Liberals Latest Tactic - Distract, Disrupt

[Wry Catcher]

What do the protesters want? They've proposed zero solutions. They're just angry. Go get a job.

Why do you suppose those who protest / resist aren't employed?

Consider the question rhetorical, it's clear, it is just an echo of another Big Lie the Right Wing thrives on.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Know what I find is really funny? Trumps pick for the NSA that was fired (Flynn) was a lobbyist for Turkey, and helped them get things they wanted, just before he joined up with Trump's campaign.

Michael Flynn cops to lobbying for Turkey during Trump’s presidential campaign

Turkish client paid $530,000 to Michael Flynn's consulting firm

Michael Flynn's lobbying firm received $530,000 from Turkish client

And yeah, there are 3 links from 3 different places, so you know this is real and not fake news.

Three links, to three different sources?!! Wow, thank you!!!

[Is this allowed on the USMB? If so, calling it rare is an understatement]

Call it a pre-emptive tactic. If there is something out there that sounds a bit strange (like Flynn who was picked for NSA head being a lobbyist for a Muslim nation like Turkey), I like to get 3 different sources (usually one liberal, one conservative, and one foreign) so they can't call it "fake news".

 

[Wry Catcher]

Know what I find is really funny? Trumps pick for the NSA that was fired (Flynn) was a lobbyist for Turkey, and helped them get things they wanted, just before he joined up with Trump's campaign.

Michael Flynn cops to lobbying for Turkey during Trump’s presidential campaign

Turkish client paid $530,000 to Michael Flynn's consulting firm

Michael Flynn's lobbying firm received $530,000 from Turkish client

And yeah, there are 3 links from 3 different places, so you know this is real and not fake news.

Three links, to three different sources?!! Wow, thank you!!!

[Is this allowed on the USMB? If so, calling it rare is an understatement]

Call it a pre-emptive tactic. If there is something out there that sounds a bit strange (like Flynn who was picked for NSA head being a lobbyist for a Muslim nation like Turkey), I like to get 3 different sources (usually one liberal, one conservative, and one foreign) so they can't call it "fake news".

Facts and Evidence are easily dismissed by the supporters of trump - the common denominators of a trump supporter are hypocrisy, and the belief everyone lies except trump and his inner circle.

 

[protectionist]

Facts and Evidence are easily dismissed by the supporters of trump - the common denominators of a trump supporter are hypocrisy, and the belief everyone lies except trump and his inner circle.

What a coincidence. That's exactly the characteristic so evident among liberals. Like all those factless TV ads Hillary Clinton ran during the campaign. Worse yet, they spewed FALSE "information"

 

[protectionist]

Not Trump's fault, but that pesky constitution. Checks and balances are built in to prevent megalomaniacs from becoming authoritarian dictators.

And do you believe all Muslims are here to kill us?

Doesn't matter if "all" do. Just ONE killed 13 soldiers in Fort Hood. ONE in the Pulse Club. TWO in San Bernardino, ONE in LAX. 19 on 9/11. Get it ? And it's not a matter of belief. It's in THEIR constitution - the Koran. Try reading it.

As for the US Constitution. It bans Islam entirely, as well as all other supremacisms (other than the Constitution itself. There;s some more reading for you the US Constitution Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Section 2, part 1)

 

[protectionist]

In other words, fear and hate trump human rights. Even a babe in arms scares the pants of RWers.

Is being a Chicken Shit / Coward a requirement to join the trump brigade?

Correct - the legitimate fear (based on recent history) of being killed, certainly trumps human rights. You don't have too many human rights when you're DEAD, do you ?

Nice try with the coward card. As all intelligent people know, it's simply a matter of national security and common sense.

 

[Nosmo King]

Not Trump's fault, but that pesky constitution. Checks and balances are built in to prevent megalomaniacs from becoming authoritarian dictators.

And do you believe all Muslims are here to kill us?

Doesn't matter if "all" do. Just ONE killed 13 soldiers in Fort Hood. ONE in the Pulse Club. TWO in San Bernardino, ONE in LAX. 19 on 9/11. Get it ? And it's not a matter of belief. It's in THEIR constitution - the Koran. Try reading it.

As for the US Constitution. It bans Islam entirely, as well as all other supremacisms (other than the Constitution itself. There;s some more reading for you the US Constitution Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Section 2, part 1)

All those incidents, with the notable exception of the September 11 attacks, were committed by American Muslims.

And the constitution does NOT ban Islam. Check that pesky 1st amendment.

 

[protectionist]

Sure, he hates and fears a billion people he does not know. That's normal, isn't it?

But I DO know them. Here's how >> Koran 8:12.....9:5.....9:123......4:34.......and many more.

 

[protectionist]

It's far simpler and easier for a docile mind to fear and hate than to learn and appreciate.

You need to "learn" the Koran, and appreciate its danger. Ask the Pulse Club, Fort Hood , and San Bernardino survivors.

 

[protectionist]

All those incidents, with the notable exception of the September 11 attacks, were committed by American Muslims.

And the constitution does NOT ban Islam. Check that pesky 1st amendment.

Doesn't matter what country. Generally, Muslims DON'T HAVE a country. Their only "country" is the UMMA (worldwide community of Muslims).

As for the 1st amendment, is is totally trumped by the Constitution's Supremacy clause (didn't I just finish telling you that ?) The 1st amendment has numerous exceptions. The Supremacy Clause has NEVER had an exception. NOTHING can be supreme over the Constitution - including religions (which Islam in not eve a religion anyway)

 

[rightwinger]

Liberals are using a political tactic never used before

Playing back what our president says

 

[protectionist]

Why do you suppose those who protest / resist aren't employed?

Consider the question rhetorical, it's clear, it is just an echo of another Big Lie the Right Wing thrives on.

They showed in large numbers during normal workday hours, at Trump rallies (and at Obama's inauguration). Lesser numbers at Trump's inauguration. His people were at work.

 

[protectionist]

Liberals are using a political tactic never used before

Playing back what our president says

Including when he plays back what THEY say (like the Jan. 20 front page article of the New York Times about wiretapping of Trump Aides) And despite naysayers (Snopes et al) of this, even THEy admit that the Tower was tapped, and that Obama had enacted the FISA investigations, and the wiretapped communications included Trump aides conversations. Duh!

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Those are not new tactics. As far back as I can remember distract and disrupt has been Liberal SOP.

 

[Nosmo King]

All those incidents, with the notable exception of the September 11 attacks, were committed by American Muslims.

And the constitution does NOT ban Islam. Check that pesky 1st amendment.

Doesn't matter what country. Generally, Muslims DON'T HAVE a country. Their only "country" is the UMMA (worldwide community of Muslims).

As for the 1st amendment, is is totally trumped by the Constitution's Supremacy clause (didn't I just finish telling you that ?) The 1st amendment has numerous exceptions. The Supremacy Clause has NEVER had an exception. NOTHING can be supreme over the Constitution - including religions (which Islam in not eve a religion anyway)

Radical Islamic terrorism is to Islam as the KKK is to Christianity.

Both have high jacked one of the great faiths of this world to serve a vile and evil purpose. Both groups employ symbols, scriptural writings and religious zeal to impose their twisted will on a population that does not support the means nor the ends.

Attitudes such as yours only makes it easier to repress, subjugate and eventually eliminate those who hold a different faith than your own. Much as the Nazis treated the European Jews.

 

[protectionist]

Radical Islamic terrorism is to Islam as the KKK is to Christianity.

.

Absolutely FALSE! You show a clear-cut IGNORANCE of Islamic DOCTRINE. Christianity does not advocate violence against anybody. The Koran advocates (if not commands) it, cover to cover. I even already mentioned some of the sura-verses. Look them up. Come back when you have even a foggy idea of what you're talking about.

The Islam-Christianity equation is about the dumbest "argument" ever presented. It like equating day with night.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

All those incidents, with the notable exception of the September 11 attacks, were committed by American Muslims.

And the constitution does NOT ban Islam. Check that pesky 1st amendment.

Doesn't matter what country. Generally, Muslims DON'T HAVE a country. Their only "country" is the UMMA (worldwide community of Muslims).

As for the 1st amendment, is is totally trumped by the Constitution's Supremacy clause (didn't I just finish telling you that ?) The 1st amendment has numerous exceptions. The Supremacy Clause has NEVER had an exception. NOTHING can be supreme over the Constitution - including religions (which Islam in not eve a religion anyway)

Radical Islamic terrorism is to Islam as the KKK is to Christianity.

Both have high jacked one of the great faiths of this world to serve a vile and evil purpose. Both groups employ symbols, scriptural writings and religious zeal to impose their twisted will on a population that does not support the means nor the ends.

Attitudes such as yours only makes it easier to repress, subjugate and eventually eliminate those who hold a different faith than your own. Much as the Nazis treated the European Jews.

The big difference between the the KKK and radical Islam is numbers and relevancy. The percentage of Christians who hold the beliefs of the KKK is really low that's not the case for Islam and the KKK has almost zero influence today.

There are no Christian extremist groups that come even close to the numbers that radical Islam commands. Nor is there any country in the world except for the Vatican that is strictly ruled by christian law.

 

[Nosmo King]

All those incidents, with the notable exception of the September 11 attacks, were committed by American Muslims.

And the constitution does NOT ban Islam. Check that pesky 1st amendment.

Doesn't matter what country. Generally, Muslims DON'T HAVE a country. Their only "country" is the UMMA (worldwide community of Muslims).

As for the 1st amendment, is is totally trumped by the Constitution's Supremacy clause (didn't I just finish telling you that ?) The 1st amendment has numerous exceptions. The Supremacy Clause has NEVER had an exception. NOTHING can be supreme over the Constitution - including religions (which Islam in not eve a religion anyway)

Radical Islamic terrorism is to Islam as the KKK is to Christianity.

Both have high jacked one of the great faiths of this world to serve a vile and evil purpose. Both groups employ symbols, scriptural writings and religious zeal to impose their twisted will on a population that does not support the means nor the ends.

Attitudes such as yours only makes it easier to repress, subjugate and eventually eliminate those who hold a different faith than your own. Much as the Nazis treated the European Jews.

The big difference between the the KKK and radical Islam is numbers and relevancy. The percentage of Christians who hold the beliefs of the KKK is really low that's not the case for Islam and the KKK has almost zero influence today.

There are no Christian extremist groups that come even close to the numbers that radical Islam commands. Nor is there any country in the world except for the Vatican that is strictly ruled by christian law.

You might be singing a different tune if it was 100 years ago. Right here in America, the KKK not only had many more members, but held real power in state houses and governor's mansions.

What percentage of Muslims world wide, in your opinion or fact if you can provide it, hold the beliefs of radical Islamic terrorists? How many are active, card carrying members of ISIS or Boko Harom or Al Qaeda?

 

[protectionist]

What percentage of Muslims world wide, in your opinion or fact if you can provide it, hold the beliefs of radical Islamic terrorists? How many are active, card carrying members of ISIS or Boko Harom or Al Qaeda?

Do you have reading comprehension trouble ? From Post # 45 >> Just ONE Muslim jihadist killed 13 soldiers in Fort Hood. ONE in the Pulse Club. TWO in San Bernardino, ONE in LAX. 19 on 9/11. Get it ?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

All those incidents, with the notable exception of the September 11 attacks, were committed by American Muslims.

And the constitution does NOT ban Islam. Check that pesky 1st amendment.

Doesn't matter what country. Generally, Muslims DON'T HAVE a country. Their only "country" is the UMMA (worldwide community of Muslims).

As for the 1st amendment, is is totally trumped by the Constitution's Supremacy clause (didn't I just finish telling you that ?) The 1st amendment has numerous exceptions. The Supremacy Clause has NEVER had an exception. NOTHING can be supreme over the Constitution - including religions (which Islam in not eve a religion anyway)

Radical Islamic terrorism is to Islam as the KKK is to Christianity.

Both have high jacked one of the great faiths of this world to serve a vile and evil purpose. Both groups employ symbols, scriptural writings and religious zeal to impose their twisted will on a population that does not support the means nor the ends.

Attitudes such as yours only makes it easier to repress, subjugate and eventually eliminate those who hold a different faith than your own. Much as the Nazis treated the European Jews.

The big difference between the the KKK and radical Islam is numbers and relevancy. The percentage of Christians who hold the beliefs of the KKK is really low that's not the case for Islam and the KKK has almost zero influence today.

There are no Christian extremist groups that come even close to the numbers that radical Islam commands. Nor is there any country in the world except for the Vatican that is strictly ruled by christian law.

You might be singing a different tune if it was 100 years ago. Right here in America, the KKK not only had many more members, but held real power in state houses and governor's mansions.

What percentage of Muslims world wide, in your opinion or fact if you can provide it, hold the beliefs of radical Islamic terrorists? How many are active, card carrying members of ISIS or Boko Harom or Al Qaeda?

100 years ago that was a little before my time and the majority of people in the world. Today the KKK has zero influence around the world. I don't really care for polls because they are mostly likely skewed because of bias, but some put the percentage of Muslims who support terrorist acts as low as 7% percent of the population, that doesn't sound like much until you realize that there are around 1.6 billion adherents.