Lets stop calling them terrorist attacks

[Skylar]

I have no problem at all in referring to the terrorism of TIMOTHY as
white---protestant---terrorism (because there was a kind of aspect
of it that included protestant ideology----albeit--weirded up) I have
no problem in naming "shoot up the abortion clinic" as ---white
protestant terrorism (unless a catholic is involved) -----but to be
PRECISE -------there aint much of WHITE PROTESTANT
TERRORISM in the world today-----now what CROMWELL is dead.
But there has been lots of MUSLIM TERRORISM for the past 1400 years
and counting

For me, their religion is irrelevant unless its the primary motivating factor in their actions.

 

[Skylar]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

No. And no one suggested it was. No more than 9-11 or Brussells or Paris or a gazillion other muslim attacks were nondenominational secular anti-US government attacks.
Why do you go to such lengths the to protect muslim terrorism?

Can you factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

And I call acts of terrorism 'terrorism'.

Your obfuscation is obvious.

So that's a 'no', you can't factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

Well that was easy.

 

[irosie91]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

No. And no one suggested it was. No more than 9-11 or Brussells or Paris or a gazillion other muslim attacks were nondenominational secular anti-US government attacks.
Why do you go to such lengths the to protect muslim terrorism?

Can you factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

And I call acts of terrorism 'terrorism'.

Your obfuscation is obvious.

----OBVIOUS OBFUSCATION <<<< excellent-------virtually poetic-----
seems contradictory but it ain't

 

[irosie91]

I have no problem at all in referring to the terrorism of TIMOTHY as
white---protestant---terrorism (because there was a kind of aspect
of it that included protestant ideology----albeit--weirded up) I have
no problem in naming "shoot up the abortion clinic" as ---white
protestant terrorism (unless a catholic is involved) -----but to be
PRECISE -------there aint much of WHITE PROTESTANT
TERRORISM in the world today-----now what CROMWELL is dead.
But there has been lots of MUSLIM TERRORISM for the past 1400 years
and counting

For me, their religion is irrelevant unless its the primary motivating factor in their actions.

oh-----ok ------the muslims who attacked people in Brussels whilst screaming
ALLAHU AKBAAR did so because they were bothered by Belgian waffles

 

[Skylar]

I have no problem at all in referring to the terrorism of TIMOTHY as
white---protestant---terrorism (because there was a kind of aspect
of it that included protestant ideology----albeit--weirded up) I have
no problem in naming "shoot up the abortion clinic" as ---white
protestant terrorism (unless a catholic is involved) -----but to be
PRECISE -------there aint much of WHITE PROTESTANT
TERRORISM in the world today-----now what CROMWELL is dead.
But there has been lots of MUSLIM TERRORISM for the past 1400 years
and counting

For me, their religion is irrelevant unless its the primary motivating factor in their actions.

oh-----ok ------the muslims who attacked people in Brussels whilst screaming
ALLAHU AKBAAR did so because they were bothered by Belgian waffles

If you say so. But that's certainly not my argument.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

No. And no one suggested it was. No more than 9-11 or Brussells or Paris or a gazillion other muslim attacks were nondenominational secular anti-US government attacks.
Why do you go to such lengths the to protect muslim terrorism?

Can you factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

And I call acts of terrorism 'terrorism'.

Your obfuscation is obvious.

So that's a 'no', you can't factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

Well that was easy.

Your obvious obfuscation is your defense of muslim terrorism.
At least we got you to utter the term 'muslim terrorism'. That's a start.

 

[irosie91]

I have no problem at all in referring to the terrorism of TIMOTHY as
white---protestant---terrorism (because there was a kind of aspect
of it that included protestant ideology----albeit--weirded up) I have
no problem in naming "shoot up the abortion clinic" as ---white
protestant terrorism (unless a catholic is involved) -----but to be
PRECISE -------there aint much of WHITE PROTESTANT
TERRORISM in the world today-----now what CROMWELL is dead.
But there has been lots of MUSLIM TERRORISM for the past 1400 years
and counting

For me, their religion is irrelevant unless its the primary motivating factor in their actions.

Why PRIMARY? It is very likely that most bomb on ass sluts have
a PRIMARY "I want to die" motivation-------islam just provides a
very convenient and GLORIOUS way to "do it".

 

[irosie91]

I have no problem at all in referring to the terrorism of TIMOTHY as
white---protestant---terrorism (because there was a kind of aspect
of it that included protestant ideology----albeit--weirded up) I have
no problem in naming "shoot up the abortion clinic" as ---white
protestant terrorism (unless a catholic is involved) -----but to be
PRECISE -------there aint much of WHITE PROTESTANT
TERRORISM in the world today-----now what CROMWELL is dead.
But there has been lots of MUSLIM TERRORISM for the past 1400 years
and counting

For me, their religion is irrelevant unless its the primary motivating factor in their actions.

oh-----ok ------the muslims who attacked people in Brussels whilst screaming
ALLAHU AKBAAR did so because they were bothered by Belgian waffles

If you say so. But that's certainly not my argument.

you have an argument?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

No. And no one suggested it was. No more than 9-11 or Brussells or Paris or a gazillion other muslim attacks were nondenominational secular anti-US government attacks.
Why do you go to such lengths the to protect muslim terrorism?

Can you factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

And I call acts of terrorism 'terrorism'.

Your obfuscation is obvious.

----OBVIOUS OBFUSCATION <<<< excellent-------virtually poetic-----
seems contradictory but it ain't

Thank you. Slightly alliterative and paradoxically accurate.

 

[Skylar]

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

No. And no one suggested it was. No more than 9-11 or Brussells or Paris or a gazillion other muslim attacks were nondenominational secular anti-US government attacks.
Why do you go to such lengths the to protect muslim terrorism?

Can you factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

And I call acts of terrorism 'terrorism'.

Your obfuscation is obvious.

So that's a 'no', you can't factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

Well that was easy.

Your obvious obfuscation is your defense of muslim terrorism.

Says you, citing yourself. Which is meaningless.

At least we got you to utter the term 'muslim terrorism'. That's a start.

If using that term makes you feel safer, go for it. But back in reality, it doesn't matter what prefixes and riders you add to the word 'terrorism'. The injured and dead aren't any less injured and dead because of what labels you apply.

 

[Skylar]

I have no problem at all in referring to the terrorism of TIMOTHY as
white---protestant---terrorism (because there was a kind of aspect
of it that included protestant ideology----albeit--weirded up) I have
no problem in naming "shoot up the abortion clinic" as ---white
protestant terrorism (unless a catholic is involved) -----but to be
PRECISE -------there aint much of WHITE PROTESTANT
TERRORISM in the world today-----now what CROMWELL is dead.
But there has been lots of MUSLIM TERRORISM for the past 1400 years
and counting

For me, their religion is irrelevant unless its the primary motivating factor in their actions.

oh-----ok ------the muslims who attacked people in Brussels whilst screaming
ALLAHU AKBAAR did so because they were bothered by Belgian waffles

If you say so. But that's certainly not my argument.

you have an argument?

Yup. And its not what you said.

 

[irosie91]

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

No. And no one suggested it was. No more than 9-11 or Brussells or Paris or a gazillion other muslim attacks were nondenominational secular anti-US government attacks.
Why do you go to such lengths the to protect muslim terrorism?

Can you factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

And I call acts of terrorism 'terrorism'.

Your obfuscation is obvious.

----OBVIOUS OBFUSCATION <<<< excellent-------virtually poetic-----
seems contradictory but it ain't

Thank you. Slightly alliterative and paradoxically accurate.

thanks----I could not think of the word ALLITERATION------(senior moment)

 

[irosie91]

No. And no one suggested it was. No more than 9-11 or Brussells or Paris or a gazillion other muslim attacks were nondenominational secular anti-US government attacks.
Why do you go to such lengths the to protect muslim terrorism?

Can you factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

And I call acts of terrorism 'terrorism'.

Your obfuscation is obvious.

So that's a 'no', you can't factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

Well that was easy.

Your obvious obfuscation is your defense of muslim terrorism.

Says you, citing yourself. Which is meaningless.

At least we got you to utter the term 'muslim terrorism'. That's a start.

If using that term makes you feel safer, go for it. But back in reality, it doesn't matter what prefixes and riders you add to the word 'terrorism'. The injured and dead aren't any less injured and dead because of what labels you apply.

oh----like dying of gun in the hands of todder accident is the same
as dying at age 98

 

[Skylar]

Can you factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

And I call acts of terrorism 'terrorism'.

Your obfuscation is obvious.

So that's a 'no', you can't factually demonstrate that I 'defend muslim terrorism'?

Well that was easy.

Your obvious obfuscation is your defense of muslim terrorism.

Says you, citing yourself. Which is meaningless.

At least we got you to utter the term 'muslim terrorism'. That's a start.

If using that term makes you feel safer, go for it. But back in reality, it doesn't matter what prefixes and riders you add to the word 'terrorism'. The injured and dead aren't any less injured and dead because of what labels you apply.

oh----like dying of gun in the hands of todder accident is the same
as dying at age 98

Nope. Not that either.

 

[skookerasbil]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

What an idiot.........that was about 80 years ago!!

About 17 people in the United States are worried about McVeigh-types committing terrorist attacks!!

 

[skookerasbil]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

What an idiot.........that was about 80 years ago!!

About 17 people in the United States are worried about McVeigh-types committing terrorist attacks!!

Make no mistake.........progressives WANT the terror bad guys to win!!

 

[Skylar]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

What an idiot.........that was about 80 years ago!!

About 17 people in the United States are worried about McVeigh-types committing terrorist attacks!!

Make no mistake.........progressive WANT the terror bad guys to win!!

You just responded yourself as you quote yourself.

Does anyone else even need to be here?

And why would progressives want 'terror bad guys' to win? Belgium gets shot up, the towers come down, a federal building is destroyed.

And then? What do 'progressives' get out of it? Why would they want it?

 

[Tresha91203]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

Was he a Muslim?

Nope. A Christian. A 'Christian' terrorist then? Or 'Theist Terrorism'? How about 'Male Terrorism'? Since most terrorists are male.

My momma taught me to always blame the man. My husband has heard, "I didn't say it was your fault. I said I blame you!" more than once.

 

[TooTall]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

No, but it wasn't a terrorist attack either.

"I chose to bomb a federal building because such an action served more purposes than other options. Foremost, the bombing was a retaliatory strike; a counter attack, for the cumulative raids (and subsequent violence and damage) that federal agents had participated in over the preceding years (including, but not limited to, Waco.) From the formation of such units as the FBI"s "Hostage Rescue" and other assault teams amongst federal agencies during the "80"s; culminating in the Waco incident, federal actions grew increasingly militaristic and violent, to the point where at Waco, our government - like the Chinese - was deploying tanks against its own citizens."


Google.

 

[Skylar]

Hello,

Considering that well over 99% of terror attacks across the planet are committed by Muslims, why don't we call them Muslim attacks?

garion13a5

So Timothy McVeigh hitting the federal building was a Muslim attack?

Was he a Muslim?

Nope. A Christian. A 'Christian' terrorist then? Or 'Theist Terrorism'? How about 'Male Terrorism'? Since most terrorists are male.

My momma taught me to always blame the man. My husband has heard, "I didn't say it was your fault. I said I blame you!" more than once.

Well, you certainly catch the largest group by blaming the fellas.