before?

America is going to be punished over coddling homosexuals and pedophiles!

 

[Colin norris]

So you just don't care if she not only gave obscenely light sentences to pedophiles but expressed hostility toward anti-child porn laws? These were not just people who had viewed kiddy porn but people who had distributed it and in some cases had participated in it. You don't care about that? Wow, you're sick.

Wheres your evidence that she did a these things?
Dont submit some right wing religious nut job evidence either.
Why didn't the justice system itself take these so called shocking decisions up with her?
Why were they not appealed by the prosecution etc? Ill tell you why.
Because she did nothing wrong. He only mistake that she didn't include you god fearing hypocrite paedophile supporting church goers in her decision.
Of course had she been a republican not a word would be uttered. How coincidental.

 

[WinterBorn]

Yes, and the basis could be defined differently by a different court. Since the 14th amendment (basically created for former slaves) has a Due Process Clause that prohibits States from depriving life, liberty or property without fair procedure, that clause could also be re-interpreted to protect the rights of the unborn.

Ok. So get a majority of the justices to vote that way and there you have it.

 

[Leo123]

Wheres your evidence that she did a these things?
Dont submit some right wing religious nut job evidence either.
Why didn't the justice system itself take these so called shocking decisions up with her?
Why were they not appealed by the prosecution etc? Ill tell you why.
Because she did nothing wrong. He only mistake that she didn't include you god fearing hypocrite paedophile supporting church goers in her decision.
Of course had she been a republican not a word would be uttered. How coincidental.

A judge doesn't have to go by the sentencing suggestions of the prosecution. In fact, if that is what she did, IMO she's more of a rubber stamp than a real judge and, we're not even getting into her refusal to state what a woman is which also makes her a rubber stamp for the radical left.

 

[Colin norris]

A judge doesn't have to go by the sentencing suggestions of the prosecution. In fact, if that is what she did, IMO she's more of a rubber stamp than a real judge and, we're not even getting into her refusal to state what a woman is which also makes her a rubber stamp for the radical left.

Youve got nothing but hate because she's a democrat so cut your bullshit.

She answered the question about women perfectly and showed the republicans godbotherers just how stupid they were for asking it. Yet here you are still grinding away with your childish back biting as if the woman is wrong.

Why don't you concentrate on Thomas's conflict of interest over his brain dead wife's action?
No. Lets forget that because he's a republican and your a hypocrite. Fuck off.

 

[Leo123]

Ok. So get a majority of the justices to vote that way and there you have it.

That is why each party would like their nominee to adhere to their particular left/right philosophy however, the fact that the appointment is for life, justices are free to shed their biases in favor of strict Constitutional interpretation. Brown, from her history, and as I mentioned in a previous post, seems to be a 'rubber stamp' for the far left. Biden chose her because she was black and a woman. Hopefully she will adhere more to the Constitution than her far left past.

 

[Colin norris]

America is going to be punished over coddling homosexuals and pedophiles!

Of course they are. I suspect God will strike them all dead and turn them into pillars of salt.
Lightning will reign down like shards of glass, rivers will run with blood from those evil atheist judges.
And when it happens all you godbotherers will rise in unison, rejoicing in prayer and throw your babies bodily into the air.
Triumphalism indeed. I can't wait. Dickhead.

 

[Leo123]

Youve got nothing but hate because she's a democrat so cut your bullshit.

She answered the question about women perfectly and showed the republicans godbotherers just how stupid they were for asking it. Yet here you are still grinding away with your childish back biting as if the woman is wrong.

Why don't you concentrate on Thomas's conflict of interest over his brain dead wife's action?
No. Lets forget that because he's a republican and your a hypocrite. Fuck off.

Just stating facts. I never mentioned I hated anyone but you seem to harbor a lot of inappropriate rage. Maybe get help.

 

[Leo123]

Of course they are. I suspect God will strike them all dead and turn them into pillars of salt.
Lightning will reign down like shards of glass, rivers will run with blood from those evil atheist judges.
And when it happens all you godbotherers will rise in unison, rejoicing in prayer and throw your babies bodily into the air.
Triumphalism indeed. I can't wait. Dickhead.

I disagree with your fundamentalist interpretation of biblical stories.

 

[dudmuck]

That is why each party would like their nominee to adhere to their particular left/right philosophy however, the fact that the appointment is for life, justices are free to shed their biases in favor of strict Constitutional interpretation. Brown, from her history, and as I mentioned in a previous post, seems to be a 'rubber stamp' for the far left. Biden chose her because she was black and a woman. Hopefully she will adhere more to the Constitution than her far left past.

oh yea, what about her record puts her on the left?