Disir
Platinum Member
- Sep 30, 2011
- 28,003
- 9,610
- 910
Are you kidding me? That's pretty much 99% of the threads.The thread premise is a lie, and any conservative who propagates it is a liar, which comes as no surprise, of course.
If it's one thing I can't stand, it's a liar:
At least 35 arrested after Trump rally in San Diego | Fox News
Question----------> How many times have Republicans, conservatives, or libertarians stormed a Hillary rally and caused a fight? Bernie rally anyone? And when they did, (they didn't) carried the flag of another nation to show support for that nation, and not America?
You lefties should be ASHAMED to even try and spin this whole thing as being ok. You can stand for what you stand for, and we will fight to GIVE YOU the RIGHT to publicly stand for it, because this is America. But you people? You people! You people make excuses for those who would deny others of free speech and assembly, and make EXCUSES for the anti-American rhetoric. YOU are the Nazis, the totalitarians, the socialists/communists, and it is obvious by your ignorant behavior, and lame excuses for those you agree with who try to deny political freedom in this country.
I do not believe that Republicans have stormed a Hillary rally and caused a fight even one time.
Violence at rallies or political events is not OK.
Anything else?
Thanks for the response. Your honesty may cause you to lose credibility though with any true libs on the board.
No. Let me explain what you are seeing, if I may.
Nobody condones acts of violence or even aggression on the part of protesters. It is an embarrassment and doesn't advance the discussion. It is a net negative for those who are politically aligned with the protesters.
Now....some who are fundamentally opposed to the aggression and are embarrassed by it....come here and read these threads where people take liberty with the facts and accuse them of "supporting" the aggression. Naturally.....being human and flawed.....these people dig in and try to defend themselves against the false charge.
What results is the accusers then.....again inaccurately....accuse them of "defending" the violent protesters. There are, in fact, defending themselves. In doing so, they may go too far and offer some weak reason for the violence.....thereby giving some credibility to the formerly false charge that they are defending the violent protesters.
It is a foolish, predictable and unrstandable circle jerk.