Leftist With a Klan Hood gets his Tail Kicked by Black Trump Supporter: Hilarious (Video)

kkk_zpszm6jhiwy.jpg
Too bad they betrayed their roots and went after the racist voters.
'sup asslips... you gonna say something worth reading, or just puke out more of your usual verbal diarrhea?
 
Bigger question is ??? WHO exactly is biasing their "perception" of this non-story with malice towards their political opposition?? And what does this matter? pogo pogo pogo ????

Got an English version of this?

Maybe I can get Kipper to translate....
 
Bigger question is ??? WHO exactly is biasing their "perception" of this non-story with malice towards their political opposition?? And what does this matter? pogo pogo pogo ????

Got an English version of this?

Maybe I can get Kipper to translate....
fans, there you have it, it's over, it's all over.
 
Last edited:
Nope, the KKK are Trump people, and they endorse him. Hatin' on those darkies..
Were you aware the democrats started the KKK? Demi's are hating on the darkies.

Horse. Shit.
Got your Horse Shit right here, buckwheat...

A Short History of Democrats, Republicans, and Racism

kkk_zpszm6jhiwy.jpg

Ah, look who crawls out from under a rock after running away from the Wichita thread because video showed up.

I put two links up there, one for each word, both actual historical sources, as opposed to a blog anyone who buys a URL can write for the gullible.

Want some more?

Wiki
First KKK
>> The first Klan was founded in 1865 in Pulaski, Tennessee, by six veterans of the Confederate Army.[17] The name is probably derived from the Greek word kuklos which means circle, suggesting a circle or band of brothers.[18]
Although there was little organizational structure above the local level, similar groups rose across the South and adopted the same name and methods.[19] Klan groups spread throughout the South as an insurgent movement during the Reconstruction era in the United States. As a secret vigilante group, the Klan targeted freedmen and their allies; it sought to restore white supremacy by threats and violence, including murder, against black and white Republicans.

Second KKK
... In 1915, the second Klan was founded in Atlanta, Georgia. Starting in 1921, it adopted a modern business system of recruiting (which paid most of the initiation fee and costume charges as commissions to the organizers) and grew rapidly nationwide at a time of prosperity. Reflecting the social tensions of urban industrialization and vastly increased immigration, its membership grew most rapidly in cities, and spread out of the South to the Midwest and West. The second KKK preached "One Hundred Percent Americanism" and demanded the purification of politics, calling for strict morality and better enforcement of prohibition. Its official rhetoric focused on the threat of the Catholic Church, using anti-Catholicism and nativism.[4] Its appeal was directed exclusively at white Protestants.[21]​

...Third KKK
The "Ku Klux Klan" name was used by a numerous independent local groups opposing the Civil Rights Movement and desegregation, especially in the 1950s and 1960s. During this period, they often forged alliances with Southern police departments, as in Birmingham, Alabama; or with governor's offices, as with George Wallace of Alabama.[25] Several members of KKK groups were convicted of murder in the deaths of civil rights workers and children in the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham. <<​

More?

Source: The Present Day Ku Klux Klan Movement, Report by the Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, First Session, December 11, 1967
>> The six Confederate army veterans credited with originating the Ku Klux Klan on Christmas Eve of 1865 in Pulaski, Tenn. are not memorialized in current klan literature. ... The organization to which modern klansmen pay homage was the Ku Klux Klan headed by Nathan Bedford Forrest, which officially operated in at least nine Southern states from 1867 to 1869 and unofficially for some years thereafter.

The conversion of klan purposes from amusement to terrorism had already been demonstrated by the time representatives of the local klan "dens" held a unifying convention in Nashville, Tenn., in 1867 and elected former Confederate Army General Forrest as their grand wizard. <<

More?

Extremism in America/ADL

>> About the Ku Klux Klan
The Ku Klux Klan is a racist, anti-Semitic movement with a commitment to extreme violence to achieve its goals of racial segregation and white supremacy.
... At first, the Ku Klux Klan focused its anger and violence on African-Americans, on white Americans who stood up for them, and against the federal government which supported their rights. Subsequent incarnations of the Klan, which typically emerged in times of rapid social change, added more categories to its enemies list, including Jews, Catholics (less so after the 1970s), homosexuals, and different groups of immigrants.


Founder: Confederate Civil War veterans Captain John C. Lester, Major James R. Crowe, John D. Kennedy, Calvin Jones, Richard R. Reed, Frank O. McCord <<
More?

Source:
In Pulaski, Tennessee, a group of Confederate veterans convenes to form a secret society that they christen the "Ku Klux Klan." The KKK rapidly grew from a secret social fraternity to a paramilitary force bent on reversing the federal government's progressive Reconstruction Era-activities in the South, especially policies that elevated the rights of the local African American population.

The name of the Ku Klux Klan was derived from the Greek word kyklos, meaning "circle," and the Scottish-Gaelic word "clan," which was probably chosen for the sake of alliteration. Under a platform of philosophized white racial superiority, the group employed violence as a means of pushing back Reconstruction and its enfranchisement of African Americans. Former Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest was the KKK's first grand wizard; in 1869, he unsuccessfully tried to disband it after he grew critical of the Klan's excessive violence. <<​

More?

Source:
>> The original Ku Klux Klan was created in an 1865 meeting in a law office by six Confederate veterans in Pulaski, Tennessee. It was, at first, a humorous social club centering on practical jokes and hazing rituals. From 1866 to 1867, various local units began breaking up black prayer meetings and invading black homes at night to steal firearms. Some of these activities may have been modeled on previous Tennessee vigilante groups such as the Yellow Jackets and Redcaps. In an 1867 convention held in Nashville, the Klan was formalized as a national organization under a Prescript written by George Gordon, a former Confederate brigadier general.

... As historian Elaine Frantz Parsons discovered [Parsons p 816]:

"Lifting the Klan mask revealed a chaotic multitude of antiblack vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, wartime guerrilla bands, displaced Democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, bored young men, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades-old grudges, and even a few freedmen and white Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own." <<​
More?

Source:
>> The first Klan was created by six men from Pulaski Tennessee, in the image of other secret societies of the day. The hierarchical organization with local chapters housed under a national umbressa [sic] structure.

... History and context:

The first KKK was formed in the American South at the end of the civil war, when the victorious Union government imposed a version of martial law on the south and began to enforce laws designed to end segregation against black citizens. When a constitutional amendment granted black men the right to vote in 1870, the group turned to intimidation and violence to try to halt de-segregation. <<​

More?
Source:
>> Started during Reconstruction at the end of the Civil War, the Klan quickly mobilized as a vigilante group to intimidate Southern blacks - and any whites who would help them - and to prevent them from enjoying basic civil rights. <<​

More?

Source:
>> The original Ku Klux Klan was organized by ex-Confederate elements to oppose the Reconstruction policies of the radical Republican Congress and to maintain "white supremacy." After the Civil War, when local government in the South was weak or nonexistent and there were fears of black outrages and even of an insurrection, informal vigilante organizations or armed patrols were formed in almost all communities. These were linked together in societies, such as the Men of Justice, the Pale Faces, the Constitutional Union Guards, the White Brotherhood, and the Order of the White Rose. The Ku Klux Klan was the best known of these, and in time it absorbed many of the smaller organizations. <<​

More?
Source:
>> The 19th-century Klan was originally organized as a social club by Confederate veterans in Pulaski, Tenn., in 1866. They apparently derived the name from the Greek word kyklos, from which comes the English circle; Klan was added for the sake of alliteration and Ku Klux Klan emerged. The organization quickly became a vehicle for Southern white underground resistance to Radical Reconstruction. Klan members sought the restoration of white supremacy through intimidation and violence aimed at the newly enfranchised black freedmen. A similar organization, the Knights of the White Camelia, began in Louisiana in 1867. <<
Had enough?

Try to fuck with me on revisionist bullshit history and you get the horn.
 
This hateful leftist agitator got what he asked for. From a black Trump supporter.

I applaud this.

What if he dies or has permanent injury...still applaud

Bet the protester won't make that stupid mistake again.

What mistake would that be?
Existing?

Being a dumbass.

You can picture a couple of Brits sitting around a fire in London saying the same thing about Nathan Hale …can’t you?
 
Yes, the media has not mentioned that a leftist KKK supporter...
There is no such thing, dumbass.

The KKK votes GOP, and now for Trump.
Wait, so are you saying the black Trump supporter beat the shit out of that leftist hood-wearing rally-disrupting moron, for no reason at all? Pull your head out of your ass.

STILL haven't watched the video?

black-trump-supporter-tony-pettaway-punching-protester.jpg

WHERE do you see a "hood" ---- dishonest HACK?


Pogo -- really man.,. You need to INVESTIGATE MORE and spout off less. I'd like you better if you weren't constantly making US do your research.. Want to see TWO LEFTIST CLOWNS in hoods????


trump_protester_arizona.png


That is the flag-wrapped moron with the chick moron accomplice.
97,000 cameras there. Took me 30 seconds to find it on Google.

Moral of the story is -- If you're playing poker with a weak hand and think about going all in --- you should at least check your wallet first.

Oh please.

The fact that you can find two people in the same photo does not make them "accomplices".
And the fact remains -- the title of this thread, AND the Revisionista wags who keep selling it --- are bald-faced lies that are easily disproved by pictorial evidence.

And there ain't a damn thing you can do about that except admit to it.
When will that be exactly? I'd like to mark my calendar so I can keep the date open.


ADMIT WHAT Pogo?? What do you want me to ADMIT???

Answer this question please.. HOW MANY white hooded clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming up the aisle at him BEFORE he grabs one and kicks it's ass????


Please make sure Pogo answers all my questions. This isn't the story of the day.. :rolleyes:
Bigger question is ??? WHO exactly is biasing their "perception" of this non-story with malice towards their political opposition?? And what does this matter? pogo pogo pogo ????

Got an English version of this?

Maybe I can get Kipper to translate....

My buddy Kipper could understand this.. The question was -------

HOW MANY clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming at him up an aisle before he starts kicking ass?

I showed you two... Difference between us is -- it wouldn't matter to me whether the clueless morons were Trump supporters or not... OR whether the Nazi I GRAB out of the Nazi parade is wearing the proper SS uniform..


Got it ? Good.. Let's move on to the next Silly but amusing "political scandal"...

:rolleyes:
 
There is no such thing, dumbass.

The KKK votes GOP, and now for Trump.
Wait, so are you saying the black Trump supporter beat the shit out of that leftist hood-wearing rally-disrupting moron, for no reason at all? Pull your head out of your ass.

STILL haven't watched the video?

black-trump-supporter-tony-pettaway-punching-protester.jpg

WHERE do you see a "hood" ---- dishonest HACK?


Pogo -- really man.,. You need to INVESTIGATE MORE and spout off less. I'd like you better if you weren't constantly making US do your research.. Want to see TWO LEFTIST CLOWNS in hoods????


trump_protester_arizona.png


That is the flag-wrapped moron with the chick moron accomplice.
97,000 cameras there. Took me 30 seconds to find it on Google.

Moral of the story is -- If you're playing poker with a weak hand and think about going all in --- you should at least check your wallet first.

Oh please.

The fact that you can find two people in the same photo does not make them "accomplices".
And the fact remains -- the title of this thread, AND the Revisionista wags who keep selling it --- are bald-faced lies that are easily disproved by pictorial evidence.

And there ain't a damn thing you can do about that except admit to it.
When will that be exactly? I'd like to mark my calendar so I can keep the date open.


ADMIT WHAT Pogo?? What do you want me to ADMIT???

Answer this question please.. HOW MANY white hooded clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming up the aisle at him BEFORE he grabs one and kicks it's ass????


Please make sure Pogo answers all my questions. This isn't the story of the day.. :rolleyes:
Bigger question is ??? WHO exactly is biasing their "perception" of this non-story with malice towards their political opposition?? And what does this matter? pogo pogo pogo ????

Got an English version of this?

Maybe I can get Kipper to translate....

My buddy Kipper could understand this.. The question was -------

HOW MANY clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming at him up an aisle before he starts kicking ass?

I showed you two... Difference between us is -- it wouldn't matter to me whether the clueless morons were Trump supporters or not... OR whether the Nazi I GRAB out of the Nazi parade is wearing the proper SS uniform..


Got it ? Good.. Let's move on to the next Silly but amusing "political scandal"...

:rolleyes:

Yeah yeah yeah, you've already admitted that you condone assault and it doesn't matter who the target is. I get that and we did that.

What I want you to admit is that the title of this thread is a bald-faced lie and and all the revisionistas still pushing it in spite of visual evidence are bald-faced liars.

Unless of course they have whiskers, in which case we may strike the adjective.
 
YYyyyyyyyyyyyyeah, unfortunately for you Splooges, I did what you didn't -- I actually read the link before posting. And the woman with the Klan hood was somebody else, somewhere else, unrelated to this guy. And the incident is, again, on video -- that magical medium you love to watch and then claim it doesn't show what it shows. That being, an unprovoked and sustained attack on a guy doing nothing more than holding a sign.

Imagine that --- holding a sign at a political rally. Ya see sump'n new every day.
His mere presence is provoking trouble...
Here's a little newsflash for you.
While the right to free speech applies, it must apply to everyone. And that right is not absolute.
One may speak, but others have an equal right to find that speech to be unacceptable.
And while one has the right to free speech, other may view said speech to be offensive, outrageous or even as an assault....at that point the one speaking may find themselves in a position of unpleasantness.
In other words, if your speech is an attempt to agitate, incite or cause harm, the reaction may be physical. That's called a choice.......
 
Nope, the KKK are Trump people, and they endorse him. Hatin' on those darkies..
Were you aware the democrats started the KKK? Demi's are hating on the darkies.

Horse. Shit.

Interview with Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice | RealClearPolitics

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

BLITZER: Tell us, because you write about this in the book, about your father's decision to become a Republican.

RICE: Yes.

BLITZER: How did that happen?

RICE: My mother and father went down in 1952 to register to vote, and they were not yet married, but they were courting.

My mother, beautiful, light-skinned, they poll tested her because there were poll tests for blacks in those days. The poll tester asked her, "So you probably know who the first president of the United States was."

She said, "Yes, George Washington."

And he said, "Fine, you register."

My father, he said, "How many beans are in that jar?" BLITZER: Darker skinned?

RICE: My father was darker skinned, and a big kind of intimidating man, actually.

And he said, "So how many beans are in that jar?"

My father, who obviously couldn't count the beans, was really devastated. And he went back, and he was talking with Mr. Frank Hunter, an old man in his church. And he said, "Oh, Reverend, I'll tell you how to get registered." He said, "There is a clerk down there who's a Republican, and she'll register anybody who will say they are Republican," because of course, this was when the Dixiecrats and the Democrats controlled Alabama completely.

So my father registered as a Republican, and he was a life-long and actually proud member of the Republican Party for the rest of his life.

BLITZER: And you, too?

RICE: And me, too. I didn't start as a Republican. I first voted for President Jimmy Carter. But I became a Republican largely around foreign policy issues initially, because I was attracted to Ronald Reagan's strength.


You're wasting your time again Pogo.. Jim Crow south was good ole boy Southern DEMS...
 
Wait, so are you saying the black Trump supporter beat the shit out of that leftist hood-wearing rally-disrupting moron, for no reason at all? Pull your head out of your ass.

STILL haven't watched the video?

black-trump-supporter-tony-pettaway-punching-protester.jpg

WHERE do you see a "hood" ---- dishonest HACK?


Pogo -- really man.,. You need to INVESTIGATE MORE and spout off less. I'd like you better if you weren't constantly making US do your research.. Want to see TWO LEFTIST CLOWNS in hoods????


trump_protester_arizona.png


That is the flag-wrapped moron with the chick moron accomplice.
97,000 cameras there. Took me 30 seconds to find it on Google.

Moral of the story is -- If you're playing poker with a weak hand and think about going all in --- you should at least check your wallet first.

Oh please.

The fact that you can find two people in the same photo does not make them "accomplices".
And the fact remains -- the title of this thread, AND the Revisionista wags who keep selling it --- are bald-faced lies that are easily disproved by pictorial evidence.

And there ain't a damn thing you can do about that except admit to it.
When will that be exactly? I'd like to mark my calendar so I can keep the date open.


ADMIT WHAT Pogo?? What do you want me to ADMIT???

Answer this question please.. HOW MANY white hooded clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming up the aisle at him BEFORE he grabs one and kicks it's ass????


Please make sure Pogo answers all my questions. This isn't the story of the day.. :rolleyes:
Bigger question is ??? WHO exactly is biasing their "perception" of this non-story with malice towards their political opposition?? And what does this matter? pogo pogo pogo ????

Got an English version of this?

Maybe I can get Kipper to translate....

My buddy Kipper could understand this.. The question was -------

HOW MANY clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming at him up an aisle before he starts kicking ass?

I showed you two... Difference between us is -- it wouldn't matter to me whether the clueless morons were Trump supporters or not... OR whether the Nazi I GRAB out of the Nazi parade is wearing the proper SS uniform..


Got it ? Good.. Let's move on to the next Silly but amusing "political scandal"...

:rolleyes:

Yeah yeah yeah, you've already admitted that you condone assault and it doesn't matter who the target is. I get that and we did that.

What I want you to admit is that the title of this thread is a bald-faced lie and and all the revisionistas still pushing it in spite of visual evidence are bald-faced liars.

Unless of course they have whiskers, in which case we may strike the adjective.
what i want is you to admit you're just an asshat and are looking for attention?
 
******* voting for a ****** isn't shocking, neither is whitey KKK voting for Trump. Clear?
Hussein Obama was endorsed by Louis Farakhan and nation of Islam, and during the election, Black Panthers went to polling centers and threatened people. The left has no shame. Obama has been encouraging riots, division and destruction for the last 7 years. Yet the leftist media mafia continues to give him a pass.
Threatened people? You aren't man enough to walk past the big scary ******* to vote?

And racists vote for racists eh, as well as racists have to pick a side based on race, usually. KKK for Trump? Yep...
You aren't addressing the fact that the media refuses to say that a black Trump supporter kicked the ass of a leftist KKK supporter.

He wasn't a KKK supporter, stop lying.
sure he was, why else would he wear a hood in the middle of a rally?
You are just mindlessly parroting Trump's lie that he was wearing a hood, he was NOT. He was holding a photo of Trump over his uncovered head when the Trump goon attacked him. The "disgusting KKK outfit" Trump accused him of wearing was an American Flag shirt. Trump and his ilk equate the American Flag with the KKK.

article-rally-28-0319.jpg
 
Wait, so are you saying the black Trump supporter beat the shit out of that leftist hood-wearing rally-disrupting moron, for no reason at all? Pull your head out of your ass.

STILL haven't watched the video?

black-trump-supporter-tony-pettaway-punching-protester.jpg

WHERE do you see a "hood" ---- dishonest HACK?


Pogo -- really man.,. You need to INVESTIGATE MORE and spout off less. I'd like you better if you weren't constantly making US do your research.. Want to see TWO LEFTIST CLOWNS in hoods????


trump_protester_arizona.png


That is the flag-wrapped moron with the chick moron accomplice.
97,000 cameras there. Took me 30 seconds to find it on Google.

Moral of the story is -- If you're playing poker with a weak hand and think about going all in --- you should at least check your wallet first.

Oh please.

The fact that you can find two people in the same photo does not make them "accomplices".
And the fact remains -- the title of this thread, AND the Revisionista wags who keep selling it --- are bald-faced lies that are easily disproved by pictorial evidence.

And there ain't a damn thing you can do about that except admit to it.
When will that be exactly? I'd like to mark my calendar so I can keep the date open.


ADMIT WHAT Pogo?? What do you want me to ADMIT???

Answer this question please.. HOW MANY white hooded clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming up the aisle at him BEFORE he grabs one and kicks it's ass????


Please make sure Pogo answers all my questions. This isn't the story of the day.. :rolleyes:
Bigger question is ??? WHO exactly is biasing their "perception" of this non-story with malice towards their political opposition?? And what does this matter? pogo pogo pogo ????

Got an English version of this?

Maybe I can get Kipper to translate....

My buddy Kipper could understand this.. The question was -------

HOW MANY clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming at him up an aisle before he starts kicking ass?

I showed you two... Difference between us is -- it wouldn't matter to me whether the clueless morons were Trump supporters or not... OR whether the Nazi I GRAB out of the Nazi parade is wearing the proper SS uniform..


Got it ? Good.. Let's move on to the next Silly but amusing "political scandal"...

:rolleyes:

Yeah yeah yeah, you've already admitted that you condone assault and it doesn't matter who the target is. I get that and we did that.

What I want you to admit is that the title of this thread is a bald-faced lie and and all the revisionistas still pushing it in spite of visual evidence are bald-faced liars.

Unless of course they have whiskers, in which case we may strike the adjective.

Sorry man -- the title of the thread is correct enough. As I said -- the particular Nazi I pull out of a Nazi parade to have a scuffle with -- doesn't depend on how much money the jerk spent on his SS uniform...
 
YYyyyyyyyyyyyyeah, unfortunately for you Splooges, I did what you didn't -- I actually read the link before posting. And the woman with the Klan hood was somebody else, somewhere else, unrelated to this guy. And the incident is, again, on video -- that magical medium you love to watch and then claim it doesn't show what it shows. That being, an unprovoked and sustained attack on a guy doing nothing more than holding a sign.

Imagine that --- holding a sign at a political rally. Ya see sump'n new every day.
His mere presence is provoking trouble...
Here's a little newsflash for you.
While the right to free speech applies, it must apply to everyone. And that right is not absolute.
One may speak, but others have an equal right to find that speech to be unacceptable.
And while one has the right to free speech, other may view said speech to be offensive, outrageous or even as an assault....at that point the one speaking may find themselves in a position of unpleasantness.
In other words, if your speech is an attempt to agitate, incite or cause harm, the reaction may be physical. That's called a choice.......

And if the source of offense is some completely different person ----
---- and we're entirely speculating about that source, since the evidence for his motivation is Absolute Zero ----

---- then it's acceptable to just jump and pummel the first moving object you see, by some kind of "proxy".

That's called a "choice" too, is it not?
 
STILL haven't watched the video?

black-trump-supporter-tony-pettaway-punching-protester.jpg

WHERE do you see a "hood" ---- dishonest HACK?


Pogo -- really man.,. You need to INVESTIGATE MORE and spout off less. I'd like you better if you weren't constantly making US do your research.. Want to see TWO LEFTIST CLOWNS in hoods????


trump_protester_arizona.png


That is the flag-wrapped moron with the chick moron accomplice.
97,000 cameras there. Took me 30 seconds to find it on Google.

Moral of the story is -- If you're playing poker with a weak hand and think about going all in --- you should at least check your wallet first.

Oh please.

The fact that you can find two people in the same photo does not make them "accomplices".
And the fact remains -- the title of this thread, AND the Revisionista wags who keep selling it --- are bald-faced lies that are easily disproved by pictorial evidence.

And there ain't a damn thing you can do about that except admit to it.
When will that be exactly? I'd like to mark my calendar so I can keep the date open.


ADMIT WHAT Pogo?? What do you want me to ADMIT???

Answer this question please.. HOW MANY white hooded clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming up the aisle at him BEFORE he grabs one and kicks it's ass????


Please make sure Pogo answers all my questions. This isn't the story of the day.. :rolleyes:
Bigger question is ??? WHO exactly is biasing their "perception" of this non-story with malice towards their political opposition?? And what does this matter? pogo pogo pogo ????

Got an English version of this?

Maybe I can get Kipper to translate....

My buddy Kipper could understand this.. The question was -------

HOW MANY clueless leftist thugs does a black man need to see coming at him up an aisle before he starts kicking ass?

I showed you two... Difference between us is -- it wouldn't matter to me whether the clueless morons were Trump supporters or not... OR whether the Nazi I GRAB out of the Nazi parade is wearing the proper SS uniform..


Got it ? Good.. Let's move on to the next Silly but amusing "political scandal"...

:rolleyes:

Yeah yeah yeah, you've already admitted that you condone assault and it doesn't matter who the target is. I get that and we did that.

What I want you to admit is that the title of this thread is a bald-faced lie and and all the revisionistas still pushing it in spite of visual evidence are bald-faced liars.

Unless of course they have whiskers, in which case we may strike the adjective.

Sorry man -- the title of the thread is correct enough. As I said -- the particular Nazi I pull out of a Nazi parade to have a scuffle with -- doesn't depend on how much money the jerk spent on his SS uniform...

So you're going to sit there on your ass and declare that a picture of a person NOT wearing anything on his head --------- is a picture of a "leftist with a Klan hood".

You lose.
 

Forum List

Back
Top