BullKurtz
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
"The fear of transgender women—or of fourteen-year-old boys pretending to be transgender women—entering bathrooms to spy on or expose themselves to girls and women is one that, according to experts, has a no basis in reality. Nonetheless, that aspect of the ordinance was stricken from its final version.
Section 17-51(b) of the ordinance contained the provision and was removed from the version that passed."
Calling this "The Bathroom Bill" as Starnes does is entirely inaccurate and misleading, if not an outright lie.
I find this move by the mayor to be most alarming but Starnes isn't telling the full story. This isn't the first time he has played fast and loose with the facts in his articles.
Hold up here.....so you don't like the writer but what about the subject? Why was such a crazy notion ever attempted? You say the mayor's actions are "alarming"....all that stopped males from entering women's bathrooms was if they were "transgender" or not? If it was stripped from the bill, it's because of the public outrage to it. That's some kinda bizarre....are these the same "experts" who say teenage boys wouldn't try to sneak a peek in there, the ones still trying to claim we are warming the planet? Studies done by homos trying to downplay or explain away the various perversions and pedophilia amongst them are a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously. And maybe you can tell me why some loser who believes if they change their junk they will somehow be happier, should get any consideration under the law? We are not obligated to change normal lifestyles to accommodate these freaks...and the more the envelope is pushed, the harder the reaction is going to be.