Crackerjack
Too sick for a cure
Any time now, darling.I'd love to hear your fever-brained interpretation of the Second Amendment*.why do you hate the constitution?
*The one about guns.
![eusa_whistle :eusa_whistle: :eusa_whistle:](/styles/smilies/eusa_whistle.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any time now, darling.I'd love to hear your fever-brained interpretation of the Second Amendment*.why do you hate the constitution?
*The one about guns.
they are both men.
the man is now dead
and you blame Romney for his being dead?
Undecided.I'd love to hear your fever-brained interpretation of the Second Amendment*.
*The one about guns.
I would like to see what your postion on privatizing the Post office is
Your turn.
And that means the average citizen has what rights as relates to firearms?Undecided.I would like to see what your postion on privatizing the Post office is
Your turn.
well I stand on the side of the founders and the constitution
I see the bosc in Costco, but have never tried one, because they look weird.I like bartlett pears the best.
i'm a bosc guy, but i'll take a bartlett
And that means the average citizen has what rights as relates to firearms?Undecided.
Your turn.
well I stand on the side of the founders and the constitution
Romney Friend Stu White Says Campaign Wants Him to Counter Prank Accusations - ABC News
One former classmate and old friend of Romneys who refused to be identified by name said there are a lot of guys who went to Cranbrook who have really negative memories of Romneys behavior in the dorms, behavior this classmate describes as like Lord of the Flies.
The classmate believes Romney is lying when he claims to not remember it.
It makes these fellows [who have owned up to it] very remorseful. For [Romney] not to remember it? It doesnt ring true. How could the fellow with the scissors forget it? the former classmate said.
Just restricting things like "mega clips." I doubt the founders would agree with you, but proceed to spin it as you will.And that means the average citizen has what rights as relates to firearms?well I stand on the side of the founders and the constitution
I am not for outlawing guns
And that means the average citizen has what rights as relates to firearms?well I stand on the side of the founders and the constitution
I am not for outlawing guns
I don't believe the founders had any future insight into the types of firepower we see today.Just restricting things like "mega clips." I doubt the founders would agree with you, but proceed to spin it as you will.And that means the average citizen has what rights as relates to firearms?
I am not for outlawing guns
I don't believe the founders had any future insight into the types of firepower we see today.Just restricting things like "mega clips." I doubt the founders would agree with you, but proceed to spin it as you will.I am not for outlawing guns
What if they only meant muskets?
If they meant muskets, I believe they would have said muskets.I don't believe the founders had any future insight into the types of firepower we see today.Just restricting things like "mega clips." I doubt the founders would agree with you, but proceed to spin it as you will.I am not for outlawing guns
What if they only meant muskets?
they are both men.
the man is now dead
and you blame Romney for his being dead?
No....... why would you claim such a dishonest thing
gee a typo , what a great way to prove you choice for president is not a elitist piece of shit who thought he was intitiled to assault people because he was rich and the son of a gov
How many flies are in a load, incidentally?
If they meant muskets, I believe they would have said muskets.I don't believe the founders had any future insight into the types of firepower we see today.Just restricting things like "mega clips." I doubt the founders would agree with you, but proceed to spin it as you will.
What if they only meant muskets?
Admittedly the text is vague, but if I had to guess at the meaning, I'd be pretty confident that they would be okay with whatever level of armament a typical infantryman would have access to.
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.