Let's talk a bit about the fundraising efforts of the two candidates for prez.

[berg80]

The fundamental difference between financial backers of Biden and those of Trump is, if Biden had been found liable for what is defined in NY as sexual assault but universally understood as rape, had he been found liable in an elaborate, decades long tax fraud scheme, found guilty of 34 felony counts in what is essentially an election fraud case involving an adulterous sexual affair with a maker of pornographic films, if his children had been ordered by the court to attend classes in how not to facilitate their father's theft of money donated for charitable purposes, if he had 3 outstanding criminal indictments including one for trying to end the constitutional order of the US by installing himself as its un-elected leader, well..........you get the picture.........Joe would not be the recipient of millions in campaign donations because he would not be the Dem's nominee. The kind of peculiar behavior allowing for an entire party to ignore those aforementioned disqualifying characteristics is not found among Dems.

Trump reaps post-verdict financial windfall​

Trump reaps post-verdict financial windfall

The former president has lagged behind Joe Biden in campaign fundraising, but his supporters provided a big jolt after his guilty verdict in New York.

www.nbcnews.com

The Following's reflexive, emphatic reply will no doubt be along the lines of but, but, but, Big Guy, but he touched a little girl's head once, but he eats babies, but Hillary!, but he's a pedo. As I do not reside in the Twilight Zone where unfounded accusations are magically elevated to fact you'll pardon me for seeing the desperation of those claims. Hatched out of necessity because supporting an immoral, incompetent, criminal requires the kind of rationalization causing his opponent to be similarly tarnished.

I can think of no parallel in US history for a fundraising boon like Trump's resulting from a criminal conviction. I'm sure I don't have to explain why. Politicians with Trump's resume aren't politicians for long. They're typically societal pariahs with a very small wardrobe consisting of a couple of jump suits.

 

[1srelluc]

 

[Auld Phart]

 

[kyzr]

...so berg can't figure out how to get the swing states back to Biden, too bad.

Better luck next time, keep putting these TDS threads up...

 

[berg80]

...so berg can't figure out how to get the swing states back to Biden, too bad.

Better luck next time, keep putting these TDS threads up...

Which is closer to reality? Your tired TDS meme or my factual observations?

 

[Blaster]

Which is closer to reality? Your tired TDS meme or my factual observations?

Neither

 

[kyzr]

Which is closer to reality? Your tired TDS meme or my factual observations?

Your "factual observation" is bullshit. Here is your last line:
Politicians with Trump's resume aren't politicians for long. They're typically societal pariahs with a very small wardrobe consisting of a couple of jump suits.

That is nothing but TDS. Put up proof if you think I'm wrong.

 

[berg80]

Your "factual observation" is bullshit. Here is your last line:
Politicians with Trump's resume aren't politicians for long. They're typically societal pariahs with a very small wardrobe consisting of a couple of jump suits.

That is nothing but TDS. Put up proof if you think I'm wrong.

Can you name me another major party presumptive presidential nominee who paid a $2M fine for stealing from a charity? Or fucked a porn star shortly after his wife gave birth to their child?

 

[berg80]

Neither

Would you care to factually refute any of the factual observations I made?

 

[SeaMajor7]

Would you care to factually refute any of the factual observations I made?

You premised this thread on how NY accepts accusations of sexual assault from decades ago with no proof whatsoever.
Therefore your observations are SHIT.
GTFOH!!!!!

 

[The Duke]

The fundamental difference between financial backers of Biden and those of Trump is, if Biden had been found liable for what is defined in NY as sexual assault but universally understood as rape, had he been found liable in an elaborate, decades long tax fraud scheme, found guilty of 34 felony counts in what is essentially an election fraud case involving an adulterous sexual affair with a maker of pornographic films, if his children had been ordered by the court to attend classes in how not to facilitate their father's theft of money donated for charitable purposes, if he had 3 outstanding criminal indictments including one for trying to end the constitutional order of the US by installing himself as its un-elected leader, well..........you get the picture.........Joe would not be the recipient of millions in campaign donations because he would not be the Dem's nominee. The kind of peculiar behavior allowing for an entire party to ignore those aforementioned disqualifying characteristics is not found among Dems.

Trump reaps post-verdict financial windfall​

Trump reaps post-verdict financial windfall

The former president has lagged behind Joe Biden in campaign fundraising, but his supporters provided a big jolt after his guilty verdict in New York.

www.nbcnews.com

The Following's reflexive, emphatic reply will no doubt be along the lines of but, but, but, Big Guy, but he touched a little girl's head once, but he eats babies, but Hillary!, but he's a pedo. As I do not reside in the Twilight Zone where unfounded accusations are magically elevated to fact you'll pardon me for seeing the desperation of those claims. Hatched out of necessity because supporting an immoral, incompetent, criminal requires the kind of rationalization causing his opponent to be similarly tarnished.

I can think of no parallel in US history for a fundraising boon like Trump's resulting from a criminal conviction. I'm sure I don't have to explain why. Politicians with Trump's resume aren't politicians for long. They're typically societal pariahs with a very small wardrobe consisting of a couple of jump suits.

Which is closer to reality? Your tired TDS meme or my factual observations?

Can you name me another major party presumptive presidential nominee who paid a $2M fine for stealing from a charity? Or fucked a porn star shortly after his wife gave birth to their child?

Would you care to factually refute any of the factual observations I made?

Just remember, sperg80: Trump beat Hillary with way less in the campaign coffers and this time he has way more than Biden!

 

[kyzr]

Can you name me another major party presumptive presidential nominee who paid a $2M fine for stealing from a charity? Or fucked a porn star shortly after his wife gave birth to their child?

So what?

Prove your lie. Here it is again:
They're typically societal pariahs with a very small wardrobe consisting of a couple of jump suits.

So who else are you referring to? Put up links. "Typically" means there are several.

This election is about running the USA, not about "lawfare". Biden is a FAILURE. His policies are a total disaster.

Americans need an extra $11,400 today just to afford the basics, Republican analysis finds

Compared with 2021, the typical household must spend an additional $11,434 annually just to maintain their standard of living, analysis shows.

www.cbsnews.com

Trump is the correct answer.