Liberals Outraged, Too!!!

[Sallow]

New York City, as is almost every American mega-city, a perfect venue for Marxist growth. Plenty of room for corruption, deception, uncontrolled growth of regulations, welfare and taxation....the perfect formula for orchestrated progression to a failed socialist state.

Did you intentionally try and use as many big words that you don't understand as you could?

This from the master of duncehood. Do you need someone to explain those big words to you, little boy?

Do you?

New York is the most successful city in America, and quite possibly the world.

The rest of the nation sucks on our teat.

 

[Sallow]

The Big Apple is ripe with billionaires.

More of the uber-rich live in New York City than anywhere else, according to a wealth-tracking report released Thursday.

Tokyo and London took top honors for millionaires and multi-millionaires — defined as a net worth of $30 million or more — but they’re just pikers among the Masters of the Universe who populate New York.


Read more: New York City home to 70 billionaires, the most in the world: report - NY Daily News

Nobody does it better..

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Big Apple is ripe with billionaires.

More of the uber-rich live in New York City than anywhere else, according to a wealth-tracking report released Thursday.

Tokyo and London took top honors for millionaires and multi-millionaires — defined as a net worth of $30 million or more — but they’re just pikers among the Masters of the Universe who populate New York.


Read more: New York City home to 70 billionaires, the most in the world: report - NY Daily News

Nobody does it better..

"Where exactly does Bill de Blasio want to take New York? During the campaign, Mr. de Blasio focused on income inequality – but he seems much more concerned about New York having too many rich people (“nearly 400,000 millionaires!”)"
De Blasio’s Dilemma: Too Many Rich People or Too Many Poor People? - The New York Sun

 

[NYcarbineer]

I need the government to tell me what to do from cradle to grave....could I be a Liberal?

No. But you could be a victim of Downs.

You are a victim of the Jackass Syndrome.

Symptoms include:

1) insulting someone's intelligence

2) name calling; and

3) trolling

Isn't calling someone a jackass namecalling?

 

[NYcarbineer]

What is it with you PC? You are absolutely fixated on communism, even though there are no communist governments left in the world except Cuba, and even though communism is a thoroughly failed and discredited ideology. Reading your posts in this thread, I keep getting the feeling we've been transported back to the 1950's and you're looking for commies when people feared there was a commie under every bed.

It's 2014, not 1954. That you're still seeing commies under every bed, shows how truly out of touch you are with reality.

" You are absolutely fixated on communism, even though there are no communist governments..."


Actually, I happy to answer that.


Full response in this OP:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/331998-i-m-reeling-from-the-attack.html



You'll quickly realize that the accuracy of the OP therein proves your statement completely false.

What is PC's Agenda? To always be right, never wrong and to be admired by all with as much ardor as she feels toward herself.

Narcissist -
1. a person who is overly self-involved, and often vain and selfish.

2. Psychoanalysis . a person who suffers from narcissism, deriving erotic gratification from admiration of his or her own physical or mental attributes.

That makes it all the more enjoyable to drive her into a meltdown.

 

[Unkotare]

New York City, as is almost every American mega-city, a perfect venue for Marxist growth. Plenty of room for corruption, deception, uncontrolled growth of regulations, welfare and taxation....the perfect formula for orchestrated progression to a failed socialist state.

Did you intentionally try and use as many big words that you don't understand as you could?

 

[PoliticalChic]

" You are absolutely fixated on communism, even though there are no communist governments..."


Actually, I happy to answer that.


Full response in this OP:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/331998-i-m-reeling-from-the-attack.html



You'll quickly realize that the accuracy of the OP therein proves your statement completely false.

What is PC's Agenda? To always be right, never wrong and to be admired by all with as much ardor as she feels toward herself.

Narcissist -
1. a person who is overly self-involved, and often vain and selfish.

2. Psychoanalysis . a person who suffers from narcissism, deriving erotic gratification from admiration of his or her own physical or mental attributes.

That makes it all the more enjoyable to drive her into a meltdown.

Hey....another lie from the congenital liar.

 

[Billy000]

1. NYC had made the most egregious of errors in electing Communist/Progressive/Democrat Bill DeBlasio as mayor of this great city. So, there really is no element of surprise when DeBlasio tapped Brooklyn pastor Reverend Fred Lucas Jr., who serves as the chaplain to the Department of Sanitation, to provide the invocation at the inauguration ceremony.





2. The Reverend's speech was peppered with numerous inappropriate racial references, such as “End the civil wars and usher in a new Reconstruction era..." and words used were shackles, plantation, crooked, and emancipation proclamation."

The reverend referred to New York City as "the plantation called New York City."

3. But, heck, what would one expect, after all Communist/Progressive/Democrat DeBlasio is an avowed exponent of the Marxist 'religious' perspective called "Liberation Theology."

a. "... "Bill de Blasio says he doesn't believe in churches -- and he doesn't believe in God either," reports the NY Daily News.
De Blasio told reporters in the Bronx, "I’m not affiliated with any particular church. I do consider myself a spiritual person." He continued, "As I’ve said many times, I was very influenced by liberation theology, by Christian liberation theology in the work I did after college and after graduate school."
Mayor Elect Bill De Blasio Quashes Atheism Rumors, Says He's Spiritual But Unaffiliated

He means when he was in Nicaragua, working with the Sandinistas.







4. Coincidentally, Communist/Progressive/Democrat DeBlasio is known as New York's Obama....and Obama had the same kind of racialist banter at his inauguration.

a "Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around ... when yellow will be mellow ... when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right. That all those who do justice and love mercy say Amen."
Reverend Joseph Lowry, at Obama Inauguration

Me...I'm as mellow as I can be.







5. But there is a ray of sunlight, as many Liberals found that divisionist polemics hard to stomach:

a." Personally, I am very versed in the income inequalities that exist today. I am also versed in the issues that exhist in New York City. There was no need for Reverend Lucas to use this opportunity to make erroneous references to slavery, with regards to the present conditions of New York City. I'm not going to tolerate this behavior from Sarah Palin or Phil Roberston, so i'm certainly not going to tolerate it from Reverend Lucas. "
The Urban Politico: New York City Mayor Bill deBlasio Inauguration (Full Video) & The Plantation called New York City (???)

b. I am a proud liberal, but the speakers opening DeBlasio's inaugural are embarrassing. "The Plantation of NYC"......F**K OFF!
At Bill de Blasio?s mayoral inauguration, invocation speaker says NYC is a ?plantation? | Twitchy

c. Cleric Fred Lucas Jr., calling NYC a plantation in his "prayer" is a disgrace! Isn't this supposed to be a day of uniting? linda stasi [MENTION=18648]Linda[/MENTION]stasi Ibid.

d. A liberal New Yorker friend's candid comment about some of the tone so far: "This stuff is freaking me out." Josh Greenman [MENTION=22477]Jos[/MENTION]hgreenman Ibid.






7. Of course, there were examples of boilerplate Liberalism, too...not just from the podium:
"777Mark777 Sicarium
Deal wit it, hombre. You don't like it? Then move back home to Europe where you came from. You European people are illegal aliens here anyway." Preacher: New York City is a 'plantation' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller

And this is exactly the kind of sentiment the DeBlasio-Lucas Axis was meant to bring out.

At least he left the 'mellow' folks alone!






6. Just more of this: De Blasio was roundly criticized back in November when Harry Belafonte, the civil rights leader and actor who was also a de Blasio surrogate, compared the libertarian billionaires Charles and David Koch to the Ku Klux Klan.
Preacher: New York City is a 'plantation' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller



Throughout history there have been folks who sought to divide people in order to accrue power.....
....they're called tyrants.





I suspect that the brighter Liberals are shaking their heads, muttering 'What have we done...."

The rest of the nation knows what you've done.

Do you not realize that you lack a basic understanding of definitions of words. Seriously, define communism and tell me how it relates to the bullshit you are talking about.

 

[Dragonlady]

Do you not realize that you lack a basic understanding of definitions of words. Seriously, define communism and tell me how it relates to the bullshit you are talking about.

PC (Politically Clueless), defines communism as liberalism. She posts in hopes of getting liberal responses in order to insult those who respond to her. Most of her posts consist of cut and paste from other people's writings because PC hasn't had an original thought in years.

Her incessant ranting conflates liberalism with Marxism/communism. She seems to be lacking all knowledge of liberal democracies, most of whom are living the good life, and taking care of ALL of their citizens.

 

[Londoner]

"America isn't a failed socialist state, it's a failed capitalist state. Case in point, the housing meltdown...."

What a dope.

1. Democrat FDR shredded the Constitution....ignoring article I, section 8, the enumerated powers.
He created GSE's Fannie and Freddie to do something the Constitution didn't authorize: meddle in housing.

2. Democrat Carter....the CRA, constraining banking policy

3. Democrat Clinton....strengthened the CRA
Under Clinton, HUD threatened banks, again, to give unrequited loans.
Henchmen: Democrats Cisneros and Cuomo.

4. Democrats Frank and Dodd barred any governmental discipline in this area.

There are a number of problems with this post.

1) The State has always meddled in the market, and most of it has been to protect the interests of the Capitalist (through subsidies, bailouts, Patent Protection, legal protection of private property, legal administration of contracts, R&D support, military protection of overseas supply chains and regulatory favors that deliver competitive advantages. Again, you need to study lobbying and investigate how much money our capitalists suck from the State Sector. American Capitalism has always been heavily state dependent. The Free Market that Austrian Economists dream of is as utopian as Marx's Communist State. Neither has ever happened, and the capitalist doesn't want it to happen. Exxon wants the State to protect its oil fields in the Middle East. Big Telecom wants the satellite technology that came out of the Cold War Pentagon and NASA programs. Big Pharma wants nanny state patent protection against foreign and generic drug competitors. Every fucking business in the Southwest wants the energy/water that comes from harnessing the Colorado River via things like the Hoover Dam. The profit makers have always sucked at the teat of the Nanny State - from DAY ONE. And they've always cultivated a small but vocal collection of useful idiots who spread anti-government propaganda in hopes that the resultant cynicism will decrease citizen participation so that they can continue to loot the treasury, uncontested. It's a fucking hoax).

2) Ahhh, the blame game. Democrats are attacked for merely whispering Bush's name, yet your side has created an industry of blaming FDR and Carter, one of whom has been dead longer than most of us have been alive. This is the most hilarious double standard I have ever seen. You must be kidding with this stuff. Fannie/Freddie and the CRA were in place when the US Housing Market endured its most stable period. The stability lasted until ….

3) Bush 43 empowered Fannie/Freddie more than Carter/Clinton/Dodd could have ever dreamed. Please watch this video. Bush not only sketches his plan for using the power of Fannie to put poor people in homes, but he obliterates all the sensible lending regulations that were upheld by every administration prior. Check out what Bush does RE down-payments, which he erases. Watch the video and listen the most aggressive plan for expanding home ownership in America's history. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNqQx7sjoS8]Home Ownership and President Bush - YouTube[/ame] Bush fueled a dead economy by loaning trillions of dollars into it on the backs of morons.

4) Fannie/Freddie represents a small portion of the problem. Everybody got in the game - it was global. The number of private mortgage and financial companies that got in the game is in the 1000s - and they all realized unprecedented wealth as the bubble grew . . . but it gets worse because many of them cashed in by strategically hedging the crash. Wall Street placed trillions of dollars of criminally insane bets on bad mortgages, many of which their partners underwrote, and then [wait for it] they created a trillion dollar industry insuring garbage that they were secretly betting against, and then [wait for it] they didn't have the money to cover losses on insurance products that gave them dynastic wealth, and then [wait for it] they got bailed out by the very Government which your side claims is oppressing them with taxes and regulations. Are you fucking kidding?

But seriously: nobody forced private Wall Street firms to generate billions of dollars in profits off a corruptly inflated housing bubble. Nobody forced them to create an entire industry of securities & derivatives from mortgage products that they had every opportunity to evaluate but simply didn't (perhaps because they - the private sector - own government and its bailout powers). Stop telling us that the State Oppresses business. Business owns the state and staffs government through election funding. This is why business gets subsidies for its operating costs . . . and patent protection for its products . . . and bailouts when shit goes bad.

ALSO: It's one thing for your neighbor to buy a house he can't afford, but it's quite another for private corporations to voluntarily place over twenty trillion dollars of securities & derivative bets on his loan. We were told to trust Wall Street's criminally flawed risk models because they were the financial innovators. We were told that Private Financial Firms (Lehman, Bear, Merrill, Morgan, Goldman) didn't need to be regulated by big brother because of Adam Smith's Homo Economicus, that is, rational self interest would ensure that our corporations would protect their investors. But, look what we got for our faith in Homo Economicus. Secondly, the pressure to create all those mortgages didn't come from a fully absorbed piece of 1977 legislation; rather, it came from Wall Street, which turned those mortgages into the largest and most criminal money making scheme in the history of our nation. To put this whole thing on Fannie/Freddie without mentioning the risk-management-failures of the big Wall Street financials is completely fucking insane. [My fear is that you don't even know what I'm talking about because your information sources never explained the relationship between the mortgage industry and the Wall Street financials]

Alas, I have to agree with some of your points.

5) Despite the fact that Reagan is credited for the great wave of deregulation that moved government out of the way so our innovative capitalists could lift all our boats . . . Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton are 100% guilty of furthering the deregulation movement. Carter made it much easier for banks to set their own lending limits. He trusted private business to regulate their own risk. He didn't think the government had the information or incentive to be so heavily involved on the investment side of banking. He opened the door to the S&Ls, and Reagan doubled down. (Carter also deregulated Communications and Transportation, which worked far better than the deregulation of finance). Clinton acquiesced to Phil Graham and removed FDR's Glass-Stegall ACT, which prevented Commercial and Investment banks from merging and thereby exposing deposits ("savings") to speculative risk. Once they removed FDR's primary financial regulation, it allowed the big Wall Street financials to bet the savings of an entire generation on the most speculative housing bubble in world history. Clinton, like Reagan and Greenspan, believed that rational capitalists should be left alone to place whatever bets they want and that rational self interest would do the best job protecting the consumer. Who knew they would use these new financial freedoms to set up the largest ponzi scheme in our lifetime? But yes, both parties are absolutely guilty. I would just caution you against over-focusing on Fannie/Freddie, and under reporting Bush's very large role.

Lastly, you're right. Our system has none of the small market virtues imagined by Smith, who died long before corporations grew large enough to buy multiple governments.

 

[thereisnospoon]

1. NYC had made the most egregious of errors in electing Communist/Progressive/Democrat Bill DeBlasio as mayor of this great city. So, there really is no element of surprise when DeBlasio tapped Brooklyn pastor Reverend Fred Lucas Jr., who serves as the chaplain to the Department of Sanitation, to provide the invocation at the inauguration ceremony.





2. The Reverend's speech was peppered with numerous inappropriate racial references, such as “End the civil wars and usher in a new Reconstruction era..." and words used were shackles, plantation, crooked, and emancipation proclamation."

The reverend referred to New York City as "the plantation called New York City."

3. But, heck, what would one expect, after all Communist/Progressive/Democrat DeBlasio is an avowed exponent of the Marxist 'religious' perspective called "Liberation Theology."

a. "... "Bill de Blasio says he doesn't believe in churches -- and he doesn't believe in God either," reports the NY Daily News.
De Blasio told reporters in the Bronx, "I’m not affiliated with any particular church. I do consider myself a spiritual person." He continued, "As I’ve said many times, I was very influenced by liberation theology, by Christian liberation theology in the work I did after college and after graduate school."
Mayor Elect Bill De Blasio Quashes Atheism Rumors, Says He's Spiritual But Unaffiliated

He means when he was in Nicaragua, working with the Sandinistas.







4. Coincidentally, Communist/Progressive/Democrat DeBlasio is known as New York's Obama....and Obama had the same kind of racialist banter at his inauguration.

a "Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around ... when yellow will be mellow ... when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right. That all those who do justice and love mercy say Amen."
Reverend Joseph Lowry, at Obama Inauguration

Me...I'm as mellow as I can be.







5. But there is a ray of sunlight, as many Liberals found that divisionist polemics hard to stomach:

a." Personally, I am very versed in the income inequalities that exist today. I am also versed in the issues that exhist in New York City. There was no need for Reverend Lucas to use this opportunity to make erroneous references to slavery, with regards to the present conditions of New York City. I'm not going to tolerate this behavior from Sarah Palin or Phil Roberston, so i'm certainly not going to tolerate it from Reverend Lucas. "
The Urban Politico: New York City Mayor Bill deBlasio Inauguration (Full Video) & The Plantation called New York City (???)

b. I am a proud liberal, but the speakers opening DeBlasio's inaugural are embarrassing. "The Plantation of NYC"......F**K OFF!
At Bill de Blasio?s mayoral inauguration, invocation speaker says NYC is a ?plantation? | Twitchy

c. Cleric Fred Lucas Jr., calling NYC a plantation in his "prayer" is a disgrace! Isn't this supposed to be a day of uniting? linda stasi [MENTION=18648]Linda[/MENTION]stasi Ibid.

d. A liberal New Yorker friend's candid comment about some of the tone so far: "This stuff is freaking me out." Josh Greenman [MENTION=22477]Jos[/MENTION]hgreenman Ibid.






7. Of course, there were examples of boilerplate Liberalism, too...not just from the podium:
"777Mark777 Sicarium
Deal wit it, hombre. You don't like it? Then move back home to Europe where you came from. You European people are illegal aliens here anyway." Preacher: New York City is a 'plantation' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller

And this is exactly the kind of sentiment the DeBlasio-Lucas Axis was meant to bring out.

At least he left the 'mellow' folks alone!






6. Just more of this: De Blasio was roundly criticized back in November when Harry Belafonte, the civil rights leader and actor who was also a de Blasio surrogate, compared the libertarian billionaires Charles and David Koch to the Ku Klux Klan.
Preacher: New York City is a 'plantation' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller



Throughout history there have been folks who sought to divide people in order to accrue power.....
....they're called tyrants.





I suspect that the brighter Liberals are shaking their heads, muttering 'What have we done...."

The rest of the nation knows what you've done.

The people of new York City who coincidentally voted for the "jersey" ( D), are in for a rude awakening.
During the Dinkins and Koch years, a development across the Hudson in a dilapidated Longshoreman's town known for bankrupt city coffers and corrupt politicians sprung up from a grimy riverside dump. It is called Newport City. This development proposed gleaming office buildings, quick access to mass transit from the interior of New Jersey and New York, lower taxes and very low per square foot lease rates, tempted many NYC based firms.
The powers that be in NY City Hall uttered a collective "HA!. You won't dare relocate to Jersey"...Meanwhile as the taxes, lease rates and other expenses went skyward in the Big Apple, mysteriously, the office space in Newport city began filling up... With now formerly NYC based companies.....City Hall gasped "UH OH!. They called our bluff." Things got so desperate, that even the venerable NY Stock Exchange's management threatened to make the trip through the Holland Tunnel to Jersey City.
Things calmed down with the new leadership of Rudy Giuliani...He helped clean up the city. Made the subways safer. Turned Times Square and the rest of midtown into a place where tourism boomed. Crime rates fell to historic lows across the board.
Now with this Di Blasio guy, a card carrying far left wing moonbat, who seems to have taken a page out of the Hugo Chavez book on governance, NYC will be in trouble. BIG trouble. If DiBlasio institutes his proposed Robin Hood impression, once again major firms may very well look to the west to escape the new mayor's commitment to "the heavy hand of government"..
Those with means, will not sit idly by and watch their earnings be gobbled up by a populist kook who uses simplistic ideas expressed in platitudes.
When they say New Yorkers are pioneers, I don't think this is what most had in mind.

 

[thereisnospoon]

True. Why can't they just accept that they have no decent candidates to run Instead, they have to demonize the different-looking guy, w/ a different-sounding name.

I freely admit that Barack Obama was more than a decent candidate.....

....for Master of Ceremonies....just not for President of the United States.


And events have certainly proven that to be the case.

Always putting that black man to the back of the bus.

Yeah..As you avatar bends over, you can clearly see where you can shove the race card.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Here comes this loser. Maybe instead of using me ....maybe you'll get the balls to ask PC out and stop this Superman act

And you get negged for being such a troll.

Boo friggin hoo...get some thicker skin ya baby

Do you ever take the time to post an intelligent response? This isn't the fifth grade you idiot, we don't call people "losers" anymore. She can be Supergirl anytime she wants. You can be stupid all you want though, but it won't protect you from the consequences.

Maybe you'll have enough balls to take her on, not call her names. You are such a child, CC. Grow up.

Look just send her a Private Msg. Call me and I will walk you thru what to say if I have too. I just want this thristy act of yours to stop. It reeks of desperation

Grow a thicker skin....That's precisely what you PC lib whiners have been told..
Do you heed the advise? No. You just intensify your search for things with which to bother yourselves.

 

[thereisnospoon]

not six years ago.

What? Keep your fragmented thoughts to yourself.

Sam at ya polichic wanna be

You've nothing of substance to offer. So why bother posting?

 

[thereisnospoon]

PC chooses to live in the US, and can't stop complaining about it.

PC chooses to live in NYC, and can't stop complaining about it.

Have you ever considered Monroe, Louisiana?

One can say the same about you libs who keep pining for European Style Socialism..
You are free to go.

 

[thereisnospoon]

The essential point of the OP was that the shameful speech by Reverend Lucas, and endorsed by Communist/Liberal/Democrat DeBlasio was designed to divide rather than bring the races together.

And, central to the theme, as seen in the title, was that sensible Liberals agree that it was a shameful display.

I also pointed out that those were the brighter Liberals who found it so.


Sure enough, the comments, and lack of comment, by Liberals in this thread proved my very point:
we have some of the stupidest Liberals in the nation right here on this very board.

Wow PC has found that if you mention race it doesnt unite people. Her proof is that she doesnt feel united. It doesnt matter if PC already felt that way since birth this is NEW STUFF.

Where oh where is this person who can discuss differences that bring us together?

This person has never existed but PC is sure it can be done one day. Its' only been thousands upon thousands of years.

I feel the same way when I hear women talk about Pap Smears I'm all like "great! Someone else dedicated to divide us into groups instead of offering Pap Smears for everyone."

The part I like on right wing posts are "communist/liberal/democrat like they're one and the same.

Essentially, they are. Similar

 

[Clementine]

New York City, as is almost every American mega-city, a perfect venue for Marxist growth. Plenty of room for corruption, deception, uncontrolled growth of regulations, welfare and taxation....the perfect formula for orchestrated progression to a failed socialist state.

Did you intentionally try and use as many big words that you don't understand as you could?

^
Typical liberal response to a well worded comment. Couldn't understand it, so got angry at the 'big words.' Tell me, which words tripped you up? I thought comment was pretty straight forward, but I realize some people have comprehension issues. May I suggest you purchase a dictionary?

 

[thereisnospoon]

The Big Apple is ripe with billionaires.

More of the uber-rich live in New York City than anywhere else, according to a wealth-tracking report released Thursday.

Tokyo and London took top honors for millionaires and multi-millionaires — defined as a net worth of $30 million or more — but they’re just pikers among the Masters of the Universe who populate New York.


Read more: New York City home to 70 billionaires, the most in the world: report - NY Daily News

Nobody does it better..

Ah ha! So the 1 % ers are cool now that you've found a way to use them for political purposes.

 

[thereisnospoon]

The Big Apple is ripe with billionaires.

More of the uber-rich live in New York City than anywhere else, according to a wealth-tracking report released Thursday.

Tokyo and London took top honors for millionaires and multi-millionaires — defined as a net worth of $30 million or more — but they’re just pikers among the Masters of the Universe who populate New York.


Read more: New York City home to 70 billionaires, the most in the world: report - NY Daily News

Nobody does it better..

Sans Easy pass it costs $26 to drive from Ft Lee to Queens and back across pot hole scattered tank trails choked with so much traffic, with 150,000 pissed off assholes who'd just as soon crash you off the Whitestone Bridge as look at you.
Taxi cab drivers from every third world shit hole on the planet with the grooming habits of of homeless people and the social graces of baboons jerking off in front of little kids at the Bronx Zoo..
A place where a person cannot lay back in a chaise lounge on a sunny spring afternoon in the middle of 5000 acres of grass and light up a cigar because the recently ex mayor is on an anti tobacco crusade.
A place where due to stratospheric heights of corruption, was once the only Bookie operation to LOSE money. $6 million per day in handle 365 days per year and the NYC OTB Corp went out of business.....Can you say "the skim"..
Yep New York City. They do it best.
You Manhattanites used to make fun of us by using the term "bridge and tunnel crowd" because we came into the City for fun or work.
Now that bridge and tunnel crowd will be the ones LEAVING the City. Just like they did when Dinkins and Koch were occupying Gracie Mansion...

 

[thereisnospoon]

Do you not realize that you lack a basic understanding of definitions of words. Seriously, define communism and tell me how it relates to the bullshit you are talking about.

PC (Politically Clueless), defines communism as liberalism. She posts in hopes of getting liberal responses in order to insult those who respond to her. Most of her posts consist of cut and paste from other people's writings because PC hasn't had an original thought in years.

Her incessant ranting conflates liberalism with Marxism/communism. She seems to be lacking all knowledge of liberal democracies, most of whom are living the good life, and taking care of ALL of their citizens.

Without consulting a search engine, why don't you explain the differences between Communism and Modern Liberalism....
Have at it.