Leftism: The Perpetual, Universal, Mistake

[Sun Devil 92]

OP doesn't realize conservatives used to support a social hierarchy...

You'd need a chart to follow the evolution of these terms through the years.

The founders were classical liberals...in one sense.....

But people fail to realize they attempted to preserve the status quo for a long long time.

It was only when they thought they would get no compromise that they decided to revolt.

They thought about things a long long very long time.

Wish the left would have given 1/100th the thought to Obamacare.

 

[TNHarley]

"All of them demand that the individual bend the knee and submit to the dictates of big, unimpeded, government."
Please tell me how a stateless society fits into that?
"distinctions without differences."

I like how you didn't acknowledge about the conservatives. I assume you concede?

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

you got that part right. So you only HALF failed.
Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

this thread might fare better in the badlands

Let's see....what do Leftists do when confronted with the truth?

Ah, yes.... silence it, marginalize it....hide it.


I'll count your post as validation of the thesis.

No. Liberals comprehensively refute your nonsense to the point where you have to run and hide from them.

But the pummeling goes on.

So why do you stay.....

Watching you get pummeled gets old.

 

[TNHarley]

OP doesn't realize conservatives used to support a social hierarchy...

You'd need a chart to follow the evolution of these terms through the years.

The founders were classical liberals...in one sense.....

But people fail to realize they attempted to preserve the status quo for a long long time.

It was only when they thought they would get no compromise that they decided to revolt.

They thought about things a long long very long time.

Wish the left would have given 1/100th the thought to Obamacare.

I agree. They change with the wind. I still think it is important, that when you are as arrogant as she is, to know the basics. lol

 

[Sun Devil 92]

OP doesn't realize conservatives used to support a social hierarchy...

You'd need a chart to follow the evolution of these terms through the years.

The founders were classical liberals...in one sense.....

But people fail to realize they attempted to preserve the status quo for a long long time.

It was only when they thought they would get no compromise that they decided to revolt.

They thought about things a long long very long time.

Wish the left would have given 1/100th the thought to Obamacare.

I agree. They change with the wind. I still think it is important, that when you are as arrogant as she is, to know the basics. lol

I would not confuse arrogance with confidence.

I have disagreed with her on several occasions and I get a good response.

I don't respond like NYC and FlyCatcher.....so I don't get her responses.

 

[PoliticalChic]

OP doesn't realize conservatives used to support a social hierarchy...

You'd need a chart to follow the evolution of these terms through the years.

The founders were classical liberals...in one sense.....

But people fail to realize they attempted to preserve the status quo for a long long time.

It was only when they thought they would get no compromise that they decided to revolt.

They thought about things a long long very long time.

Wish the left would have given 1/100th the thought to Obamacare.

I agree. They change with the wind. I still think it is important, that when you are as arrogant as she is, to know the basics. lol

I notice that you've attempted to ignore this............. But, I'm not going to allow you to. Instead, I'm going to pound the stake through your heart like the walking intellectually dead that you are.

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

OP doesn't realize conservatives used to support a social hierarchy...

You'd need a chart to follow the evolution of these terms through the years.

The founders were classical liberals...in one sense.....

But people fail to realize they attempted to preserve the status quo for a long long time.

It was only when they thought they would get no compromise that they decided to revolt.

They thought about things a long long very long time.

Wish the left would have given 1/100th the thought to Obamacare.

I agree. They change with the wind. I still think it is important, that when you are as arrogant as she is, to know the basics. lol

I notice that you've attempted to ignore this............. But, I'm not going to allow you to. Instead, I'm going to pound the stake through your heart like the walking intellectually dead that you are.

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

Which brings with it a host of other considerations.....

The left can't seem to get their minds around the fact that a limited constitutional government is a federal government.

States can then do as they please as long as it does not tread on the responsiblities of the fed.

So, you could have a fascist.....nazi-like state government (we did in the south for a long long time) and it is perfectly fine.

Don't like it....don't live there....I left CA for that reason.

 

[TNHarley]

OP doesn't realize conservatives used to support a social hierarchy...

You'd need a chart to follow the evolution of these terms through the years.

The founders were classical liberals...in one sense.....

But people fail to realize they attempted to preserve the status quo for a long long time.

It was only when they thought they would get no compromise that they decided to revolt.

They thought about things a long long very long time.

Wish the left would have given 1/100th the thought to Obamacare.

I agree. They change with the wind. I still think it is important, that when you are as arrogant as she is, to know the basics. lol

I would not confuse arrogance with confidence.

I have disagreed with her on several occasions and I get a good response.

I don't respond like NYC and FlyCatcher.....so I don't get her responses.

Dude, she is slapped with the truth and hides from it. Confident people admit their mistakes.

 

[TNHarley]

OP doesn't realize conservatives used to support a social hierarchy...

You'd need a chart to follow the evolution of these terms through the years.

The founders were classical liberals...in one sense.....

But people fail to realize they attempted to preserve the status quo for a long long time.

It was only when they thought they would get no compromise that they decided to revolt.

They thought about things a long long very long time.

Wish the left would have given 1/100th the thought to Obamacare.

I agree. They change with the wind. I still think it is important, that when you are as arrogant as she is, to know the basics. lol

I notice that you've attempted to ignore this............. But, I'm not going to allow you to. Instead, I'm going to pound the stake through your heart like the walking intellectually dead that you are.

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

Are you even reading what I am writing?
none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
I clearly said you got that part right.
I don't understand how you think comparing big govt to a stateless society is a distinction without a difference. Then again, you keep calling me a liberal. So you are obviously willfully ignorant. You are raping terms like the left does.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"All of them demand that the individual bend the knee and submit to the dictates of big, unimpeded, government."
Please tell me how a stateless society fits into that?
"distinctions without differences."

I like how you didn't acknowledge about the conservatives. I assume you concede?

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

you got that part right. So you only HALF failed.
Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?

"Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?"

The use of that term is an identifier of Liberals...

Gore once accused his political enemies of possessing "an extra chromosome," a remark that infuriated the families of persons with Down Syndrome, which is caused by the presence of an extra chromosome. http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/miller200406010833.asp

 

[PoliticalChic]

OP doesn't realize conservatives used to support a social hierarchy...

You'd need a chart to follow the evolution of these terms through the years.

The founders were classical liberals...in one sense.....

But people fail to realize they attempted to preserve the status quo for a long long time.

It was only when they thought they would get no compromise that they decided to revolt.

They thought about things a long long very long time.

Wish the left would have given 1/100th the thought to Obamacare.

I agree. They change with the wind. I still think it is important, that when you are as arrogant as she is, to know the basics. lol

I notice that you've attempted to ignore this............. But, I'm not going to allow you to. Instead, I'm going to pound the stake through your heart like the walking intellectually dead that you are.

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

Are you even reading what I am writing?
none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
I clearly said you got that part right.
I don't understand how you think comparing big govt to a stateless society is a distinction without a difference. Then again, you keep calling me a liberal. So you are obviously willfully ignorant. You are raping terms like the left does.

Excellent.

Now....fill in your lack of education with a reading of our memorializing documents.

 

[TNHarley]

"All of them demand that the individual bend the knee and submit to the dictates of big, unimpeded, government."
Please tell me how a stateless society fits into that?
"distinctions without differences."

I like how you didn't acknowledge about the conservatives. I assume you concede?

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

you got that part right. So you only HALF failed.
Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?

"Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?"

The use of that term is an identifier of Liberals...

Gore once accused his political enemies of possessing "an extra chromosome," a remark that infuriated the families of persons with Down Syndrome, which is caused by the presence of an extra chromosome. http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/miller200406010833.asp

yep, you are retarded. No wonder you don't want one on one debate

 

[PoliticalChic]

"All of them demand that the individual bend the knee and submit to the dictates of big, unimpeded, government."
Please tell me how a stateless society fits into that?
"distinctions without differences."

I like how you didn't acknowledge about the conservatives. I assume you concede?

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

you got that part right. So you only HALF failed.
Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?

"Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?"

The use of that term is an identifier of Liberals...

Gore once accused his political enemies of possessing "an extra chromosome," a remark that infuriated the families of persons with Down Syndrome, which is caused by the presence of an extra chromosome. http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/miller200406010833.asp

yep, you are retarded. No wonder you don't want one on one debate

"No wonder you don't want one on one debate."


We just did.
And you were destroyed.

Clearly you wish this to be the equivalent of starting a patty-cake game with a three year old...it never ends.

This one did....and you were beaten as badly as Carthage in the Third Punic War.

Try to learn from it.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Uzbekistan in Asia?

indeedy:

 

[TNHarley]

"All of them demand that the individual bend the knee and submit to the dictates of big, unimpeded, government."
Please tell me how a stateless society fits into that?
"distinctions without differences."

I like how you didn't acknowledge about the conservatives. I assume you concede?

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

you got that part right. So you only HALF failed.
Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?

"Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?"

The use of that term is an identifier of Liberals...

Gore once accused his political enemies of possessing "an extra chromosome," a remark that infuriated the families of persons with Down Syndrome, which is caused by the presence of an extra chromosome. http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/miller200406010833.asp

yep, you are retarded. No wonder you don't want one on one debate

"No wonder you don't want one on one debate."


We just did.
And you were destroyed.

Clearly you wish this to be the equivalent of starting a patty-cake game with a three year old...it never ends.

This one did....and you were beaten as badly as Carthage in the Third Punic War.

Try to learn from it.

"All of them demand that the individual bend the knee and submit to the dictates of big, unimpeded, government."
Please tell me how a stateless society fits into that?
"distinctions without differences."

I like how you didn't acknowledge about the conservatives. I assume you concede?

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

you got that part right. So you only HALF failed.
Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?

"Why do you keep calling me a liberal? Are you retarded?"

The use of that term is an identifier of Liberals...

Gore once accused his political enemies of possessing "an extra chromosome," a remark that infuriated the families of persons with Down Syndrome, which is caused by the presence of an extra chromosome. http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/miller200406010833.asp

yep, you are retarded. No wonder you don't want one on one debate

"No wonder you don't want one on one debate."


We just did.
And you were destroyed.

Clearly you wish this to be the equivalent of starting a patty-cake game with a three year old...it never ends.

This one did....and you were beaten as badly as Carthage in the Third Punic War.

Try to learn from it.

DUDE, you fuckin won a STRAWMAN. That wasn't even what my posts were about.
Your dishonest ass wont even acknowledge the others because you know im right.
You remind me of rderp and daws. Pathetic

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Rhetorical says: 'Classifying American Liberals who attack dissent and opposing speech as the very same as the Uzbek torturers is a bit over the top, isn't it?'



Oh, wait.....

"....University of California, Santa Barbara and feminist professor Mireille Miller-Young, who was recently convicted of stealing from and assaulting pro-life protesters earlier this year.
The feminist studies professor, who specializes in queer theory and pornography, went on a video-recorded rampage in March when she stole and destroyed a pro-life poster, before attacking and causing minor injuries to 16-year-old protestor Thrin Short.



...she literally drew blood from a minor,”....

The Ph.D.-wielding professor whose dissertation is called “A Taste for Brown Sugar: The History of Black Women in American Pornography,” is still listed as an associate professor at the public university. And according to the Life Legal Defense, she might keep her job because UCSB apparently does not blame the convicted assaulter for igniting the attack.

....her fellow looney liberal colleagues urged the judge to excuse the criminal allegations of assault and theft because of the “cultural legacy of slavery.”
UCSB Professor Mireille Miller-Young Served With Civil Suit The Daily Caller"



a. “Miller-Young went on to say that because the poster was upsetting to her and her students, she felt that the activists did not have a right to be there,” the crime report states.

Further, Miller-Youngsaid she had a “moral” right in taking the poster, as showing graphic imagery was “insensitive” and a violation of University policy.

“Miller-Young argued that she set a good example for her students..." UCSB Professor Faces Assault Charges After Dispute With Pro-Life Protesters The Daily Nexus




"Feminist prof now claims ‘MORAL RIGHT’ to attack 16-year-old abortion foe, destroy sign"
http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/19/f...-old-abortion-foe-destroy-sign/#ixzz3hORCEFtc




The obligation of good people is to speak out against evil; 'silence is tacit approval and latent complicity.'

And cowardice.

 

[NYcarbineer]

this thread might fare better in the badlands

Let's see....what do Leftists do when confronted with the truth?

Ah, yes.... silence it, marginalize it....hide it.


I'll count your post as validation of the thesis.

No. Liberals comprehensively refute your nonsense to the point where you have to run and hide from them.

But the pummeling goes on.

So why do you stay.....

Watching you get pummeled gets old.

I'll debate you one on one on any topic.

 

[NYcarbineer]

OP doesn't realize conservatives used to support a social hierarchy...

You'd need a chart to follow the evolution of these terms through the years.

The founders were classical liberals...in one sense.....

But people fail to realize they attempted to preserve the status quo for a long long time.

It was only when they thought they would get no compromise that they decided to revolt.

They thought about things a long long very long time.

Wish the left would have given 1/100th the thought to Obamacare.

I agree. They change with the wind. I still think it is important, that when you are as arrogant as she is, to know the basics. lol

I notice that you've attempted to ignore this............. But, I'm not going to allow you to. Instead, I'm going to pound the stake through your heart like the walking intellectually dead that you are.

.....would you like to deny this: "...you may choose to call it communism, socialism, Liberalism, Nazism, Progressivism, or Fascism....
...or, simply use the generic...'Leftism'....no matter.
Any differences are mere technicalities, distinctions without differences...




.......none favor individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Deny it....or the Liberal ignore it?

Which brings with it a host of other considerations.....

The left can't seem to get their minds around the fact that a limited constitutional government is a federal government.

States can then do as they please as long as it does not tread on the responsiblities of the fed.

So, you could have a fascist.....nazi-like state government (we did in the south for a long long time) and it is perfectly fine.

Don't like it....don't live there....I left CA for that reason.

We have a federal government where the federal government is supreme. Read your Constitution.

 

[TNHarley]

this thread might fare better in the badlands

Let's see....what do Leftists do when confronted with the truth?

Ah, yes.... silence it, marginalize it....hide it.


I'll count your post as validation of the thesis.

No. Liberals comprehensively refute your nonsense to the point where you have to run and hide from them.

But the pummeling goes on.

So why do you stay.....

Watching you get pummeled gets old.

I'll debate you one on one on any topic.

hell yea! I love one on ones!

 

[NYcarbineer]

7. Rhetorical says: 'Classifying American Liberals who attack dissent and opposing speech as the very same as the Uzbek torturers is a bit over the top, isn't it?'



Oh, wait.....

"....University of California, Santa Barbara and feminist professor Mireille Miller-Young, who was recently convicted of stealing from and assaulting pro-life protesters earlier this year.
The feminist studies professor, who specializes in queer theory and pornography, went on a video-recorded rampage in March when she stole and destroyed a pro-life poster, before attacking and causing minor injuries to 16-year-old protestor Thrin Short.



...she literally drew blood from a minor,”....

The Ph.D.-wielding professor whose dissertation is called “A Taste for Brown Sugar: The History of Black Women in American Pornography,” is still listed as an associate professor at the public university. And according to the Life Legal Defense, she might keep her job because UCSB apparently does not blame the convicted assaulter for igniting the attack.

....her fellow looney liberal colleagues urged the judge to excuse the criminal allegations of assault and theft because of the “cultural legacy of slavery.”
UCSB Professor Mireille Miller-Young Served With Civil Suit The Daily Caller"



a. “Miller-Young went on to say that because the poster was upsetting to her and her students, she felt that the activists did not have a right to be there,” the crime report states.

Further, Miller-Youngsaid she had a “moral” right in taking the poster, as showing graphic imagery was “insensitive” and a violation of University policy.

“Miller-Young argued that she set a good example for her students..." UCSB Professor Faces Assault Charges After Dispute With Pro-Life Protesters The Daily Nexus




"Feminist prof now claims ‘MORAL RIGHT’ to attack 16-year-old abortion foe, destroy sign"
Feminist prof now claims ‘MORAL RIGHT’ to attack 16-year-old abortion foe, destroy sign




The obligation of good people is to speak out against evil; 'silence is tacit approval and latent complicity.'

And cowardice.

And one example proves what?

Paul Hill, a CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN minister, murdered an abortion doctor. What broadbrush conclusions about conservatives and Christians am I allowed to draw from that?