Know Why The Left Hides History?

[Unkotare]

Are there any of my actual posts, revelations about your god, FDR, that you can actually come to grips with?

Any?


No?


Not a one?????



Soooo....inadvetently, you're testimony is that I am 100% correct, and accurate in my myriad posts about your god, FDR.


Witness is dismissed.

And what testimony do you present that the voting public, and the historians are wrong?

OK.....I'll give you another chance to prove you have a spine, or that bulbous organ atop one......


This about your god, Franklin Roosevelt.
Any disagreement about these facts????
1. he extended the recession into a depression
2. he turned over military control of US strategy in WWII to Joseph Stalin
3. he despised minorities
4. he despised the Constitution
5. he kept WWII going an extra 2-3 years with concomitant casualties.


and.....can you clarify this age old query?
'Was FDR a socialist or a communist?'

You should get that information to the historians as soon as possible, getting the information to the people that voted for FDR four times may be kinda late.

Again, nothing but logical fallacy and idol fellatio.

I don't think the 238 presidential scholars that selected FDR as America's best president care too much about your evaluation. After all new groups of scholars are selected every few years and new groups of historians have been voting since 1948. How do you think conservative historians would vote for best president?

You have never had anything to say about this topic other than logical fallacy.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are there any of my actual posts, revelations about your god, FDR, that you can actually come to grips with?

Any?


No?


Not a one?????



Soooo....inadvetently, you're testimony is that I am 100% correct, and accurate in my myriad posts about your god, FDR.


Witness is dismissed.

And what testimony do you present that the voting public, and the historians are wrong?

OK.....I'll give you another chance to prove you have a spine, or that bulbous organ atop one......


This about your god, Franklin Roosevelt.
Any disagreement about these facts????
1. he extended the recession into a depression
2. he turned over military control of US strategy in WWII to Joseph Stalin
3. he despised minorities
4. he despised the Constitution
5. he kept WWII going an extra 2-3 years with concomitant casualties.


and.....can you clarify this age old query?
'Was FDR a socialist or a communist?'

You should get that information to the historians as soon as possible, getting the information to the people that voted for FDR four times may be kinda late.

So you agree that all of 'em are correct??



1. he extended the recession into a depression
2. he turned over military control of US strategy in WWII to Joseph Stalin
3. he despised minorities
4. he despised the Constitution
5. he kept WWII going an extra 2-3 years with concomitant casualties.


and.....can you clarify this age old query?
'Was FDR a socialist or a communist?'

Childish

Nay, nay.....one of us is honest, and the other is you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are there any of my actual posts, revelations about your god, FDR, that you can actually come to grips with?

Any?


No?


Not a one?????



Soooo....inadvetently, you're testimony is that I am 100% correct, and accurate in my myriad posts about your god, FDR.


Witness is dismissed.

And what testimony do you present that the voting public, and the historians are wrong?

OK.....I'll give you another chance to prove you have a spine, or that bulbous organ atop one......


This about your god, Franklin Roosevelt.
Any disagreement about these facts????
1. he extended the recession into a depression
2. he turned over military control of US strategy in WWII to Joseph Stalin
3. he despised minorities
4. he despised the Constitution
5. he kept WWII going an extra 2-3 years with concomitant casualties.


and.....can you clarify this age old query?
'Was FDR a socialist or a communist?'

You should get that information to the historians as soon as possible, getting the information to the people that voted for FDR four times may be kinda late.

Again, nothing but logical fallacy and idol fellatio.

I don't think the 238 presidential scholars that selected FDR as America's best president care too much about your evaluation. After all new groups of scholars are selected every few years and new groups of historians have been voting since 1948. How do you think conservative historians would vote for best president?

"I don't think the 238 presidential scholars that selected FDR as America's best president care too much about your evaluation. After all new groups of scholars are selected every few years and new groups of historians have been voting since 1948. How do you think conservative historians would vote for best president?"

Your post was accurate up to the first three words.




Yet you are unable to dispute any of the facts about the man, that I provide and document.

Why is that?


When will you be changing your avi to the far more accurate 'FDRGroupie'?

 

[regent]

So far, no. What might you reveal: that FDR was elected by the people four times in a row, a record that still stands; America's most noted historians have never rated FDR below third best and now, America's best. How can I argue against the people's judgment four times in a row and the historian's rating since 1948? Might try the balanced budget thing again, and maybe the MacArthur appointment.

Are there any of my actual posts, revelations about your god, FDR, that you can actually come to grips with?

Any?


No?


Not a one?????



Soooo....inadvetently, you're testimony is that I am 100% correct, and accurate in my myriad posts about your god, FDR.


Witness is dismissed.

And what testimony do you present that the voting public, and the historians are wrong?

OK.....I'll give you another chance to prove you have a spine, or that bulbous organ atop one......


This about your god, Franklin Roosevelt.
Any disagreement about these facts????
1. he extended the recession into a depression
2. he turned over military control of US strategy in WWII to Joseph Stalin
3. he despised minorities
4. he despised the Constitution
5. he kept WWII going an extra 2-3 years with concomitant casualties.


and.....can you clarify this age old query?
'Was FDR a socialist or a communist?'

You should get that information to the historians as soon as possible, getting the information to the people that voted for FDR four times may be kinda late.

Again, nothing but logical fallacy and idol fellatio.

I agree that those historians must be nuts. Imagine group after group of America's best historians voting that FDR was America's greatest president? Must be some kind of sickness that history creates. And worse, those historians seem to be completely unaware of the history that Chic brings to the boards. All of that history Chic knows and the historians know none of it.

 

[Unkotare]

Are there any of my actual posts, revelations about your god, FDR, that you can actually come to grips with?

Any?


No?


Not a one?????



Soooo....inadvetently, you're testimony is that I am 100% correct, and accurate in my myriad posts about your god, FDR.


Witness is dismissed.

And what testimony do you present that the voting public, and the historians are wrong?

OK.....I'll give you another chance to prove you have a spine, or that bulbous organ atop one......


This about your god, Franklin Roosevelt.
Any disagreement about these facts????
1. he extended the recession into a depression
2. he turned over military control of US strategy in WWII to Joseph Stalin
3. he despised minorities
4. he despised the Constitution
5. he kept WWII going an extra 2-3 years with concomitant casualties.


and.....can you clarify this age old query?
'Was FDR a socialist or a communist?'

You should get that information to the historians as soon as possible, getting the information to the people that voted for FDR four times may be kinda late.

Again, nothing but logical fallacy and idol fellatio.

I agree that those historians must be nuts. Imagine group after group of America's best historians voting that FDR was America's greatest president? Must be some kind of sickness that history creates. And worse, those historians seem to be completely unaware of the history that Chic brings to the boards. All of that history Chic knows and the historians know none of it.

Your sickness is an addiction to logical fallacy. The cure is to try thinking for yourself once in a while.

 

[regent]

And what testimony do you present that the voting public, and the historians are wrong?

OK.....I'll give you another chance to prove you have a spine, or that bulbous organ atop one......


This about your god, Franklin Roosevelt.
Any disagreement about these facts????
1. he extended the recession into a depression
2. he turned over military control of US strategy in WWII to Joseph Stalin
3. he despised minorities
4. he despised the Constitution
5. he kept WWII going an extra 2-3 years with concomitant casualties.


and.....can you clarify this age old query?
'Was FDR a socialist or a communist?'

You should get that information to the historians as soon as possible, getting the information to the people that voted for FDR four times may be kinda late.

Again, nothing but logical fallacy and idol fellatio.

I agree that those historians must be nuts. Imagine group after group of America's best historians voting that FDR was America's greatest president? Must be some kind of sickness that history creates. And worse, those historians seem to be completely unaware of the history that Chic brings to the boards. All of that history Chic knows andthe historians seem to ignore it..

Your sickness is an addiction to logical fallacy. The cure is to try thinking for yourself once in a while.

I've never tried the "thinking history" method, it differs so with the history found in history books. When you start having success with "the thinking history method let me know how it's done. So I can avoid it. Do you use the thinking history for other projects such as thinking science and so on might be good?

 

[Unkotare]

OK.....I'll give you another chance to prove you have a spine, or that bulbous organ atop one......


This about your god, Franklin Roosevelt.
Any disagreement about these facts????
1. he extended the recession into a depression
2. he turned over military control of US strategy in WWII to Joseph Stalin
3. he despised minorities
4. he despised the Constitution
5. he kept WWII going an extra 2-3 years with concomitant casualties.


and.....can you clarify this age old query?
'Was FDR a socialist or a communist?'

You should get that information to the historians as soon as possible, getting the information to the people that voted for FDR four times may be kinda late.

Again, nothing but logical fallacy and idol fellatio.

I agree that those historians must be nuts. Imagine group after group of America's best historians voting that FDR was America's greatest president? Must be some kind of sickness that history creates. And worse, those historians seem to be completely unaware of the history that Chic brings to the boards. All of that history Chic knows andthe historians seem to ignore it..

Your sickness is an addiction to logical fallacy. The cure is to try thinking for yourself once in a while.

I've never tried the "thinking history" method, it differs so with the history found in history books. When you start having success with "the thinking history method let me know how it's done. So I can avoid it. Do you use the thinking history for other projects such as thinking science and so on might be good?

You've actually tied yourself up into so many illogical knots that you are in opposition to thinking itself? Time to regroup and reassess, champ. Chic may have literally driven you insane by proving you wrong so many times.

 

[regent]

You should get that information to the historians as soon as possible, getting the information to the people that voted for FDR four times may be kinda late.

Again, nothing but logical fallacy and idol fellatio.

I agree that those historians must be nuts. Imagine group after group of America's best historians voting that FDR was America's greatest president? Must be some kind of sickness that history creates. And worse, those historians seem to be completely unaware of the history that Chic brings to the boards. All of that history Chic knows andthe historians seem to ignore it..

Your sickness is an addiction to logical fallacy. The cure is to try thinking for yourself once in a while.

I've never tried the "thinking history" method, it differs so with the history found in history books. When you start having success with "the thinking history method let me know how it's done. So I can avoid it. Do you use the thinking history for other projects such as thinking science and so on might be good?

You've actually tied yourself up into so many illogical knots that you are in opposition to thinking itself? Time to regroup and reassess, champ. Chic may have literally driven you insane by proving you wrong so many times.

Chic must use the "think history" method and how can one that uses the old "look it up method" possibly compete?

 

[Unkotare]

Again, nothing but logical fallacy and idol fellatio.

I agree that those historians must be nuts. Imagine group after group of America's best historians voting that FDR was America's greatest president? Must be some kind of sickness that history creates. And worse, those historians seem to be completely unaware of the history that Chic brings to the boards. All of that history Chic knows andthe historians seem to ignore it..

Your sickness is an addiction to logical fallacy. The cure is to try thinking for yourself once in a while.

I've never tried the "thinking history" method, it differs so with the history found in history books. When you start having success with "the thinking history method let me know how it's done. So I can avoid it. Do you use the thinking history for other projects such as thinking science and so on might be good?

You've actually tied yourself up into so many illogical knots that you are in opposition to thinking itself? Time to regroup and reassess, champ. Chic may have literally driven you insane by proving you wrong so many times.

Chic must use the "think history" method and how can one that uses the old "look it up method" possibly compete?

Thinking scares you, doesn't it?

 

[regent]

I agree that those historians must be nuts. Imagine group after group of America's best historians voting that FDR was America's greatest president? Must be some kind of sickness that history creates. And worse, those historians seem to be completely unaware of the history that Chic brings to the boards. All of that history Chic knows andthe historians seem to ignore it..

Your sickness is an addiction to logical fallacy. The cure is to try thinking for yourself once in a while.

I've never tried the "thinking history" method, it differs so with the history found in history books. When you start having success with "the thinking history method let me know how it's done. So I can avoid it. Do you use the thinking history for other projects such as thinking science and so on might be good?

You've actually tied yourself up into so many illogical knots that you are in opposition to thinking itself? Time to regroup and reassess, champ. Chic may have literally driven you insane by proving you wrong so many times.

Chic must use the "think history" method and how can one that uses the old "look it up method" possibly compete?

Thinking scares you, doesn't it?

No, but other people's thinking can scare me, I would not go to a MD that uses the "think method" in lieu of medical school, and right now I don't think much of your "think history" method.

 

[Unkotare]

Your sickness is an addiction to logical fallacy. The cure is to try thinking for yourself once in a while.

I've never tried the "thinking history" method, it differs so with the history found in history books. When you start having success with "the thinking history method let me know how it's done. So I can avoid it. Do you use the thinking history for other projects such as thinking science and so on might be good?

You've actually tied yourself up into so many illogical knots that you are in opposition to thinking itself? Time to regroup and reassess, champ. Chic may have literally driven you insane by proving you wrong so many times.

Chic must use the "think history" method and how can one that uses the old "look it up method" possibly compete?

Thinking scares you, doesn't it?

No, but other people's thinking can scare me, I would not go to a MD that uses the "think method" in lieu of medical school, and right now I don't think much of your "think history" method.

You don't want your doctor to think?

Your inability to address ANY of the issues raised regarding your idol has made you completely irrational.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

1. Essentially, it's because they want to hide who they are, where they came from.

This sort of thing:

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425




2. But, to pick up on today's headlines.....

....the KKK began with gun control as a major objective.

Guess whose guns they wanted to control?




3. "America’s most horrific racist organization, the Ku Klux Klan, began with gun control at the very top of its agenda. Before the Civil War, blacks in the South had never been allowed to possess guns. During the war, however, blacks obtained guns for the first time. Some served as soldiers in black units in the Union Army, which allowed its men, black and white, to take their guns home with them as partial payment of past due wages. Other Southern blacks bought guns in the underground marketplace, which was flooded with firearms produced for the war.

After the war, Southern states adopted discriminatory laws like the Black Codes, which among other things barred the freedmen from having guns. Racist whites began to form posses that would go out at night to terrorize blacks—and take away those newly obtained firearms. The groups took different names: the “Men of Justice” in Alabama; the “Knights of the White Camellia” in Louisiana; the “Knights of the Rising Sun” in Texas. The group formed in Pulaski, Tenn., became the most well-known: the Ku Klux Klan."
Adam Winkler, “Gun Fight” Author, On Gun Control’s Racism



4. "The night riders move through the darkness, white against the black road....they go about their business, their horsed draped, guns and bullwhips banging dully against saddles.

....this is the South Carolina of the 1870s, not of the turn of a new millennium, and the night riders are the terror of these times. They roam upcountry, visiting their version of justice on poor blacks and the Republicans that support them, refusing to bow to the requirements of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments."
From the novel "The White Road," by John Connolly



5. Of course, the sons of the KKK, the members of the Party of Jefferson Davis and Bull Connor, ride again....

....and for the same objective.....gun control.



6. Who do they want to disarm today?
Democrats who own guns are more likely to vote for a Republican.
If you're a woman, and you own a gun, you are more likely to vote for a Republican.
If you're African-American, and you own a gun, are more likely to vote for a Republican.

The real reason is to keep guns out of the hands of Black people and give us more dope to keep us in control...

 

[regent]

I think the left has been hiding history in history books. It should be checked out and someone informed.

 

[P@triot]

The left tries to rewrite history because their history is dark and ugly...

1792 – Thomas Jefferson and James Madison founded the Democratic-Republican Party (yes, both together), a party founded on the libertarian principle of limited government.

1829 – The first official Democratic Party president, Andrew Jackson, took office.

1830 – President Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law. Under this act, Native American tribes living east of the Mississippi were rounded up and marched to camps farther west.

1830’s – The US Supreme court ruled in favor of Cherokee Indians in a suit against Georgia. The ruling said the Cherokee Nation could not be forcibly removed from their homes. Andrew Jackson overruled the decision and the Cherokee people were rounded up at gunpoint and forced out. One in four Cherokee people died during the inhumane journey which became known as the Trail of Tears.

1840’s – The Democratic Party adopted the doctrine of manifest destiny: the idea that white Americans were divinely entitled to dominate the North American continent.

1854 – A new anti-slave political party was formed to secure equal rights for black Americans. It was named the Republican Party because it’s founders wanted to return to the principles of freedom and equality set forth in the governing documents of the republic.

1856 – The first Republican presidential candidate ran on a platform that included only nine planks, six of which were for black equality and equal rights for African Americans. That same year, the Democratic platform strongly defended slavery, stating that abolitionist efforts threatened to “diminish the happiness of the people.” The Democrats won the election.

1856 – Founding Republican Party member, Sen. Charles Sumner gave a speech in the US Senate against slavery. Angered by Sumner’s message, Democratic House Rep. Preston Brooks of South Carolina, crossed the rotunda of the Capitol and in front of the entire Senate, literally clubbed Sumner almost to death. “It’s almost unthinkable, but the Democratic assailant was never even charged with the attempted murder of a United States Senator on the Senate floor,” remarked Glenn.

1857 – The Democrat-controlled Supreme Court approved the dreaded Dred Scott Decision, which declared that black American’s were “not persons but property” and therefore had no rights.

1860 – Republican presidential candidate Abraham Lincoln ran on a platform that blasted the Dred Scott Decision, opposed the fugitive slave law and announced an intention to end slavery. Lincoln received only 40 percent of the popular vote but won the presidency with 57% of the electoral college.

1861 – The Confederate flag was created by the Democratic party.

1866 – A Republican-controlled Congress enacted the 13th Amendment to constitutionally ban slavery in the US.

1860’s – The Ku Klux Klan was started by Democrats to murder Republicans: black or white.

1871 – Republican State Senator, Dr. John Winsmith, was shot seven times by the Klan because he was fighting for the rights of blacks in his state. Dr. Winsmith survived the shooting and testified before Congress about the attack.

TIMELINE: Surprising historical facts the Democratic Party wouldn’t want you to know

 

[regent]

Yeah, using our early political parties for evidence of political beliefs can be confusing. They were not like the political parties of today's America, so we can play confusing political games with them. It would be more accurate to use the terms liberal and conservative but that would destroy the purpose of using the early political parties for political beliefs.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You go on and on...but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand....others left to join the Republicans that welcomed them with open arms.....Yes, Wallace went back to being a Democrat where he won the governorship of racist Alabama (the same state that just almost elected a racist pedophile for Senator)...but was AGAIN rejected for national office in 1972 by....you guessed it...the Democrats.

Interesting read, btw: Dixie's Long Journey From Democratic Stronghold To Republican Redoubt

"....but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand..."

Nonsense.

Self-serving nonsense, the spew of folks who have been tricked into supporting the party of Jefferson Davis, the Klan, and life-long racists such as Bill Clinton.

The Democrat Party is the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

Absolute truth.....but you know that already.....remember, you didn't even KNOW that Wallace was not running as a Democrat in 1968. I had to point that out to you.

"Ex: [DEMOCRAT] Schneiderman called me ‘brown slave,’ slapped me until I called him ‘Master’

[Democrat] State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman called his Sri Lankan girlfriend his “brown slave” and wanted her to refer to him as “Master,” the woman says.
...and he’d slap me until I did,” Selvaratnam said.


“He started calling me his ‘brown slave’ and demanding that I repeat that I was ‘his property.’”
https://nypost.com/2018/05/07/ex-sc...lave-would-slap-me-until-i-called-him-master/


The Democrat Party has always ....ALWAYS.....been the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

 

[regent]

You go on and on...but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand....others left to join the Republicans that welcomed them with open arms.....Yes, Wallace went back to being a Democrat where he won the governorship of racist Alabama (the same state that just almost elected a racist pedophile for Senator)...but was AGAIN rejected for national office in 1972 by....you guessed it...the Democrats.

Interesting read, btw: Dixie's Long Journey From Democratic Stronghold To Republican Redoubt

"....but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand..."

Nonsense.

Self-serving nonsense, the spew of folks who have been tricked into supporting the party of Jefferson Davis, the Klan, and life-long racists such as Bill Clinton.

The Democrat Party is the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

Absolute truth.....but you know that already.....remember, you didn't even KNOW that Wallace was not running as a Democrat in 1968. I had to point that out to you.

"Ex: [DEMOCRAT] Schneiderman called me ‘brown slave,’ slapped me until I called him ‘Master’

[Democrat] State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman called his Sri Lankan girlfriend his “brown slave” and wanted her to refer to him as “Master,” the woman says.
...and he’d slap me until I did,” Selvaratnam said.


“He started calling me his ‘brown slave’ and demanding that I repeat that I was ‘his property.’”
https://nypost.com/2018/05/07/ex-sc...lave-would-slap-me-until-i-called-him-master/


The Democrat Party has always ....ALWAYS.....been the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

So which political party do Blacks vote for today Democratic or Republican? And just as important how come the party of Lincoln seems ashamed to mention Lincoln?

 

[Unkotare]

You go on and on...but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand....others left to join the Republicans that welcomed them with open arms.....Yes, Wallace went back to being a Democrat where he won the governorship of racist Alabama (the same state that just almost elected a racist pedophile for Senator)...but was AGAIN rejected for national office in 1972 by....you guessed it...the Democrats.

Interesting read, btw: Dixie's Long Journey From Democratic Stronghold To Republican Redoubt

"....but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand..."

Nonsense.

Self-serving nonsense, the spew of folks who have been tricked into supporting the party of Jefferson Davis, the Klan, and life-long racists such as Bill Clinton.

The Democrat Party is the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

Absolute truth.....but you know that already.....remember, you didn't even KNOW that Wallace was not running as a Democrat in 1968. I had to point that out to you.

"Ex: [DEMOCRAT] Schneiderman called me ‘brown slave,’ slapped me until I called him ‘Master’

[Democrat] State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman called his Sri Lankan girlfriend his “brown slave” and wanted her to refer to him as “Master,” the woman says.
...and he’d slap me until I did,” Selvaratnam said.


“He started calling me his ‘brown slave’ and demanding that I repeat that I was ‘his property.’”
https://nypost.com/2018/05/07/ex-sc...lave-would-slap-me-until-i-called-him-master/


The Democrat Party has always ....ALWAYS.....been the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

So which political party do Blacks vote for today Democratic or Republican? And just as important how come the party of Lincoln seems ashamed to mention Lincoln?

Logical fallacy again.

 

[boedicca]

Easy Peasy Lemon Squeezy:

The Left hides history because a true examination of history demonstrates that the Left's agenda is highly destructive to the welfare of humans.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This shit again? At that point in history the southern Democrats were the right wing of the country. Those "Democrats" all joined the Republican party in the 1950/60s. You're using labels that no longer carry the same meaning to distort history. Whether you're doing that intentionally or out of stupidity is unknown, but the truth of it is that that's the legacy of the right wing, not the left.

Check this out.

I bet if you looked up the platform of the southern "Democrats" from that time period you'd agree with just about everything they were saying. People from the right that claim that the KKK was born from the left either have absolutely no integrity or they don't have a strong understanding of history.

^ The Parties switches sides, remember?