Let's make something clear.

[j-mac]

Sure it’s important. It’s also important that the president not have committed an act of insurrection.

Good thing he didn't then....

 

[Oddball]

Attention whore seeks attention.

 

[Marener]

Good thing he didn't then....

The court disagrees.

Better luck next time.

 

[OKTexas]

You need an act in furtherance of a crime. Good luck!

How about allowing the entry of 10 million illegal aliens and acting as the last mile delivery service for the cartels? Then providing work permits to legally ineligible illegals. I think that's enough for starters.

.

 

[Marener]

How about allowing the entry of 10 million illegal aliens and acting as the last mile delivery service for the cartels? Then providing work permits to legally ineligible illegals. I think that's enough for starters.

.

Policy disagreements don’t amount to rebellion and insurrection.

Its best to start with something that would meet the requirements.

 

[j-mac]

The court disagrees.

Better luck next time.

The courts are ideologically corrupt....

 

[eagle1462010]

Sure it’s important. It’s also important that the president not have committed an act of insurrection.

What Insurrection?

Say it a thousand times Lies become Truth huh....

Show me a trial conviction or STFU.

 

[Concerned American]

Sure it’s important. It’s also important that the president not have committed an act of insurrection.

What insurrection was ever accomplished with the words "peacefully and patriotically?"

 

[Marener]

The courts are ideologically corrupt....

Tell me more.

 

[j-mac]

Tell me more.

No, it does no good....

 

[Marener]

What Insurrection?

Say it a thousand times Lies become Truth huh....

Show me a trial conviction or STFU.

Show me where section 3 of the 14th amendment stipulates a trial conviction is necessary ir STFU.

 

[Marener]

No, it does no good....

It appears all you have are talking points.

 

[j-mac]

It appears all you have are talking points.

It appears all you have are lies, and distortions, but what else is new?

 

[Concerned American]

Its best to start with something that would meet the requirements.

Good advice. Try following it.

 

[Marener]

It appears all you have are lies, and distortions, but what else is new?

All I did was ask a question. Your lack of an answer suggests little substance to your allegation.

 

[Concerned American]

Show me where section 3 of the 14th amendment stipulates a trial conviction is necessary ir STFU.

It is adequately covered in the 4th, 5th and 6th.

 

[OKTexas]

I'm waiting for a Trumpleton to make an informed argument against the assertion "Historical precedent also confirms that a criminal conviction is not required for an individual to be disqualified under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment," but I'm not expecting one. Theirs is the way of invectives, not reason.

Dumbass, prosecutions weren't allowed because of Lincoln's blanket amnesty. But as I've posted, under current precedent, individual voters don't have standing to challenge the constitutional qualifications of a candidate to be on a ballot.

.

 

[Marener]

Good advice. Try following it.

Done and done. Hence the ruling in Colorado.

Trump did indeed attempt to undermine the electoral system in 2020. It was brazen and unprecedented. I don’t know if it amounted to insurrection exactly, but it’s at least in the ballpark.

 

[Marener]

It is adequately covered in the 4th, 5th and 6th.

Please explain how those amendments have an effect on disqualification by the 14th.

 

[OKTexas]

Policy disagreements don’t amount to rebellion and insurrection.

Its best to start with something that would meet the requirements.

Willfully violating US law, when he swore to uphold them, is not a policy disagreement. Having cabinet level officials intentionally lie to congress is not a policy disagreement.

.