Leftists Melt Down Over New York Times Op-Ed Declaring 'Trump Can Win on Character'

[Billiejeens]

He’s a BIG antisemite too.

He is the worst that this country has to offer.

 

[g5000]

He’s a BIG antisemite too.

Please explain how your demented mind reached this insane conclusion.

 

[marvin martian]

Apparently some people don't understand what NEVER Trumper actually means.

It still stuns me when I see someone actually saying Trump has good character.

The level of willful blindness this requires is beyond profound.

Trump, who broke into underaged girls' dressing rooms to catch them naked.

Trump, who said dodging AIDS in the 80s as he slept around was his "personal Vietnam".

Trump, who stole from the elderly at his fake university.

Trump, whose foundation was shut down for fraud.

Trump, whose organization was shut down for fraud.

Trump, who was convicted by a jury on 34 felony counts.

Trump, who stole from the Army Emergency Relief, the Children’s Aid Society, City Meals-on-Wheels, Give an Hour, Martha’s Table, the United Negro College Fund, the United Way of National Capital Area, and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Trump who committed adultery against three wives.

Trump, who fucked a porn star and a Playmate while his wife was home nursing their newborn.

Trump, who pardoned Steve Bannon for stealing from his supporters in a fraudulent We Build The Wall scheme.

Trump, who was found guilty of sexual assault.

Trump, who attempted a coup to overthrow our democracy.


I honestly don't know how many pounds of brain damage it takes for a Trump supporter to make this about character. This is sheer insanity. This is actual mental illness.

Bannon charged with fraud, money laundering, conspiracy in ‘We Build the Wall’​

Trump pardons ex-strategist Steve Bannon, dozens of others



Teen Beauty Queens Say Trump Walked In On Them Changing

The ‘big rip-off’: how Trump exploited his fans with ‘election defense’ fund​

Donald Trump, Stormy Daniels and the $130,000 payment to buy her silence​

Trump Organization found guilty on all counts of criminal tax fraud​

Trump Foundation Will Dissolve, Accused of ‘Shocking Pattern of Illegality’​

Judge finalizes $25 million settlement for 'victims of Donald Trump's fraudulent university'​

Donald J. Trump Pays Court-Ordered $2 Million For Illegally Using Trump Foundation Funds​

Trump was ordered to pay $2 million, or $250,000, a piece to eight different charities. Those charities are Army Emergency Relief, the Children’s Aid Society, Citymeals-on-Wheels, Give an Hour, Martha’s Table, the United Negro College Fund, the United Way of National Capital Area, and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

D.A. Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Trial Conviction of Donald J. Trump​

You must be SO excited to vote for the most pro-abortion administration in history!

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

An interesting discussion might be why did the NYT decide to print the piece by Lowrey? Is there a change of heart at the top of The Not-So-Great Grey Lady?

If the Demwits Lost the NYT, They've Lost the Narrative

 

[Augustine_]

Leftists Melt Down Over New York Times Op-Ed Declaring 'Trump Can Win on Character'​

Melting down in laughter

 

[lafayette]

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The problem with trying to win on character is that the Left - political and Media - have created a cornucopia of slanders (many of which are partly true) on which they base their assessment that Trump is a total reprobate. Trump was impeached twice. Trump is (was) a serial adulterer. Trump is a convicted felon. Trump bragged about grabbing women by their private parts. Trump called Neo-Nazi's "fine people." Trump stole from his subcontractors and investors. And on, and on. The list is almost endless.

And most voters do not know the underlying facts, and don't care enough to research them.

The best attack strategy is to point out the long list of awful or demonstrably stupid policy statements she has made, starting with when she ran for President in 2020 and continuing to this very day. The good part about that is that her handlers recognize how stupid and unpalatable they were and are trying to subtly walk them back, hoping nobody notices the 180 degree turnaround. Parenthetically, calling her stupid also has some traction, as even her supporters now recognize that there is a very good reason why her handlers won't let her speak extemporaneously or answer questions that are not screened in advance.

But make no mistake, no matter how awful KH is, this election is actually between Donald Trump and Not Donald Trump. The name or characteristics of the Democrat candidate are irrelevant. The policies will still be the same weak, counterproductive bullshit, but none of them is Donald Trump, which is all that matters.

"Trump Has No Joy or Cuddliness. He's Just WEIRD!!!"

 

[surada]

The New York Times’ editors should exercise some caution.

After all, at this rate their deranged liberal readers might drag them into a Maoist struggle session.

On Monday, the Times printed a guest essay by National Review editor Rich Lowry entitled “Trump Can Win on Character,” which left deranged liberals frothing at the mouth over what amounted to a rather mild bit of commentary.

Indeed, on substance, Lowry made an argument perhaps best described as uninspiring-but-plausible.

“Everything has to be connected to the deeper case that Ms. Harris is weak and a phony and doesn’t truly care about the country or the middle class,” Lowry wrote.

In other words, former President Donald Trump needs to make the 2024 election a referendum on Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris’ character.

Lowry, in fact, suggested that the former president focus on Harris’s myriad weaknesses.

“To wit: Ms. Harris was too weak to win the Democratic primary contest that year. She was too weak to keep from telling the left practically everything it wanted to hear when she ran in 2019. She is too weak to hold open town-hall events or do extensive — or, at the moment, any — sit-down media interviews,” the National Review editor wrote.

Leftists Melt Down Over New York Times Op-Ed Declaring 'Trump Can Win on Character'

Deranged liberals have the temperaments of totalitarians, which could earn NYT editors punishment for stories not wholly critical of Trump.

www.westernjournal.com

BJ -
Lowry is somewhere between a Never-Never Trumper and a simple Never Trumper - but even he realizes what a disaster Harris would be for the country - Like the stream of Democrats putting country over party by supporting President Trump now.

Haitians in Springfield are terrified that Trump's lies have turned them into a target.

 

[Billiejeens]

Haitians in Springfield are terrified that Trump's lies have turned them into a target.

No

They made themselves targets
They should go home.

 

[Crepitus]

The New York Times’ editors should exercise some caution.

After all, at this rate their deranged liberal readers might drag them into a Maoist struggle session.

On Monday, the Times printed a guest essay by National Review editor Rich Lowry entitled “Trump Can Win on Character,” which left deranged liberals frothing at the mouth over what amounted to a rather mild bit of commentary.

Indeed, on substance, Lowry made an argument perhaps best described as uninspiring-but-plausible.

“Everything has to be connected to the deeper case that Ms. Harris is weak and a phony and doesn’t truly care about the country or the middle class,” Lowry wrote.

In other words, former President Donald Trump needs to make the 2024 election a referendum on Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris’ character.

Lowry, in fact, suggested that the former president focus on Harris’s myriad weaknesses.

“To wit: Ms. Harris was too weak to win the Democratic primary contest that year. She was too weak to keep from telling the left practically everything it wanted to hear when she ran in 2019. She is too weak to hold open town-hall events or do extensive — or, at the moment, any — sit-down media interviews,” the National Review editor wrote.

Leftists Melt Down Over New York Times Op-Ed Declaring 'Trump Can Win on Character'

Deranged liberals have the temperaments of totalitarians, which could earn NYT editors punishment for stories not wholly critical of Trump.

www.westernjournal.com

BJ -
Lowry is somewhere between a Never-Never Trumper and a simple Never Trumper - but even he realizes what a disaster Harris would be for the country - Like the stream of Democrats putting country over party by supporting President Trump now.

Not seeing any meltdowns over this.


Maybe some hysterical laughter. I think the times is confused.

 

[Billiejeens]

Not seeing any meltdowns over this.


Maybe some hysterical laughter. I think the times is confused.

The Times is gospel father fucker

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump has no character, neither does his people.

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump has no character, neither does his people.

View attachment 1026349

Democrat Lawfare

Wait for the sequel, clown.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Only an idiot would pit Harris's character against Trump's character and expect Trump to win!

OMFG! Can people be that stupid?

Oh yeah...there is the MAGA crowd...sorry I asked...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Trump has no character, neither does his people.

View attachment 1026349

Cameltoe has characters, you

 

[lafayette]

Democrat Lawfare

Wait for the sequel, clown.

That is the legal system in action.

Your people are engaging in criminal actions and will be punished.

 

[Billiejeens]

That is the legal system in action.

Your people are engaging in criminal actions and will be punished.

View attachment 1026357

You are going to cry so hard, bitch