Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,150
- 56,924
- 3,615
No link, huh?% of income
I accept your admission you are full of shit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No link, huh?% of income
Irony.You posts lack content. There’s nothing to comprehend.
Look up the definition of liberty and get back to me, Simp.There is no language limiting the power of the section to former Confederates, however, and its scope is sweeping, with no requirement that those engaged in the specified conduct be convicted. Indeed, given the number of people who served in the Confederate army and governments, such a requirement would have been impractical.
The Colorado Ruling Calls the Originalists’ Bluff
The disqualification of Donald Trump challenges the Supreme Court’s conservatives to follow through on their stated beliefs.www.theatlantic.com
"The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.""
Trump is not being deprived of any of the above. Additionally, he was given due process by both courts in CO, cuck.
That hack Dimtard judge has no authority to enforce the 14th Amendment, Simp. Congress is the sole entity given that power by the 14th.The CO judge in the lower court based her opinion on 5 days of extensive evidence and expert testimony by both sides. That is what a hearing to determine disqualification calls for.
Congress can ONLY vote to allow someone to be ON the ballot that has been declared ineligibleThat hack Dimtard judge has no authority to enforce the 14th Amendment, Simp. Congress is the sole entity given that power by the 14th.
Get educated, moron.
Nope.Congress can ONLY vote to allow someone to be ON the ballot that has been declared ineligible
Section 5
The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
That’s not in the 14th is it…Nope.
It is.That’s not in the 14th is it…
With the caveat that had the idiot Dems been smart enough to attain a formal declaration of Insurrection, the States would have been free to act.I accept your admission CO and Maine are full of shit and overstepped their authority.
lolCongress can ONLY vote to allow someone to be ON the ballot that has been declared ineligible
WTF is a “formal declaration of insurrection”?With the caveat that had the idiot Dems been smart enough to attain a formal declaration of Insurrection, the States would have been free to act.
Your ignorance is noted. Perhaps you should read the entire amendment and get educated for once, Simp.
With the caveat that had the idiot Dems been smart enough to attain a formal declaration of Insurrection, the States would have been free to act.
Wouldn't a formal declaration of insurrection be made by the "insurrection'er'' and delivered to the ''insurrection'ees''?WTF is a “formal declaration of insurrection”?
In this context, an authoritative declaration that a State of Insurrection exists (or existed on January 6, 2021).WTF is a “formal declaration of insurrection”?
More like a Congressional Resolution or a Supreme Court Ruling or an Executive Order.Wouldn't a formal declaration of insurrection be made by the "insurrection'er'' and delivered to the ''insurrection'ees''?
Oh, I see. They needed to go to the Federal Department of Insurrections and get a notarized record of insurrection, probably in triplicate, from the undersecretary of domestic disturbances to submit to the board of uprisings.In this context, an authoritative declaration that a State of Insurrection exists (or existed on January 6, 2021).
Made by an arm of the Federal government with the jurisdiction or legal competency to issue such a proclamation.
Usable as the basis for taking action - including banning a candidate who so participated from appearing on a ballot.
Nope.Sorry, but you made this shit up and it’s just not a thing.
What makes you think any Congressional Resolution or a Supreme Court Ruling or an Executive Order would be possible?More like a Congressional Resolution or a Supreme Court Ruling or an Executive Order.
Such a thing would have given CO or ME the legal basis for barring Donald Trump from their primary ballots.
However, and unfortunately, the idiotic, procrastinating, chicken$hit Democrats never issued one on January 21, 2021.
Youre talking about the thing you just made up, right?Nope.
One cannot act upon an Insurrection without an official declaration that one exists or has taken place.
And no such declaration or official Federal -level recognition of that state exists to date.