Liberals:"We Know The Russians Hacked The Election".We Don't Need Any Proof From Anyone !

[


So someone hacked into the DNC emails and made them public, so they didn't hack the election, they hacked the DNC?

Yabut telling the truth about democrats is NO FAIR.

Besides, the Russians had trolls on the internet besmirching Hillary, just like Soros has Jillian and other trolls spreading fake news to besmirch Trump. NO FAIR.
 
Check out the difference between "Hacking" and the word "Influence".

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released on Friday a report that detailed what it called a Russian campaign to influence the election.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf


Hacking was the method of obtaining the information.
Influence was using that information to diminish Clinton and allow Trump to hammer her relentlessly over it.

Why is this so difficult to understand?

Hillary allowing 20% US uranium sale to Russia, in exchange for Clinton foundation donations, did have influence on elections.

That was yuge favor to Donald.
 
Check out the difference between "Hacking" and the word "Influence".

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released on Friday a report that detailed what it called a Russian campaign to influence the election.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf


Hacking was the method of obtaining the information.
Influence was using that information to diminish Clinton and allow Trump to hammer her relentlessly over it.

Why is this so difficult to understand?

Hillary allowing 20% US uranium sale to Russia, in exchange for Clinton foundation donations, did have influence on elections.

That was yuge favor to Donald.

^Fake news.
 
Check out the difference between "Hacking" and the word "Influence".

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released on Friday a report that detailed what it called a Russian campaign to influence the election.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf


Hacking was the method of obtaining the information.
Influence was using that information to diminish Clinton and allow Trump to hammer her relentlessly over it.

Why is this so difficult to understand?

Hillary allowing 20% US uranium sale to Russia, in exchange for Clinton foundation donations, did have influence on elections.

That was yuge favor to Donald.

^Fake news.

Which one, that she approved the sale or that she got donations? Be specific.
 
That's like asking if Hillary Clinton Blew Putin or Swallowed his load.

We know she don't do dick.......so

Check out the difference between "Hacking" and the word "Influence".

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released on Friday a report that detailed what it called a Russian campaign to influence the election.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf


Hacking was the method of obtaining the information.
Influence was using that information to diminish Clinton and allow Trump to hammer her relentlessly over it.

Why is this so difficult to understand?

Hillary allowing 20% US uranium sale to Russia, in exchange for Clinton foundation donations, did have influence on elections.

That was yuge favor to Donald.

^Fake news.

Which one, that she approved the sale or that she got donations? Be specific.
That
 
:argue: :bang3: :confused-84: And for how many weeks have we been listening to Hillary Supporters and "Angry Loonies" bring up "The Russians" every time the topic is brought up on any of the cable news networks? and along with "The View"....They just keep pushing the narrative that somehow "The Russians" were able to give Donald Trump a clean sweep of all the swing states. And even today, I overheard someone bring this up on Fox News, that, something along the lines of "We already know the Russians were involved with the election,and helped Donald win, {But even though the host had to tell him/her that the FBI couldn't find any evidence}.....the left seems to have the attitude that,,,,,"Yah, we know it was the russians, therefore Trump needs to be impeached":confused:

who said that we don't need proof?

the POINT, is that the intel services already KNOW they hacked the election.

or do you think the orange sociopath isn't lying to you? :cuckoo:

normal people simply KNOW there is enough evidence to warrant an independent investigation, not one run by trump shills.

What exactly did the Russians do to hack the election?

Stole emails from DNC and Podesta and made them public.

So someone hacked into the DNC emails and made them public, so they didn't hack the election, they hacked the DNC?

They hacked to influence the election...you seriously still don't get what happened or are you playing stupid?
 
It's been proven. As has the Holocaust. Feel free to continue denying both.
You're a liar.
How many times do they have to tell you that no evidence exists that Russians effected the election. This is no different than the looney belief that 911 was an inside job.

No different?

So, the intelligence community was unanimous in their belief that 9/11 was an inside job?
No. The intelligence community didn't say that. And the intelligence community said Russia made attempts (like they always have) but there was no proof of Russian spies having a smidgen of an effect on the election. Face it, Hillary sucked as a candidate and she lost straight up.

But they did say very clearly that the Russians attempted to influence our electoral process. So, it's not the same in any way then, dope.
They attempted is quite different from hacking the election. Dope.
 
Check out the difference between "Hacking" and the word "Influence".

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released on Friday a report that detailed what it called a Russian campaign to influence the election.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf


Hacking was the method of obtaining the information.
Influence was using that information to diminish Clinton and allow Trump to hammer her relentlessly over it.

Why is this so difficult to understand?

Hillary allowing 20% US uranium sale to Russia, in exchange for Clinton foundation donations, did have influence on elections.

That was yuge favor to Donald.

^Fake news.

Which one, that she approved the sale or that she got donations? Be specific.

All of it.
There's no connection.
Clinton did not have unilateral approval authority over that deal. State was one of nine agencies or departments that had to sign off on that deal for it to be approved.
 
It's been proven. As has the Holocaust. Feel free to continue denying both.
You're a liar.
How many times do they have to tell you that no evidence exists that Russians effected the election. This is no different than the looney belief that 911 was an inside job.

No different?

So, the intelligence community was unanimous in their belief that 9/11 was an inside job?
No. The intelligence community didn't say that. And the intelligence community said Russia made attempts (like they always have) but there was no proof of Russian spies having a smidgen of an effect on the election. Face it, Hillary sucked as a candidate and she lost straight up.

But they did say very clearly that the Russians attempted to influence our electoral process. So, it's not the same in any way then, dope.
They attempted is quite different from hacking the election. Dope.

You people are retarded.
No one in any official capacity has said the election was " hacked".
 
:argue: :bang3: :confused-84: And for how many weeks have we been listening to Hillary Supporters and "Angry Loonies" bring up "The Russians" every time the topic is brought up on any of the cable news networks? and along with "The View"....They just keep pushing the narrative that somehow "The Russians" were able to give Donald Trump a clean sweep of all the swing states. And even today, I overheard someone bring this up on Fox News, that, something along the lines of "We already know the Russians were involved with the election,and helped Donald win, {But even though the host had to tell him/her that the FBI couldn't find any evidence}.....the left seems to have the attitude that,,,,,"Yah, we know it was the russians, therefore Trump needs to be impeached":confused:

who said that we don't need proof?

the POINT, is that the intel services already KNOW they hacked the election.

or do you think the orange sociopath isn't lying to you? :cuckoo:

normal people simply KNOW there is enough evidence to warrant an independent investigation, not one run by trump shills.

What exactly did the Russians do to hack the election?

Stole emails from DNC and Podesta and made them public.

So someone hacked into the DNC emails and made them public, so they didn't hack the election, they hacked the DNC?

They hacked to influence the election...you seriously still don't get what happened or are you playing stupid?

Stupid is as stupid does.
 
Hillary allowing 20% US uranium sale to Russia

Pseudo-News.

The Canadian Company that was sold to Russia owned some U mines in the US. The ore produced at these mines cannot be exported out of this country and must be used here. The reason is simple. We only produce about 20% of what we need and must import the remaining 80%. The mines in question represent 20% of our U mines production.
 
You're a liar.
How many times do they have to tell you that no evidence exists that Russians effected the election. This is no different than the looney belief that 911 was an inside job.

No different?

So, the intelligence community was unanimous in their belief that 9/11 was an inside job?
No. The intelligence community didn't say that. And the intelligence community said Russia made attempts (like they always have) but there was no proof of Russian spies having a smidgen of an effect on the election. Face it, Hillary sucked as a candidate and she lost straight up.

But they did say very clearly that the Russians attempted to influence our electoral process. So, it's not the same in any way then, dope.
They attempted is quite different from hacking the election. Dope.

You people are retarded.
No one in any official capacity has said the election was " hacked".
No shit!!!!
Only Democrats and the media claim it was.
This is all just an imaginary scandal created by a bunch of assholes that are pissed they lost the election.
 
:argue: :bang3: :confused-84: And for how many weeks have we been listening to Hillary Supporters and "Angry Loonies" bring up "The Russians" every time the topic is brought up on any of the cable news networks? and along with "The View"....They just keep pushing the narrative that somehow "The Russians" were able to give Donald Trump a clean sweep of all the swing states. And even today, I overheard someone bring this up on Fox News, that, something along the lines of "We already know the Russians were involved with the election,and helped Donald win, {But even though the host had to tell him/her that the FBI couldn't find any evidence}.....the left seems to have the attitude that,,,,,"Yah, we know it was the russians, therefore Trump needs to be impeached":confused:

who said that we don't need proof?

the POINT, is that the intel services already KNOW they hacked the election.

or do you think the orange sociopath isn't lying to you? :cuckoo:

normal people simply KNOW there is enough evidence to warrant an independent investigation, not one run by trump shills.

What exactly did the Russians do to hack the election?

Stole emails from DNC and Podesta and made them public.

So someone hacked into the DNC emails and made them public, so they didn't hack the election, they hacked the DNC?
No. The Democrats hired a bunch of Pakistani IT guys and they leaked to Wikileaks.
 
Check out the difference between "Hacking" and the word "Influence".

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released on Friday a report that detailed what it called a Russian campaign to influence the election.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf


Hacking was the method of obtaining the information.
Influence was using that information to diminish Clinton and allow Trump to hammer her relentlessly over it.

Why is this so difficult to understand?

Hillary allowing 20% US uranium sale to Russia, in exchange for Clinton foundation donations, did have influence on elections.

That was yuge favor to Donald.

^Fake news.

Which one, that she approved the sale or that she got donations? Be specific.

All of it.
There's no connection.
Clinton did not have unilateral approval authority over that deal. State was one of nine agencies or departments that had to sign off on that deal for it to be approved.

She didn't have sole authority to approve that deal. Any agency had authority to deny it. Did she?

Tell me, how much money Clinton foundation got from Russians during the approval, after the approval, and how much money foundation is getting from Russians presently... Throw in some numbers.
 
:argue: :bang3: :confused-84: And for how many weeks have we been listening to Hillary Supporters and "Angry Loonies" bring up "The Russians" every time the topic is brought up on any of the cable news networks? and along with "The View"....They just keep pushing the narrative that somehow "The Russians" were able to give Donald Trump a clean sweep of all the swing states. And even today, I overheard someone bring this up on Fox News, that, something along the lines of "We already know the Russians were involved with the election,and helped Donald win, {But even though the host had to tell him/her that the FBI couldn't find any evidence}.....the left seems to have the attitude that,,,,,"Yah, we know it was the russians, therefore Trump needs to be impeached":confused:

who said that we don't need proof?

the POINT, is that the intel services already KNOW they hacked the election.

or do you think the orange sociopath isn't lying to you? :cuckoo:

normal people simply KNOW there is enough evidence to warrant an independent investigation, not one run by trump shills.

What exactly did the Russians do to hack the election?

Stole emails from DNC and Podesta and made them public.

So someone hacked into the DNC emails and made them public, so they didn't hack the election, they hacked the DNC?
No. The Democrats hired a bunch of Pakistani IT guys and they leaked to Wikileaks.

You're delusional
 
Hillary allowing 20% US uranium sale to Russia

Pseudo-News.

The Canadian Company that was sold to Russia owned some U mines in the US. The ore produced at these mines cannot be exported out of this country and must be used here. The reason is simple. We only produce about 20% of what we need and must import the remaining 80%. The mines in question represent 20% of our U mines production.

Nonsense. Read bold.

The mines do represent roughly 20% of US production, but the way you put it, it looks like Russians own all of US production which is false.
 

Forum List

Back
Top