Let's be clear

[NYcarbineer]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

The order doesn't mention Muslims and is specific regarding those who are potential terrorists. Whose fault it is that the ones who most likely fit the description and are the most difficult to vet happen to be Muslims?

No lib said shit about Obama banning Muslims for a six month period in 2011. And, yes, it was aimed at Muslims over terrorist concerns.

It is perfectly reasonable to ban people from known terrorist states until we can come up with a better system of vetting them. Our safety is important and our president has a duty to U.S. citizens FIRST. That means when there is any doubt, they must choose us.

Some of the 'fully vetted' refugees allowed in ended up being terrorists. Here's a few of them:

20 ‘Fully Vetted’ Refugees Who Were Charged With TERRORISM After...

Trying to blame this on Obama is another gem by you people.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

Are you saying that it was ok for O to evolve but not trump?

Trump lied to you.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

Are you saying that it was ok for O to evolve but not trump?

Trump lied to you.

So did O....keep your doctor, lower premiums over a year etc, bush43......mwds, clinton.....affairs, grand jury and on and on, bush41.....no new taxes. Blah blah blah.

 

[Clementine]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

Link to Trumps ban on Muslims?

Liberals clearly equate terrorists to Muslims. Is that an admission on their part? After all, the order was quite specific on keeping potential terrorists out of the country.

The left is just grandstanding and attempting to keep people riled over every little thing. Never mind that Trump isn't the first president to make a move like this.

It's absolutely insane to allow unvetted people in from known terrorist countries. Our safety is far more important than Muslims wanting to immigrate. The U.N. stated months ago that the majority of refugees being seeded all over our country are not running from war and are merely looking for a better life. Interpreters at refugee camps have reported what the refugees talk about and it's not chat about a better life. They discuss their orders to spread and multiply because they want Islam to eventually rule the world. Why the hell would anyone support that? And too many subscribe to sharia, which is the opposite of our constitution and Bill of Rights.

There isn't anything wrong with keeping an oppressive form of government out of the U.S. It shouldn't be allowed. The terrorists want the same thing that the leftwing radicals want, which is the destruction of America.

 

[Clementine]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

The order doesn't mention Muslims and is specific regarding those who are potential terrorists. Whose fault it is that the ones who most likely fit the description and are the most difficult to vet happen to be Muslims?

No lib said shit about Obama banning Muslims for a six month period in 2011. And, yes, it was aimed at Muslims over terrorist concerns.

It is perfectly reasonable to ban people from known terrorist states until we can come up with a better system of vetting them. Our safety is important and our president has a duty to U.S. citizens FIRST. That means when there is any doubt, they must choose us.

Some of the 'fully vetted' refugees allowed in ended up being terrorists. Here's a few of them:

20 ‘Fully Vetted’ Refugees Who Were Charged With TERRORISM After...

Trying to blame this on Obama is another gem by you people.

Either you have problems with reading comprehension or you are being deliberately obtuse.

No one is blaming this on Obama. I pointed out the left's hypocrisy by reminding you that Obama had done something similar, for good reason, and none of you objected.

The order focuses on terrorism. If you want to push the notion that it's the same as banning all Muslims, I can't argue with you. It's you guys who now equate terrorists and Muslims. Good job!!!

 

[Indeependent]

TRUMP should fire that asshole Bannon. Last thing trump needs is that Goebbels-like character.

Sure...if you had your way there would be no one on earth who disagreed with you.

 

[Camp]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

The order doesn't mention Muslims and is specific regarding those who are potential terrorists. Whose fault it is that the ones who most likely fit the description and are the most difficult to vet happen to be Muslims?

No lib said shit about Obama banning Muslims for a six month period in 2011. And, yes, it was aimed at Muslims over terrorist concerns.

It is perfectly reasonable to ban people from known terrorist states until we can come up with a better system of vetting them. Our safety is important and our president has a duty to U.S. citizens FIRST. That means when there is any doubt, they must choose us.

Some of the 'fully vetted' refugees allowed in ended up being terrorists. Here's a few of them:

20 ‘Fully Vetted’ Refugees Who Were Charged With TERRORISM After...

Trying to blame this on Obama is another gem by you people.

Either you have problems with reading comprehension or you are being deliberately obtuse.

No one is blaming this on Obama. I pointed out the left's hypocrisy by reminding you that Obama had done something similar, for good reason, and none of you objected.

The order focuses on terrorism. If you want to push the notion that it's the same as banning all Muslims, I can't argue with you. It's you guys who now equate terrorists and Muslims. Good job!!!

Let's see how many terrorist leaders of the magnitude of Bin Ladin or Momar that trump takes out or even the tally he racks up for upper level or even mid level leaders of al Qaeda. You can even throw in ISIL leaders.

 

[owebo]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

The order doesn't mention Muslims and is specific regarding those who are potential terrorists. Whose fault it is that the ones who most likely fit the description and are the most difficult to vet happen to be Muslims?

No lib said shit about Obama banning Muslims for a six month period in 2011. And, yes, it was aimed at Muslims over terrorist concerns.

It is perfectly reasonable to ban people from known terrorist states until we can come up with a better system of vetting them. Our safety is important and our president has a duty to U.S. citizens FIRST. That means when there is any doubt, they must choose us.

Some of the 'fully vetted' refugees allowed in ended up being terrorists. Here's a few of them:

20 ‘Fully Vetted’ Refugees Who Were Charged With TERRORISM After...

Trying to blame this on Obama is another gem by you people.

Who?

 

[SmokeALib]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

Quit starting stupid threads.

 

[owebo]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

Quit starting stupid threads.

What will he do with his life then?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

Other than being an anti semetic hypocrite, you're a dishonest prick.


Too bad you watch fake news, he changed it a loong time before the election... next time pay attention to the campaign.

 

[Dale Smith]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

The order doesn't mention Muslims and is specific regarding those who are potential terrorists. Whose fault it is that the ones who most likely fit the description and are the most difficult to vet happen to be Muslims?

No lib said shit about Obama banning Muslims for a six month period in 2011. And, yes, it was aimed at Muslims over terrorist concerns.

It is perfectly reasonable to ban people from known terrorist states until we can come up with a better system of vetting them. Our safety is important and our president has a duty to U.S. citizens FIRST. That means when there is any doubt, they must choose us.

Some of the 'fully vetted' refugees allowed in ended up being terrorists. Here's a few of them:

20 ‘Fully Vetted’ Refugees Who Were Charged With TERRORISM After...

Trying to blame this on Obama is another gem by you people.

Either you have problems with reading comprehension or you are being deliberately obtuse.

No one is blaming this on Obama. I pointed out the left's hypocrisy by reminding you that Obama had done something similar, for good reason, and none of you objected.

The order focuses on terrorism. If you want to push the notion that it's the same as banning all Muslims, I can't argue with you. It's you guys who now equate terrorists and Muslims. Good job!!!

Let's see how many terrorist leaders of the magnitude of Bin Ladin or Momar that trump takes out or even the tally he racks up for upper level or even mid level leaders of al Qaeda. You can even throw in ISIL leaders.

We have muslims that have been radicalized and funded by the deep state. They are undermining European countries and I can't fore the life of me understand why the left is championing the influx of these people that have no intention of assimilating into American culture and want to make their host country bend to THEIR ways and their way of life. Docile muslims are not a threat until the radical ones come in and once they become huge in number? They start pushing their weight around. You need to do some research about this and view some videos of military age muslims behaving very badly........this is a fact of life.

 

[Camp]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

The order doesn't mention Muslims and is specific regarding those who are potential terrorists. Whose fault it is that the ones who most likely fit the description and are the most difficult to vet happen to be Muslims?

No lib said shit about Obama banning Muslims for a six month period in 2011. And, yes, it was aimed at Muslims over terrorist concerns.

It is perfectly reasonable to ban people from known terrorist states until we can come up with a better system of vetting them. Our safety is important and our president has a duty to U.S. citizens FIRST. That means when there is any doubt, they must choose us.

Some of the 'fully vetted' refugees allowed in ended up being terrorists. Here's a few of them:

20 ‘Fully Vetted’ Refugees Who Were Charged With TERRORISM After...

Trying to blame this on Obama is another gem by you people.

Either you have problems with reading comprehension or you are being deliberately obtuse.

No one is blaming this on Obama. I pointed out the left's hypocrisy by reminding you that Obama had done something similar, for good reason, and none of you objected.

The order focuses on terrorism. If you want to push the notion that it's the same as banning all Muslims, I can't argue with you. It's you guys who now equate terrorists and Muslims. Good job!!!

Let's see how many terrorist leaders of the magnitude of Bin Ladin or Momar that trump takes out or even the tally he racks up for upper level or even mid level leaders of al Qaeda. You can even throw in ISIL leaders.

We have muslims that have been radicalized and funded by the deep state. They are undermining European countries and I can't fore the life of me understand why the left is championing the influx of these people that have no intention of assimilating into American culture and want to make their host country bend to THEIR ways and their way of life. Docile muslims are not a threat until the radical ones come in and once they become huge in number? They start pushing their weight around. You need to do some research about this and view some videos of military age muslims behaving very badly........this is a fact of life.

What does any of your post have to do with the post you quoted about how many al-Qaeda terrorist leaders trump will take out?

 

[Dale Smith]

The order doesn't mention Muslims and is specific regarding those who are potential terrorists. Whose fault it is that the ones who most likely fit the description and are the most difficult to vet happen to be Muslims?

No lib said shit about Obama banning Muslims for a six month period in 2011. And, yes, it was aimed at Muslims over terrorist concerns.

It is perfectly reasonable to ban people from known terrorist states until we can come up with a better system of vetting them. Our safety is important and our president has a duty to U.S. citizens FIRST. That means when there is any doubt, they must choose us.

Some of the 'fully vetted' refugees allowed in ended up being terrorists. Here's a few of them:

20 ‘Fully Vetted’ Refugees Who Were Charged With TERRORISM After...

Trying to blame this on Obama is another gem by you people.

Either you have problems with reading comprehension or you are being deliberately obtuse.

No one is blaming this on Obama. I pointed out the left's hypocrisy by reminding you that Obama had done something similar, for good reason, and none of you objected.

The order focuses on terrorism. If you want to push the notion that it's the same as banning all Muslims, I can't argue with you. It's you guys who now equate terrorists and Muslims. Good job!!!

Let's see how many terrorist leaders of the magnitude of Bin Ladin or Momar that trump takes out or even the tally he racks up for upper level or even mid level leaders of al Qaeda. You can even throw in ISIL leaders.

We have muslims that have been radicalized and funded by the deep state. They are undermining European countries and I can't fore the life of me understand why the left is championing the influx of these people that have no intention of assimilating into American culture and want to make their host country bend to THEIR ways and their way of life. Docile muslims are not a threat until the radical ones come in and once they become huge in number? They start pushing their weight around. You need to do some research about this and view some videos of military age muslims behaving very badly........this is a fact of life.

What does any of your post have to do with the post you quoted about how many al-Qaeda terrorist leaders trump will take out?

CI-Al qeada/ISIS is being funded by the Deep State...don't you know that?? You think the taking out of Qaddafi was about terrorism? Dude...you are waaaaay off course about that. Osama bin Laden died on December 13th, 2001...he was always a CIA covert operative. He was visited by numerous intel agencies including the CIA for debriefing. He had Marfan's Syndrome with failing kidneys. The war on terrorism is a ruse to bring in muslims that are radical to rally the moderate ones. Have you seen what is happening in Europe and their "come one, come all" policy? They started off with women and children for the TV cameras and then phase two was to bring in militant, military aged muslims. You need to take the blinders off. This is real and it is happening.

 

[Clementine]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

The order doesn't mention Muslims and is specific regarding those who are potential terrorists. Whose fault it is that the ones who most likely fit the description and are the most difficult to vet happen to be Muslims?

No lib said shit about Obama banning Muslims for a six month period in 2011. And, yes, it was aimed at Muslims over terrorist concerns.

It is perfectly reasonable to ban people from known terrorist states until we can come up with a better system of vetting them. Our safety is important and our president has a duty to U.S. citizens FIRST. That means when there is any doubt, they must choose us.

Some of the 'fully vetted' refugees allowed in ended up being terrorists. Here's a few of them:

20 ‘Fully Vetted’ Refugees Who Were Charged With TERRORISM After...

Trying to blame this on Obama is another gem by you people.

Either you have problems with reading comprehension or you are being deliberately obtuse.

No one is blaming this on Obama. I pointed out the left's hypocrisy by reminding you that Obama had done something similar, for good reason, and none of you objected.

The order focuses on terrorism. If you want to push the notion that it's the same as banning all Muslims, I can't argue with you. It's you guys who now equate terrorists and Muslims. Good job!!!

Let's see how many terrorist leaders of the magnitude of Bin Ladin or Momar that trump takes out or even the tally he racks up for upper level or even mid level leaders of al Qaeda. You can even throw in ISIL leaders.

We have muslims that have been radicalized and funded by the deep state. They are undermining European countries and I can't fore the life of me understand why the left is championing the influx of these people that have no intention of assimilating into American culture and want to make their host country bend to THEIR ways and their way of life. Docile muslims are not a threat until the radical ones come in and once they become huge in number? They start pushing their weight around. You need to do some research about this and view some videos of military age muslims behaving very badly........this is a fact of life.

True. When the 'peaceful' Muslims refuse to stand up to the radicals and support them over others, it makes them just as bad.

 

[J.E.D]

Muslims are not welcome here...

That is one reason Trump got elected..

The people have spoken

-Geaux

The people spoke for Secretary Clinton. The electoral college spoke for Donald

 

[owebo]

Muslims are not welcome here...

That is one reason Trump got elected..

The people have spoken

-Geaux

The people spoke for Secretary Clinton. The electoral college spoke for Donald

And Trump won with a mandate, and Hillary was last seen wondering the woods....

 

[J.E.D]

Muslims are not welcome here...

That is one reason Trump got elected..

The people have spoken

-Geaux

The people spoke for Secretary Clinton. The electoral college spoke for Donald

And Trump won with a mandate, and Hillary was last seen wondering the woods....

The word you're looking for is 'wandering'. I'm pretty sure she's doing just fine.

And, no, he wasn't elected with a mandate. He didn't even win the popular vote.

 

[Iceweasel]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

The order doesn't mention Muslims and is specific regarding those who are potential terrorists. Whose fault it is that the ones who most likely fit the description and are the most difficult to vet happen to be Muslims?

No lib said shit about Obama banning Muslims for a six month period in 2011. And, yes, it was aimed at Muslims over terrorist concerns.

It is perfectly reasonable to ban people from known terrorist states until we can come up with a better system of vetting them. Our safety is important and our president has a duty to U.S. citizens FIRST. That means when there is any doubt, they must choose us.

Some of the 'fully vetted' refugees allowed in ended up being terrorists. Here's a few of them:

20 ‘Fully Vetted’ Refugees Who Were Charged With TERRORISM After...

Trying to blame this on Obama is another gem by you people.

Who's doing any blaming except liberals? Blame assumes wrong doing.

 

[Johann]

Currently, two points from the Right are going on on this board...

1. Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises

2. Trump's ban on Muslims is not a ban on Muslims

Agreed?

Let's go back to 2015:

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com

So which of you Trumptards wants to admit you're lying about either number one, or number two.

Who gives a fuck?

I don't want those fucking muzzies here blowing shit up. this ain't Paris nor is it brussels.

Let's keep it that way.