Let’s root for Democrat talk of impeachment

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,877
The professional “conservative” commentators will write about how serious a threat the Michael Cohen “admission” is.

He said candidate Donald Trump directed him to payoff two trollops who Trump had bedded and make them go away.

Each of these prostitutes was paid after they signed a “non-disclosure” agreement that made them affirm they understood they were taking their money only on the condition that they never talk about their connection to candidate Trump again.

Both of them violated their agreement, but hey they are hookers, right?

As we have seen there is no such thing as a “Hooker With Heart of Gold.”

Whores are honorable people only up to the time their honor is tested.

Both of these whores failed the honor test; but that is unimportant now.

What is important is how the revelation that in open court Michael Cohen said he paid them for their silence at the direction of then candidate Trump.

The wussies who never really got Trump – the George Will Noah Goldberg and David French crowd - will make stupid comparisons to Watergate to win favor with the Democrats.

They think the Democrats are going to regain control of the House and be in position to then blackmail Trump with whispers of, “Give us this or that or we will impeach you.”

They can’t wait for those days to come. They will be very disappointed by Trump once again.

That bunch of quislings will be just as wrong now as they were when they willingly joined the effort to destroy America through the election of Hillary Clinton.

Nevertheless, the Cohen allocution is a BIG trap for Democrats; one these drooling halfwits will not be able to resist.

They have nothing to attract voters but hate Trump and hate America, but they know that they can’t beat Trump in these midterm elections with hate.

Trying to save their political lives, Democrats will grab onto impeachment like a straw on a fast-moving river bank.

Since they are Democrats they really don’t understand the force of Trump’s achievements.

They believe CNN and the rest of the media who keep telling them America hates Trump just as much as they do.

When the noose of defeat starts getting tighter around Democrats’ necks they will talk only of impeachment and set up their own destruction.

They will offer to be the instruments of Trump’s impeachment – after all CNN tells them everyone hates Trump – right?

This open and disparate appeal will draw the kind of clear distinction between the two parties the media works so hard to hide.

Americans of all groups, even the leftists who have jobs, know we are living in the best economy of our lifetime.

Older voters who held their nose and voted for Bill Clinton, a true and adjudicated lowlife, remember doing so because they wanted nothing to upset the good economy we had then.

History will more than repeat itself.

There is no way Americans will vote to overturn the economic benefits of Trump’s economy by giving a Democrat controlled House the chance to roll them back and repeal the tax cuts as Democrats have said they would.

So, let’s root for Democrat talk of impeachment; we can do that because we are not “conservative” commentators.

Bill Clinton didn’t bother pay prostitutes. He simply raped women, knowing his power mad WINO would manage the coverup for him. And that was fine with the Democrat media. Remember all those elaborate accounts of how clever Bill was that he was able to “compartmentalize” his life, and we were just dumb rubes for thinking there was anything wrong with that? I remember all of that and for those who don’t, look it up in the NYT archives
 
They don't have the guts to even try....Trump supporters would be amped up so high they could never remove him from office...the senate would never provide a 2/3 vote for removal...
 
Still haven't seen anything on collusion which this whole thing was supposed to be about.

Trump paid off a couple of women who were looking for money. Nothing says they actually had an affair with Trump, just that he paid them off ahead of the election.

Hell JFK and his brother were notorious bed hoppers and JFK would never have made it to the WH if the press of then was the press of today. Back then the press knew but never reported on it.

Just a whole lot of nothing in my book. Two criminals got convicted as they should have been.

Get back to us with proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
 
They don't have the guts to even try....Trump supporters would be amped up so high they could never remove him from office...the senate would never provide a 2/3 vote for removal...


I wouldn't be so positive on that. If the democrats win the House they are going to impeach Trump, no matter that he hasn't broken the law or done anything wrong. The Senate democrats will use the impeachment to leverage squish republicans and never Trump republicans to not confirm any nominee sent up by Trump, and possibly to get those same Republicans who hate Trump to vote to remove him from office. It would be the end of the Republican party, but they aren't called the stupid party for nothing...
 
Still haven't seen anything on collusion which this whole thing was supposed to be about.

Trump paid off a couple of women who were looking for money. Nothing says they actually had an affair with Trump, just that he paid them off ahead of the election.

Hell JFK and his brother were notorious bed hoppers and JFK would never have made it to the WH if the press of then was the press of today. Back then the press knew but never reported on it.

Just a whole lot of nothing in my book. Two criminals got convicted as they should have been.

Get back to us with proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
There is NO LAW about collusion, the special prosecutor was a FRAUD to start with. BUT since it is going. I believe Trump will be firing a whole bunch of people after the RED WAVE washes the scum away in Nov.
 
From Dershowitz:

A candidate can spend as much of their own money as they want to—even if it was a campaign-related expense. You have to show that it’s a crime, it’s “not a crime” for a candidate like Trump to contribute to his own campaign, and probably not even a crime to direct someone else to contribute if he plans to pay that back. Further, Dershowitz said, “The only evidence that the president did anything that might be unlawful … comes from a man who’s admitted to be a liar.”
 
The professional “conservative” commentators will write about how serious a threat the Michael Cohen “admission” is.

He said candidate Donald Trump directed him to payoff two trollops who Trump had bedded and make them go away.

Each of these prostitutes was paid after they signed a “non-disclosure” agreement that made them affirm they understood they were taking their money only on the condition that they never talk about their connection to candidate Trump again.

Both of them violated their agreement, but hey they are hookers, right?

As we have seen there is no such thing as a “Hooker With Heart of Gold.”

Whores are honorable people only up to the time their honor is tested.

Both of these whores failed the honor test; but that is unimportant now.

What is important is how the revelation that in open court Michael Cohen said he paid them for their silence at the direction of then candidate Trump.

The wussies who never really got Trump – the George Will Noah Goldberg and David French crowd - will make stupid comparisons to Watergate to win favor with the Democrats.

They think the Democrats are going to regain control of the House and be in position to then blackmail Trump with whispers of, “Give us this or that or we will impeach you.”

They can’t wait for those days to come. They will be very disappointed by Trump once again.

That bunch of quislings will be just as wrong now as they were when they willingly joined the effort to destroy America through the election of Hillary Clinton.

Nevertheless, the Cohen allocution is a BIG trap for Democrats; one these drooling halfwits will not be able to resist.

They have nothing to attract voters but hate Trump and hate America, but they know that they can’t beat Trump in these midterm elections with hate.

Trying to save their political lives, Democrats will grab onto impeachment like a straw on a fast-moving river bank.

Since they are Democrats they really don’t understand the force of Trump’s achievements.

They believe CNN and the rest of the media who keep telling them America hates Trump just as much as they do.

When the noose of defeat starts getting tighter around Democrats’ necks they will talk only of impeachment and set up their own destruction.

They will offer to be the instruments of Trump’s impeachment – after all CNN tells them everyone hates Trump – right?

This open and disparate appeal will draw the kind of clear distinction between the two parties the media works so hard to hide.

Americans of all groups, even the leftists who have jobs, know we are living in the best economy of our lifetime.

Older voters who held their nose and voted for Bill Clinton, a true and adjudicated lowlife, remember doing so because they wanted nothing to upset the good economy we had then.

History will more than repeat itself.

There is no way Americans will vote to overturn the economic benefits of Trump’s economy by giving a Democrat controlled House the chance to roll them back and repeal the tax cuts as Democrats have said they would.

So, let’s root for Democrat talk of impeachment; we can do that because we are not “conservative” commentators.

Bill Clinton didn’t bother pay prostitutes. He simply raped women, knowing his power mad WINO would manage the coverup for him. And that was fine with the Democrat media. Remember all those elaborate accounts of how clever Bill was that he was able to “compartmentalize” his life, and we were just dumb rubes for thinking there was anything wrong with that? I remember all of that and for those who don’t, look it up in the NYT archives
You know, that whole gobbly goo post of yours is worth teats. You know why? Because the law doesn't care what your emotionally charged head exploding post says. Carry on!
 
From Dershowitz:

A candidate can spend as much of their own money as they want to—even if it was a campaign-related expense. You have to show that it’s a crime, it’s “not a crime” for a candidate like Trump to contribute to his own campaign, and probably not even a crime to direct someone else to contribute if he plans to pay that back. Further, Dershowitz said, “The only evidence that the president did anything that might be unlawful … comes from a man who’s admitted to be a liar.”
Lol! Dershowitz forgot about reporting the money, and Trump lied about its existence. Dershowitz is tone deaf about that. Do you know why? Because that constitutes a crime.

But please, don't let that stop you from presenting more useless counter defense arguments.
 
Still haven't seen anything on collusion which this whole thing was supposed to be about.

Trump paid off a couple of women who were looking for money. Nothing says they actually had an affair with Trump, just that he paid them off ahead of the election.

Hell JFK and his brother were notorious bed hoppers and JFK would never have made it to the WH if the press of then was the press of today. Back then the press knew but never reported on it.

Just a whole lot of nothing in my book. Two criminals got convicted as they should have been.

Get back to us with proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
There is NO LAW about collusion, the special prosecutor was a FRAUD to start with. BUT since it is going. I believe Trump will be firing a whole bunch of people after the RED WAVE washes the scum away in Nov.
That's right. There is a law of conspiracy to attack the U.S. in an election with foreign nationals. The Trump Tower meeting is that evidence. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
 
From Dershowitz:

A candidate can spend as much of their own money as they want to—even if it was a campaign-related expense. You have to show that it’s a crime, it’s “not a crime” for a candidate like Trump to contribute to his own campaign, and probably not even a crime to direct someone else to contribute if he plans to pay that back. Further, Dershowitz said, “The only evidence that the president did anything that might be unlawful … comes from a man who’s admitted to be a liar.”
Lol! Dershowitz forgot about reporting the money, and Trump lied about its existence. Dershowitz is tone deaf about that. Do you know why? Because that constitutes a crime.

But please, don't let that stop you from presenting more useless counter defense arguments.

How is me quoting a highly respected constitutional attorney equate to "presenting arguments"? Explain this one.
 
From Dershowitz:

A candidate can spend as much of their own money as they want to—even if it was a campaign-related expense. You have to show that it’s a crime, it’s “not a crime” for a candidate like Trump to contribute to his own campaign, and probably not even a crime to direct someone else to contribute if he plans to pay that back. Further, Dershowitz said, “The only evidence that the president did anything that might be unlawful … comes from a man who’s admitted to be a liar.”
Lol! Dershowitz forgot about reporting the money, and Trump lied about its existence. Dershowitz is tone deaf about that. Do you know why? Because that constitutes a crime.

But please, don't let that stop you from presenting more useless counter defense arguments.

How is me quoting a highly respected constitutional attorney equate to "presenting arguments"? Explain this one.
You quoted him didn't you?
 
From Dershowitz:

A candidate can spend as much of their own money as they want to—even if it was a campaign-related expense. You have to show that it’s a crime, it’s “not a crime” for a candidate like Trump to contribute to his own campaign, and probably not even a crime to direct someone else to contribute if he plans to pay that back. Further, Dershowitz said, “The only evidence that the president did anything that might be unlawful … comes from a man who’s admitted to be a liar.”
Lol! Dershowitz forgot about reporting the money, and Trump lied about its existence. Dershowitz is tone deaf about that. Do you know why? Because that constitutes a crime.

But please, don't let that stop you from presenting more useless counter defense arguments.

How is me quoting a highly respected constitutional attorney equate to "presenting arguments"? Explain this one.
You quoted him didn't you?

Feel free to email him and complain. I am not an attorney.
 
I wouldn't be so positive on that. If the democrats win the House they are going to....
:lmao: If that happens we can look forward to saying "President Pence". Hillary lost. Get over it.


And if they remove Trump, by some means, Pence will be impeached 30 seconds after he takes the oath.... the democrats have gotten tired of leaving their power at the whim of elections.....those days are now officially over.
 
Still haven't seen anything on collusion which this whole thing was supposed to be about.

Trump paid off a couple of women who were looking for money. Nothing says they actually had an affair with Trump, just that he paid them off ahead of the election.

Hell JFK and his brother were notorious bed hoppers and JFK would never have made it to the WH if the press of then was the press of today. Back then the press knew but never reported on it.

Just a whole lot of nothing in my book. Two criminals got convicted as they should have been.

Get back to us with proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
There is NO LAW about collusion, the special prosecutor was a FRAUD to start with. BUT since it is going. I believe Trump will be firing a whole bunch of people after the RED WAVE washes the scum away in Nov.
That's right. There is a law of conspiracy to attack the U.S. in an election with foreign nationals. The Trump Tower meeting is that evidence. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States


No.... the Russian lawyer met with hilary's employee, Fusion GPS before and after the meeting.
 
Still haven't seen anything on collusion which this whole thing was supposed to be about.

Trump paid off a couple of women who were looking for money. Nothing says they actually had an affair with Trump, just that he paid them off ahead of the election.

Hell JFK and his brother were notorious bed hoppers and JFK would never have made it to the WH if the press of then was the press of today. Back then the press knew but never reported on it.

Just a whole lot of nothing in my book. Two criminals got convicted as they should have been.

Get back to us with proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
There is NO LAW about collusion, the special prosecutor was a FRAUD to start with. BUT since it is going. I believe Trump will be firing a whole bunch of people after the RED WAVE washes the scum away in Nov.


The only way to stop this is to vote Republican in November. The democrats need to be crushed at the ballot box. I can't stand the Republicans, but I will vote for even the squish republicans to keep the democrats from impeaching Trump.
 
Still haven't seen anything on collusion which this whole thing was supposed to be about.

Trump paid off a couple of women who were looking for money. Nothing says they actually had an affair with Trump, just that he paid them off ahead of the election.

Hell JFK and his brother were notorious bed hoppers and JFK would never have made it to the WH if the press of then was the press of today. Back then the press knew but never reported on it.

Just a whole lot of nothing in my book. Two criminals got convicted as they should have been.

Get back to us with proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
There is NO LAW about collusion, the special prosecutor was a FRAUD to start with. BUT since it is going. I believe Trump will be firing a whole bunch of people after the RED WAVE washes the scum away in Nov.
That's right. There is a law of conspiracy to attack the U.S. in an election with foreign nationals. The Trump Tower meeting is that evidence. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
What was defrauded?...Even if he knew opposition research is perfectly legal!
 
Still haven't seen anything on collusion which this whole thing was supposed to be about.

Trump paid off a couple of women who were looking for money. Nothing says they actually had an affair with Trump, just that he paid them off ahead of the election.

Hell JFK and his brother were notorious bed hoppers and JFK would never have made it to the WH if the press of then was the press of today. Back then the press knew but never reported on it.

Just a whole lot of nothing in my book. Two criminals got convicted as they should have been.

Get back to us with proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
There is NO LAW about collusion, the special prosecutor was a FRAUD to start with. BUT since it is going. I believe Trump will be firing a whole bunch of people after the RED WAVE washes the scum away in Nov.
That's right. There is a law of conspiracy to attack the U.S. in an election with foreign nationals. The Trump Tower meeting is that evidence. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
What was defrauded?...Even if he knew opposition research is perfectly legal!
As always, the Right misses the boat. The Trump Tower meeting was not opposition research. It was a crime to get dirt on a political opponent with foreign nationals, whom we had sanctions against. That's illegal, and an attack on our country.
 
Still haven't seen anything on collusion which this whole thing was supposed to be about.

Trump paid off a couple of women who were looking for money. Nothing says they actually had an affair with Trump, just that he paid them off ahead of the election.

Hell JFK and his brother were notorious bed hoppers and JFK would never have made it to the WH if the press of then was the press of today. Back then the press knew but never reported on it.

Just a whole lot of nothing in my book. Two criminals got convicted as they should have been.

Get back to us with proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
There is NO LAW about collusion, the special prosecutor was a FRAUD to start with. BUT since it is going. I believe Trump will be firing a whole bunch of people after the RED WAVE washes the scum away in Nov.


The only way to stop this is to vote Republican in November. The democrats need to be crushed at the ballot box. I can't stand the Republicans, but I will vote for even the squish republicans to keep the democrats from impeaching Trump.
Keeping a criminal in office is to fight against the "rule of law".
 
Still haven't seen anything on collusion which this whole thing was supposed to be about.

Trump paid off a couple of women who were looking for money. Nothing says they actually had an affair with Trump, just that he paid them off ahead of the election.

Hell JFK and his brother were notorious bed hoppers and JFK would never have made it to the WH if the press of then was the press of today. Back then the press knew but never reported on it.

Just a whole lot of nothing in my book. Two criminals got convicted as they should have been.

Get back to us with proof of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
There is NO LAW about collusion, the special prosecutor was a FRAUD to start with. BUT since it is going. I believe Trump will be firing a whole bunch of people after the RED WAVE washes the scum away in Nov.


The only way to stop this is to vote Republican in November. The democrats need to be crushed at the ballot box. I can't stand the Republicans, but I will vote for even the squish republicans to keep the democrats from impeaching Trump.
Trump is the most wannabe Republican, why you wanna protect him at all costs ?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: WTP

Forum List

Back
Top