BuckToothMoron
Gold Member
- Apr 3, 2016
- 9,895
- 1,898
- 290
Education is a national priority for some of us.Yep, she’s a dandy. She will to do anything to be on top.....I mean get to the top.
She’s a rockstar but she's longshot. Her plan to increase teacher’s pay is exciting. But since it used multi-syllable words, I doubt you could understand it sling blade.
Why the hell should the president of the country be telling school district what to pay their teachers?
This is a hardline between liberals and conservatives. Liberals believe it should be the duty and task of the federal government to oversee and manage individual school districts in every county in every state. Conservatives know it is better handled by the local people and their government.
Education is not a priority for conservatives.
National,priority? What does that even mean? Look, having a government entity 100’s or 1000’s, sometimes 10’s of 1000’s Mile’s away control and dictate the function of a school district is inefficient and expensive, and it does not improve results. Liberals love the idea of the omnipotent government that can cure all things. It’s a fairy tale.
You don’t know what the words “national priority” mean?
Again, Education is not a priority for conservatives. You’ve proven that.
No, what I have proof of is that the more the federal government gets involved and the more money spent by the Federal government with local school districts the less effective they are.
Does Spending More on Education Improve Academic Achievement?
KEY TAKEAWAYS
American spending on public K–12 education continues at an all-time high and is still rising.
Federal spending on elementary and secondary education has also increased dramatically.
Continuous spending increases have not corresponded with equal improvement in American educational performance.