- Thread starter
- #881
Most workplaces are gun free zones, sport.
The premise of this is that if there was any other reason for the shooting, then they don't consider that it's being a gun free zone shooting, which is of course just plain stupid.
It's not just the location, it's that school shooters knowing that it's gun free are going for the record.
And your task is to *PROVE* that that is even a consideration in the shooter's fucked-up mind. It's been the same task all day and you've come up with ....... nothing.
No, no. I think you're right. The shooter went there because schools have chocolate milk and libraries where they can kill time (yuk yuk) during the slow times during the rampage. I think you're on to something there
The difference between that and what you're saying is, I'm not about to claim a specious causal relationship and then go "yuk yuk look at the ball" when called on to prove it. Whereas you are.
Not grasping why someone who wants to shoot as many people as possible would go to a gun free zone to do it is intentionally dense
Sixty-two documented mass shootings, exactly zero (0) of which demonstrate any causal link at all between a "gun free zone" status and the act.
Need a link to what "zero" means?
Now back to you for a discussion of "dense". Aaaaaand GO.
62 shootings, mostly in gun free zones, but leftists determined not to see a link didn't find one. Again, I couldn't make up the stupid crap you people actually believe