Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I haven't dug MYSELF into a hole.Yanno, when you've dug yourself into a hole the thing NOT to do is probably go get a bigger shovel.
Tip for the day.
Yes, those founding fathers. Who supported gun rights, a strong military, protectionist tariffs, and had no income tax.The founding fathers ---- oh yes. The Liberals.
No shit.
1. I accept the reality of what a religion is (with a code of ETHICS). You're the one who ludicrously accepts the highly UNethical Islam to be a religion. Your problem, not mine.Check your own OP. Starring our most recent canard the refusal to accept the reality of what a religion is.
Much akin to your thread that linked to this one where you refused to accept Rump's blatant lying about "thousands and thousands on rooftops on TV".
It's a pattern.
stretch of Trump actually referring to 1000s of people. You get a huge 
fo that one.Yes, those founding fathers. Who supported gun rights, a strong military, protectionist tariffs, and had no income tax.The founding fathers ---- oh yes. The Liberals.
No shit.
1. I accept the reality of what a religion is (with a code of ETHICS). You're the one who ludicrously accepts the highly UNethical Islam to be a religion. Your problem, not mine.Check your own OP. Starring our most recent canard the refusal to accept the reality of what a religion is.
Much akin to your thread that linked to this one where you refused to accept Rump's blatant lying about "thousands and thousands on rooftops on TV".
It's a pattern.
2. You refuse to accept the use of an ordinary metaphor, and continue to push the
"blatant self-delusion." That's what YOU do. Consistent confirmation of the point of the OP, We've got enough now though, thanks.As I said ---- blatant self-delusion.
And as I said, a pattern. One in the daylight, another here in the moonlight.
No, those are all CONSERVATIVE ideas, > gun rights, a strong military, protectionist tariffs, and had no income tax. And the ones who opposed them (aka liberals) were (and are) the nutjobs.Yep, them. The Liberals. The ones who your title says "don't realize how crazy they are".
Guess those are all crazy ideas. Huh Squeaky?
"blatant self-delusion." That's what YOU do. Consistent confirmation of the point of the OP, We've got enough now though, thanks.As I said ---- blatant self-delusion.
And as I said, a pattern. One in the daylight, another here in the moonlight.
No, those are all CONSERVATIVE ideas, > gun rights, a strong military, protectionist tariffs, and had no income tax. And the ones who opposed them (aka liberals) were (and are) the nutjobs.Yep, them. The Liberals. The ones who your title says "don't realize how crazy they are".
Guess those are all crazy ideas. Huh Squeaky?
1. It is OBVIOUSLY not a religion, nutjob.DOOD. You sat here and created a thread that declares Liberals "crazy" for not joining you on the banana boat of disreality that refuses to acknowledge a common religion. And before that you sat on this board and tried to sell the swill that three Israelis dancing on rooftops viewed by an old lady with binoculars is the same as "watching thousands and thousands on TV" where it was never broadcast because the event never happened.
Holy SHIT.
1. It is OBVIOUSLY not a religion, nutjob.
2. YOU say people dancing on rooftops never happened. You were refuted repeatedly, long ago >>
1. 9/16/01 - WCBS-TV, Pablo Guzman
2. 9/22/01 - San Francisco Chronicle
3. 9/17/01 - MTV video - Fight for Your Rights: Aftermath of Terror
4. 9/12/01 - the Howard Stern Show
5. 9/14/01 - New York Post, op-ed
6. 9/18/10 - Serge Kovaleski, Washington Post
7. 12/01/15 - Rudy Giuliani, CNN
8. 12/21/15 - Arthur Teeter, Jersey City Police HQ
9. Ibid, 2 civilian witnesses, Ron Knight & Carlos Ferran
10. Ibid, 11 Jersey city police officers, Facebook
What is " Disconnected from reality" is you taking the 2nd amendment (the practice of which is opposed by every liberal in America today) and trying to convert it into a liberal item, so as to be cool with the founding fathers. Yet more evidence of liberal nuttieness. (and you don't realize it)Ah yes, the Liberals who literally wrote the Second Amendment. And the rest of the entire Bill of Rights.
The conservative ideas those Liberals opposed were that we should do whatever King George said and let him and the Church run the joint.
Once again I reiterate: Disconnected from reality.
So if I include the hyperlinks that you can click on, that will further cement your error, and further illustrate my correctness. You want that ? I could do it.Oh look. A list of non-links to anything. How vaguely amusing.
COMPLETELY divorced from reality.
More you ask for, more you get >>Oh goody. An Arumentum ad Populum fallacy. Haven't seen that in four minutes. And for desssert ad hom. Oh lucky day. I feel so enlightened. Please, do regale us with more of these fallacies.
Actually I proved it. While you provided nothing but obfuscation about "thousands and thousands means three" and "I saw it on TV" means "nobody saw it on TV". And all because you can't bring yourself to admit you got sold a pack of lies and you bought 'em.
Oh look. A list of non-links to anything. How vaguely amusing. COMPLETELY divorced from reality.
What I find interesting in this thread is that >> in the OP, I mentioned that I still do agree with some policies of liberals. Not one liberal has been curious as to what those policies are. Wouldn't you think they might at least be a bit curious ?
What is " Disconnected from reality" is you taking the 2nd amendment (the practice of which is opposed by every liberal in America today) and trying to convert it into a liberal item, so as to be cool with the founding fathers. Yet more evidence of liberal nuttieness. (and you don't realize it)Ah yes, the Liberals who literally wrote the Second Amendment. And the rest of the entire Bill of Rights.
The conservative ideas those Liberals opposed were that we should do whatever King George said and let him and the Church run the joint.
Once again I reiterate: Disconnected from reality.
More ? You (and your ilk) oppose freedom of religion, when you demand that a Christian baker make a wedding cake for gays. You all support kicking people off social media, because you don't like what they say. You oppose the right of people to peacefully assemble, to legally march against the removal of a Robert E Lee statue, and you support the obstruction of that assembly by supporting counterdemonstrators illegally sitting in the street to block that peaceful assembly (march). I could list these all day. Ho hum.
This thread could as well have been entitled >> "Liberals Ruin a Good Thing". Wow. Does this mean that I, protectionist, actually agree with some policies of liberals ? Well, yes it does. There are a few. As a conservative who was a liberal for 40 years, before becoming an independent in 2003 (and still voting for Kerry in 2004, and then Obama in 2008), and then a conservative in 2009, I still have a few liberal preferences.
Some friends of mine say >> "If you think that, you should be a Democrat." Well, I'm not. I'm a registered Republican, and a very conservative one, as well. So what is that keeps me firmly entrenched on the right, despite having some left issue preferences ?
It is the crazyiness of the left that keeps me away from it. The problem with the left is that it goes waaaay too far in some of the things it stands for. It is so bad that I have to abandon some of my rather lefty policies, which I still firmly support, and go to the right, and vote for Donald Trump (twice). I also voted for Virgil Goode in 2012, because I thought Romney wasn't conservative enough.
I doubt that this will even make a dent in liberals' mindsets and political persuasions, but here are the reasons I could go never back to them again, and how they ruin their own polity, making it unacceptable >>
1. Being globalist, advocating open borders, and flooding the US with millions of people from 3rd world hellholes.
2. Accepting Islam as a religion, and its imposition of immoral and illegal practices upon Americans, even including terrorism in some cases.
3. Pandering to blacks to the point of discriminating against whites in Affirmative Action, and engaging in lawlessness.
4. Disrespecting the 2nd amendment and infringing on the right to carry a gun for self-defense.
5. Support of crazy sexual orientation policies.
There are more but I guess these are the basics. What a shame. To ruin good policies, and a whole political party, just to support these crazy ones.
T
5. Just the sight of 2 guys kissing each other is appalling, sickening, and disturbing. I'd call that "harm". It's also harmful to children seeing that and becoming influenced. I really see homosexuality as more of an illness than anything else. Its difficult to support people who support illnesses.
Poor little snowflake. So easily offended. So easily 'sickened'.
Imagine how offended you must be when you see a mixed race couple kissing.....
More you ask for, more you get >>Oh goody. An Arumentum ad Populum fallacy. Haven't seen that in four minutes. And for desssert ad hom. Oh lucky day. I feel so enlightened. Please, do regale us with more of these fallacies.
Actually I proved it. While you provided nothing but obfuscation about "thousands and thousands means three" and "I saw it on TV" means "nobody saw it on TV". And all because you can't bring yourself to admit you got sold a pack of lies and you bought 'em.
Oh look. A list of non-links to anything. How vaguely amusing. COMPLETELY divorced from reality.
http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2012/...d-as-a-religion-denied-religious-tax-status-2
Islam Watch - About Us
Islam Is Not A Religion, It Is Foreign Law
Islam and the Definition of Religion
Why Islam is Not a Religion > Rebecca Bynum
Former Muslim, Wafa Sultan, says, "Islam is NOT a religion" | BARE NAKED ISLAM
?Allah is Dead ? Why Islam is Not a Religion? | Logan's Warning
Islam Is Not A Religion, But A Dangerous Ideology | International
Islam: not a religion? « The Immanent Frame
Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system. « Avid Editor's Insights
Half Sigma: Islam not a religion?
Islam in Italy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comments from Former Muslims - WikiIslam
The Patriot Factor: Islam is NOT a Religion
Why Islam Should NOT Be Protected Under the US Constitution! | CatchKevin.com
Islam: Politics In Religious Garb
Italy: Islam Not Recognized as a Religion -- Denied Religious Tax Status - Atlas Shrugs
Info on Islam: Islam is not a religion
Islam Is Not A Religion It Is A Cult
Islam is NOT a Religion
Islam Does Not Qualify Under US Constitution ?Freedom of Religion? Rights « Northeast Intelligence NetworkNortheast Intelligence Network
Asia Times - Asia's most trusted news source
Islam is a political system ? NOT a religion | Creeping Sharia
Islam is not a religion, but a death cult of misogynistic pedophiles
Pretending that "thousands and thousands" is to be taken literally, may seem strong to you. To the American people it's absurd and laughable.
